Towards a Taxonomy: Classifying Design Innovation Policies in Europe DeEP: Design in European Policy

Similar documents
Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

FP9 s ambitious aims for societal impact call for a step change in interdisciplinarity and citizen engagement.

A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands

DANUBE INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

The Impact of EUREKA. EFECS Conference Dora Meredith.

PREPARATORY ACTION ON DEFENCE RESEARCH

Added Value of Networking Case Study INOV: encouraging innovation in rural Portugal. Portugal

GamECAR JULY ULY Meetings. 5 Toward the future. 5 Consortium. E Stay updated

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Introduction to the Centre for Digital Built Britain. Dr Jennifer Schooling Director, CDBB Research Bridgehead

Strengthening the knowledge base and reducing fragmentation

Fostering SME innovation through cross-border cooperation

Innovation in Europe: Where s it going? How does it happen? Stephen Roper Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK

The importance of maritime research for sustainable competitiveness

Burgundy : Towards a RIS3

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Prof David Shepherd Deputy Vice Chancellor. Bangor University Founded 1884

ARTEMIS Industry Association. ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking ARTEMIS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION & JOINT UNDERTAKING

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Copernicus Evolution: Fostering Growth in the EO Downstream Services Sector

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 INNOVATION

Engineering Grand Challenges. Information slides

Current state of the debate regarding the role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Research and Innovation in the EU 1

developments from early material design stage. This chapter collects seven papers on material and their property related research.

EUREKA in the ERA INTRODUCTION

Data users and data producers interaction: the Web-COSI project experience

TENTATIVE REFLECTIONS ON A FRAMEWORK FOR STI POLICY ROADMAPS FOR THE SDGS

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

A4BLUE - Adaptive Automation in Assembly For BLUE collar workers satisfaction in Evolvable context

Publishable summary. 1 P a g e

Torino Living Lab & Open Incet

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

REPORT D Proposal for a cluster governance model in the Adriatic Ionian macroregion. (Activity 3.4)

SME support under Horizon 2020 Diana GROZAV Horizon 2020 SME NCP Center of International Projects

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Funding Opportunities in Metrology Related Research

ABCPhD CALL4SCHOLARSHIP 33 Research topic: Design for All in Healthcare Facilities

Dario della Sala ENEA Research Centre «Casaccia», Rome (Italy)

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

Point of View. Establishing a Culture of Digital Change within Universities

Report on Policy Action Plan

This project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement nº

Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

International Workshop On Hydrogen Safety Training for First Responders

IN-DEPTH ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION (CONTRACT NO ENTR/2010/16, LOT 2) Task 6: Research, Development and Innovation in the Footwear Sector

Into Moving Forward to Automated Driving. In this issue: ITS World Congress in Montreal. CARTRE and ERTRAC Joint Workshop

The BLUEMED Initiative: RESEARCH AND INNOVATION INITIATIVE FOR BLUE JOBS AND GROWTH IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Assessing the socioeconomic. public R&D. A review on the state of the art, and current work at the OECD. Beñat Bilbao-Osorio Paris, 11 June 2008

Plenary Assembly European Construction Technology Platform (ECTP( Building the Europe of Knowledge ECTP) Special features. Specific Programmes

2nd Call for Proposals

REDI final conference: Go! Go! Go! Brussels, 10th March 2015

Future City Glasgow. City of Glasgow

EurOCEAN The Galway Declaration

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Framework Programme 7

Technology and Innovation in the NHS Scottish Health Innovations Ltd

The Relationship between Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Sustainable Development. Research on European Union Countries.


The Role Of Public Policy In Innovation Processes Brussels - May 4 th, 2011

Annual Report 2010 COS T SME. over v i e w

ORCHESTRA: Developing a Unified Open Architecture for Risk Management Applications

Examples of Public Procurement of R&D services within EU funded Security Research actions

FP7 Funding Opportunities for the ICT Industry

ECO INNOVATION IN SMALL TO MEDIUM SIZED ENTERPRISES:

The research commercialisation office of the University of Oxford, previously called Isis Innovation, has been renamed Oxford University Innovation

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

THE BLUEMED INITIATIVE AND ITS STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

DIGITALISING MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE 2017

Position Paper on Horizon ESFRI Biological and Medical Research Infrastructures

EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, outcomes and uptake

NOTE Strategic Forum for International S&T Cooperation (SFIC) opinion on the ERA Framework (input to the ERAC opinion on the ERA Framework)

UNIVERSITIES AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PATENT ATTORNEYS TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS

CONTACT DETAILS. NNC s Leak Sealing Services. Greg Willetts, Head Of Leak Sealing Services. Phone: +44 (0)

XXVII MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE - COMMUNIQUE MADRID, 30 JUNE 2017

Digital Transformation Delivering Business Outcomes

New Triple Helix Environments for Creating Innovations

Belgian Position Paper

Torino Living Lab & Open Incet OPEN INNOVATION CENTER TURIN

Human Integration in the Life-cycle of Aviation Systems HILAS

Consultation on Long Term sustainability of Research Infrastructures

SME support under HORIZON 2020

Bath University Open Programmable City Region 15 th January 2015 Paul Wilson Interim paulwilson

DIGITAL WITH PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY DIGITAL STRATEGY

EUROPEAN INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP FOR ACTIVE AND HEALTHY AGEING

GLOBAL EDUCATION DIALOGUES STIMULUS PAPER

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

+44 (0) (0) Response from the Marine Biological Association, November 2015.

Baltic Sea Region Urban Forum for Smart Cities - a market place for smart solutions

Member State Programme Objec ve Focus Priori es Method Funding Source

Standardization and Innovation Management

Digital Transformation Delivering Business Outcomes

Insights: Helping SMEs to access the energy industry

Innovation in EU Policy Innovation concepts and innovation policy

Conclusions of Annual Political Meeting. Thursday 13 November 2014 Milan

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

Transcription:

Towards a Taxonomy: Classifying Design Innovation Policies in Europe DeEP: Design in European Policy John Chisholm 2 nd Cambridge Academic Design Management Conference 05.09.2013 Cambridge, UK.

2 Towards a Taxonomy Classifying Design Innovation Policies in Europe

3 DeEP: Design in European Policy Europe 2020 Innovation Union places innovation at the heart of the Europe 2020 strategy for growth and jobs identifies design as an enabler of growth European Design Innovation Initiative raise the awareness of design as a driver of innovation in Europe European Design Leadership Board 6 strategic design programmes

4 DeEP: Design in European Policy DeEP aims to create an understanding of the impact of design innovation policies by building frameworks and indicators to evaluate these actions both at a macro (regional, national, European) and micro (specific initiative) level. www.designpolicy.eu

5 DeEP: Design in European Policy Consortium partners Italy Politecnico Milano Confartigianato Lombardia UK Lancaster University The Work Foundation Sweden Malardalen University Munktell Science Park Poland ProDesign

6 DeEP: Design in European Policy The project will deliver: A taxonomy of Design Innovation Policies The DeEP Evaluation Tool made of: a Design Innovation Scoreboard to evaluate regional and national performance (set of macro indicators); an analytical framework and indicators to evaluate the impact of specific initiatives directly on companies (set of micro indicators) An open platform for knowledge sharing and for evaluation.

7 Towards a Taxonomy: Classifying Design Innovation Policies in Europe The paper discusses the role of design in innovation policies presents an approach to classifying design innovation policies in the form of a taxonomy considers how a taxonomy has the potential to inform the evaluation of design innovation policies

8 Towards a Taxonomy The Role of Design in Innovation Policies

9 Design [in] Innovation Policies (DIP) The relation ship between design and innovation is not straightforward or well-established (Cruickshank 2011) A broader view of innovation has evolved: integration of policy areas e.g. R&D and industrial policy multiple levels at which innovation takes place and which expands the boundaries of the policy instruments that may be applied to support innovation Design (where it is referenced) is positioned in a supporting role aimed at realising specific objectives rather than coherent or fully formed component of innovation support policy.

10 Classifying Design Innovation Policies in Europe General lack of understanding about contribution of design: - Macro (policy) level need to demonstrate how to use design & designers to improve national competitive advantage & social & economic growth. - Micro (firm) level problem of helping companies to use design e.g. find & commission designers and manage design projects for business improvement.

11 Design Innovation Policy Landscape Relationships & interactions Macro Policy Programme Initiative Initiative Initiative Micro Company (firm)

12 Design Innovation Policy Landscape Policies Policy Actions (Programmes / Initiatives) - Implementation Organisations Research Reports - Evaluation

13

14 Towards a Taxonomy Classifying Design Innovation Policies in Europe

15 Innovation Taxonomy The design component is not explicitly stated. In the context of Europe 2020, design is a means to the end (innovation) just as innovation is a means to its end (jobs and growth). Design is dissipated amongst innovation policy. Design can enhance any part of an innovation policy in reality it appears in varying degrees and at various points. The design innovation policy framework and taxonomy aims to provide a mechanism in which the relationship between macro and micro indicators can be accommodated and articulated.

DeEP Design Innovation Policy Framework 16

17 Route & Specificity Route the paths or routes within the DIP eco-system i.e. the route by which enterprises access the results of policy i.e. directly, indirectly and through collaboration. Specificity i.e. how specific is the use/recognition/ promotion etc. of design in increasing the design capability of the enterprise i.e. specific, complementary or opportunistic. Specific Complementary Opportunistic Direct Indirect Collaborative

18 Route Direct directly increasing the design capability of the enterprise itself. Indirect through increasing the design capability of surrounding ecosystem. Collaborative increasing design capability collaboratively by connecting enterprise with surrounding ecosystem i.e. improving access to ecosystem resources.

19 Specificity Specific increasing design capacity in an enterprise using specific policy actions where design has been explicitly stated from the outset. Complementary increasing design capacity in an enterprise through complementary policy actions where the focus is not on design, but design is recognised as a significant, or contributory, factor in increasing design capability. Opportunistic - increasing design capacity in an enterprise in an opportunistic way where the policy actions may be accessed by the enterprise in order to increase its design capability, but where design was not the stated aim of the instrument

20 Classifying Policy Initiatives Specificity Specific Complementary Opportunistic Direct Designing Demand Route Indirect Catapult Centres Collaborative Innovation Vouchers

21 Validation Specificity Specific Complementary Opportunistic Direct 45 10 12 72 Route Indirect 7 55 8 75 Collaborative 12 16 6 36 71 86 26

22 Towards a Taxonomy Informing the Evaluation of Design Innovation Policies

23 Indicators Direct/Specific (45) (for example) Policy Action 1 Micro Indicator 1 Micro Indicator 2 Micro Indicator 3 etc Policy Action 2 Policy Action 3 etc

Design Innovation Policy Cycle 24

25 Conceptualising the DeEP Evaluation Tool Query Black box Scenario Generator Toolbox of tools Participative Process Action learning Output Source: DeEP Taxonomy Workshop (Lancaster University/Big Innovation Centre), Lancaster, UK. 06 November 2012

Thank you John Chisholm j.chisholm@lancaster.ac.uk