November SKA Low Frequency Aperture Array. Andrew Faulkner

Similar documents
March Phased Array Technology. Andrew Faulkner

May AA Communications. Portugal

SKA-low and the Aperture Array Verification System

SKA1 low Baseline Design: Lowest Frequency Aspects & EoR Science

Towards SKA Multi-beam concepts and technology

SKA technology: RF systems & signal processing. Mike Jones University of Oxford

Correlator Development at Haystack. Roger Cappallo Haystack-NRAO Technical Mtg

Focal Plane Arrays & SKA

Phased Array Feeds & Primary Beams

2-PAD: An Introduction. The 2-PAD Team

Smart Antennas in Radio Astronomy

The SKA New Instrumentation: Aperture Arrays

The AAMID consortium: Mid Frequency Aperture Array

Overview of the SKA. P. Dewdney International SKA Project Engineer Nov 9, 2009

Memo 65 SKA Signal processing costs

Antenna and Analog Beamformer

A Multi-Fielding SKA Covering the Range 100 MHz 22 GHz. Peter Hall and Aaron Chippendale, CSIRO ATNF 24 November 2003

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

All-Digital Wideband Space-Frequency Beamforming for the SKA Aperture Array

NRC Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics

THE KAROO ARRAY TELESCOPE (KAT) & FPA EFFORT IN SOUTH AFRICA

Multi-octave radio frequency systems: Developments of antenna technology in radio astronomy and imaging systems

LOFAR: Special Issues

MISCELLANEOUS CORRECTIONS TO THE BASELINE DESIGN

Phased Array Feeds A new technology for multi-beam radio astronomy

Phased Array Feeds for the SKA. WP2.2.3 PAFSKA Consortium CSIRO ASTRON DRAO NRAO BYU OdP Nancay Cornell U Manchester

Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA. Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility

Phased Array Feeds for Parkes. Robert Braun Science with 50 Years Young

Technology Drivers, SKA Pathfinders P. Dewdney

Phased Array Feeds A new technology for wide-field radio astronomy

An FPGA-Based Back End for Real Time, Multi-Beam Transient Searches Over a Wide Dispersion Measure Range

Status of Design Planning for Construction

The SKA LOW correlator design challenges

Instrument Requirements and Options for Meeting the Science Opportunities MHz P. Dewdney A. Gray, B. Veidt

Memo 111. SKADS Benchmark Scenario Design and Costing 2 (The SKA Phase 2 AA Scenario)

Beamforming for IPS and Pulsar Observations

Numerical Approach for the Analysis and Optimization of Phased Array Feed Systems

Active Impedance Matched Dual-Polarization Phased Array Feed for the GBT

Memo 149. Increased SKA-Low Science Capability through Extended Frequency Coverage. D. C. Price D. Sinclair J. Hickish M.E. Jones.

Specifications for the GBT spectrometer

Aperture Arrays for the SKA: the SKADS White Paper

Roshene McCool Domain Specialist in Signal Transport and Networks SKA Program Development Office

MWA Antenna Description as Supplied by Reeve

Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA. Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility

Technologies for Radio Astronomy

5G India Demystifying 5G, Massive MIMO and Challenges

ARRAY CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL POWER CALIBRATION FOR LEDA

Green Bank Instrumentation circa 2030

Array noise temperature measurements at the Parkes PAF Test-bed Facility

Submitted to the SKA Engineering and Management Team by

Detector Systems. Graeme Carrad

Planning (VLA) observations

The CASPER Hardware Platform. Richard Armstrong

SKA Site Characterisation and Array Configuration; Overview and Status WP Rob Millenaar, SPDO

Components of Imaging at Low Frequencies: Status & Challenges

Wide-Band Imaging. Outline : CASS Radio Astronomy School Sept 2012 Narrabri, NSW, Australia. - What is wideband imaging?

Memo 130. SKA Phase 1: Preliminary System Description

SKA station cost comparison

LWA1 Technical and Observational Information

Receivers for. FFRF Tutorial by Tom Clark, NASA/GSFC & NVI Wettzell, March 19, 2009

Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) - Introduction, Current System & ugmrt

SKA-LOW: Status Update. André van Es SKA-LOW Project Manager

Il progetto SKA: misure di campo elettromagnetico mediante UAV

EVLA System Commissioning Results

Why Single Dish? Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson

Results from LWA1 Commissioning: Sensitivity, Beam Characteristics, & Calibration

A report on KAT7 and MeerKAT status and plans

Propagation effects (tropospheric and ionospheric phase calibration)

ASKAP Industry technical briefing. Tim Cornwell, ASKAP Computing Project Lead Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder

Signal Flow & Radiometer Equation. Aletha de Witt AVN-Newton Fund/DARA 2018 Observational & Technical Training HartRAO

Practical Aspects of Focal Plane Array Testing

Radio Astronomy Transformed

Introduction to interferometry with bolometers: Bob Watson and Lucio Piccirillo

VLBI with IRAM 30m & NOEMA

The Australian SKA Pathfinder Project. ASKAP Digital Signal Processing Systems System Description & Overview of Industry Opportunities

BRAND EVN AND EVN) (BRoad-bAND Joint Research Activity in RadioNet4 Gino Tuccari & Walter Alef plus partners

Cormac Reynolds. ATNF Synthesis Imaging School, Narrabri 10 Sept. 2008

Image-Domain Gridding on Accelerators

N. Pingel, K. Rajwade, D.J. Pisano, D. Lorimer West Virginia University

Phased Array Feed (PAF) Design for the LOVELL Antenna based on the Octagonal Ring Antenna (ORA) Array

Scalable Front-End Digital Signal Processing for a Phased Array Radar Demonstrator. International Radar Symposium 2012 Warsaw, 24 May 2012

Dense Aperture Array for SKA

EMBRACE DS5 presentation

Radio Astronomy: SKA-Era Interferometry and Other Challenges. Dr Jasper Horrell, SKA SA (and Dr Oleg Smirnov, Rhodes and SKA SA)

VLBI2010: In search of Sub-mm Accuracy

RAPID A Portable and Reconfigurable Imaging Interferometer Array

LOFAR Long Baseline Calibration Commissioning

Radio Interferometers Around the World. Amy J. Mioduszewski (NRAO)

BRAND EVN (BRoad-bAND EVN) Joint Research Activity in RadioNet4 Gino Tuccari & Walter Alef plus partners

Radio Frequency Monitoring for Radio Astronomy

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

Very Long Baseline Interferometry. Richard Porcas Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn

An Accurate phase calibration Technique for digital beamforming in the multi-transceiver TIGER-3 HF radar system

ARRAY DESIGN AND SIMULATIONS

The First Station of the Long Wavelength Array

5G mmwave Radio design for Mobile. Kamal Sahota Vice President Engineering Qualcomm Inc.

Evolution of the Capabilities of the ALMA Array

S.A. Torchinsky, A. van Ardenne, T. van den Brink-Havinga, A.J.J. van Es, A.J. Faulkner (eds.) 4-6 November 2009, Château de Limelette, Belgium

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 3 Sep 2010

Data processing with the RTS A GPU-accelerated calibration & imaging stream processor

Transcription:

SKA Phase 1 Implementation Southern Africa Australia SKA 1 -mid 250 15m dia. Dishes 0.4-3GHz SKA 1 -low 256,000 antennas Aperture Array Stations 50 350/650MHz SKA 1 -survey 90 15m dia. Dishes 0.7-1.7GHz Construction 2017 start

SKA Phase 2 Implementation Southern Africa Australia SKA 2 -mid 2700 15m dia. Dishes 0.4-10GHz AA-mid 256 60m dia. Aperture Array Stations 400 1450MHz SKA 2 -low 3,000,000 antennas. Aperture Array Stations 50 650MHz Construction 2020 s

Sparse: >λ/2 A eff increases as λ 2 Layout irregular Increased skynoise from grating lobes Small beam at high frequencies AA selection 1000 Sparse AA-low Sky Brightness Temperature (K) 100 10 T sky A eff Fully sampled AA-mid Becoming sparse Aeff / T sys (m 2 / K) Dense: λ/2 Constant A eff Fully sampled wavefront Excellent side lobe control Regular layout A eff /T sys 1 100 AA frequency overlap 300 500 Frequency (MHz) Dish operation

Basic and stretch SKA Office appointed Consortia to produce the major Elements Low Freq. AA - Science Data Processor - Communications Dishes - Correlator+Beamformer - Infrastructure Integration Issued a Baseline Spec. now as Level 1 Requirements LFAA must meet the Level 1, or Baseline requirements Baseline spec. misses a lot of opportunity from AAs, so LFAA may meet Target requirements (self-imposed ), Low cost or traded with other aspects of SKA1 (e.g. dish performance)

SKA 1 -low Baseline specs Strongly configured for EoR Frequency: Bandwidth: Sensitivity : Polarisation: Beam size: Scan angle: 50MHz 350MHz 300MHz 1000m 2 /K (110 350MHz) Dual (of good quality) >5 (no beam stitching) 45 max. # of beams: Single (!) Configuration: 50% <600m radius 75% <1km radius 95% <3km radius 3 spiral arms of 50km Output Data rate: ~10Tb/s (total)

SKA 1 -low Baseline specs Strongly configured for EoR Frequency: 50MHz 350MHz Bandwidth: 300MHz Sensitivity Excludes : 1000m any 2 /K (110 350MHz) pulsar processing!! Dual (of good quality) Pretends an AA is a metal dish only 1 beam! >5 (no beam stitching) Polarisation: Beam size: Scan angle: 45 max. # of beams: Single (!) Configuration: 50% <600m radius Fixed station 75% <1km size radius 95% <3km radius 3 spiral arms of 50km Issues Restricts parameters for a transient search Limited frequency range No autonomy for stations Output Data rate: ~10Tb/s (total)

Technical implementation Antenna: Log Periodic No. of ant.: 256,000 (2 18 ) Ant. placement: Random. 1.5m min. Station size: 256 / 512 / 1024 ant. 35m / 50m / 70m dia. No. of stations: 256-1024 Signal transport: Analogue fibre Processing: Digital Sample res.: 8-bit or 4-bit real Tiles: 16 antenna per Tile Data routing: Switch network

Array sensitivity vs. frequency T rec 35K >100MHz SKA Survey Band 1 Credit: Eloy de Lera Acedo EM simulations (CST) and LNA electronic simulations (Microwave Office). Further optimisations to perform

Target Implementation Individual Log-periodic antennas single array Analog fibre signal transport from each antenna Individual solar power (+battery) at each antenna Single (large) processing bunker (256 racks) Band selection using ADC baseband or first alias Data routing inside bunker using COTS switches

Example bunkers

SKA-low: end-to-end Maser Signal & Data Transport Low frequency Aperture Array Central Signal processor Science Data processor Scientists! HPC HPC HPC Bulk Store HPC UV Processor Buffer store Switch Correlator Beamformer Buffer store Switch Beamforming Power Cooling Infrastructure M&C Telescope Manager Central Bunker can integrate: LFAA Beamforming Signal transport Local M&C LFAA Correlator Maser clock

Signal flow through AA Antenna & LNA Receiver Signal Processing Antenna structure LNA e/o RFoF ADC 1 st Beamforming Spectral filters Control & Monitoring Station beamforming e/o Data out Clock Solar/copper Power Power Bunker Local Infrastructure Power Monitor & Control Cooling

2 x 50-350 MHz Baseline: SKA-low Station Processing 2 x 6.4 Gb/s per antenna RF over Fibre from Antennas RF over Fibre from Antennas RFI shield TILE Filters 50-350MHz ADCs 800MS/s Spectral filters Spectral filters Beamforming Beamforming 2 x 4 Gb/s for 250MHz BW per element Data Switch Data to Correlator TILE

2 x 50-650 MHz Target: SKA-low Station Processing 2 x 6.4 Gb/s per antenna RF over Fibre from Antennas Spectral filters Beamforming 2 x 4 Gb/s for 250MHz BW per element RF over Fibre from Antennas RFI shield TILE Filters 50-375MHz 375-650MHz ADCs 800MS/s 700MS/s Spectral filters Beamforming Data Switch Data to Correlator TILE Low Band High Band

2 x 50-650 MHz Target++: SKA-low Station Processing 2 x 6.4 Gb/s per antenna Memory RF over Fibre from Antennas Spectral filters Beamforming 2 x 4 Gb/s for 250MHz BW per element RF over Fibre from Antennas RFI shield TILE Filters 50-375MHz 375-650MHz TILE ADCs 800MS/s 700MS/s Spectral filters Beamforming Data Switch Transient buffer Data to Correlator Low Band High Band Memory

Implementation Antenna RFoF Data Network Analogue inputs 16 dual pol. antennas Digitise and beamform

256 racks in 16 aisles High speed switched network Flexible beamforming Overlayed monit. & control

Capabilities of the design No. of stations: 1024 or 512 or 256 Core close-up Station dia,: Multiple Beams: 35m or 50m or 70m Flexibly allocated in available data rate Beam forming: Improved apodisation Scan angle: 60 max. No. of Bands: 2 Frequency Ranges: Data rate: 50MHz 375MHz 375MHz 650MHz 10Tb/s Credit: Keith Grainge REDUCING SKA1 system cost and/or IMPROVING performance.

Capabilities of the design No. of stations: 1024 or 512 or 256 Station dia,: 35m or 50m or 70m Multiple Flexibly allocated in Beams: available data rate Beam forming: Improved apodisation Better Stations Station Station Scan angle: 60 max. No. of Bands: 2 Frequency Ranges: Data rate: 50MHz 375MHz 375MHz 650MHz 10Tb/s Extended Station Credit: Keith Grainge REDUCING SKA1 system cost and/or IMPROVING performance.

SKA-low could observe Pulsars! Imaging: Corner Turning Course Delays Fine F-step/ Correlation Visibility Steering Observation Buffer Gridding Visibilities Imaging Image Storage LFAA Beams Switch Buffer store Correlator Beamformer Switch Buffer store UV Processor HPC Bulk Store Non-Imaging: Corner Turning Course Delays Beamforming/ De-dispersion Beam Steering Observation Buffer Time-series Searching Search analysis Object/timing Storage SKA-low Processing Chain

Aims First cross-correlation AAVS 0.5 tests Verify correct interferometer operation and calibration Make a variety of test images Extract key AAVS 0.5 parameters: SEFD, station beam characteristics,. Inform design of future verification activities (AAVS 1) Requires reliable and well-calibrated MWA

First AAVS 0.5 image (using MWA) 2 minute integration, wide-field snapshot, centred on 3C444 AAVS 0.5 baselines only (but calibrated using whole MWA) November 2013 No allowance yet for AAVS SKA Low 0.5 point Frequency spread Aperture function, Array pointing or baseline 24 errors

AAVS 0.5 System Equivalent Flux Density (SEFD) 3C444 for 3 hrs from 1030 local time, 20/8/13 120 azimuth variation; modest Bad variation around elevation 80 MWA and AAVS 0.5 tiles connected to the same MWA receiver (#7) Good agreement between models and measurements NB: un-optimized AAVS configuration Good Simulation: 2.5 % moisture soil, Trx = 50 K

In conclusion.

In conclusion. SKA-low can be superb for transients & pulsars! Low frequency aperture array is critical to SKA Wide-band log-periodic antennas give 13:1 freq. range RFoF enables a very flexible architecture Solar power reduces deployment and running costs Centralised processing enables: Flexible station configuration Improved beamforming Simpler maintenance Use of COTS components