DATE OF REVISION March 15, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Office of Research

Similar documents
Policy on Patents (CA)

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

California State University, Northridge Policy Statement on Inventions and Patents

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

Policy Contents. Policy Information. Purpose and Summary. Scope. Published on Policies and Procedures (

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

Intellectual Property

UCF Patents, Trademarks and Trade Secrets. (1) General. (a) This regulation is applicable to all University Personnel (as defined in section

Lewis-Clark State College No Date 2/87 Rev. Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7

(1) Patents/Patentable means:

Intellectual Property

New York University University Policies

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property

II. Curation Guidelines

Policy 7.6 Intellectual Property Policy

SR (FPC)(RC)

KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY Policy on Intellectual Property Rights

Policy No: TITLE: EFFECTIVE DATE: CANCELLATION: REVIEW DATE:

Governing Council. Inventions Policy. October 30, 2013

Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATED BY STAFF AND STUDENTS POLICY Organisation & Governance

exceptional circumstance:

Intellectual Property Policy. DNDi POLICIES

Intellectual Property. Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy, PhD

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

Fiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS 2015

Intellectual Property

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Good

A POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA)

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

POLICY ON INVENTIONS AND SOFTWARE

LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998

ART COLLECTION POLICY

POLICY PHILOSOPHY DEFINITIONS AC.2.11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Programs and Curriculum. APPROVED: Chair, on Behalf of SAIT s Board of Governors

PEDIGREE Publication Policy & Procedures

2015 CREDENTIAL MEMO PETE FIERLE, VICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS & SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT

Quality and GLP for Histology and Pathology of Drug Safety Studies

Defence Export Controls Policy

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES ON PATENTS AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT NOVEMBER 2, 2015

Delaware State University

Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Principles in the Conduct of Biomedical Research

PATENT AND LICENSING POLICY SUMMARY

Translation University of Tokyo Intellectual Property Policy

MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE CONTRACTOR ALERT REPORTING DATABASE (CARD)

UNIVERSITI BRUNEI DARUSSALAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES 2015

University of Houston System. System-wide Public Art Committee (SPAC) Operating Procedures Manual

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Intellectual Property & Technology Transfer

WHEREAS, UCMERI requires additional financial support to sustain its operations; and

FAYETTEVILLE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE MINUTES OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES

STATEMENT OF WORK Environmental Assessment for the Red Cliffs/Long Valley Land Exchange in Washington County, Utah

CRS Report for Congress

Office of Technology Commercialization. Inventors Handbook

Appeals Policy Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation th Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C

Use of the Graded Approach in Regulation

PUBLIC ART PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES

ART SERVICES AND ACQUISITION AGREEMENT *******************************************************************************

DISPOSITION POLICY. This Policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on March 14, 2017.

Top 10 Reasons NOT to get Organized

New Mexico Lottery Authority MY REWARDS PROGRAM DRAWING PROCEDURES v1.0

The following draft Agreement supplements, but does not replace, the MOU by and between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the California

ISO 1012 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Photography Films in sheets and rolls for general use Dimensions

CARRA PUBLICATION AND PRESENTATION GUIDELINES Version April 20, 2017

Guidance for Industry

International Correspondence Chess Federation PLAYING RULES SERVER Changes in the Playing Rules - Server Set of Rules

Data Acquisition, Management, Sharing and Ownership

Intellectual Property

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries. Digital Preservation Policy, Version 1.3

THE ASEAN FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON ACCESS TO BIOLOGICAL AND GENETIC RESOURCES

AGREEMENT on UnifiedPrinciples and Rules of Technical Regulation in the Republic of Belarus, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation

PREP Course 10: Electronic External Interests Review & The HRPP Review Process Presented by: Hallie Kassan Scott Beardsley Gerry Kassoff

Public Information and Disclosure RD/GD-99.3

TeesRep policy document

Policy in Relation to Plagiarism, Infringement of Copyright and Infringement of Moral Rights and Submission to Multiple Publications

INTELLECTUALPROPERTY PROCEDURES MANUAL INTERNAL OPERATING MEMORANDUM

Intellectual Property Guide

Guidelines for Facilitating the Use of Research Tool Patents in the Life Sciences. March 1, 2007 Council for Science and Technology Policy

Details of the Proposal

American Nuclear Society

Alfred University Intellectual Property Policy May 2008

WHEREAS, the City of (the City ) is an Illinois municipality in. accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and,

Protection of Privacy Policy

Intellectual Property and Related Rights: Issues when a Researcher Moves to another Organization

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use

Intellectual Property Policy

REPORT ON THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MEMORY OF THE WORLD IN THE DIGITAL AGE: DIGITIZATION AND PRESERVATION OUTLINE

CHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS

Public Art Network Best Practice Goals and Guidelines

CBD Request to WIPO on the Interrelation of Access to Genetic Resources and Disclosure Requirements

PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT between THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and INSERT PARTNER'S CORPORATE NAME

Invention SUBMISSION BROCHURE PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR INVENTION

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

University of Southern California Guidelines for Assigning Authorship and for Attributing Contributions to Research Products and Creative Works

European Charter for Access to Research Infrastructures - DRAFT

A. Notice to Inventors

Transcription:

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION RSCH Office of Research POLICY TITLE Data Access, Retention, and Ownership SCOPE OF POLICY USC System RESPONSIBLE OFFICER Vice President for Research DATE OF REVISION March 15, 2018 POLICY NUMBER RSCH 1.05 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Office of Research PURPOSE This policy articulates requirements and expectations related to data ownership, sharing and retention. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Research Data or Data - information in whatever form (e.g., both physical and electronic) collected and/or generated in the course of a sponsored research project conducted at USC, under the auspices of USC or with university resources. This includes original and derivatives of research data, including recordings of such data. Examples of research data include, but are not limited to: 1. Records necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the results of research; 2. Data contained in laboratory notebooks; 3. Data collected using instrumentation or systems and stored in an electronic format; 4. Case report forms and source documentation for human subject research studies. Record - recorded information of any kind and in any form including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, images, prints, photographs, microfilms, audio and video recordings, data and data compilations, and electronic media, including e-mail. POLICY STATEMENT The University of South Carolina (USC) has both rights and responsibilities for the retention of research or other data acquired or developed as a result of a grant, contract or other sponsored agreement. Accurate and appropriate research and programmatic records are an essential component of any research endeavor. USC and the Principal Investigator/Project Director (PI) share responsibilities and rights concerning access to, use of and maintenance of original research or scientific data. A. Except where precluded by the specific terms of sponsorship or other agreements, tangible research property, including all data and other records conducted under the auspices of USC, belong to USC. B. Data produced from federally sponsored research are subject to a variety of requirements and regulations. 1

C. This policy shall apply to all USC faculty, staff, students and any other persons at USC involved in the design, conduct or reporting of research at or under the auspices of USC, and it shall apply to all research on which those individuals work, regardless of the source of funding for the project. D. USC must retain research and sponsored project data in sufficient detail and for an adequate period of time to enable appropriate responses to questions about accuracy, authenticity, primacy and compliance with laws and regulations governing the conduct of the research. It is the responsibility of the PI to determine what needs to be retained under this policy. E. Where research or a sponsored project is funded by a contract that includes specific provision(s) regarding ownership, retention of and access to technical data, the provision(s) of that agreement will supersede this policy. PROCEDURES A. Ownership and Responsibilities 1. The university's ownership and stewardship of the scientific record and research data is based on both regulation (2 CFR 200.333) and sound management principles. USC's responsibilities in this regard include, but are not limited to: a. complying with the terms of research agreements; b. ensuring the appropriate use of animals, human subjects, recombinant DNA, etiological agents, radioactive materials, and the like; c. protecting the rights of students, postdoctoral scholars, and staff, including, but not limited to, their rights to have access to data results from research in which they participated; d. securing intellectual property rights; and, e. facilitating the investigation of allegations, such as scientific misconduct. 2. Both the PI and USC have responsibilities and rights concerning access to, use of, and maintenance of original research data. USC can be held accountable for the integrity of the data even after the PI(s) has left the university. Although the original data shall remain within the appropriate USC unit or laboratory, the PI is entitled to retain copies of the research data created by him/her. Also see Section C. below. 3. Research data are to be accessible to members of the university community, external collaborators and others as appropriate (e.g., for patent applications or journal submissions). Where necessary to assure needed and appropriate access (e.g., for research misconduct investigations), the university may take custody of research data in a manner specified by the Vice President for Research. 4. Disputes regarding access to data should be settled at the lowest possible level, i.e. 2

among the primary parties involved in the generation, analysis, and/or reporting of research data. The next level of arbitration is the Chair of the Department and/or the Dean of the College or School. If disputes about data access cannot be resolved at these levels, the parties, through administrative channels, may request that the Vice President for Research review the issues and render a recommendation for resolution. B. Data Retention 1. The retention of accurately recorded and retrievable research data is of utmost importance for the progress of scientific integrity. The PI is responsible for the recording, collection, management and retention of research data. These records must include sufficient detail to permit examination for the purpose of replicating the research, responding to questions that may result from unintentional error or misinterpretation, establishing authenticity of the records, and confirming the validity of the conclusions. 2. PIs must adopt an orderly system of data organization and should communicate the chosen system to all members of a research group and to the appropriate administrative personnel, where applicable. Particularly for long- term research, PIs must establish and maintain procedures for the protection of essential records in the event of a natural disaster or other emergency. 3. For studies involving several investigators/collaborators, possibly in more than one laboratory, the (lead) PI must implement a procedure to catalogue the experiments of the whole study and provide the location of other experimental and/or field notebooks, data, and relevant materials stored in other laboratories or other locations. 4. There are state and federal regulations prescribing the length of time researchers must maintain the original data. The times required to retain data vary from three to seven years depending on the governmental organization. Unless a longer period is specified by the State of South Carolina or the sponsor, research data must be kept for a minimum of three years after the project ends or, if funded research, three years after the final project close-out. In addition, any of the following circumstances may justify longer periods of retention: a. data must be kept for as long as may be necessary to protect rights to intellectual property resulting from the work; b. if allegations regarding the research arise concerning scientific, scholarly or financial misconduct, data must be retained until such allegations are fully resolved; and/or, c. if a student is involved, data must be retained at least until the degree is awarded or it is clear that the student has abandoned the work. 5. Beyond the period of retention specified herein, the destruction of research data is at the discretion of the PI and his/her department. Records normally will be retained in the unit where they are produced. Research and sponsored project records must be retained on the USC campus, or in facilities under the auspices of USC, unless specific 3

permission to do otherwise is granted in writing by the Vice President for Research or his/her designee. C. Transfer of Data in the Event a Researcher Leaves USC In the event that the PI or other key researcher leaves USC, he/she may negotiate an Agreement for the Disposition of Research Data for projects on which he/she is working. 1. A written Agreement on Disposition of Research Data may be negotiated between the departing investigator and the department chair or dean and approved by the Vice President for Research or his/her designee to allow the transfer of research data. This agreement must be executed prior to the removal of data from USC. 2. If a researcher transfers with a funded project to another institution, ownership of the research data may be transferred to the new institution under a written agreement approved by the departmental chair, dean and Vice President for Research or his/her designee. At minimum, the agreement will establish the following: i. The new institution s acceptance of custodial responsibilities for the data; and, ii. USC s access to the data, should that become necessary. 3. All Agreements on Disposition of Research Data must include a provision that USC has the right of access to all research records and materials for reasonable cause after reasonable notice regardless of the location of the researcher(s) for the period of time specified in Section II. B. 4 above. Related University Policies UNIV 1.51 Data and Information Governance UNIV 1.52 Responsible Use of Data, Technology, and User Credentials HISTORY OF REVISIONS DATE OF REVISION March 14, 1996 June 7, 2005 November 8, 2013 March 15, 2018 REASON FOR REVISION New Policy Policy organization, content, and accuracy reviewed in October 2013; no substantive revision required. Policy organization, content, and accuracy reviewed in October 2013; no substantive revision required. The research environment is changing due to the exponential growth of data, legislative and sponsor mandates on data management, and 4

5 new solutions for data storage. This revision is designed to assure continuing compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and internal requirements with respect to research data management practices, data storage, data security, and sharing and dissemination of research data.