Dynamics of National Systems of Innovation in Developing Countries and Transition Economies. Jean-Luc Bernard UNIDO Representative in Iran

Similar documents
Science, technology and engineering for innovation and capacity-building in education and research UNCTAD Wednesday, 28 November 2007

EVCA Strategic Priorities

BOOSTING INNOVATION 1

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Innovation Management & Technology Transfer Innovation Management & Technology Transfer

Framework conditions, innovation policies and instruments: Lessons Learned

Economic and Social Council

Сonceptual framework and toolbox for digital transformation of industry of the Eurasian Economic Union

Key features in innovation policycomparison. Dr Gudrun Rumpf Kyiv, 9 November, 2010

The Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages

INNOVATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF ARMENIA Chapter 2: National Innovation System and Innovation Governance

Higher Education for Science, Technology and Innovation. Accelerating Africa s Aspirations. Communique. Kigali, Rwanda.

Technology Executive Committee

Urban and Regional Innovation

Study on the Architecture of China s Innovation Network of Automotive Industrial Cluster

Course 1.1 Introduction to Innovation: Role of STI for Growth and Sustainable Development UN-Wide Capacity Building Workshop on Technology for

Bridging the Technology Gap

Introduction to the SMEs Division of WIPO

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

ACCESS TO FINANCING FOR SMEs Problems and Challenges. Prof. dr Dejan Erić Belgrade Banking Academy Member of the ERENET Network 2005.

Environmental technology diffusion in developing countries

WIPO Development Agenda

Development UNESCO s Perspective

APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap

- The experience and relevance of EU SMEs support in Asia-

Technology transfer and development: implications of four case studies Session 2

Africa. Prof. Kevin Urama, Executive Director, ATPS Contact Presented at UNESCO Meeting Dakar Senegal

Outcomes of the 2018 OECD Ministerial Conference on SMEs & the way forward

TECHNOLOGY VISION 2017 IN 60 SECONDS

REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR REGIONAL STRATEGY. Dr. James Wilson Orkestra and Deusto Business School

MSMES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE SDG AGENDA

RIS3 from Strategic Orientations towards Policy Implementation: The Challenges Claire NAUWELAERS Independent expert in STI policy

Regional Innovation Policies: System Failures, Knowledge Bases and Construction Regional Advantage

BASED ECONOMIES. Nicholas S. Vonortas

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE MACEDONIAN INNOVATION SYSTEM AND POLICY

Zero-Order Review of STI Roadmaps and Strategies

the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission of South Africa (CIPC)

Human Capital and Industrial Development in Africa

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

TRANSFORMATION INTO A KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY: THE MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE

Evolution of International Business

The Sustainable Tourism Programme of the 10-Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production

Policy analysis ESF/ECRP project Constructing Regional Advantage: Towards State-of-the-art Regional Innovation System Policy in Europé

Technology and Competitiveness in Vietnam

STATE ADVANCED MANUFACTURING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS. As at February 2018

Victor O. Matthews (Ph.D)

OECD Innovation Strategy: Key Findings

COMPETITIVNESS, INNOVATION AND GROWTH: THE CASE OF MACEDONIA

UN-GGIM Future Trends in Geospatial Information Management 1

The Technology Innovation Agency (TIA): Mobilising resources for R&D led

Innovation Under the Radar in Low Income Countries: Evidence from Ghana

Portugal Space 2030 A research, innovation and growth strategy for Portugal

FINLAND. The use of different types of policy instruments; and/or Attention or support given to particular S&T policy areas.

National Innovation System of Mongolia

Seoul Initiative on the 4 th Industrial Revolution

Economic Clusters Efficiency Mathematical Evaluation

Expert Group Meeting on

The 26 th APEC Economic Leaders Meeting

Innovation system research and policy: Where it came from and Where it might go

MOVING FROM R&D TO WIDESPREAD ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND INNOVATION

KIC EIT Raw Materials

Finnish STI Policy

MEASURES TO SUPPORT SMEs IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Community System of Innovation for African Development

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANTS

POSITION PAPER. GREEN PAPER From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding

SMEs Participation in Regional Production Networks and Access to Finance: ASEAN Perspectives

Challenges and Expectations for Today s Innovation Support

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

Priority Theme 1: Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for the Post-2015 Agenda

In-Country Shared Value Creation The Case of Ghana

Sparking a New Economy. Canada s Advanced Manufacturing Supercluster

RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: ESSENTIALS FOR SOCIO-ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

Knowledge-Oriented Diversification Strategies: Policy Options for Transition Economies

SMEs Development: Vietnamese Experience

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 2 of 9 September 13:00 hrs

1. Recognizing that some of the barriers that impede the diffusion of green technologies include:

They all say it is about the economy. It is more than ratio s, percentages, and growth; it is about the Lives of people

Draft Plan of Action Chair's Text Status 3 May 2008

What is Digital Literacy and Why is it Important?

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

GROWTH-STRATEGY FOR THE ENGINEERING INDUSTRY TO ACHIEVE RAPID INDUSTRIALIZATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

Fostering SME innovation through cross-border cooperation

The Role Of Public Policy In Innovation Processes Brussels - May 4 th, 2011

Local Production of Pharmaceuticals and Related Technology Transfer UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1. Background

Smart Specialisation in the Northern Netherlands

Science, Technology & Innovation Policy: A Global Perspective. Dr Lauren Palmer Australian Academy of Technological Sciences & Engineering (ATSE)

Colombia s Social Innovation Policy 1 July 15 th -2014

European Charter for Access to Research Infrastructures - DRAFT

OECD-INADEM Workshop on

ACP/84/047/02 Final Cape Town, 28 July 2002 PAHD Dept. CAPE TOWN DECLARATION ON RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Finland as a Knowledge Economy 2.0 Lessons on Policies & Governance

Ministry of. Economic Development

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

Document on the. Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation

Consultancy on Technological Foresight

Strategic & managerial issues behind technological diversification

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

Vietnam s Innovation System: Toward a Product Innovation Ecosystem.

Transcription:

Dynamics of National Systems of Innovation in Developing Countries and Transition Economies Jean-Luc Bernard UNIDO Representative in Iran

NSI Definition Innovation can be defined as. the network of institutions in the public and private sectors who s activities and interactions initiate, import, modify and diffuse new technologies. (Freeman, 1987). Innovation is at the base of economic, social and cultural development Innovation occurs through complex relationships to: Produce Adapt Distribute And apply knowledge

National Innovation System R&D Government Global Market S&T Structure Productive Chains Firms Market Place Business Organisations Local Society Learning & Education System Conformity System Financial System

NSI Approach & Evolution The approach used for analytical purposes in the study of research and innovation due to a) Economic importance of knowledge b) Increasing rise of systemic approaches to the study of STI development c) Growing number of institutions in knowledge generation d) Policy makers provides a point of leverage to enhance innovativeness

Actors and flow Countries tend to develop along technological paths or trajectories Table 1. National System of Innovation Taxonomy Distance from Innovation Process Narrow NSI Broad NSI Level of Formality Formal 1)Innovation network in the narrow sense: -Companies, patents. -University and non university research institutes and publications. -Technology transfer agencies. -Technology policy and programs. 2) Formal institutions in the background of the innovation process: -Educational and financial system, labor market, unions, legislation, taxes, policies (f.e. environmental and competition). Informal 3) Informal cognitive and behavioral patterns in the innovation process: -Quality of relationships between customers and suppliers, interactive learning. -Degree of competitive or cooperative behavior among companies. -Companies willing to co-operate with scientific institutions. -Closeness of relationship between companies and technology policy. 4) Cultural and historical factors: -Values and attitudes (risk aversion, innovative spirit, mutual trust, time preference, attitude towards technology, consensus orientation). -Historical development, e.g. of the educational and financial system.

Regional Sub-national and sector systems of innovation Regional Systems Make contributions through: Cooperation Strategic alliances in technology development More towards an open market model Create a more outward looking position Sectors Important level of multilevel analysis Integrated view of production Overcome static view of analysis Allow better analysis of the value chain of importance for developing countries as a measure of policy Allows for a better understanding of boundaries of the chain - intervening agents - interactions Sub-national and sectorial systems are important when dealing with learning from a geographical and institutional context.

Performance of NSI: Indicators From a policy perspective, the choice and use of indicators is of importance. They are both of assistance to policy makers but also inform the public, who ultimately support research and innovation through taxes. Boundaries of the NSI It is not enough to identify elements and flows in NSI, but that also activities and functions (the determinants of innovation) should be understood, thus providing a functional boundary. Liu and White Johnson and Jacobson Rickne Mullin -Research (basic, development, engineering). -Implementation (manufacturing) -End-use (customers of the product or process outputs). -Linkage (bringing together complementary knowledge). -Education. -Create new knowledge. -Guide the direction of the search process. -Supply resources, i.e. capital, competence and others. -Facilitate the creation of positive external economies under the form of an exchange of information, knowledge and visions. - Create human capital. - Create and diffuse technological opportunities. -Create and diffuse products. Incubate in order to provide facilities, equipment and administrative support. -Facilitate regulation for technologies, materials and products that may enlarge market and enhance market access. -Legitimize technology and firms. -Create markets and diffuse market knowledge. -Enhance networking. -Direct technology, market and partner research. -Facilitate financing. -Create a labor market that the new technology based firms can utilize. Central government functions -Policy formulations and resource allocation at the national level. -Specialized advisory functions. -Regulatory policy making. Shared functions -Financing of innovation related activities. -Performance of research, development and innovation. -Creation of linkages an knowledge flows. -Human resources development and capacity building. -Provision of technical services and infrastructure

NSI in DCTED Present Characteristics: Traditional definitions of NSI require that there be in place elements and flows of a complex system e.g. knowledge and finance. Developing countries can be divided into two groups: Developing those that have developed their NSI LDC - those which have not The causes for a lack of development are: Lack of culture for innovation Investment into Innovation is low Innovative firms perform R&D indoors Industrial innovation is highly informal etc..

Alternative Methods Systems for Innovation development (SID) focuses on absorption capacities, and has four points of divergence from: Product innovations more important than process innovations. Incremental innovations more attainable and important than radical ones. Absorption (diffusion) is more important than innovation development. Innovations in low and medium technology sectors are more attainable than in high tech sectors. In order to apply NSI to developing countries with a minimal detrimental effect Should stimulate policy And promote the learning capacity at all segments of the society National Technology System considers that developing countries do not create but import, absorb, and improve on them.

Systemic Weaknesses in Developing Countries and Transition Economies Rigidities in organizations Ineffective financial system (for innovation) Organisational ineffectiveness Weaknesses Institutional gaps Path dependent system failure Sub-optimal knowledge networks

Why a NSI approach in DCTE? The reasons are : All developed countries have a solid institutions dedicated to the production of knowledge They have University to transfer skills and knowledge The economic world need to follow analytical tool as NSI NSI will help to understand the gap between developed and developing countries Modern technologies is a part of NSI Industrial development is not only for developed countries NSI allows taking into account the specificities of each countries A efficient system need to undertake efforts from importers Innovation extends well beyond R&D

National Systems of innovation in specific Countries For example, research expand for : Material science in Egypt Engineering in Saudi Arabia The absence of an appropriate institutional mechanism is a brake for innovation. They attach a low priority to technology, such is the case of : Africa (Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Ghana) Asia (especially small developing countries) Latin America Thank to NSI, a larger developing countries are going through an important process of specialization, as : India (software services industry) Thailand (food processing, agro-innovation ) Vietnam (following a similar path)

Towards a Concept of NSI in DCTE The challenges To meet the challenge closer attention must be given to the processes of learning and innovation in a systematic way. In a short term, the three basic challenges that must be faced are : How to deal with strategic specialization, which implies a capacity of strategic and prospective analysis, to identify sectors where competitive advantages can be developed. How to pass from selective financial mechanisms to support technology and innovation projects in firm, to a massive financing scheme that permits the access to credit through the commercial financing system to a much larger number of firms. How to design industrial organizations for rapid technological catch-up, nothing that much of the innovation that is organizational and institutional.

Main characteristics The NSI in DCTE should be conceived as a creative space in social learning for the exchange of knowledge. At the center of the system are the entrepreneurial and productive sectors, composed of value chains to maintain diffusion and application of knowledge and technology. Plus, firms that become learning organizations are more productive, and create stable jobs. A definition of NSI for DCTE could be : The network of institutions in the private and public sectors whose activities and interactions, generate, import, modify, adapt and diffuse new and traditional knowledge, facilitate learning, and educate innovators and entrepreneurs, transferring the benefits of science and technology, according to the requirements of greater competitiveness in the economy and satisfying social, cultural and environmental demands

Policy and strategic trends and recommendations Role of government, policy and strategic trend and recommendation Government State have to create favorable conditions to build bases of firms for their strengthening Competence of firms Innovation capacities Creation or acquisition of technological

Policy have been added recently, that why most of the countries have not been successful in formulating and implementing coherent policies. The first public objective for the development of STI should be adopt a systemic approach such as the National System of Innovation. The way of recommendations can be summarized as : Higher education is a key to the development of a culture of innovation Identify the main factors which determine the demand for innovation The science sector must be seen as that capable of developing absorptive capacities A focus on technology capacity building is necessary In order to guarantee autonomy, reduced bureaucracies, transparency, small transaction cost efficiency and effectiveness must be evaluated Policy must be more relevant and evident at world level To provide information services for firms an infrastructure for technology must be created Natural competitive advantages must be identified and exploited for a better productive specialization The basic technological objective for industry is to ensure the enhanced use of suitable technologies Private firms investing in STI require an effective protection

Role of support institutions and international organizations They have a critical roles to play in supporting the build-up of NSI in DTCE. They have : the resources required to identify the frontiers of S & T the possibility to transfer and share their knowledge the capacity to change some procedures regarding protection of property rights Scientific institutions of excellence must be at the forefront of the search and they have to preserved such institutions in the developing countries. Support institutions, donors and international agencies can provide resources for this build-up. Support institutions and international organizations must allow DCTE to participate fully in the operation of world value chains. Governments with of international organizations can define strategies to guide this process.