Storage and Naming Standards for Un-Rectified Image Products at the Minnesota DNR

Similar documents
MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR JUDITH H. DUTCHER RANKING OF COUNTY EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996

Photographs, Prints and Postcards. Historic County Courthouses. Minnesota. Part One

Photographs, Prints and Postcards. Historic County Courthouses. Minnesota. Part One

Photographs, Prints and Postcards. Historic County Courthouses. Minnesota. Part Two

Photographs, Prints and Postcards. Historic County Courthouses. Minnesota. Part Two

Minnesota. County Assessor. Directory

County Assessor Membership Directory. County Assessor Directory

APPENDIX A Map Exhibits

Currently Future Agency Used for Use for Classification Property

News from the Bench. Submitted by Kim Buechel Mesun, Minneapolis Public Schools

Black Tern Sightings in Minnesota:

2010 MACPZA ANNUAL MEETING. Thursday, October 7, 2010, 2:00 p.m. Holiday Inn - Willmar, MN

2011 Mn/DOT Greater Minnesota Construction Projects Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation

METADATA ENTRY GUIDELINES

Minnesota Department of Transportation 2011 Greater Minnesota Construction Projects

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE STONE CARVER PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Minnesota in Profile

Sanford Health F-M Ambulance. ARMER 800 MHz Radio System Participation Plan

CONTEST SCORE REPORT SUMMARY FOR GRADES 6, 7, AND 8 Summary of Results 6th Grade Contests MNML. Wayzata Central Middle School Plymouth 35

MOTE NUUUNE LABORATORY MANATEE RESEARCH ACTIVITIES.

Downloading Imagery & LIDAR

Each spring, the Minnesota DNR coordinates statewide ruffed grouse (Bonasa

THE HEXAGON/PANEL SYSTEM FOR SELECTING FIA PLOTS

Orthoimagery Standards. Chatham County, Georgia. Jason Lee and Noel Perkins

First Exam: Thurs., Sept 28

THE NATIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROGRAM: AN AERIAL SYSTEM IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED STATES SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE

First Exam: New Date. 7 Geographers Tools: Gathering Information. Photographs and Imagery REMOTE SENSING 2/23/2018. Friday, March 2, 2018.

First Exam. Geographers Tools: Gathering Information. Photographs and Imagery. SPIN 2 Image of Downtown Atlanta, GA 1995 REMOTE SENSING 9/19/2016

Future Projects. District 3 Central Minnesota. mndot.gov/d3

THE COMMON LOON. Population Status and Fall Migration in Minnesota MINNESOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION OCCASIONAL PAPERS: NUMBER 3

Downloading and formatting remote sensing imagery using GLOVIS

The American White Pelican in Minnesota after the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Assessing Distribution, Abundance and Population Change

2012 MnDOT Greater Minnesota Construction Projects

Each spring, the Minnesota DNR coordinates statewide ruffed grouse (Bonasa

2015 MINNESOTA SPRING GROUSE SURVEYS

applications, tips, and tricks for landowners that make mapping easy July 10, 2013

MSB Imagery Program FAQ v1

2018 Minnesota Spring Grouse surveys

Metro Area Planning Agency. Request for Proposal Omaha-Lincoln Metro Area Imagery Project

An Evaluation of the May 2010 Click It or Ticket Safety Belt Mobilization Campaign in Minnesota David W. Eby Jonathon M. Vivoda John Cavanagh

GEO/EVS 425/525 Unit 9 Aerial Photograph and Satellite Image Rectification

USE OF SMALL FORMAT DIGITAL AERIAL IMAGES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES

Land Cover Type Changes Related to. Oil and Natural Gas Drill Sites in a. Selected Area of Williams County, ND

An Analysis of Aerial Imagery and Yield Data Collection as Management Tools in Rice Production

WESTERN GREAT LAKES REGION OWL MONITORING SURVEY

CONTEST SCORE REPORT SUMMARY FOR GRADES 6, 7, AND 8 Summary of Results 6th Grade Contests MNML. Wayzata Central Middle School Plymouth 37

Copy OWNER S MANUAL MODEL N OUTDOOR STORAGE. Keep this Identification Number in case you must contact our Customer Service Department.

Using High-Res. Orthoimagery for Environmental Change Detection & Analysis in Northern Alaska

v Introduction Images Import images in a variety of formats and register the images to a coordinate projection WMS Tutorials Time minutes

Salt Lake County (Utah). Planning and Development Services Aerial Photographs, Series #PD-001

Earth Observations from Space U.S. Geological Survey

Hyperspectral Imagery: A New Tool For Wetlands Monitoring/Analyses

Results of an Observation Card Survey for Eastern Greater Sandhill Cranes in Minnesota for 1978

v WMS 10.0 Tutorial Introduction Images Read images in a variety of formats and register the images to a coordinate projection

Greater prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido pinnatus) were surveyed in 16 of 17

2010 Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2012

Project Planning and Cost Estimating

Environmental and Natural Resources Issues in Minnesota. A Remote Sensing Overview: Principles and Fundamentals. Outline. Challenges.

White Paper. Medium Resolution Images and Clutter From Landsat 7 Sources. Pierre Missud

ABC and Innovative Bridge Construction for Minnesota Local Roads

MINNESOTA NAWCA PROJECTS

MPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report

Aerial Photo Interpretation

Raptor Nest Field Survey Technical Memorandum for the North Meadows Extension to US 85 and Interstate 25

Preserving the Past: The Development of a Digital Historical Aerial Photography Archive

FOR 474: Forest Inventory. FOR 474: Forest Inventory. Why do we Care About Forest Sampling?

Using Web-based Tools for GIS-Friendly Satellite Imagery

Detecting and Mapping Invasive Phragmites australis in the Coastal Great Lakes with ALOS PALSAR Imagery

2016 WATERFOWL BREEDING POPULATION SURVEY MINNESOTA

2007 Construction Information/Season Notes

Scanned Aerial Photography: Product Level Profile of Nova Scotia Metadata Standard

Wisconsin Bald Eagle and Osprey Surveys

Baldwin and Mobile Counties, AL Orthoimagery Project Report. Submitted: March 23, 2016

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC RESECTION DIFFERENCES BASED ON LABORATORY vs. OPERATIONAL CALIBRATIONS

THE COMMON LOON. Population Status and Fall Migration in Minnesota MINNESOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION OCCASIONAL PAPERS: NUMBER 3

GIS Data Sources. Thomas Talbot

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

APCAS/10/21 April 2010 ASIA AND PACIFIC COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS TWENTY-THIRD SESSION. Siem Reap, Cambodia, April 2010

Erika Rivers MN DNR Mary Blickenderfer U of MN Extension

MULTISPECTRAL AGRICULTURAL ASSESSMENT. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Federal Robotics INSPECTION & DOCUMENTATION

Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling Managing HEC-RAS Cross Sections

Chapter 1 Overview of imaging GIS

2017 Annual Volunteer Report

OUR INDUSTRIAL LEGACY WHAT ARE WE LEAVING OUR CHILDREN REAAA Roadshow Taupo, August 2016 Young presenter s competition

VERTICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

RADIO TECHNICAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE AGENDA

HIGH RESOLUTION COLOR IMAGERY FOR ORTHOMAPS AND REMOTE SENSING. Author: Peter Fricker Director Product Management Image Sensors

Image Registration Issues for Change Detection Studies

Using Color-Infrared Imagery for Impervious Surface Analysis. Chris Behee City of Bellingham Planning & Community Development

Nesting Habitat Characteristics of Goshawks in Minnesota

2018 WATERFOWL BREEDING POPULATION SURVEY, MINNESOTA

Enhanced Library Collection Access through GIS: Historic Colorado Aerial Photographs. Kathryn Lage Christopher Cronin Holley Long

Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling Managing HEC-RAS Cross Sections

US Census. Thomas Talbot February 5, 2013

Aerial Image Acquisition and Processing Services. Ron Coutts, M.Sc., P.Eng. RemTech, October 15, 2014

Maloney, Cath. LAARC Version 05 Date 08/05/2013

Option 1. Design Options are diverse e.g. new route alignments covering a wide area. Option 2. Design Options are restricted

Realigning Historical Census Tract and County Boundaries

Product family data sheet

Black Dot shows actual Point location

Transcription:

Storage and Naming Standards for Un-Rectified Image Products at the Minnesota DNR Specifications for Product Storage, Naming and Organizing Principles July 17, 2003 Tim Loesch Minnesota DNR MIS Bureau, GIS Section (651) 296-0654 tim.loesch@dnr.state.mn.us

Minnesota DNR Air Photo Storage Specifications Tim Loesch GIS Applications Programmer MIS-GIS 1. Introduction DNR staff have used aerial photographs as an source of land resource information for many years. As computer technology has permeated the natural sciences through various software products and tools the use of digital air photos become an accepted, if not essential part of doing business for many employees at the DNR. To manage these photos for easy access and distribution it has become necessary to develop a standardized way of naming and organizing the variety of digital air photo products that the department owns or otherwise acquires. This document proposes a naming and storage structure for Unreferenced/unrectified digital products, including aerial photographs and existing hardcopy maps, to facilitate predictable and reliable access to these images by users through a variety of methods including desktop GIS programs, web-browsers and other image viewing tools. This document also addresses the need for an image index - a spatial reference that identifies the approximate photo centers for a project as a point object in a spatial database such as a shapefile. This document focuses on imagery that will be part of the DNR GIS Data Resource Site (DRS). A DRS is an organized collection of data, metadata and supporting software. It is envisioned that these standards will become part of the DNR s Data Resource Site Specifications 1. This document is split into three parts: 1) Introduction 2) Background 3) File Naming Conventions 4) Storage Structure Guidelines 5) Spatial Data Format for Index Files 2. Background Generally speaking, air photo acquisition is conducted for/by an organization (private or public), during a given time frame for a particular area. Project areas are assigned an identification code (generally by the photo contractor) and if these projects are conducted on a regular interval, the project name generally remains constant. While this is not true in all cases, this specification is not designed on this assumption. For example, air photos for Pope County, MN were acquired for the USDA-ASCS in 1938/39, 1951, 1958 and 1965. The project code assigned for each of these projects is BJJ. 1

For many products, within each project area the film negative roll and frame number uniquely identify each photograph. In many cases this information can find the date of the image as well as the date the image was acquired. The following file name and organizational concepts were developed to conform to the DNR s DRS standards. In addition, existing air photo collections were examined to determine how they were organized and stored as a way to gain insights to strengths and weaknesses of various techniques. 3. File Naming Conventions Because the type of images this document addresses are not georeferenced they cannot be stored using a geographic tiling scheme as defined in the DNR s GIS storage standard, another method must be used. The files need to be organized and named such that each can be uniquely identified. It should be noted that in this document the file naming conventions are all indicated in UNIX file conventions forward slashes (/) for folder delimiters and all lower-case names. Aerial Photography Traditional Air photo acquisition is generally conducted as a project for a particular organization. Each air photo project is assigned a name or project code. When the project is flown, each individual photo is assigned a number based on the roll or flight line and frame number for this particular photo. Combining the project name, the roll number and the frame number provides a unique identification value for each photo. This information is also printed on the photo, usually separated by dashes -. An example of a photo name would be VE-1-1. This image represents the first frame of the first roll for project ve. This combination provides a good means of file naming standards for digital imagery although it may be insufficient for some scanned products. In these cases an alternative method will need to be defined. In order to be flexible, filename length is restricted to 64 characters with no spaces or special characters. File names would consist of the project code followed by two spaces reserved for roll number/flight line and three spaces reserved for frame number. This assumes that there are no more than 99 rolls in a project and 999 frames in a roll. Based on the earlier example of VE-1-1, the filename for a JPEG formatted image would be ve01001.jpg. This works well until you have areas where multiple years of imagery have been scanned. While the date of the image could be a part of the image filename the overhead of adding this level of detail to the filename is significant. In addition the availability of the dates on the images themselves provides a permanent record of when the image was acquired. Differentiating different years of photos will be accomplished by storing the images in different folders. 2

Other Products For products that do not fit these naming conventions other alternatives must be explored. The minimum naming standards that must be met are that the files have unique names. As new products are developed, project and filenames will have to be developed for those products. 4. Storage Structure Guidelines Since DRS structure is a file-based system for managing data, storage conventions are also an important component of this specification. These storage definitions are hierarchical and have a folder based structure designed to be robust enough to satisfy a variety of situations The file storage hierarchy proposed here is based on a scheme of folders with names based on a provider code, a project code and a project year. The DRS specification defines the folder drs/ancillary as the location to store non-referenced spatial data. It is proposed that the parent folder to store digital imagery is called imagery (/drs/ancillary/imagery). This is a flexible system however and is not restricted to the proposed DRS parent folder. For organizations that don t use DRS storage standards as a way of organizing their GIS data the source folder for imagery can and will vary. This system is designed to be generic above the source provider folder. PROVIDER Identifier Imagery is often referenced by the organization that provides or purchases the imagery. Some examples include DNR Resource Assessment, NAPP and FSA. Typically, each of these programs has a consistent set of acquisition parameters including plane height, dates, and content. This provides the next level of organization in the structure. The photos for a particular Program/Provider will be stored in a folder with a name based on that provider, 13 characters (?) or less. A review of imagery archives at the John R. Borchert Map Library at the University of Minnesota lists nine sources of imagery for the state. These sources include the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, US Forest Service, National Aerial Photography Program, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry, Metropolitan Council, Markhurd Aerial Surveys, Inc., Horizons Inc., Clyde E., Williams & Associates (CEWA). There are also several potential program/providers that can be identified. While these program/provider codes can be developed at the time they are encountered it is desirable to define as many of these as possible. Based on information from the Borchert Map library and taking advantage of abbreviations already in use at the DNR, the following abbreviations are proposed. Code ASCS BWSR NAPP Provider Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Board of Water and Soil Resources National Aerial Photography Program 3

FORCIR ECO ENF FOS FSH LAM PRK TAW WAT WLD MNDOT HOR MC SCS USFWS USFS USGS ACM COE MH Minnesota Department of Natural Resources- Division of Forestry Color Infrared photographs DNR Division of Eco Services DNR Division of Enforcement DNR Field Operation Services Bureau DNR Division of Fisheries DNR Division of Lands and Minerals DNR Division of Parks DNR Division of Trails and Waterways DNR Division of Waters DNR Division of Wildlife Minnesota Department of Transportation Horizons Inc. Metropolitan Council Soil Conservation Service US Fish and Wildlife Service US Forest Service United States Geologic Survey Coastal Zone Management Program United States Corps of Engineers Markhurd It is likely that this list will grow over time as new project/providers emerge. As an example, the folder for color infrared photos acquired by the Minnesota DNR would be named /drs/ancillary/imagery/forcir PROJECT Identifier The project portion of the file storage convention provides the first spatial context for the imagery. Projects occur over a fixed piece of geography, many times based on county boundaries, but not always. Therefore, folder name should be the same as the project name. For example, DNR Forestry Resource Assessment photos for Itasca County are assigned a project code of ita and a folder name of ita. /drs/ancillary/imagery/forcir/ita Project identifiers should be selected with care and some sort of oversight is required to ensure unique names. Currently, there are a number of project identifiers already in use and these are listed below. County ASCS Project ID USFS Project ID Aitkin BXN AIT DNR Forestry Project ID 4

Anoka BIM MET Becker BXO CBM, BBC Beltrami CIN BEL, BBC Benton BIN Big Stone BIO Blue Earth BIP Brown BIQ Carlton BXP CAR Carver WM Cass BXQ CCW Chippewa BIR Chisago BIS CIK, CHI Clay BXR Clearwater BXS CBM, BBC Cook CIT FX COO Cottonwood BIT Crow Wing BXT CCW Dakota WK MET Dodge WC Douglas BIU POD Faribault BIV Fillmore VZ WFH, FIL Freeborn VX Goodhue WH GOW, GOO Grant BIW Hennepin WN MET Houston WA WFH, HOU Hubbard BXU HUB Isanti BIX CIK, ISA Itasca CIP ITA Jackson BIY Kanabec BXV CIK, KAN Kandiyohi BIZ Kittson BXW Koochiching CIO KOO Lac Qui Parle BJA Lake CIS FX LAK Lake of the CIQ LWR Woods Le Sueur WF LSN Lincoln BJB Lyon BJC McLeod WL Mahnomen BXX CBM, BBC Marshall BXY 5

Martin BJD Meeker BJE Mille Lacs BXZ CIK, MIL Morrison BYA MOR Mower UY Murray BJF Nicollet BJG LSN Nobles BJH Norman BYB Olmsted WB GOW, OLM Otter Tail DA POD Pennington BYC Pine BYD PIN Pipestone BJI Polk BYE Pope BJJ POD Ramsey WO MET Red Lake BYF Redwood BSE Renville BJK Rice WG RIC Rock DG Roseau BYG LWR St. Louis CIR FX SLN, SLS Scott WJ MET Sherburne BJL SHE Sibley BJM Stearns BJN Steele WD Stevens WJO STE Swift BJP Todd BYH TOD Traverse BJQ Wabasha WI GOW, WAB Wadena BYI WAD Waseca WE WAS Washington CCZ MET Watonwan BJR Wilkin BYJ Winona CS WFH, WIN Wright WP Yellow Medicine BJS 6

Year Identifier The Year portion of the file storage convention is required because projects are often done on a repetitive basis over the years. The year designation helps to organize the imagery for large geographic areas that may contain many thousands of individual images. The year folder is named with a Y and the four-digit year. For example, DNR Forestry Resource Assessment photos for Itasca County in 2003 are stored in a folder called Y2003. /drs/ancillary/imagery/forcir/ita/y2003 5. Spatial Data Format for Index Files Because these images are not georeferenced they must be spatially referenced in another way. This is done via an image index spatial data file. This spatial file contains point features that represent the approximate centers of the frames (photos) for a particular project year. This file provides the basis for which users can access individual photos via ArcView, LandView, web applications or other custom-built products. These index files should be stored within the project year folder. The indexes should be named INDX_imgpt<scale_identifier>. The scale identifier code should correspond with established DNR scale identifier codes. /drs/ancillary/imagery/forcir/itas/y2003/indx_imgpt3 FILENAME = path and image name for image file starting with the provider code PROV = name of provider PROJ = Project code YEAR = Year of imagery acquisition PHOTO_ID = Name of image (VE01001) EXT = Image extension (jpg, tif, etc) COUN = two digit county code of centroid CTY_ABBR = county abbreviation of county centroid falls in XUTM = UTM NAD83 X coordinate of photo frame centroid YUTM = UTM NAD83 Y coordinate of photo frame centroid STATUS = 0 if image has not been scanned, 1 if image has been scanned, 2 if image has been rectified, 3 if image has been orthorectified Individual project indexes can then be merged together in various forms to produce composites of these image points. A wide variety of product generation routines could be developed to provide a wide variety of image center mosaics. 7