OptiSystem applications: LIDAR systems design

Similar documents
OptiSystem applications: Digital modulation analysis (FSK)

Optical Coherent Receiver Analysis

Optical PLL for homodyne detection

OptiSystem applications: Digital modulation analysis (PSK)

Key Features for OptiSystem 12

Dual-frequency multifunction lidar

Key Features for OptiSystem 14

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF INTERSATELLITE OPTICAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION WITH MULTIPLE TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVERS

Receiver Signal to Noise Ratios for IPDA Lidars Using Sine-wave and Pulsed Laser Modulation and Direct Detections

OptiSystem-MATLAB data formats (Version 1.0)

Understanding the performance of atmospheric free-space laser communications systems using coherent detection

Key Features for OptiSystem 14.2

1. Explain how Doppler direction is identified with FMCW radar. Fig Block diagram of FM-CW radar. f b (up) = f r - f d. f b (down) = f r + f d

(All-Fiber) Coherent Detection Lidars 2

Theoretical Analysis of Random-Modulation Continuous Wave LIDAR

Implementation of Green radio communication networks applying radio-over-fibre (ROF) technology for wireless access

COHERENT DETECTION OPTICAL OFDM SYSTEM

Introduction. Laser Diodes. Chapter 12 Laser Communications

RF Basics 15/11/2013

LTE. Tester of laser range finders. Integrator Target slider. Transmitter channel. Receiver channel. Target slider Attenuator 2

Precise control of broadband frequency chirps using optoelectronic feedback

This article reports on

Translational Doppler detection using direct-detect chirped, amplitude-modulated laser radar

Underwater laser range finder

Receiver Signal to Noise Ratios for IPDA Lidars Using Sinewave and Pulsed Laser Modulation and Direct Detections

Phase Modulator for Higher Order Dispersion Compensation in Optical OFDM System

Performance Analysis Of Hybrid Optical OFDM System With High Order Dispersion Compensation

Continuous Wave Radar

Matlab component Creating a component to handle optical signals. OptiSystem Application Note

The secondary MZM used to modulate the quadrature phase carrier produces a phase shifted version:

A Parameterized Simulation of Doppler Lidar

OptiSPICE applications: Ring Resonator Gyroscope 22 February 2017 (Version 1.1) Cem Bonfil

LIGO Photodiode Development and Optical Platform for LIGO Photodetectors Testing

NON-AMPLIFIED PHOTODETECTOR USER S GUIDE

S.R.M Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed University) Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering

Performance Evaluation of Gbps (1.28 Tbps) FSO Link using RZ and NRZ Line Codes

Week 2 Lecture 1. Introduction to Communication Networks. Review: Analog and digital communications

Signal Characteristics

Lecture 6 SIGNAL PROCESSING. Radar Signal Processing Dr. Aamer Iqbal Bhatti. Dr. Aamer Iqbal Bhatti

IIIIIii tn _. Subcarrier-Multiplexed Coherent Optical Video Transmission Using Direct Frequency Modulation of Semiconductor Lasers

PHOTON COUNTING CHIRPED AM LADAR: CONCEPT, SIMULATION, AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

DC VI R 1 31D92t. e~~~ nr 71. !llll!llllllli1111ll QStanford

Range Dependent Turbulence Characterization by Co-operating Coherent Doppler Lidar with Direct Detection Lidar

EXAMINATION FOR THE DEGREE OF B.E. and M.E. Semester

Phase Noise measurements using Fiber Optic Delay Lines

The quality of the transmission signal The characteristics of the transmission medium. Some type of transmission medium is required for transmission:

NON-AMPLIFIED HIGH SPEED PHOTODETECTOR USER S GUIDE

Simultaneous Measurements for Tunable Laser Source Linewidth with Homodyne Detection

High range precision laser radar system using a Pockels cell and a quadrant photodiode

Light Polarized Coherent OFDM Free Space Optical System

o Conclusion and future work. 2

Code No: R Set No. 1

Technician License Course Chapter 3 Types of Radios and Radio Circuits. Module 7

Coherent power combination of two Masteroscillator-power-amplifier. semiconductor lasers using optical phase lock loops

Q.P. Code : [ TURN OVER]

S.R.M. Institute of Science & Technology School of Electronics & Communication Engineering

Opto-electronic Receivers

CHAPTER 13 TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS

BER Analysis for Synchronous All-Optical CDMA LANs with Modified Prime Codes

Chapter-15. Communication systems -1 mark Questions

Chapter 1. Overview. 1.1 Introduction

Local Oscillator Phase Noise and its effect on Receiver Performance C. John Grebenkemper

Phase-shift laser range finder based on high speed and high precision phase-measuring techniques

Theoretical and experimental signal-to-noise ratio assessment in new direction sensing continuouswave Doppler lidar

ECE5713 : Advanced Digital Communications

Technician License Course Chapter 3. Lesson Plan Module 7 Types of Radio Circuits

Development of a 1319-nm Laser Radar Using Fiber Optics and RF Pulse Compression

Setup of the four-wavelength Doppler lidar system with feedback controlled pulse shaping

Phase Noise Compensation for Coherent Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing in Optical Fiber Communications Systems

Agilent AN 1275 Automatic Frequency Settling Time Measurement Speeds Time-to-Market for RF Designs

Application of optical system simulation software in a fiber optic telecommunications program

Phase-Lock Techniques for Phase and Frequency Control of Semiconductor Lasers

Free Space Optical Communication System under all weather conditions using DWDM

a 1550nm telemeter for outdoor application based on off-the-shelf components

Comparison in Behavior of FSO System under Clear Weather and FOG Conditions

Theoretical Approach. Why do we need ultra short technology?? INTRODUCTION:

Simulation and Performance Analysis of Free Space Optical Systems using Multiple TX/RX and Polarized CO-OFDM techniques under Atmospheric Disturbances

Tutorials. OptiSys_Design. Optical Communication System Design Software. Version 1.0 for Windows 98/Me/2000 and Windows NT TM

Laser Beam Analysis Using Image Processing

Effects of Fading Channels on OFDM

EE3723 : Digital Communications

A 330 GHz active terahertz imaging system for hidden objects detection

Receiver optimization of FSO system with MIMO technique over log-normal channels

Performance Analysis of Inter-satellite

Amplified Photodetectors

GBT. LO Reference Distribution System. Maintenance Manual. M. J. Stennes September 15, 2004

Communication using Synchronization of Chaos in Semiconductor Lasers with optoelectronic feedback

Performance analysis of terrestrial WDM-FSO Link under Different Weather Channel

A CMOS Chip Set for Accurate Pulsed Time-of- Flight Laser Range Finding

Optical Wireless Communications

A NOVEL SCHEME FOR OPTICAL MILLIMETER WAVE GENERATION USING MZM

Active Stabilization of Multi-THz Bandwidth Chirp Lasers for Precision Metrology

Performance Evaluation of FSO Link Under NRZ-RZ Line Codes, Different Weather Conditions and Receiver Types in the Presence of Pointing Errors

Performance Analysis of dispersion compensation using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) in Optical Communication

How It Works The PPM Radio Control System: Part 1

interpolation and smoothing filter options. New graph display OFDM FFT of subcarrier indexes.

8.5 Modulation of Signals

Non-amplified Photodetectors

π code 0 Changchun,130000,China Key Laboratory of National Defense.Changchun,130000,China Keywords:DPSK; CSRZ; atmospheric channel

Timing and cross-talk properties of BURLE multi-channel MCP PMTs

Transcription:

OptiSystem applications: LIDAR systems design 7 Capella Court Nepean, ON, Canada K2E 7X1 +1 (613) 224-4700 www.optiwave.com 2009 Optiwave Systems, Inc.

Introduction Light detection and ranging (LIDAR) The following four example designs demonstrate how to simulate light detection and ranging systems (LIDAR) using OptiSystem, specifically: Laser pulse time of flight range measurement Phase-shift range measurement Frequency Modulation Continuous Wave (FMCW) range measurement with direct detection FMCW range measurement with coherent detection The reference project for this application note is: LIDAR system designs Version 1_0.osd. Example view of OptiSystem model for FMCW LIDAR using direct detection 2

Range measurement (Time of flight) (1) LIDAR design Using laser pulses, the time of flight range measurement method measures the time it takes for a transmitted pulse to travel from the transmit device to the target and back to the receiver. The range is then calculated from [1] where c is the speed of light. The received signal power is determined based on an extended target model and is calculated as follows [2] where P t is transmitted optical power, D is the receiver aperture diameter, ρ is the reflectivity of the target, τ atm is the atmospheric loss factor, τ opt is the optical transmission system loss factor and R is the target range To reliably determine the time trigger for the arriving pulse, the Constant Fraction Time Measurement [3] method is used (implemented with our Cpp Component). REF 1: Laser ranging: a critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement, Optical Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1. (2001), pp. 10-19 by Markus C. Amann, Thierry Bosch, Marc Lescure, Risto Myllylä, Marc Rioux REF 2: Ahmed H. Elghandour; Chen D. Ren; Modeling and comparative study of various detection techniques for FMCW LIDAR using OptiSystem, Proc. SPIE 8905, International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging 2013: Laser Sensing and Imaging and Applications, 890529 (September 19, 2013) REF 3: Fast-Timing Discriminator Introduction, Ortec Inc., http://www.orteconline.com/-/media/ametekortec/other/fast-timing-discriminatorintroduction.pdf?la=en (accessed 10 Feb 2017) Layout: Range finder (TofF) 3

Range measurement (Time of flight) (2) LIDAR design In the example below, a Gaussian pulse (Peak pulse time = 1 us) is transmitted optically and reflected from a virtual target (defined by the Free space channel model (Extended target)). After being subjected to attenuation and delay, the received signal is detected and post-processed by the Cpp Component Constant Fraction Time Measurement. The received pulse is time triggered at the time sample 6.02e-06 sec and in turn the range is found to be 751.27 m (compared to the global parameter range setting of 750 m). The sensitivity of the Constant Fraction Discriminator can be modified by changing the input parameters CFTDelay, CFTFraction, CFTNoiseThreshold. Global parameter settings for LIDAR system. The Constant Fraction Discriminator works by first making a copy of the received signal, inverting it, and applying a delay (CFTDelay). The original signal is then reduced in amplitude by the factor CFTFraction and summed with the copied signal waveform. An example of the output waveform is shown here. The zero-crossing point (from negative to positive) is then found and acts as the time trigger to determine the received pulse time. 4

Range measurement (Phase shift) LIDAR design Another way to measure the range of an object/target is with a phase-shift range finder. With this method, the optical source is modulated at specific frequency R f and transmitted towards the target. The reflected signal is then detected with a PIN photodiode followed by a heterodyne receiver. The phase shift resulting from the transmission of the optical signal ( φ), relative to the original reference signal, is then measured and used to calculate the range as follows [1]: To improve the accuracy of this system, the reference and received modulated signals can be mixed with a local oscillator R LO to down-convert the received waveform to a lower frequency (R LO R f ). These signals are then band-pass filtered (to reduce noise) and processed by a Phase Meter (using our programmable Cpp Component) REF 1: Laser ranging: a critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement, Optical Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1. (2001), pp. 10-19 by Markus C. Amann, Thierry Bosch, Marc Lescure, Risto Myllylä, Marc Rioux Layout: Range finder (Phase Shift) In this example the range has been calculated as 0.2012 m (compared to the global parameter setting of 0.2 m) 5

Range measurement (FMCW) LIDAR design The last method to be presented is the frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) LIDAR. Two models have been developed: FMCW LIDAR with Direct Detection and FMCW LIDAR with Coherent Detection. Both models work on the same principle. A frequency modulated optical transmitter is sent out towards the target and the reflected signal is detected (by a photodetector) and mixed with the original linear frequency modulated (LFM) signal. As the received signal is time-delayed, an intermediate frequency signal is produced. Using a frequency counter (implemented with our Cpp Component) the detected R f signal is measured and then used to calculate the range as follows [1]: where the RampPeriod is equal to the global parameter Time window and the DeltaFreq is equal to the parameter RFSweepBandwidth (set within the component parameters of the Subsystem RF LFM Waveform Generator) The only difference between both detection systems is that one uses square law detection whereas the other uses a coherent homodyne detector to recover the incoming optical signal before mixing (the latter thus provides a higher sensitivity as the detection process is shot-noise limited) REF: Ahmed H. Elghandour; Chen D. Ren; Modeling and comparative study of various detection techniques for FMCW LIDAR using OptiSystem, Proc. SPIE 8905, International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging 2013: Laser Sensing and Imaging and Applications, 890529 (September 19, 2013) Layout: FMCW Coherent Detection In this example the range has been calculated as 749 m (compared to the global parameter setting of 750 m) Received electrical spectrum. The peak is the intermediate frequency signal resulting from the mixing between the reference and received FM waveforms 6