A Failure Analysis of the ExoCube CubSat. 13 th Annual Cubesat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA Wednesday, April 20 th, 2016

Similar documents
RAX: The Radio Aurora explorer

The Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE) On-Orbit Performance

NanoSwarm: CubeSats Enabling a Discovery Class Mission Jordi Puig-Suari Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems

RAX: Lessons Learned in Our Spaceflight Endeavor

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Update Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

CubeSat Design Specification

Miniaturized Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer for CubeSat Atmospheric Measurements

The NSF Cubesat Program

Strategies for Successful CubeSat Development. Jordi Puig-Suari Aerospace Engineering Department Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo CEDAR Workshop July, 2009

Proximity Operations Nano-Satellite Flight Demonstration (PONSFD) Overview

Improving Receive Sensitivity of the CPX Bus

DYNAMIC IONOSPHERE CUBESAT EXPERIMENT

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

Poly Picosatellite Orbital Deployer Mk. III Rev. E User Guide

The M-Cubed/COVE Mission

Interplanetary CubeSat Launch Opportunities and Payload Accommodations

DICE CubeSat Mission. Spring 2011 CubeSat Workshop April 20, 2011 Erik Stromberg,

David M. Klumpar Keith W. Mashburn Space Science and Engineering Laboratory Montana State University

CubeSat Test Pod User s Guide Revision IV June, 2005

Self-Steering Antennas for CubeSat Networks

NASA ELaNa IV Launch

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Vehicle Avionics and Design

CubeSats: From Launch to Deployment Necessity for a standard.

The Evolution of Nano-Satellite Proximity Operations In-Space Inspection Workshop 2017

UCISAT-1. Current Completed Model. Former Manufactured Prototype

Innovative Uses of the Canisterized Satellite Dispenser (CSD)

Amateur Radio and the CubeSat Community

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

The Future of CubeSat Communications: Transitioning Away from Amateur Radio Frequencies for High-speed Downlinks

Highly-Integrated Design Approach for High-Performance CubeSats

GEM - Generic Engineering Model Overview

KUTESat. Pathfinder. Presented by: Marco Villa KUTESat Project Manager. Kansas Universities Technology Evaluation Satellite

2013 RockSat-C Preliminary Design Review

Interplanetary CubeSats mission for space weather evaluations and technology demonstration

CubeSat High-Speed Downlink Communications (CHDC) Update

The Future for CubeSats Present and Coming Launch Opportunities 18th Annual AIAA / USU Conference on Small Satellites CubeSat Workshop

The Use of SPARK in a Complex Spacecraft CubeSat Developer s Workshop - Copyright 2017 Carl Brandon & Peter Chapin

ELaNa Educational Launch of Nanosatellite Enhance Education through Space Flight

PolySat Launch and Operations

CubeSat Standard Updates

GSAW 2014 Session 11C Current and Future Ground Systems for CubeSats Working Group

On Discriminating CubeSats Launched Together

AMSAT Fox Satellite Program

Integration and Test of the Microwave Radiometer Technology Acceleration (MiRaTA) CubeSat

NCUBE: The first Norwegian Student Satellite. Presenters on the AAIA/USU SmallSat: Åge-Raymond Riise Eystein Sæther

Lessons Learned from the US Air Force SENSE CubeSat Mission

Developing and Distributing a CubeSat Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Reference Model Interim Status

IT-SPINS Ionospheric Imaging Mission

6U CubeSat Design Specification Revision 1.0

ELaNa Educational Launch of Nanosatellite Providing Routine RideShare Opportunities

ncube Spacecraft Specification Document

The NaoSat nanosatellite platform for in-flight radiation testing. Jose A Carrasco CEO EMXYS Spain

Revision C June 5, Author: Ryan Connolly

Dr. Carl Brandon & Dr. Peter Chapin Vermont Technical College (Brandon),

An Overview of the Recent Progress of UCF s CubeSat Program

KySat-2: Status Report and Overview of C&DH and Communications Systems Design

University Nanosat Program

Rocket Lab Rideshare CubeSat Launch in Maxwell

From the Delfi-C3 nano-satellite towards the Delfi-n3Xt nano-satellite

The FASTRAC Satellites

A CubeSat Radio Beacon Experiment

Pico-Satellite Training Kit HEPTA-Sat: Hands-on Practices for Space Engineering

Sensor & Actuator. Bus system and Mission system

University of Kentucky Space Systems Laboratory. Jason Rexroat Space Systems Laboratory University of Kentucky

Launch Service 101: Managing a 101 CubeSat Launch Manifest on PSLV-C37

CubeSat Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Reference Model - Development and Distribution Interim Status #3

Microwave Radiometers for Small Satellites

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW

Miniature Deployable High Gain Antenna for CubeSats

GEM Student Tutorial: Cubesats. Alex Crew

Peregrine: A deployable solar imaging CubeSat mission

The results of Small Satellite technology transfer from JAXA

Small Satellites: The Execution and Launch of a GPS Radio Occultation Instrument in a 6U Nanosatellite

GeneSat-1 Quick Look Mission Report

Tropnet: The First Large Small-Satellite Mission

CubeSat-Scale Hyperspectral Imager for Middle Atmosphere Investigations

Bistatic Radar Receiver for CubeSats: The RAX Payload

Lessons learned measuring 3U and 6U payload rotation and velocity when dispensed in reduced gravity environment

Developing and Distributing a Model-Based Systems Engineering(MBSE) CubeSat Reference Model Status

Brazilian Inter-University CubeSat Mission Overview

Miniaturized In-Situ Plasma Sensors Applications for NSF Small Satellite program. Dr. Geoff McHarg

Drag and Atmospheric Neutral Density Explorer

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

A Scalable Deployable High Gain Reflectarray Antenna - DaHGR

MISSION OPERATION FOR THE KUMU A`O CUBESAT. Zachary K. Lee-Ho Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI 96822

Lituanica SAT-1. AMSAT-UK Colloquium July, Gintautas Sulskus AMSAT-UK International Space Colloquium July, 2014

YamSat. YamSat Introduction. YamSat Team Albert Lin (NSPO) Yamsat website

Coach Class to Orbit: the NPS CubeSat Launcher

An Information Session on Canadian Cubesat Project

HYDROS Development of a CubeSat Water Electrolysis Propulsion System

Presentation of the Xatcobeo project XAT PRE-012-UVIGO.INTA

KySat1 Mission Review

ARMADILLO: Subsystem Booklet

How Software Errors Contribute to Satellite Failures -

USNA-0601 ParkinsonSAT Remote Data Relay (Psat) Cubesat Conference Aug 2012

Picture of Team. Bryce Walker. Charles Swenson. Alex Christensen. Jackson Pontsler. Erik Stromberg. Cody Palmer. Benjamin Maxfield.

10 August 2005 Utah State University Logan, UT

INSPIRE: Interplanetary NanoSpacecraft Pathfinder In Relevant Environment

SNIPE mission for Space Weather Research. CubeSat Developers Workshop 2017 Jaejin Lee (KASI)

Transcription:

A Failure Analysis of the ExoCube CubSat 13 th Annual Cubesat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA Wednesday, April 20 th, 2016 1

Background To characterize Hydrogen, Helium, Nitrogen and Oxygen, ions and neutrals in the Exosphere. Also measure total ion density above ground stations, and Incoherent Scatter Radar (ISR) stations. Collaboration between Scientific Solutions, University of Wisconsin in Madison, the University of Illinois, Cal Poly and Funded by the NSF. Mass Spectrometer built by NASA Goddard Launched aboard a Delta II on the NASA SMAP mission on January 31, 2015. 2

ExoCube Anomaly Investigation Team Anomaly Investigation Panel John Noto (Scientific Solutions) Rick Doe (SRI) John Bellardo (Cal Poly) James Cutler (umich) Scott Higginbotham (NASA) Robert Kerr (Scientific Solutions) Jordi Puig-Suari (Cal Poly, Tyvak) David Hinkley (Aerospace)* Support Jerry Fuller (Aerospace) Alex Saunders (Cal Poly) * chairman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/exocube_(cp-10) Launched Jan 31, 2015 Last heard from August 7, 2015 3

Failure Review Process Steps Establish a set of failure modes Develop a fishbone and investigation plan Coordinate a plan among personnel to implement root cause analysis Establish a battle rhythm and communications protocol (e.g.: tag-ups, telecons) 4

Failure Modes Antenna did not deploy One of gravity gradient booms did not deploy Radio stopped working 6 months after start of mission 5

Anomaly #1: RF Antenna Deploy Anomaly Description Description: RF antenna did not deploy Evidence: Gain insufficient without 150 diameter SRI dish or NASA Wallops facilities to talk to satellite - using larger dish, satellite behaved nominally. List and timeline of relevant on-orbit events : Date: 2/1/2014 Observation: Weak signal from ExoCube 6

Fishbone Diagram Operations failure Solar event Commanding Assembly workmanship attery Capacity/ Charge State Command not received Command not executed Device wiring failed due to launch Heating wire burned out before actuating Wiring to device is broken Temperature outside of operational range Radiation total Dose Analog failure Digital failure Environmental Telemetry (analog monitors) Anomaly Bone Closed Testing complete; Unable to close but deemed improbable Candidate Contributor Confirmed Contributor 7

Anomaly #1: RF Antenna Deploy Pictures of Hardware Matching Board And Burn Wire Antenna Route 8

Anomaly #1: RF Antenna Deploy Fault Response of the Burn-circuit IC Fault line - Active Low Fault Occurs When: Overcurrent - Over 928.4mA Over temperature - Over 135 Reverse Voltage Over 190mV Prevents false reports with an internal delay deglitch circuit Telemetry Output - First number is the number of times a burn was stopped, and the second is number of times a burn was initiated. Feb 10 2015: 3 9 Feb 12 2015: 5 11 Feb 23 2015: 5 11 Command was issued 9

Anomaly #1: RF Antenna Deploy Telemetry Evidence Antenna deployment draws approximately 1 A of current However, no large current draw events seen in the first month Current did not flow when commanded 10

Anomaly #1: RF Antenna Deploy Fishbone Diagram Operations failure Solar event Commanding Assembly workmanship attery Capacity/ Charge State Heating wire burned out before actuating Wiring to device is broken Command not received Command not executed Temperature outside of operational range Radiation total Dose Device wiring failed due to launch Analog failure Digital failure Environmental Telemetry (analog monitors) Anomaly Bone Closed Testing complete; Unable to close but deemed improbable Candidate Contributor Confirmed Contributor Likely that burn wire electrical path broke (burn wire itself or wires leading to it) 11

Anomaly #1: RF Antenna Deploy Evidence for Bone Closure Operations Failure Battery Charge State Closed by showing that battery voltage was in the nominal range during deployment times. Analog Failure Heating Wire Burned Out Possible contender since no current was flowing through the burn wire. Wiring to Device is Broken Possible contender vibrations could have disconnected the wire leading to the burn element. 12

Anomaly #1: RF Antenna Deploy Evidence for Bone Closure Commanding Command not Received, or not Executed Closed by viewing telemetry showing total number of completed burn commands. Environmental Temperature Outside of Operational Ranges Deemed not probable since command executed and satellites temperature was not out of nominal range Radiation Dose Closed considering EXOCUBE was only in orbit a few days before deployment was commanded, hard to test. Assembly Workmanship Device wiring failed due to launch. Possible that wire to heating element solder joints could have broken. 13

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Anomaly Description Description: One out of two booms did not deploy Evidence: Boom magnetometer readings did not align with spacecraft navigation magnetometer readings List and timeline of relevant on-orbit events : Date: July 20th 2015 Observation: Extra Current draw indicating burn Date: July 27th 2015 Observation: Mag boom data indicates one deployed 14

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Magnetometer readings Pre: Y, B1, B2 (Dark Blue, Red, Green respectively) Values do not line up. Post: Y, B1, B2 (Violet, Light Blue, Orange respectively) Values of Post Y and B1 line up. Post Y and B2 do not line up. B1 deployed and B2 did not. On boom did not deploy 15

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Pictures of hardware Process for installing burn wire has challenges 16

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Fault Response of the Burn-circuit IC) Fault line - Active Low Fault Occurs When: Overcurrent Set by an external resistor - Over 450mA Over temperature - Over 135 Reverse Voltage - Over 190mV Prevents false reports with an internal delay deglitch circuit. No Faults Were detected 17

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Telemetry evidence Approximately 1100 ma indicates both burn wires active. Data from day of boom deployment July 20th. Commanded current was realized 18

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Telemetry evidence fuelgaugeone volt: 4.040588 V fuelgaugeone current: -0.297989 A fuelgaugeone currentaccum: 2.026993 A fuelgaugeone volt: 4.040588 V fuelgaugeone current: -0.528000 A fuelgaugeone currentaccum: 2.026993 A fuelgaugeone volt: 4.035690 V fuelgaugeone current: -0.528000 A fuelgaugeone currentaccum: 2.026993 A fuelgaugeone volt: 4.035690 V fuelgaugeone current: -0.528000 A fuelgaugeone currentaccum: 2.026993 A fuelgaugeone volt: 4.035690 V fuelgaugeone current: -0.728989 A fuelgaugeone currentaccum: 2.025986 A fuelgaugeone volt: 4.035690 V fuelgaugeone current: -0.728989 A About 430 ma current per boom. Differences can be explained with the error associated with the switch error of approximately +/- 40mA. Commanded current was realized 19

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Fishbone Diagram Operations failure Solar event Commanding Assembly workmanship attery Capacity/ Charge State Heating wire burned out before actuating Wiring to device is broken Command not received Command not executed Temperature outside of operational range Radiation total Dose Device wiring failed due to Contact NiChrome Broke Analog failure Digital failure Environmental Telemetry (analog monitors) Anomaly Bone Closed Testing complete; Unable to close but deemed improbable Candidate Contributor Confirmed Contributor Conclude insufficient contact between burn wire and restraint filament 20

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Evidence for Bone Closure Operations Failure Battery Charge State Closed by showing that battery voltage was in the nominal range during deployment times. Analog Failure Heating Wire Burned Out Closed by showing current flow through the burn circuit. Wiring to Device is Broken Closed by showing current flow through the burn circuit. 21

Anomaly #2: Magnetometer Boom Deploy Evidence for Bone Closure Commanding Command not Received, or not Executed Closed since current telemetry shows commands executed successfully Environmental Temperature Outside of Operational Ranges Closed by showing the circuit works and the current flow was nominal. Radiation Dose Closed by showing the circuit works and the current flow was nominal Assembly Workmanship Device wiring failed due to launch. Closed by showing current flow was nominal. Burn Wire did not Make Good Contact with Fishing Line Deemed the most probable since in lab testing shows that burn wire was hot, but did not cut the fishing line.. 22

Anomaly #3: Radio stopped working Anomaly Description Description: Radio transmissions ceased Evidence: Nothing has been heard from satellite since 6 months after mission start Noticeable degradation of performance 1 week prior to silence List and timeline of relevant on-orbit events: Date: 7/30/2014 Observation: RF Temperature Sensor Reset Date: 7/30/2014 Observation: Poor Radio Performance 23

Anomaly #3: Radio stopped working Telemetry evidence Overview: Radio amplifier saw a large amount of reflections. Large amount of power dissipated in amplifier. 24

Anomaly #3: Radio stopped working Fishbone Operations failure Solar event Commanding Assembly workmanship Battery Capacity/ Charge State Reflections from Antenna Overcurrent Temperature outside of operational range Radiation total Dose Analog failure Digital failure Environmental Telemetry (analog monitors) Anomaly Bone Closed Testing complete; Unable to close but deemed improbable Candidate Contributor Confirmed Contributor Suspect RF amplifier failed due to reflected RF energy from undeployed antenna 25

Anomaly #3: Radio stopped working Evidence for Bone Closure Operations Failure Battery Charge State Closed by showing that battery voltage was in the nominal range during deployment times. Analog Failure Reflections From Radio Possible contender because the antenna did not deploy which causes RF reflections. Overcurrent Possible, subset of RF reflections. Reflections could increase the voltage reflected which would drive current back through the amplifier. Environmental Temperature Outside of Operational Ranges Possible contender since a mismatch of the antenna causes more current to be used. Radiation Dose Closed because it can not be easily tested. 26

Lesson s Learned Design Design for testability and repeatability NiChrome needed to be reset after every test more reliable systems Technically Procedurally Failure is only the opportunity to begin again, only this time more wisely. - Henry Ford 27

Questions? 28