Minimum Requirements for Digital Radiography Equipment and Measurement Procedures by Different Industries and Standard Organizations

Similar documents
Film Replacement in Radiographic Weld Inspection The New ISO Standard

Essential Parameters for the Visibility of IQIs and Small Indications in Digital Radiography

Minimum Requirements for Digital Radiography Equipment and Measurement Procedures by Different Industries and Standard Organizations

Essential Parameters and Conditions for Optimum Image Quality in Digital Radiology

Computed Radiography

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Strategies for Film Replacement in Radiography - a comparative study -

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF DIGITAL DETECTOR SYSTEMS FOR HIGH ENERGY APPLICATIONS

» There are many possible techniques for making good radiographs. » Following a defined procedure will simplify technique

Pre Conference Workshop on Advanced Digital imaging

Dürr NDT GmbH & Co. KG Höpfigheimer Straße 22 D Bietigheim-Bissingen Germany. Contract No. BAM ZBA Dürr

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Non-destructive testing of welds Radiographic testing Part 2: X- and gamma-ray techniques with digital detectors

Equivalent Penetrameter Sensitivity (EPS) for Performance Evaluation of Computed Radiography Systems Muzibur Khan * and Mike Brothers

Dürr NDT GmbH & Co. KG Höpfigheimer Straße 22 D Bietigheim-Bissingen Germany. Contract No. BAM ZBA Dürr

Migrating from traditional to Digital Radiography in Aerospace

Performance evaluation of a photon counting detector for high energy NDT applications

Digital Radiography : Flat Panel

APPLICATION OF THE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN WELD INSPECTION OF GAS AND OIL PIPELINES

Experiences of users in Digital Radiography

Moving from film to digital: A study of digital x-ray benefits, challenges and best practices

The HOIS recommended practice for in-service computed radiography of pipes. Dr Stephen F Burch, WCNDT 2012, Durban, SA. April 2012

Recommended Training Curriculum For Digital Radiography Personnel (Level II)

Conversion to Digital Radiography from Film Radiography

Digital Radiology with Photon Counting Detectors

The HOIS recommended practice for in-service computed radiography of pipes

Fig.2: Scanner VistaScan for image plates

ON THE WAY TO DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Non-destructive testing of welds Radiographic testing Part 1: X- and gamma-ray techniques with film

In-service inspections for primary coolant circuit components of light water reactors Part 6: Radiographic testing

THE CR SPECIALISTS HD-CR CR 35 NDT

Guidelines on Training, Examination and Certification in Digital Industrial Radiology Testing (RT-D)

PERFORMANCE CHARACTERIZATION OF AMORPHOUS SILICON DIGITAL DETECTOR ARRAYS FOR GAMMA RADIOGRAPHY

Engineering Policy & Procedure

UNDERSTANDING THE CURRENT CAPABILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF DIGITAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY

Amorphous Selenium Direct Radiography for Industrial Imaging

5th Pan American Conference for NDT 2-6 October 2011, Cancun, Mexico

Digital Detector Array Image Quality for Various GOS Scintillators

IQI-Sensitivity and Applications of Flat Panel Detectors and X-Ray Image Intensifiers A Comparison

Investigation of the film Kodak MX 125 in Agfa NDT S eco processing

Spokane Industries Computed Radiography Implementation Experience. David Jolin Technical Sales

AUTOMATED AND QUANTITATIVE METHOD FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IMAGING SYSTEMS

17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Oct 2008, Shanghai, China

Preliminary Modulation Transfer Function Study on Amorphous Silicon Flat Panel System for Industrial Digital Radiography

Digital Radiographic Inspection replacing traditional RT and 3D RT Development

Research Article Digital Radiography Using Digital Detector Arrays Fulfills Critical Applications for Offshore Pipelines

Photon Counting and Energy Discriminating X-Ray Detectors - Benefits and Applications

A Modified Detectability Criterion for Conventional Radiography Simulation

ScienceDirect. Evaluation of Pipe Wall Thickness Based on Contrast Measurement using Computed Radiography (CR)

COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY THE STATE OF THE ART

DOSE REDUCTION BY USE OF DIGITAL X-RAY DETECTORS. Bernhard REDMER

PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND EFFECTS OF METALLIC SCREEN FLUORESCENCE AND BACKSCATTER CONTROL IN GAMMA COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY

NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION UTILIZING IMAGING PLATES FOR FIELD RADIOGRAPHY APPLICATIONS

Gamex CR 2.0 Program description and operating manual

Radiology Physics Lectures: Digital Radiography. Digital Radiography. D. J. Hall, Ph.D. x20893

Any question concerning this ballot item should be addressed to Cliff Bueno at or

Digital Radiography for the Inspection of Small Defects

NAVSEA Requirements for Computed Radiography DRAFT

10/3/2012. Study Harder

Part 3: Image quality classes

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Non-destructive testing of welds Radiographic testing of fusionwelded

Projection Radiography. application on stream

10/26/2015. Study Harder

A TUTORIAL FOR PERFORMING A RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION

Investigation of the film FUJIFILM IX 80 in TETENAL machine processing

Tomographic 3D-Radiometry for the Visualisation and Measurement of the Defects of Girth Seams

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Examination of Pipe Welds by Image Plate Based Computed Radiography System

Radiographic testing: Increased detection sensitivity using optimum source to object distance

Advancements In Digital Radiography: CR, DR, and DICONDE

SINCE2011 Singapore International NDT Conference & Exhibition, 3-4 November 2011

Gamex Lite 3.0 Program description and operating manual

Digital Radiography Systems Techniques and Performance Evaluation for Space Applications

Radiographic Testing (RT) [10]

Introduction. Chapter 16 Diagnostic Radiology. Primary radiological image. Primary radiological image

NEW POSSIBILITIES OF RADIATION CONTROL OF QUALITY OF WELDED JOINTS

Determination of Optimum X-Ray Tube Output Parameters kv and ma for Digital Radiography Testing of Welded Tubes

Production of HPDs for the LHCb RICH Detectors

Non-destructive testing Image quality of radiographs. Part 2: Determination of the image quality value using step/hole-type image quality indicators

UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGES IN THE TRANSITION FROM FILM TO DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN THE NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY

Digital Imaging Considerations Computed Radiography

FOCUS. Digital Radiography in Industry: Digital Detector Arrays in Radiographic Testing. Introduction. Definitions. by Brad Kraai

COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY CHAPTER 4 EFFECTIVE USE OF CR

Ray Detection Digital Image Quality and Influential Factors

DISC QC/QA Program for Digital Imaging Systems using the DR Radchex Plus Meter

CR Basics and FAQ. Overview. Historical Perspective

7/24/2014. Image Quality for the Radiation Oncology Physicist: Review of the Fundamentals and Implementation. Disclosures. Outline

DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY. Digital radiography is a film-less technology used to record radiographic images.

Digital Industrial Radiography

SYLLABUS. TITLE: Equipment Operation I. DEPARTMENT: Radiologic Technology

SECTION I - CHAPTER 2 DIGITAL IMAGING PROCESSING CONCEPTS

Standard Test Method for Radiographic Examination of Metallic Castings 1

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them?

NDT Supply.com 7952 Nieman Road Lenexa, KS USA

RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

Unit thickness. Unit area. σ = NΔX = ΔI / I 0

Acquisition, Processing and Display

Digital Profile Radiography Practical uses and limitations

HPX1-Plus. For Non-Destructive Testing. THE BENCHMARK IN COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY.

Standard Practice for Qualification of Radioscopic Systems 1

Hardware for High Energy Applications 30 October 2009

Transcription:

uwe.ewert@bam.de Minimum Requirements for Digital Radiography Equipment and Measurement Procedures by Different Industries and Standard Organizations Uwe Ewert and Uwe Zscherpel BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany 1

Introduction - Film Radiography has been developed for quality assurance in industry over decades. - It is basis for contractual agreements of Supplier and Purchaser. - Digital Radiography shall achieve the same image quality or better, but with higher efficiency. - Selected image quality requirements of different standards as ASTM, ASME and ISO are compared. - The essential parameters for optimization and prediction of IQI visibility are discussed. - Requirements for equipment selection are derived for CR and DDAs. - Newly developed classification procedures for RT-D equipment are introduced. 2

Basic Requirements in Radiography Requirement Film Digital Standards Exposure Detector requirements Maximum image unsharpness Image quality ISO, CEN, ASTM, ASME Exceed minimum optical density Use required film system class or better Do not exceed the geometrical unsharpness limits Achieve required IQI contrast sensitivity ISO, CEN Exceed minimum required SNR N (Normalized Signal to Noise Ratio) Use detectors which achieve the required SNR N and do not exceed the detector unsharpness limit Do not exceed the image unsharpness limits Achieve IQI contrast sensitivity + duplex wire resolution 3 ASTM, ASME, MAI DDAs: Exceed minimum required CNR CR: expose to EPS plateau (MAI) Do not exceed image unsharpness limits Do not exceed the image unsharpness limits Achieve required IQI contrast sensitivity

Key Technologies for Film Replacement Computed Radiography (CR) with storage phosphor imaging plates Digital Detector Arrays (DDA) CR DDA 4

Image Quality in Radiography - Influence of SNR and CNR - Intensity Signal (base material) Contrast Intensity Signal (base material) Contrast Notch visible! Contrast/Noise is high Signal/Noise is high Length Notch not visible! Contrast/Noise is low Signal/Noise is low 5 Length Notch is visible in the profile if C > 2.5 Noise

Noise Sources in Radiographic Images Typical noise sources in digital radiography: 1. EXPOSURE CONDITIONS: Photon noise, depending on exposure dose (e.g. ma s or GBq min). This is the main factor! SNR increases with higher exposure dose. 2. Limitation for the maximum achievable SNR: 1. DETECTOR: Structural noise of DDAs and Imaging Plates also called fixed pattern noise (due to variations in pixel to pixel response and inhomogeneities in the phosphor layer). 2. OBJECT: 1. Crystalline structure of material (e.g. nickel based steel, mottling) 2. Surface roughness of test object 6

Measurement of Contrast to Noise Ratio in DDA Practice by ASTM E 2698 Noise I=contrast CNR shall be measured in the 4T hole for proof of image quality. A minimum CNR of 2.5 is required by ASTM E 2698. This value needs to be revised! ASTM E 1025 I CNR = 6.7 C = I = 473 Noise = 71 SNR = 155 7

Human Observer Model: Perception Threshold PT 50 µm pixel size Diameter 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 mm Flat bottom holes of different depth and diameter SR b image = 50 µm Noise = 1000 Signal = 30000 CNR = 2.5 d - diameter of hole CNR = 1.25 CNR = 0.625 ASTM E 2698 requires CNR > 2.5 Needs revision! Large area flaws are better visible than small ones at same Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Each row has indications with same CNR = C depth / Each column has holes with same diameter PT const d SR b Rose approach, 1946 CNR PT const - constant human perception threshold 10 d diameter of just visible hole CNR - contrast to noise ratio SR b basic spatial resolution (effective pixel size) 8

System Selection for ASTM Standard Practice ASTM Draft, Practice for the Use of Digital Detector Arrays and Computed Radiology for Aerospace Casting Inspections requires a minimum basic spatial resolution of the detector (SR b detector ) if images have been taken without magnification or a minimum basic spatial resolution in the magnified image SR b image ). image Effective pixel size of digital image ( SR b ) 9 9

Verification of CNR min for ASTM Standard Practice ASTM Draft, Practice for the Use of Digital Detector Arrays and Computed Radiology for Aerospace Casting Inspections and E 2698 Standard Practice for Radiological Examination Using Digital Detector Arrays require for digital images with DDAs in the 2T IQI hole: CNR min 2.5 The ASTM E 2698 value (CNR = 2.5) is optimized for testing of thin objects with thickness < ½ and typical DDAs in the range of 0.1 mm < SR b < 130 µm. Generally, CNR min for all digital images can be described more accurate by the equation: image SRb CNR 10 min diameteriqi hole Based on old Rose equation as shown before for PT constant 10

Contrast Sensitivity as Required by Different Standards Almost all standards require image quality indicators on each production radiograph. The operator has to evaluate if the required image quality has been achieved. He decides about acceptance or rejection of the production radiographs. Different international standards require different contrast sensitivities, which yields different inspection quality. The thickness sensitivity improves with material thickness. 11

Basic Requirements for IQI Visibility of International Standards in Comparison ISO 19232-3 Step Holes, ISO 17636-2, 2013 Plate Holes, ASME BPVC SC V Ar. 2 Plate Holes, ASTM E 1742, E 2104 ASME BPVC SC V, Ar. 2, and ISO 17636-class A are about equivalent ASTM E1742, E 2104, ISO 17636-class B are about equivalent below t=12 mm (1/2 ) ASTM E 1025 ISO 19232-2 12

Additional Requirements for Unsharpness and Basic Spatial Resolution In all film radiography standards the permitted geometric unsharpness (U g ) is limited and the film unsharpness is neglected. In digital radiography the detector unsharpness (U detector ) contributes significantly to the image unsharpness (U im ) or total unsharpness (U T ). Therefore, the permitted detector unsharpness (U detector ) is limited in different standard systems, which is relevant for detector selection. The detector unsharpness shall be always smaller than the permitted geometric unsharpness (U detector < U g ). The basic spatial resolution is defined as ½ unsharpness in digital radiography (SR b = ½ U). 13

Measurement of Basic Spatial Resolution Duplex wire IQI ISO 19232-5 ASTM E 2002 ASTM E 2002 Two new wire pairs The detector unsharpness u detector shall be controlled by reference exposures with the duplex wire IQI. Duplex Wire IQI, 90 kv, 1m SDD, small focus 14

Standard ISO 17636-2 (2013): Table B.13, B.14 Maximum detector or image unsharpness (2 SR b ) DDA CR 15

Unsharpness Requirements of Different International Standards No International Harmonization - Unsharpness requirements 0,08 0,07 E 1030, 1032 Unsharpness in inch 0,06 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,01 E 1742 E 1030 (2004) MAI E 2104 ISO 17636 class A ISO 17636 class B 0,00 0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 Thickness in inch Co-60, High Energy 16

Unsharpness Requirements in Different Int. Standards 17

EPS= equivalent penetrameter sensitivity (see ASTM E 746, E 747, E 1025) EPS Procedure is proposed accepted for CR qualification in ASTM E 20445/6 draft and the draft on Practice for the Use of Computed Radiology for Aerospace Casting Inspections (USA: MAI group) - The EPS (equivalent penetrameter sensitivity) measurement is based on ASTM E 746 A smooth ¾ inch (19 mm) steel plate with a set of plate holes is radiographed at 200 kv in 1 m distance The exposure is performed with different mas settings A graph is generated, see next pages The calculation of just visible hole diameter is given by: d visible PT New formula Qualification of CR-Systems - The EPS Concept - image SRb SNR eff ASTM E 746 PT depends slightly on operator and viewing conditions µ eff for 200 kv and 19 mm Fe is about 0,05 mm -1 18

Example: EPS Test with HD CR Scanner at 20 µm Pixel Size Do you see the holes? ¾ (19 mm) steel plate, 200 kv 1 mm steel step for measurement of µ eff CNR 0.8 19

Visibility of EPS holes (E 746) Do you see the holes? CNR 0.8 20

New Formula for Conversion of SNR N Measurements to EPS Values and Working Range for CR (ASTM Draft E 2033) PT is about 2 100 for visibility of the 2 T hole of IQIs corr. to ASTM E 1025 EPS by ASTM E 746 with 200 kv, t = 19 mm Fe plate and µ eff = 0.05 mm -1 EPS method for determination of performance levels Measured EPS,IP 1, Scanner 2 Best fit Level I level II 2,6 2,4 2,2 140 EPS PT' t testplate image SRb µ SNR eff EPS 2 1,8 350 Level II: PV 140 4095 1,6 1,4 1,2 Level I: PV 350 4095 aeps = 1.16 206 Dose / mgy EPS= equivalent penetrameter sensitivity (see ASTM E 746, E 747, E 1025) 1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 450 Plateau range Pixel value 90% PVmax 0 23 46 69 91 114 137 160 183 21

Old CR Classification Scheme System class CEN Minimum normalised SNR IP 1/Y 130 IP 2/Y 117 IP 3/Y 78 IP 4/Y 65 IP 5/Y 52 IP 6/Y 43 Note 1: The normalized SNR values of Table 1 are similar to those of EN 584-1. They are calculated by SNR= log(e) (Gradient/Granularity) of Table 1 in EN 584-1. The measured SNR values are calculated from linearised signal data. Classification scheme of ASTM; e 2446, EN 14784-1 and ISO 16371-1 by system classes. The CR systems are classified by the maximum achievable SNR N (IP 1 6) and the basic spatial detector resolution SR b detector (Y). 22

New CR Classification Scheme New classification by performance levels as given in the draft revision of ASTM E 2446 (2014). Additionally, a specified EPS performance is required. CR System Classification Minimum SNR N (normalized to SR b =88.6 µm) Maximum isr b detector value [µm] CR Special 200 50 1.00 CR Level I 100 100 1.41 CR Level II 70 160 1.66 CR Level III 50 200 1.92 Maximum achieved EPS by E 746 [%] 23

Qualification Spidernet Graph and Classification Statement Qualification of CR System XY Interpolated SR b detector for E 2795, ISO 17636-2 users SRbdetector = 145µm Achievable SNR N for ISO 17636-2 user asnrn = 88 Speed as defined for film ISO Speed@SNRN130 = 400 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Csa = 0,8 aeps@mag 1 = 1,65 Achievable CS for E 2597 user Achievable EPS Specific for CR Performance level II Efficiency@1mGy = 115 Efficiency as defined for DDAs in E 2597 24

New Qualification Procedures Required Test for ASTM E 2445/2446 Required Result Geometric Distortion Fail if distortion > 2% Laser Jitter Not permitted, Laser Beam Scan Line Integrity Not permitted Scan column dropout Not permitted Scanner Slippage Not permitted Imaging plate Artifacts Not permitted Erasure Fail if > 2% Shading or banding Fail if more than ±10% Test results shall be reported, Result to report classification is possible in case of exceeding the limits PMT Non-linearity Report if > 2% Burn-In Report if > 2% Spatial Linearity <2% Imaging plate response variation Report if > ±10% Optional test on request Result to report Imaging Plate Fading (no test object required), optional test Report fading in %, 25

Requirements for Digital Detector Arrays DDA Qualification by ASTM E 2597M 26

BAM 5, 8mm steel FujiFilm IX25 SNRN ~ 265 DDA Technology provides better image quality than film with a special calibration procedure! Best (slowest) NDT film Images high pass filtered for better presentation Radiological DDA exposure 8.3 PerkinElmer 1620 SNRN ~ 1500 Magn. = 3.5 27

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - Management of Underperforming Pixels - A bad pixel can be corrected if it has at least 5 good neighbors ASTM E 2597M Definition and Test of Bad Pixels: 6.2.1.1 Dead Pixel 6.2.1.2 Over Responding Pixel 6.2.1.3 Under Responding Pixel 6.2.1.4 Noisy Pixel 6.2.1.5 Non-Uniform Pixel 6.2.1.6 Persistence/Lag Pixel 6.2.1.7 Bad Neighborhood Pixel 6.2.2 Types or Groups of Bad Pixels: 28 6.2.2.1 Single Bad Pixel 6.2.2.2 Cluster of Bad Pixels 6.2.2.3 A cluster without any CKP is well correctable. 6.2.2.4 A cluster with CKP is labeled a relevant cluster. 6.2.2.5 A single bad line segment is a special irrelevant cluster.

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - Pixel Coverage Recommendations - ASTM E 2736 29

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - Management of Underperforming Pixels - ASTM E 2736 Compensation Principles 30

Compensation Principle (II) of ISO 17636-2 Compensation of high detector unsharpness by increased SNR Unsharp digital systems may be applied for NDT if they enable to compensate the missing sharpness by increased SNR. That means, achieves a digital system not the required visibility of the separated duplex wires, it can be used for NDT, if one or two single wires more than required (see tables B.1 B.12 of ISO/DIS 17636-2) can be seen clearly in the digital image for one or two missing duplex wire pairs. Compensation of 3 wires vs. wire pairs requires agreement of contracting parties. Compensation principle (II): High detector unsharpness can be compensated by increased SNR 31 31

Example : Compensation Principle (II) of ISO 17636-2 Interesting for detectors with higher unsharpness Compensate missing spatial resolution by increased single wire sensitivity: A lower spatial resolution i.e. a lower double wire score (D) may be compensated by a higher single wire sensitivity i.e. higher single wire score (W). Max. two (or three) single/double wire scores may be exchanged. Duplex wire score Single wire score Not OK D13 W13 Required: D12 W14 OK: D11 W15 OK D10 W16 OK by agreement D9 W17 32

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - Efficiency Measurement - 120 kv, 40 mm Al 90 kv 160 kv 120 kv, 3 mm Cu 50 kv 220 kv, 40 mm Al Qualification by ASTM E 2597M 33

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - Image Lag - Qualification by ASTM E 2597M Important for CT and fast measurements as e.g. automated defect recognition (ADR). 34

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - Contrast Sensitivity by CNR-Step Wedge Measurement - Qualification by ASTM E 2597M Step wedge with notch Measure contrast and noise per step Contrast sensitivity (CA) at 5% notch in a step wedge by 1/CNR 35

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - Contrast Sensitivity by CNR-Step Wedge Measurement - Qualification by ASTM E 2597M Working range (4s) 36

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays - SMTR by SNR-Step Wedge Measurement - Qualification by ASTM E 2597M SNR = 250 SNR = 130 Specific Material Thickness Range by SNR limits Qualification by ASTM E 2597M 37

Qualification of Digital Detector Arrays DDAs are qualified by different tests of ASTM E 2597. Five relevant parameters shall be provided: Basic spatial resolution (SRb) Specific Material Thickness Range Efficiency Qualification by ASTM E 2597M Image lag Contrast sensitivity 38 38

Conclusions Replacement of film radiography by digital techniques in NDT requires careful selection of suitable digital detectors. Standards on digital radiography were published and revised since 2005 in ISO, CEN, ASTM and ASME, defining requirements for image quality and detector selection. International standards define different requirements for image quality and detector selection. The image quality depends on the essential parameters: specific contrast µ eff, SNR and basic spatial resolution SR b. CR is accepted as film replacement technology: The prove of image quality requires SNR N measurements and IQI visibility (ISO 17636-2). CR classification and qualification is under major revision. Classification will consider SNR N, SR detector b and EPS DDAs achieve a significantly better contrast sensitivity with suitable detector calibration than film radiography. The prove of image quality requires CNR measurements and IQI visibility (ASTM practice E 2798). DDAs are qualified by different but similar procedures than CR systems, because the DDA detector calibration and image integration influences seriously the qualification, and DDAs provide currently better image quality than CR. 39

End uwe.ewert@bam.de 40