Space Communication and Navigation Testbed: Communications Technology for Exploration

Similar documents
LLCD Accomplishments No Issues with Atmospheric Effects like Fading and Turbulence. Transmitting Data at 77 Mbps < 5 above the horizon

Software Defined Radio Developments and Verification for Space Environment on NASA s Communication Navigation, and Networking Testbed (CoNNeCT)

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

Space Communications Supporting NASA s Missions

Don M Boroson MIT Lincoln Laboratory. 28 August MIT Lincoln Laboratory

STRS COMPLIANT FPGA WAVEFORM DEVELOPMENT

SCaN. Badri Younes Deputy Associate Administrator NASA Space Communications and Navigation October NASA Aeronautics and Space Administration

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

High Speed, Low Cost Telemetry Access from Space Development Update on Programmable Ultra Lightweight System Adaptable Radio (PULSAR)

Incorporating a Test Flight into the Standard Development Cycle

NASA Mission Directorates

Potential Markets for Optical Communications SkyLight Workshop ESTEC, 08/02/2017 D. Mignolo, P. Haines

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

Satellite Technology for Future Applications

Software Defined GPS Receiver for International Space Station

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Update Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

JHU/APL CubeSat Initiatives. Andy Lewin 19 April 2007

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

The Decade of Light: Innovations in Space Communications and Navigation Technologies

Christopher J. Scolese NASA Associate Administrator

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

Constellation Systems Division

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

JPL Does Cubesats. Tony Freeman* Manager, Innova1on Foundry. April 2013

CubeSat Navigation System and Software Design. Submitted for CIS-4722 Senior Project II Vermont Technical College Al Corkery

Deep Space Communication The further you go, the harder it gets. D. Kanipe, Sept. 2013

Future Plans for the Deep Space Network (DSN)

DLR s Optical Communications Program for 2018 and beyond. Dr. Sandro Scalise Institute of Communications and Navigation

A CubeSat-Based Optical Communication Network for Low Earth Orbit

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

Automation & Robotics (A&R) for Space Applications in the German Space Program

BENEFITS OF A SPACE-BASED AUGMENTATION SYSTEM FOR EARLY IMPLEMENTATION OF GPS MODERNIZATION SIGNALS

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

A Feasibility Study of Techniques for Interplanetary Microspacecraft Communications

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

2009 CubeSat Developer s Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

GSAW 2014 Session 11C Current and Future Ground Systems for CubeSats Working Group

Ground Systems for Small Sats: Simple, Fast, Inexpensive

SpaceDataHighway. Commercial Data Relay Service and its Evolution

NASA and Earth Science Enterprise Overview

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

Space Technology FY 2013

SPACE STUDIES BOARD MEETING NASA Science Overview. Thomas H. Zurbuchen Associate Administrator Science Mission Directorate,

New Small Satellite Capabilities for Microwave Atmospheric Remote Sensing: The Earth Observing Nanosatellite- Microwave (EON-MW)

SPACOMM 2009 PANEL. Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites

Integration and Test of the Microwave Radiometer Technology Acceleration (MiRaTA) CubeSat

BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT FY12 TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION MISSIONS PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST PROPOSALS DUE.

chairs IEEE EMC symposium technical sessions. He is often tutorial workshops and technical demonstrations at IEEE EMC international symposiums.

W-Band Satellite Transmission in the WAVE Mission

NASA Research Areas of Interest Released by NASA HQ February 2014

MarCO: Ready for Launch Andrew Klesh, Joel Krajewski

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

MSL Lessons Learned Study. Presentation to NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee April 29, 2013 Mark Saunders, Study Lead

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

High Speed, Low Cost Telemetry Access from Space Development Update on Programmable Ultra Lightweight System Adaptable Radio (PULSAR)

Executive Summary. Astrium GmbH (Germany): Study lead RF systems and protocols. INSA (Spain): RF ground segment

Cover. DLR-ESA Workshop on ARTES-11. SGEO: Implementation of of Artes-11. Dr. Andreas Winkler

NASA s Strategy for Enabling the Discovery, Access, and Use of Earth Science Data

Overview on Lasercom (from an MIT-LL Perspective)

General Support Technology Programme (GSTP) Period 6 Element 3: Technology Flight Opportunities (TFO)

Future DSN Capabilities

ICG: Achieving GNSS Interoperability and Robustness

NASA Spectrum Management Update: WRC-11 Issues and Objectives and Domestic Concerns

Model Based AOCS Design and Automatic Flight Code Generation: Experience and Future Development

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

An insight in the evolution of GEO satellite technologies for broadband services

Laser Communications Relay Demonstrations

Uranus Exploration Challenges

HYDROS Development of a CubeSat Water Electrolysis Propulsion System

Satellite System Engineering. -- Communication Telemetry/Tracking/Telecommand (TT&C)

NOAA Satellite Observing System Architecture (NSOSA) Study Update

U.S. Exploration EVA: Architecture and ConOps Overview. NASA-JSC EVA Office/J. Buffington

Space Situational Awareness 2015: GPS Applications in Space

Pathfinder Technology Demonstrator GlobalStar Testing and Results

From Antenna to Bits:

LUXEMBOURG AND KLEOS COOPERATION WITHIN THE SPACERESOURCES.LU INITIATIVE CONFÉRENCE DE PRESSE. 24 juillet 2017

I SARA 08/10/13. Pre-Decisional Information -- For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

THE OPS-SAT NANOSATELLITE MISSION

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE. Inter-satellite omnidirectional optical communicator for remote sensing

Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme

KUTESat. Pathfinder. Presented by: Marco Villa KUTESat Project Manager. Kansas Universities Technology Evaluation Satellite

ARTES 1 ROLLING WORKPLAN 2010

From Single to Formation Flying CubeSats: An Update of the Delfi Programme

Deep Space cubesats a nanosats at JPL. Tony Freeman Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Satellite Advances in New Mexico

X-band CubeSat Communication System Demonstration

Maturing Small Satellite Mission Capabilities at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

10/29/2018. Apollo Management Lessons for Moon-Mars Initiative. I Have Learned To Use The Word Impossible With The Greatest Caution.

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

CubeSat Launch and Deployment Accommodations

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

Orbicraft Pro Complete CubeSat kit based on Raspberry-Pi

Air Force Institute of Technology. A CubeSat Mission for Locating and Mapping Spot Beams of GEO Comm-Satellites

Transcription:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Communication and Navigation Testbed: Communications Technology for Exploration Richard Reinhart NASA Glenn Research Center July 2013 ISS Research and Development Conference Sponsored by Space Communication and Navigation Program

Titan Lunar Relay Satellite Neptune Saturn Uranus Pluto Charon LADEE Jupiter Near Earth Optical Relay Pathfinder Mars NISN NISN MCC MOCs 2018 2025 2015 Add: 2023 SCaN Services Provide: Venus Antenna Array Sun Deep Space Optical Relay Pathfinder Mercury Microwave Links Optical Links Standard Services andarchitecture Interfaces Integrated Network Management (INM) Deep Space Optical Initial Capability Integrated Enhanced service-based Optical Initial Capability DelaySpace Tolerant Networking Integrated Service Execution (ISE) Space Internetworking throughout Deep Optical Relay Pathfinder Space internetworking (DTN and IP) Solar Deep Space Antenna Array Space Internetworking System Lunar Relay Satellite Initial Capability International interoperability Lunar Optical Pathfinder (LADEE) Optical Ground Terminal Significant Increases in Bandwidth Assured safety and security of missions TDRSEarth K, Lincreases Near Optical Capability Retirement of AgingInitial RF Systems Significant in bandwidth Increased TDRS M,N microwave link data rates 2 Lunar Relay Payload (potential) NISN

Next Generation Communication and Navigation Technology Optical Communications Antenna Arraying Technology Receive and Transmit Software Defined Radio Advanced Antenna Technology Spacecraft RF Transmitter/Receiver Technology Advanced Networking Technology Spacecraft Antenna Technology Spectrum Efficient Technology Ka-band Atmospheric Calibration Position, Navigation, and Time Space-Based Range Technology Uplink Arraying SCaN Testbed Technologies 3

SCaN Testbed Software Defined Radio-based Communication System S-band Antenna Ka-band Antenna Gimbal GPS Antenna SDRs - Two S-band SDRs (One with GPS), One Ka-band SDR RF - Ka-band TWTA, S-band switch network Antennas - Two low gain S-band antennas, One - L-band GPS antenna, Medium gain S-band and Ka-band antenna on antenna pointing subsystem. Antenna pointing system - Two gimbals, Control electronics Flight Computer/Avionics 4

Pictures of Installation and First Operations Launched: July 20, 2012

SCAN Testbed Mission Objectives Mature Software Defined Radio (SDR) technologies and infrastructure for future SCaN architecture and NASA Missions Ready for space use/verification/reconfiguration/operations/new software aspects Advance the understanding of SDR Standard, waveform repository, design references, tools, etc for NASA missions Conduct Experiment s Program Portfolio of experiments across different technologies; communication, navigation, and networking Build/educate a group of waveform developers and assemble repository of waveforms Validate Future Mission Capabilities Representative capabilities; S-band, Ka-band, GPS 6

SCAN Testbed System Architecture TDRS K/L S/L-band Ka-band * Cubesat (Commercial/International) 7

Why Use Software Defined Radios? SDRs provide unprecedented operational flexibility that allows communications functions in software to be updated in development or flight Functions can be changed within the same SDR across mission phases E.g., range safety functions in launch phase, mission ops functions in mission phase Technology upgrades can be made in flight E.g., modulation methods, new coding schemes Failure corrections can be implemented in flight E.g., A Mars satellite corrected interference problem with software update in transit using an SDR Software defined functionality enables standard radios to be tailored for specific missions with reusable software Like different PCs running Word and Excel use an operating system, standardization enables different radio platforms to run common,reusable software across many missions Cost reductions possible with common architecture, reusable software and risk avoidance Software Defined Radios are the Instruments of the SCaN Testbed; 8 Jet Propulsion Lab Harris Corp. General Dynamics Corp.

Software makes it go Waveform Application and Hardware Interfaces Reprogrammable Software is the key! Desktop Computer Software Defined Radio Applications in Software (Word, Excel, Financial, Games) Applications in Software (comm, networking, navigation) Hardware Abstraction Layer Hardware STRS Abstraction Layer (e.g. Windows Operating System) (Space Telecommunications (e.g. Operating Environment andradio Operating System) System) Processor Memory Keyboard Input Hard Drive Video /Monitor Output Processor Digital Signal Processing HW (e.g. FPGA, DSP) Memory digital RF conversion Science Instrument Antenna Input Output (Data) (Signal) New New Validate

Impact of SCaN Testbed Technology Reconfigurable devices are part of our missions. Understanding their function both individually and within the system is critical Open platform model to reduce developer dependence Platforms last for >10 years software by NASA, others on space hardware SDR standardization enables 3rd party software development on open platforms and formation of a software applications repository Incentive to conform to standard architecture to reuse flight proven sw Changing the culture associated with radio technology Routine verification of new sw on ground hardware, not the flight hardware Pioneering techniques for rapid turnaround of software verification for flight applications. We are unique to change functions often and intentionally Consider the platform along with the application Requirements, test waveforms for verification, configuration options

Early Research & Technology On-orbit Accomplishments STRS-compliant SDRs successfully implemented and operational in space - NASA s new standard for SDRs Independent 3rd party developed waveform operating on another provider s SDR, according to STRS Architecture Operated NASA s first Ka-band mission with TDRSS. Many lessons both for project team and Space Network Ka-band system First Testbed SDR reconfigurations. Demonstrated new software verification and new capability added on-orbit Received GPS carrier signals; first civilian reception of new L5 signals in space. Conducting tests with the newest GPS satellites. Progress on waveform repository technical aspects and licensing issues a key element of the SCaN Testbed Demonstration in space is key to accomplishments

Experiment Program Goals Enable and encourage national participation with industry and academia to gain a broad level of ideas and concept Increase the base of STRS experts Maximize use and usefulness of SCaN Testbed to meet NASA s needs and interests Guided by SCaN Integrated Architecture and Comm/Nav Roadmap Innovative developments to advance new technologies and applications Increase confidence in SDR technology and accelerate infusion Balance among different kinds of activities Tech advancement/flight validation (bandwidth efficient, cognitive, coding, networking, GPS) Mission concept demo (e.g. next gen relay, lander communication), Supporting other NASA activities (e.g. TDRS-K, Space Network updates) Science experiments 12

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ka/S band System emulation for Space Based Relay GPS L1, L2c, L5 orbit fix and validation Improved GPS solutions with comm link data fusion. Scintillation, jammer detector Space based networking, including DTN, & security Potential SDRs for lunar landers, rovers, EVA SDRs for future TDRS Transponders Bandwidth efficient waveforms reduce spectrum use Ka/S System for TDRSS K,/ L function, performance validation 1st NASA Ka TDRSS User Cognitive applications enable next generation comm. Sensing, interference mitigation Validation and on-orbit user for WSC testing SDR/STRS technology advancement to TRL-7 New processing capacity www.nasa.gov 13

What Experiment Can I Do? Research or New Product Developments & Technology: Spectrum/power Efficient Techniques (new modulations and coding) Cognitive Radio Applications and Adaptive Waveforms Signal sensing & interference mitigation GPS demonstrations (L1/L2, L5, GPS corrections/augmentation), jammer detectors, scintillation (e.g. solar flares) Networking including Disruptive Tolerant Networking (store/forward), adaptive routing, secure routing, sensor web app, formation flying Architecture Unique system access in space with compatible ground station and Space Network Conops Use on-orbit processing capacity in new and different ways NASA In-orbit target of opportunity for e.g. TDRS-K/L tests, space network updates 1 4

System Architecture Concept Experiment Examples TDRS GEO TDRS LEO Cubesat 15

Ways to Start the Experiment Process Intended Org Call University Cooperative Agreement Notice (CAN) Commercial Experiment Opportunity (EO) NASA/ OGA EO, SCaN Program, Commercial (small) SBIR Proposal Submit via NSPIRES to Principal Investigator Evaluation Three review periods (proposal due dates): Sept, Jan, May Submit to Principal Ongoing synch-up Investigator with CAN Review cycle or call Experiment Board Submit to Principal as-needed Investigator Submit to NASA SBIR annual call NASA review, per SBIR process Agreement Available Funding Cooperative Agreement Space Act Agreement MOU Contract 16

SCAN Testbed Benefits As a technology demonstration mission, SCAN Testbed is primarily a benefit to future missions Greater science data return from future missions Enable new science capability and/or extend mission life through adaptive platforms Reduces technology and development risks for new SDRbased systems Reduce SDR vendor dependence for waveform development Demonstrate new capability and concepts in space The STRS SDR Standard has been referenced in SDR standards bodies for applicability to Earth-based, resource constrained radio systems Strong relevance to future Agency communication and navigation needs 17

Summary SCaN Testbed launched, on-orbit and SDRs performing great! SCaN Testbed available to commercial, university, and other partners for experiments! University - NSPIRES: http://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/index.do Commercial/Non-profit FedBiz Ops: https://www.fbo.gov/ Small Commercial: SBIR: http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/sbir/sbir.html SCaN Testbed advancing SDR technology and applications aboard ISS! 18

For more information Visit SCaN Testbed on-line: http://spaceflightsystems.grc.nasa.gov/sopo/sco/ SCaNTestbed or Contact: Richard Reinhart Principal Investigator, SCaN Tesbed richard.c.reinhart@nasa.gov 19

Acknowledgements SCaN Testbed Research & Technology (R&T) Leadership: Sandra Johnson1, Thomas Kacpura1, James Lux2, Greg Heckler3, Oron Schmidt4, Jacqueline Myrann4 SCaN Testbed Glenn Research Center R&T Team Jennifer Nappier, Joseph Downey, David Chelmins, Dan Bishop, Dale Mortensen, Mary Joe Shalkhauser, Steve Hall, Neil Adams, David Kifer, Jeff Glass, Janette Briones, David Brooks, Wesley Eddy, Bryan Welch 1. 2. 3. 4. NASA Glenn Research Center Jet Propulsion Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Johnson Space Center

2 1

SCaN Testbed Point of Contacts Project Website http://spaceflightsystems.grc.nasa.gov/sopo/sco/scantestbed Technical Contacts Principal Investigator Mr. Richard Reinhart richard.c.reinhart@nasa.gov 216-433-6588 Deputy Principal Investigator Ms. Sandra Johnson sandra.k.johnson@nasa.gov 216-433-8016 Programmatic Contact Project Manager Mr. Dave Irimies david.p.irimies@nasa.gov 216-433-5979 22

STRS and SCaN Testbed References Space Telecommunication Radio System Rel 1.02.1 NASA/TM 2010-216809/REV1 http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/2011000280 6_2011001718.pdf SCaN Testbed Overview, Documents, Links http://spaceflightsystems.grc.nasa.gov/sopo/sco/scantestbe d/candidate/ 23

NSPIRES Website for university proposals 2 4

Federal Business Opportunity WebSite for commercial proposals 2 5