Broader Impacts: Achieving Greater Goals

Similar documents
Engineering NSF Budget and Priorities

Improved understandings of:

Future Directions for Broader Impacts in the NSF Engineering Directorate

POSITION PAPER. GREEN PAPER From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

Future Directions for Broader Impacts in the NSF Engineering Directorate

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

New Faculty National Science Foundation (NSF) Broader Impacts (BI) Workshop Series:

E Distr. LIMITED E/ESCWA/TDD/2017/IG.1/6 31 January 2017 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: ARABIC

Educating Leaders for the 21 st Century Role of Engineering

Project Review: P1 (2)

a) Core federal technology transfer principles and practices that should be protected, and those which should be adapted or changed;

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK Updated August 2017

VSNU December Broadening EU s horizons. Position paper FP9

Position Paper on Horizon ESFRI Biological and Medical Research Infrastructures

g~:~: P Holdren ~\k, rjj/1~

Broader Impacts (BI), the NSF BI Criterion, and the Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant (DDRIG) A CRASH COURSE

Enabling Greater Research Achievements by Transforming the Inception Phase

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

SASAR POSITION PAPER ON: GREEN PAPER ON A COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE EU RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FUNDING

They all say it is about the economy. It is more than ratio s, percentages, and growth; it is about the Lives of people

Technology and Innovation in the NHS Scottish Health Innovations Ltd

Sparking a New Economy. Canada s Advanced Manufacturing Supercluster

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

COUNTRY: Questionnaire. Contact person: Name: Position: Address:

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

DIGITAL WITH PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY DIGITAL STRATEGY

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

Vice Chancellor s introduction

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

Minister-President of the Flemish Government and Flemish Minister for Economy, Foreign Policy, Agriculture and Rural Policy

The Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 2 of 9 September 13:00 hrs

WIPO Development Agenda

RESEARCH AND INNOVATION STRATEGY

IFT STRATEGIC PLAN. 2017/18 Strategic Objectives

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

Draft resolution on Science, technology and innovation for. Technology for Development as the United Nations torch-bearer

Assessing the Welfare of Farm Animals

Evaluation report. Evaluated point Grade Comments

DG GROW - Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Space Policy and Research Unit

G7 SCIENCE MINISTERS COMMUNIQUÉ

ADVANCING KNOWLEDGE. FOR CANADA S FUTURE Enabling excellence, building partnerships, connecting research to canadians SSHRC S STRATEGIC PLAN TO 2020

G20 Initiative #eskills4girls

The IET Strategic Framework. Working to engineer a better world

Arshad Mansoor, Sr. Vice President, Research & Development INNOVATION SCOUTS: EXPANDING EPRI S TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NETWORK

President Barack Obama The White House Washington, DC June 19, Dear Mr. President,

Economic and Social Council

Higher Education for Science, Technology and Innovation. Accelerating Africa s Aspirations. Communique. Kigali, Rwanda.

BUILDING DIGITAL COMPETENCIES TO BENEFIT FROM EXISTING AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON GENDER AND YOUTH DIMENSIONS

Technology Policy Organizations Session 12: Technology Policy Organizations Concluding Materials

Technology Transfer and Climate Change: International Flows, Barriers and Frameworks

APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap

Workshop on Enabling Technologies in CSF for EU Research and Innovation Funding

APEC Chile 2019 Chile s Priorities

IPRs and Public Health: Lessons Learned Current Challenges The Way Forward

Japan s FinTech Vision

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

Innovation-Based Economic Development Strategy for Holyoke and the Pioneer Valley

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

GROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

Strategic Planning Framework

DERIVATIVES UNDER THE EU ABS REGULATION: THE CONTINUITY CONCEPT

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 INNOVATION

Seoul Initiative on the 4 th Industrial Revolution

November 18, 2011 MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS

Ministry of Industry. Indonesia s 4 th Industrial Revolution. Making Indonesia 4.0. Benchmarking Implementasi Industri 4.0 A.T.

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

CO-ORGANISERS: Page 1 of 13

Transportation Education in the New Millennium

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

SMART PLACES WHAT. WHY. HOW.

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

TALENT AS CANADA S COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Digital Talent Strategy: Road to 2020 and Beyond Ottawa March 9 th Namir Anani President & CEO

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

An Essential Health and Biomedical R&D Treaty

Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

HORIZON Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies (LEIT)

Green Paper - From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework. for EU Research and Innovation Funding

NSF Engineering Directorate Overview and Priorities

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

NHS Next Stage Review: Innovation

Evaluation Axis and Index in the Next Mid to Long-Term Objectives (draft)

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

International Cooperation in Horizon 2020

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

Innovative public procurement case Finland

7656/18 CF/MI/nj 1 DG G 3 C

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

National approach to artificial intelligence

Innovation through Smart Specialisation in MENA Countries

An Introdcution to Horizon 2020

The 26 th APEC Economic Leaders Meeting

Executive Summary Industry s Responsibility in Promoting Responsible Development and Use:

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

TRIUMF ACCELERATING CANADIAN BUSINESS THROUGH SCIENCE AND INNOVATION Pre-Budget Consultation

Common evaluation criteria for evaluating proposals

Expert Group Meeting on

Transcription:

Broader Impacts: Achieving Greater Goals Pramod Khargonekar Assistant Director for Engineering National Science Foundation Boston University 4 December 2015

to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense NSF Act, 1950!"#$%&'()*+%,-&.!/&.),%)"& Science offers a largely unexplored hinterland for the pioneer who has the tools for his task. The rewards of such exploration both for the Nation and the individual are great. Scientific progress is one essential key to our security as a nation, to our better health, to more jobs, to a higher standard of living, and to our cultural progress..!!"

NSF Merit Review Criteria! Intellectual Merit: The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge;! Broader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes. $%&'(()))*+,-*./0(&12,(&/34567/5,(&8&&.1479(+,-:;<<:(.&.=#*>,&?@@@A!" #"

America COMPETES - 2010 SEC. 526. BROADER IMPACTS REVIEW CRITERION. (a) GOALS. The Foundation shall apply a Broader Impacts Review Criterion to achieve the following goals: (1) Increased economic competitiveness of the United States. (2) Development of a globally competitive STEM workforce. (3) Increased participation of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM. (4) Increased partnerships between academia and industry. (5) Improved pre-k 12 STEM education and teacher development. (6) Improved undergraduate STEM education. (7) Increased public scientific literacy. (8) Increased national security. B"

From NSF GPG Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes. ;"

From NSF GPG Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education. C"

National Science Board: Broader Impacts!!! The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes. These outcomes include:! increased participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM);! improved STEM education at all levels;! increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society;! development of a globally competitive STEM workforce;! increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others;! increased national security;! increased economic competitiveness of the United States;! and enhanced infrastructure for research and education. These examples of societally relevant outcomes should not be considered either comprehensive or prescriptive. Investigators may include appropriate outcomes not covered by these examples. I" JKL"M9&/FN"OMP::(!!"P"J8Q/+83"K549+59"R/1+78Q/+S," D959E29F"GH"!<:;" O9F4N"M9049)"TF4N9F48'"M9049)"8+7"M904,4/+,""

NSB Recommendations! Just as institutions play an important role in facilitating researchrelated activities of their investigators, often in ways that align with strategic departmental and institutional (and possibly state-wide, regional, or national) priorities and investments, such a role can extend to activities directed toward the broader impacts of the project as well.! such efforts might be more effective if coordinated appropriately in ways that leverage particular institutional assets or strategic directions and even link investigators from multiple projects.! NSF should encourage institutions to pursue such cooperative possibilities, which have the dual benefit of retaining the contributions of individual investigators while addressing national goals and yielding benefits broader than those within a given project. U"

Broader Impacts - Stakeholders! Public! Policymakers! Institutions Universities! Researchers! Students! NSF G" D959E29F"GH"!<:;"

Feedback from Committees of Visitors! Greater clarification about the meaning of and expectations about the Broader Impacts criterion needed.! How important is it for Broader Impacts to be novel?! Inconsistent interpretation and handling of BI criterion by reviewers as well as NSF staff.! Variability across Programs, Divisions, Directorates! Recommendations:! Improved training for reviewers and NSF staff! Clarification of the language used to define Broader Impacts,! Provision of examples of significant Broader Impacts

How can we turn BI into exciting opportunities? ::"

Key Elements! Frameworks for thinking about BI! Non-prescriptive models for BI! Roles for Institutions! Universities! K-12, community colleges! Foundations! Local, regional, national organizations! Industry and private sector! NSF :!"

Possible Mechanisms! Facilitation on campuses for BI formulations! Leveraging complementary activities! Alignment and coherence among BI activities and goals! Together, these mechanisms have the potential to achieve results at scale :#"

Food for Thought! IM : Publications :: BI :?! How can we fuel competition for great BI concepts and outcomes?! Can/should non-prescriptive BI goals be defined by Directorate/Division/Program?! How can the conversation at this meeting be scaled to the larger research community?! Are there early adopters of new ways of thinking about BI? :B"

It is critical that all stakeholders achieve common and shared understanding of BI and engage in mutually reinforcing activities to achieve the promise and expectations behind BI :;"

QUESTIONS? IDEAS, SUGGESTIONS! 012#*$(343,56$(7& :C" D959E29F"GH"!<:;"