BEMPSEY G. CO, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows:

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I N D I C T M E N T. - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., 78j(b), SANJAY KUMAR and 78m(a) and 78ff; T. 18,

INVESTIGATOR GERARD J. MATHESON, SHIELD # 130, of the Office of the

THE MATTER : BEFORE THE SCHOOL

Defendant. : INVESTIGATOR GERARD J. MATHESON, SHIELD #130, of the Office of the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DATE FILED: I N D I C T M E N T COUNTS ONE THROUGH THIRTY-NINE

Affidavit in Support of Warrant

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term. Grand Jury Sworn in on October 31, 2003

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Middle District of Tennessee

Frank Abagnale By CommonLit Staff 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

The Tribeca Group at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney

We're excited to announce that the next JAFX Trading Competition will soon be live!

Case 1:11-cv LBS Document 50 Filed 09/20/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:13-cr AJB Document 1 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:12-cr MSD-DEM Document 95 Filed 04/04/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 511

The Federal Prosecution of Trade Secret Theft

ALAN G. HEVESI, : Defendant. : DEPUTY CHIEF INVESTIGATOR GREGORY J. STASIUK of the Office of

Dear Friends, December, 2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2012. Index No.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE. Sam Sloan. Petitioner INDEX No against-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAW - CHARITIES BUREAU

Contracts Examination 1, This is a three-hour examination. All bluebooks must be turned in at the end of the three hour period.

FILED BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD

ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

David M. Friedman (DF4278) Richard F. Casher KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

S17Y1593. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. MEYERS. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the Review

The Players. Mark Zuckerberg. November 2003

Filing # E-Filed 02/17/ :19:19 PM

Pickens Savings and Loan Association, F.A. Online Banking Agreement

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

NSPE Spring 2009 Ethics Forum

WGA LOW BUDGET AGREEMENT

David M. Friedman (DF4278) Richard F. Casher KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

Multi-Million Dollar Pre-Trial Settlement Achieved for Wrongfully Terminated Commissioned Sales Representative Under Indiana Law

18 HARRISON STREET. Exclusive Offering Memorandum. Prime Tribeca Building For Sale. TEAM at Douglas Elliman

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Tribute Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

New York Bar admission (or eligibility to obtain admission promptly) is required.

Paper topic Aligning the definition and additional paragraphs for IAS 1

ITOCO INC Amended Quarterly Report March 31, 2018

LEARN HOW TO MAKE EASY MONEY

The Witness Charter - Looking after Witnesses

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT

Contract of Agreement for Cultural Exchange Between Au Pair and Host Family Employer in Sweden

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

VOLUSIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS

Did you know that prior to late 1912, there were no laws or regulations restricting amateur radio transmitters in the United States?

Filing # E-Filed 04/14/ :22:58 AM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT DENISE RENEE DECARY

Case 2:15-mj jmc Document 1-1 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 8

F.A.Q. Card Holders & Merchants Card Holders

2015 Mark Whitten DEJ Enterprises, LLC 1

A Message from A. Harrison Barnes

January 31, Hon. Joel I. Klein Chancellor New York City Public Schools Department of Education 52 Chambers Street, Room 314 New York, NY 10007

Judge tells Garofalo: You ll be away for some time

KKR & Co. Inc. Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference December 4, 2018

Small Business Investment Companies

Making a claim? - Some questions to ask yourself

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MENTAL HEALTH ADVANCE DIRECTIVES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Lesson 2: What is the Mary Kay Way?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

Fed Document Challenges Clifford, Altman

How Investigators Help Investors Identify Real Risks. James Mintz Founder and CEO Mintz Group

PROBLEM SET Explain the difference between mutual knowledge and common knowledge.

STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION FINAL ORDER. THIS CAUSE came on to be heard at an informal hearing held before the Florida APPEARANCES

The Stack-Gravenstine-Smith Group at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FULCRUM EXPLORATION, L.L.C. POOLING REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

Lesson Twenty-Six: Creating Your Ideal Client Profile

Case 1:11-cr JSR Document 155 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 9

Morgan Stanley (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION INFORMATION GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

STAUNING Trade-In Internet Sales Process with /Voic Templates to Non-Responsive Prospects 2018 Edition

Marjorie E. Gross, Esq.

IN THE JUSTICE COURT/CITY COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF GALLATIN, MONTANA ************************************************ Cause No.17<11~3t.

Outreach Seminar for Compliance Professionals: Investment Advisers and Investment Funds. Tuesday 15 July 2014

x

Defendant. : YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer in this action and serve a copy of your

ADDENDUM D COMERICA WEB INVOICING TERMS AND CONDITIONS

CASE 0:18-cv PAM-HB Document 1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:15-cr wks Document 6 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Approved, ~ AM LEER Assistant United States Attorney Before: HONORABLE KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York x14c UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SEALED COMPLAINT 0 "\, l - v. - CHARLES A. BENNETT, Defendant. Violations of 15 U.S.C. 78j (b) and 78ffi 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5i and 18 U.S.C. 1343 and 2 COUNTY OF OFFENSE: NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ss.: BEMPSEY G. CO, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows: COUNT ONE (Securities Fraud) 1. From at least in or about 2008 through in or about November 2014, CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, willfully and knowingly, directly and indirectly, by the use of the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, the mails, and the facilities of national securities exchanges, did use and employ, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities, manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances, as set forth above, 'in vi0lation of Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5, by (a) employing devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud, (b) making untrue statements of material facts and omitting to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and (c) engaging in acts, practices, and courses of business which operated and would operate as a fraud and deceit upon investors, to wit, BENNETT solicited more than $5 million from investors

based on false and misleading representations that he would use the money to purchase and sell securities when, in fact, BENNETT used the investors' money substantially for his own personal benefit and to repay other investors. (Title IS, united States Code, Sections 78j (b) and 78ff; Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5; Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.) COUNT TWO (Wire Fraud) 2. From at least in or about 2008 through in or about November 2014, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, willfully and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, would and did transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, to wit, BENNETT solicited more than $5 million from investors, through the use of telephones, electronic communications, and wire transfers, including the transfer of funds from investors into bank accounts in New York, New York, based on false and misleading representations that he would use the money to make legitimate investments with the investors' money when, in fact, BENNETT useq the investors' money substantially for his own personal benefit and to repay other investors. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.) The bases for my knowledge and for the foregoing charges are, in part, as follows: 3. I have been a Special Agent with the FBI for approximately eleven years. I am currently assigned to a squad within the FBI that is responsible for investigating violations of the federal securities laws, as well as wire, bank, and mail fraud laws and related offenses. I have participated in numerous investigations of these offenses, and I have made and participated in making arrests of numerous individuals for committing in such offenses. 4. The information contained in this affidavit is based upon my personal knowledge, as well as information obtained 2

during this investigation, directly or indirectly, from other sources, including documents and information provided by investors, a review of bank records and public records, information provided by witnesses who participated in conversations and written communications with CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, and statements made by BENNETT himself. Because this affidavit is prepared for limited purposes, I have not set forth each and every fact I have learned in connection with this investigation. Where conversations and events are referred to herein, they are related in substance and in part. Where dates, figures, and calculations are set forth herein, they are approximate. The Scheme to Defraud 5. Based upon interviews of witnesses, a review of documents provided by witnesses, a review of public records, and a review of electronic communications between CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, ~nd others, I have learned that: a. BENNETT is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of New York, but no longer has an active law practice. b. Approximately thirteen years ago, BENNETT was employed by a large law firm in New York City (the "Law Firm") where he worked on corporate mergers and acquisitions, among other matters. While at the Law Firm, BENNETT met an individual ("Individual-I") who later founded a successful privately-held investment fund (the "Fund"). c. During the period of time relevant to this Complaint, BENNETT held himself out to potential investors as having a close personal relationship with Individual-I and, therefore, the ability to invest others' money in the Fund, which was not otherwise open to small, individual investors. Numerous investors decided to make an investment in the Fund based on this, and other, representations by BENNETT, as set forth more fully below. d. BENNETT told individual investors that he himself had invested money in the Fund and that, snould they choose to invest, the investors' money would be held in BENNETT's account. BENNETT also led most of the individual investors to believe that they were the only individuals to whom he had extended the offer to lnvest with him in the Fund. 3

e. The investors typically transmitted money to BENNETT by wire transfer or check. BENNETT provided "promissory notes" to the individual investors as a record of the amounts of money they had given to BENNETT to invest. In addition, BENNETT provided certain individual investors with account statements that purported to show the amount that BENNETT (and the individual investor, through BENNETT) had invested in the Fund. f. BENNETT told some of the investors that the Fund purchased credit default swaps and/or mortgage-backed securities, and said that he (BENNETT) was required to travel overseas, including to France, in order to manage or oversee the Fund's investments. From time to time, BENNETT also told the investors that he was traveling to meet with Individual-l about the Fund's investments. g. BENNETT communicated with individual investors primarily by telephone and email. In these communications, BENNETT told the investors about the purported status of their investments and the purported returns on those investments, and solicited additional funds from investors. h. BENNETT solicited millions of dollars from more than,thirty investors, many of whom were close friends or family members, based on his representations that the money would be invested in the Fund. In truth and in fact, BENNETT never invested any of the investors' money in the Fund 1 or in any other investment vehicle. Instead, BENNETT used the investors' money principally for his own personal benefit and to repay other investors. Victim-l Invests with BENNETT 6. Based on an interview of an individual ("Victim-I") who invested with CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, and a review of documents provided by Victim-I, I have learned the following: a. Victim-l has known BENNETT for more than 25 years and considers him a close friend. b. Between in or about 2008 and in or about November 2014, BENNETT solicited over $1.4 million from Victim-I. During 1 I have spoken with Individual-I, who confirmed that BENNETT has never invested any money with the Fund -- neither BENNETT's own money nor anyone else's. In fact, Individual-l stated that the Fund has been closed to outside investments for over ten years. 4

the $ame period of time, Victim-1 received slightly less than $500,000 in returns from BENNETT, leaving Victim-1 with a loss of over $900,000. c. BENNETT provided Victim-l with over twenty promissory notes documenting the amounts of money that victim-1 gave to BENNETT for investment between December 2008 and April 2010, which ranged from $7,000 to $39,500. d. BENNETT communicated with Victim-1 by email about Victim-1's investment. For example, on or about June 5, 2014, BENNETT emailed Victim-1 a "Ledger Account Statement" that purported to be a statement of the amounts that Victim-1 had invested in the Fund with BENNETT since December 15, 2009, along with Victim-1's earnings on those investments. The document calculated Victim-1's total principal as of June 5, 2014 as being over $1.7 million. Victim-2 Invests with BENNETT 7. Based on an interview of another individual ("Victim- 2") who invested with CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, and a review of documents provided by Victim-2, I have learned the following: a. Victim-2 has known BENNETT for more than 25 years and considers him a close friend. b. Between in or about 2009 and in or about November 2014, BENNETT solicited more than $1 million from Victim-2. During the same period of time, Victim-2 received approximately $400,000 in returns from BENNETT, leaving Victim-2 with a loss of approximately $600,000. c. BENNETT communicated by email with Victim-2 about Victim-2's investment.. For example: i. On or about July 1, 2013, BENNETT emailed victim-2 regarding the status of his investment, stating in part, "[T]he three month $688,725 earned 15% way back around beginning April for a return of $103,309 and a total of $792,033. That rolled on April 18th and will end July 18th and earn 15%. Blimey you are getting close to $lmil.!" ii. On or about June 12, 2014, BENNETT emailed Victim-2 regarding the status of his 5

investment, stating in part, "[YJou earned 22% on your $150K for a total of $33,000." iii. On or about June 30, 2014, BENNETT sent an email to Victim-2 attaching a promissory note dated June 27, 2014 for $300,000 that Victim-1 gave to BENNETT to invest on Victim-1's behalf. e. BENNETT also provided Victim-2 with account statements purporting to show the balance of BENNETT's -- and by extension therefore, Victim-2's -- investment in the Fund. For example, Victim-2 received from BENNETT a "Quarterly Investor Account Statement" dated March 31, 2014 that purported to show a total capital balance of over $4 million in the account "Charles A. Bennett, Esq.," which Victim-2 understood to contain both BENNETT's money and Victim-2's money. The account statement indicates that the investment is in "Euro CDS/Mortgage Backed Breakout." Victim-3 Invests with BENNETT 8. Based on an interview of an individual ("Victim-3") who invested with CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, and a.. review of documents provided by Victim-3, I have learned the following: a. In or about October 2013, Victim-3 met BENNETT through a mutual friend, who had previously invested with BENNETT. b. Between October 2013 and November 2014, BENNETT. solicited $100,000 from Victim-3. During the same period of time, Victi~-3 received slightly less than $7~000 in returns from BENNETT, leaving victim-3 with a loss of approximately $93,000. c. BENNETT communicated by email with Victim-3 about Victim-3's investment. For example: i. On or about October 10, 2013, BENNETT sent Victim-3 an email containing wire instructions to a bank account held in BENNETT's name, including an account number and routing number, for Victim- 3's investment. The same day, Victim-3 confirmed by email that Victim-3 had wired $35,000 to BENNETT's account. 6

ii. On or about November 13, 2013, BENNETT emailed Victim-3: "Good news the deal is about up and looks like a return of 8.5%./1 BENNETT then asked whether Victim-3 wanted to "roll/l the investment, that is, reinvest the earnings. iii. On or about November 18, 2013, BENNETT sent Victim-3 an email containing wire instructions to a different bank account held in BENNETT's name, including an account number and routing number, for an investment by Victim-3. Victim-3 responded: "Thanks. Look for the wire. I'll send it soon./1 iv. Later that same day, BENNETT wrote: "Just to let you know I got the $15K.. You [ ] earned $2,975 on your $35K and with the $15K your ~otal is $52,975. You are smart and like your decisiveness - in all the ways, not just in. Thanks and let[']s let [Individual-1] do the work now. /I v. On or about January 7, 2014, BENNETT emailed Victim-3 to say, "[T]he return came in at a nice 9.6% so you are now at $58,060./1 d. On or about January 28, 2014, BENNETT had the following email exchange with Victim-3: BENNETT: Yo, huge game changer 10 day deal cooked up with [Individual-1] and it is expected at 25%+. Gotta move fast as doing within 24-36 hours. This is outside the normal ones. Anyone who might be interested is invited to join. Don't need it as I have enough to fund my part to get in but there is extra capacity and more the merrier. victim-3:. Tell me more. Would be interested if it makes sense. BENNETT:. It's going to be a gangbuster I am sure (25%+ return is our model with risk comparable to the other ones).. It's a 7

similar playas the other ones but with the debacle in commercial real estate occurring in Toronto and elsewhere in Canada included with some of the same in the US and Europe, principally Holland. We are cranking away as I type on the exact properties and expect to be done tonight later. No min, no max for you mate since you are a player anyway. Would have to move fast though with a wire. e. The following day, Victim-3 caused $25,000 to be wired to a bank account held by BENNETT at JP Morgan Chase Bank NA ("Chase Bank") after receiving wire instructions, including the account number and routing number, from BENNETT in an email. 2 f. In or around October 2014, Victim-3 sought to redeem his entire investment with BENNETT. BENNETT and Victim-3 exchanged a series of emails in which BENNETT repeatedly promised to send a wire transfer to the account designated by Victim-3. Victim-3 asked to meet BENNETT in person to discuss the problem. g. On or about November 3, 2014, at 11:34 a.m., BENNETT emailed Victim~3: "[S]orry I meant to get back to you and meet up but I was tied up in New Jersey unexpectedly. Sorry but let's talk after I have confirmed the wire.. which shall be done this afternoon as promised." h. Victim-3 did not receive the redemption from BENNETT as promised. The Scheme Unravels 9. Based upon information and documents provided by the New York City Police Department (the "NYPD"), I have learned the following: 2 I have reviewed bank records from Chase Bank which confirm that, on January 29, 2014, BENNETT's account received $25,000 as the result of this interstate wire transfer. 8

a. On or about November 3, 2014, at 3:00 p.m., CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, attempted to commit suicide by jumping into the Hudson River from a pier located on the West Side of Manhattan. b. BENNETT was rescued and transferred to a hospital, where he remains in stable condition. BENNETT. c. The NYPD recovered a suicide note signed by 10. I have reviewed the suicide note authored by CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, which is a sixteen-page handwritten letter with the heading, "A Sad Ending to My Life," and contains the following statements, among others: a. "I have systematically over the course of five years or so perpetrated a huge Ponzi scheme envelopping [sic] my family and closest friends." b. "I managed to completely squander the hard earned money that my family and dear friends managed to set aside over the course of their working lives. To be clear about this: the whole.. investment scheme that so many thought was real was in fact a complete and [sic] fiction of my crazed imagination. Not one trade of credit default swaps was ever attempted by me." c. "It was all an illusion - again not one trade was ever done. It was a Ponzi scheme pure and simple... The bulk of the funds were used in classic Ponzi scheme fashion to payoff other supposed \ investors' and my absurd li'festyle. All the while pretending I was making everyone wealthy with absurd returns on their money." 11. On or about November 12 and 14, 2014, I spoke to CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, about the statements in the suicide note, among other things. After being advised of his Miranda rights and waiving those rights orally and in writing, BENNETT made the following statements, in sum and substance, among others: a. BENNETT stated that he had solicited at least several million dollars from his close friends and family members, based on the representation that he would invest the money on their behalf. b. BENNETT stated that he started soliciting money from friends as a way to "borrow" funds to meet his own 9

financial obligations, but that the scheme spiraled out of control. c. BENNETT admitted that he had never invested any of the money he received from investors in Individual-l's Fund or in any other investment vehicle. BENNETT also stated that he spent all of the money he received from investors, either on personal expenses -- such as food, travel, and legal representation for his girlfriend -- or on "returns" to other investors. WHEREFORE, I respectfully request that an arrest warrant be issued for CHARLES A. BENNETT, the defendant, and that he be arrested and imprisoned or bailed, as the case may be. SPECIAL AGENT FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES MAGIST SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF 10