Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv KHV-DJW Document 1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. E4X, Inc.; Fiftyone, Inc.; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RGA Document 8 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 90 PageID #: 546 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

Attorneys for Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv TWP-MPB Document 1 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:12-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

Case 3:10-cv D Document 119 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1770

Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study

PlainSite. Legal Document. Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company.

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

~ft~... J _J ~ ' ;1 '::1st~ ::i<isi~1 110.J tn Dis~~d;e ~

Case 2:18-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 11

Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:14-cv AJB-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS

An investment in a patent for your invention could be the best investment you will ever

Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

UCF Patents, Trademarks and Trade Secrets. (1) General. (a) This regulation is applicable to all University Personnel (as defined in section

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 1:17-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mall of America for its Verified Complaint

Case 1:18-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 21 : : : : : : : : : : : : :

International Intellectual Property Practices

ALAN G. HEVESI, : Defendant. : DEPUTY CHIEF INVESTIGATOR GREGORY J. STASIUK of the Office of

Filing # E-Filed 02/17/ :19:19 PM

Effective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law. April 30, 2012

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 18

Intellectual Property

Yee ) and A.V. Jewelry Export-Import, Ltd. ( AV Jewelry ) (collectively Plaintiffs ), for their

This contract is for services and products related to a photography shoot (hereafter Shoot ) to take place at the following time and place.

Ryan N. Phelan. Tel

Case 3:02-cv EBB Document 34 Filed 01/20/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff,

Case 1:06-cv RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Practical Guidelines For IP Portfolio Management

Lawyers sued over advice to board

MAY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND SANDRA EVANS, Plaintiff, VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY 1 Hayden Drive Petersburg, VA 23806

The Objective Valuation of Non-Traded IP. Jonathan D. Putnam

Policy Contents. Policy Information. Purpose and Summary. Scope. Published on Policies and Procedures (

Rocco E. Testani, Partner

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

Recent Changes to the Patent Litigation Landscape and Predictions for the Future. June 12, 2018

PATENT AND LICENSING POLICY SUMMARY

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K

SAN DIEGO CITY SCHOOLS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 265 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3

Comments of the AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION. Regarding

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee,

Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC v. Plaintiffs, ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY; ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE; ERIE INSURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY; ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY; FLAGSHIP CITY INSURANCE COMPANY; and ERIE FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendants. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Abraham Lincoln said that patents added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius in the discovery and production of new and useful things. 1 Plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC ( Intellectual Ventures or Plaintiffs ) agree. Plaintiffs believe that ideas are valuable and are working to make applied research profitable, thereby attracting more private investment and ultimately increasing the number of inventions. To support those goals, Plaintiffs file this Original Complaint for Patent Infringement against Defendants Erie Indemnity Company, Erie Insurance Exchange, Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company, 1 Lecture Discoveries, Inventions and Improvements (22 Feb 1860) in John George Nicolay and John Hay (eds.), Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln (1894), Vol. 5, 113. In Eugene C. Gerhart, Quote it Completely! (1998), 802.

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 2 of 12 Erie Insurance Company, Flagship City Insurance Company, and Erie Family Life Insurance Company (collectively, Erie or Defendants ); and allege as follows: I. NATURE OF THE SUIT 1. This is a claim for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. II. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures I LLC ( Intellectual Ventures I ) is a Delaware limited liability company having its principal place of business located at 3150 139th Avenue Southeast, Bellevue, Washington 98005. 3. Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures II LLC ( Intellectual Ventures II ) is a Delaware limited liability company having its principal place of business located at 3150 139th Avenue Southeast, Bellevue, Washington 98005. 4. Defendant Erie Indemnity Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and maintaining its principal place of business at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. Erie Indemnity Company may be served through its Officers and/or Directors at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. 5. Defendant Erie Insurance Exchange is a commercial insurance provider formed as an unincorporated association in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and maintaining its principal place of business at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. 6. Defendant Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and maintaining its principal place of business at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. Erie Insurance Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 2

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 3 of 12 Property & Casualty Company may be served at its registered office address at 100 Erie Insurance Place, PO Box 1699, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. 7. Defendant Erie Insurance Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and maintaining its principal place of business at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. Erie Insurance Company may be served at its registered office address at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. 8. Defendant Flagship City Insurance Corporation is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and maintaining its principal place of business at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania, 16530. Flagship City Insurance Corporation may be served at its registered office address at 100 Erie Insurance Place, PO Box 1699, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. 9. Defendant Erie Family Life Insurance Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and maintaining its principal place of business at 100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania, 16530. Erie Family Life Insurance Company may be served at its registered office address at 144 East 6th Street, Erie, Pennsylvania 16530. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. Thus, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 11. This Court has specific personal jurisdiction over each Defendant pursuant to due process and the Pennsylvania Long Arm Statute because each Defendant resides in this District. Additionally, each Defendant, directly or through intermediaries, has conducted and conducts Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 3

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 4 of 12 substantial business in this forum, including but not limited to: (i) engaging in at least part of the infringing acts alleged herein; (ii) purposefully and voluntarily placing one or more infringing products or services into the stream of commerce with the expectation that they will be purchased by consumers in this forum; and/or (iii) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in Pennsylvania and in this District. 12. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) (d) and 1400(b) for the reasons set forth above. IV. BACKGROUND 13. Intellectual Ventures was founded in 2000 on the fundamental premise that inventions are valuable. Since its founding, Intellectual Ventures has built on this premise by working to ensure that a market for invention continues to thrive. Intellectual Ventures creates inventions and files patent applications for those inventions; collaborates with others to develop and patent inventions; and acquires and licenses patents from individual inventors, universities and other institutions. A significant aspect of Intellectual Ventures business is managing the Plaintiffs in this case, Intellectual Ventures I and II. 14. Intellectual Ventures business includes purchasing important inventions from individual inventors and institutions and then licensing the inventions to those who need them. Through this business, Intellectual Ventures allows inventors to reap a financial reward from their innovations, which is frequently difficult for individual inventors to do. To date, Intellectual Ventures has acquired more than 70,000 IP assets and, in the process, has paid individual inventors more than half a billion dollars for their inventions. Intellectual Ventures has over $6 billion in committed capital for inventions in over 50 technology areas. Intellectual Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 4

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 5 of 12 Ventures, in turn, has earned more than $3 billion by licensing these patents to some of the world s most innovative and successful technology companies who continue to use them to make computer equipment, software, semiconductor devices, and a host of other products. 15. Intellectual Ventures also creates inventions. Intellectual Ventures has a staff of scientists and engineers who develop ideas in a broad range of fields, including agriculture, computer hardware, life sciences, medical devices, semiconductors, and software. Intellectual Ventures has invested millions of dollars developing such ideas and files hundreds of patent applications on its inventions every year, making it one of the top patent filers in the world. Intellectual Ventures has also invested in laboratory facilities to assist with the development and testing of new ideas. 16. Intellectual Ventures also invents by collaborating with inventors and research institutions around the world. For example, Intellectual Ventures has developed inventions by selecting a technical challenge, requesting proposals for inventions to solve the challenge from inventors and institutions, selecting the most promising ideas, rewarding the inventors and institutions for their contributions, and filing patent applications on the ideas. Intellectual Ventures has invested millions of dollars in this way and has created a network of more than 4,000 inventors worldwide. 17. This cause of action asserts infringement of patents that Plaintiffs acquired as part of its effort to create an efficient market for inventions. This case involves United States Patent No. 6,519,581 B1, entitled Collection of Information Regarding a Device or a User of a Device Across a Communication Link (the 581 Patent ); United States Patent No. 6,546,002 B1, entitled System and Method for Implementing an Intelligent and Mobile Menu-Interface Agent (the 002 Patent ); United States Patent No. 6,510,434 B1, entitled System and Method for Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 5

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 6 of 12 Retrieving Information From a Database Using an Index of XML Tags and Metafiles (the 434 Patent ); and United States Patent No. 7,757,298, entitled Method and Apparatus for Identifying and Characterizing Errant Electronic Files (the 298 Patent ) (collectively, the Patents-in-Suit ). 18. On February 11, 2003, the 581 Patent was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the 581 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 19. On April 8, 2003, the 002 Patent was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the 002 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 20. On January 21, 2003, the 434 Patent was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the 434 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 21. On July 13, 2010, the 298 Patent was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the 298 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 22. Intellectual Ventures I is the owner and assignee of all right, title, and interest in and to the 581, 434, and 298 Patents and holds the right to sue and recover damages for infringement thereof, including past damages. 23. Intellectual Ventures II is the owner and assignee of all right, title, and interest in and to the 002 Patent and holds the right to sue and recover damages for infringement thereof, including past damages. 24. Erie Indemnity Company ( Indemnity ) is a publicly-held Pennsylvania business corporation that is the managing attorney-in-fact for the subscribers (policyholders) at the Erie Insurance Exchange ( Exchange ). The Exchange is a subscriber-owned Pennsylvaniadomiciled reciprocal insurer that writes property and casualty insurance. Indemnity s primary function is to perform certain services for the Exchange relating to the sales, underwriting, and Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 6

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 7 of 12 issuance of policies on behalf of the Exchange. The property and casualty and life insurance operations are owned by the Exchange, and Indemnity functions as the management company. Indemnity, the Exchange, and its subsidiaries and affiliates, which include Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company, Erie Insurance Company, Erie Family Life Insurance Company, and Flagship City Insurance Company operate collectively as the Erie Insurance Group. 25. Defendants provide online services and other systems via electronic means, including, but not limited to, the web site https://www.erieinsurance.com. Additionally, Defendants use and maintain computer systems and software in the course of their business, including, but not limited to, the provision of online services. In connection with these online services and other systems, Defendants infringe one or more claims of the 581 Patent, the 434 Patent, the 002 Patent, and the 298 Patent. 26. On August 21, 2014 Intellectual Ventures notified Defendants via letter that it would commence the filing of this suit accusing Defendants of infringing the Patents-in-Suit. 27. As detailed in that letter, Intellectual Ventures contacted Defendants on numerous occasions beginning in June 2014. Defendants never responded to Intellectual Ventures licensing overtures, forcing the filing of this suit. 28. By the filing and serving of this Original Complaint for Patent Infringement, Intellectual Ventures has again given Defendants written notice of their infringement. COUNT I Infringement of the 581 Patent 29. The allegations of paragraphs 1 28 above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 30. Defendants have directly infringed and continue to infringe at least claim 1 of the 581 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a) by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell in Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 7

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 8 of 12 the United States, without Intellectual Ventures I s authority, their computer systems that use the patented systems and methods for configuration management. By way of example only and without limiting Intellectual Ventures I s claims to this specific example, Defendants implementation and use of its back-end configuration management and distribution software and services infringes at least claim 1 of the 581 Patent. 31. Intellectual Ventures I has been injured and seeks damages to adequately compensate it for Defendants infringement of the 581 Patent. Such damages should be no less than the amount of a reasonable royalty under 35 U.S.C. 284. 32. Defendants will continue to infringe the 581 Patent unless enjoined by this Court. Intellectual Ventures I therefore requests that this Court enter an order under 35 U.S.C. 283 preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendants from continuing to make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States the products and processes accused of infringing the 581 Patent and from further infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducing infringement of the 581 Patent. COUNT II Infringement of the 002 Patent 33. The allegations of paragraphs 1 28 above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 34. Erie Indemnity Company, Erie Insurance Exchange, Erie Insurance Company, Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company, and Flagship City Insurance Company have directly infringed and continue to infringe at least claim 9 of the 002 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a) by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, without Intellectual Ventures II s authority, their computer systems that use the patented systems and methods for displaying user-specific resources on a mobile interface. By way of example only Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 8

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 9 of 12 and without limiting Intellectual Ventures II s claims to this specific example, Defendants implementation and use of its ERIEmobile application infringes at least claim 11 of the 002 Patent. 35. Intellectual Ventures II has been injured and seeks damages to adequately compensate it for Defendants infringement of the 002 Patent. Such damages should be no less than the amount of a reasonable royalty under 35 U.S.C. 284. 36. Defendants will continue to infringe the 002 Patent unless enjoined by this Court. Intellectual Ventures II therefore requests that this Court enter an order under 35 U.S.C. 283 preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendants from continuing to make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States the products and processes accused of infringing the 002 Patent and from further infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducing infringement of the 002 Patent. COUNT III Infringement of the 434 Patent 37. The allegations of paragraphs 1 28 above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 38. Defendants have directly infringed and continue to infringe at least claim 9 of the 434 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a) by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, without Intellectual Ventures I s authority, their computer systems that use the patented systems and methods for searching databases with metafiles. By way of example only and without limiting Intellectual Ventures I s claims to this specific example, Defendants implementation and use of database services and systems that return information based on the content of metafiles infringes at least claims 1 and 7 of the 434 Patent. Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 9

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 10 of 12 39. Intellectual Ventures I has been injured and seeks damages to adequately compensate it for Defendants infringement of the 434 Patent. Such damages should be no less than the amount of a reasonable royalty under 35 U.S.C. 284. 40. Defendants will continue to infringe the 002 Patent unless enjoined by this Court. Intellectual Ventures I therefore requests that this Court enter an order under 35 U.S.C. 283 preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendants from continuing to make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States the products and processes accused of infringing the 434 Patent and from further infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducing infringement of the 434 Patent. COUNT IV Infringement of the 298 Patent 41. The allegations of paragraphs 1 28 above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 42. Defendants have directly infringed and continue to infringe at least claim 1 of the 298 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a) by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, without Intellectual Ventures I s authority, their computer systems that use the patented systems and methods for identifying and characterizing errant electronic files. By way of example only and without limiting Intellectual Ventures I s claims to this specific example, Defendants implementation and use of software and services that search and identify potentially malicious information infringes at least claim 1 of the 298 Patent. 43. Intellectual Ventures I has been injured and seeks damages to adequately compensate it for Defendants infringement of the 298 Patent. Such damages should be no less than the amount of a reasonable royalty under 35 U.S.C. 284. Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 10

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 11 of 12 44. Defendants will continue to infringe the 002 Patent unless enjoined by this Court. Intellectual Ventures I therefore requests that this Court enter an order under 35 U.S.C. 283 preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendants from continuing to make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States the products and processes accused of infringing the 298 Patent and from further infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducing infringement of the 298 Patent. JURY DEMAND 45. Plaintiffs request a jury trial of all issues triable of right by a jury. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Intellectual Ventures respectfully requests the following relief: a. A judgment in favor of Intellectual Ventures that each Defendant has infringed the 581, 434, 002, and 298 Patents, whether literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, as described herein; b. A judgment and order requiring each Defendant to pay Intellectual Ventures its damages, costs, expenses, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest for each Defendant s infringement of the 581, 434, 002, and 298 Patents as provided under 35 U.S.C. 284, including supplemental damages for any continuing post-verdict or post-judgment infringement with an accounting as needed; c. An order under 35 U.S.C. 283 preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendants from continuing to make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States the products and processes accused of infringing the Patents-in-Suit and from further infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducing infringement of the Patents-in-Suit; and d. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 11

Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 12 of 12 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Henry M. Sneath Henry M. Sneath, Esquire PA I.D. No. 40559 Robert L. Wagner, Esquire PA I.D. No. 308499 Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. Four Gateway Center 444 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1105 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (412) 288-4000 (412) 288-2405 FAX Derek Gilliand, Esquire (pro hac vice pending) Nix, Patterson & Roach, LLP 5215 N. O Connor Blvd., Suite 1900 Irving, TX 75039 Counsel for Plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC Original Complaint for Patent Infringement Page 12