APPENDIX M NOISE ANALYSIS

Similar documents
Attachment #2 PPW133-07

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

Q. Will prevailing winds and wind speeds be taken into account in the noise study?

Appendix N. Preliminary Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum

CALGARY SOUTHEAST STONEY TRAIL Detailed Design 17th Avenue SE to Macleod Trail South (Hwy 2A) Calgary, Alberta

Town of Milton Phasing: Urban Expansion Area

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

Acoustic Assessment Report Silvercreek Solar Park Transformer Station Aylmer, Ontario

Appendix B: Noise Study

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

NOISE IMPACT STUDY. Benton Boarding and Daycare 5673 Fourth Line Road Ottawa, Ontario City of Ottawa File No. D

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Fairview Wind Project Township of Clearview (Stayner), Ontario

Noise Impact Analysis. NW Bethany Boulevard Improvement Project NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. November Washington County.

Noise Study Report. Addendum. Interstate 10 Corridor Project. In the Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles

Appendix D. Traffic Noise Analysis Report. I-94 St. Michael to Albertville Minnesota Department of Transportation

Radiocommunication Facility Review Protocol

Southwest Anthony Henday Drive At Wedgewood Heights Residential Neighborhood in Edmonton, AB

Virginia Avenue Tunnel (VAT) Reconstruction Noise Analysis Approach

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

REVISED NOISE IMPACT STUDY

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM)

Session 8 Traffic Noise Modeling: Best Practices for Modeling and Review of Models

January 2012 Noise Impact Assessment Report for Proposed Cable Tow System For Wakeboarding & Water-skiing Grand Canal Dock, Dublin 4

Appendix H: Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Volume 3: Bloor-Lansdowne GO Station Design and Technical Studies. Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

APPENDIX D Noise Analysis

Noise Abatement Design Study Report Dulles Loop Project (Route 606 and Loudoun County Parkway) UPC 97529

January 15, File: A. Urban Systems Ltd Homer Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9. Attention: Tim Stevens. Dear Tim:

EVALUATION OF COMPLEX AT-GRADE RAIL CROSSING DESIGNS USING A DRIVER SIMULATION

SOUTHWEST ANTHONY HENDAY DRIVE NOISE STUDY OPEN HOUSE WHAT WE HEARD REPORT ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) APPENDIX K Parallel Barriers

Assured Monitoring Group

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

580 - NOISE BARRIERS OPSS 580 INDEX

Traffic Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Technical Report for the North Meadows Extension to US 85 and Interstate 25

Exit 61 I-90 Interchange Modification Justification Study

1 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

King Mill Lambert DRI# 2035 Henry County, Georgia

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number

RETAIL SPACE FOR LEASE Appleby Line at 407, Burlington, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

The Shoppes at Forney Crossings

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT

Building Canada s Advanced Wireless Networks: Protocol Development

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

APPENDIX Q MSP 2020 Improvements EA Traffic Noise Proposed Roadway Improvements Memorandum

REP N Bank St. Rooftop Patio Noise Study. N45 Architecture Inc. 852 Bank Street Project Rooftop Patio Environmental Noise Study

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Raging River Quarry. Environmental Noise Monitoring Protocol Provisional Operations 11/30/2016

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study

State Road A1A North Bridge over ICWW Bridge

Noise walls Some Noise Facts

PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT

2.8 NOISE. Chapter IX 2. Comments and Responses CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Comment

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 26, 2017

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

GEORGE MASSEY TUNNEL REPLACEMENT PROJECT PHASE 2 EXPLORING THE OPTIONS CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT AUGUST 2013

ON USING PERFECT SIGNAL PROGRESSION AS THE BASIS FOR ARTERIAL DESIGN: A NEW PERSPECTIVE

Update on Traffic Results and Findings

APPENDIX F NOISE IMPACT AND VIBRATION ANALYSIS. City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01

Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Appendix F Noise and Vibration

SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING an APPLICATION TO REDEVELOP 130 Thompson Road South Milton, Ontario

Further Comparison of Traffic Noise Predictions Using the CadnaA and SoundPLAN Noise Prediction Models

Environmental Noise Mapping with Smartphone Applications: A participatory noise map of West Hartford, CT.

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PORTABLE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ENTIRE PROJECT WAS A COMPLETELY ACADEMIC EXERCISE. THIS PROJECT IN NO WAY REPRESENTS THE OPINIONS OF ITRANS OR THE MTO

FARM TO MARKET 1103 OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC MEETING. FM 1103 I-35 to Rodeo Dr

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints

Sydney Metro City and Southwest North Corridor Works Technical Report - Noise Monitoring OOHW P1-6: 25 to 26 August 2018

Environmental noise mapping study for heterogeneous traffic conditions

Complete Streets & PPM to FDM Update

FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Contents

Effectiveness of Traffic Noise Barrier on I 471 in Campbell County, Kentucky (Interim Report)

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING AUGUST 2014

CONCEPT REVIEW GUIDELINES

Diversion Analysis. Appendix K

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017

Appendix CANADA / Québec Montréal tunnels Ville-Marie & Viger

A STUDY ON THE CHARACTERISTICS AND PREDICTION METHOD OF NOISE FROM CONCRETE RAILWAY BRIDGE

November 12, Mr. Bryan Tripp Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc. 34 Harvard Road Guelph, ON N1G 4V8

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. PROPOSED AMENDED MASTER PLAN AMENDED - H - ZONE Village of Ridgewood Bergen County, New Jersey

FM 691 CORRIDOR STUDY

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) APPENDIX L Tunnel Openings

FORMER COMMUNITY BETHESDA SPACE

Non-Technical Summary of Environmental Statement

USING THE RAILWAY NOISE MODEL (RWNM) FOR DETAILED NOISE ANALYSES AT SOME INTERESTING RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

CHAPTER 2C - PRELIMINARY DESIGN. General... 2C-1. Review of Work Load... 2C-2 Establishing Priorities... 2C-2

Transcription:

APPENDIX M NOISE ANALYSIS

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 300 Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: Andrew Head, Halton Region FROM: Gino Dela Cruz, MRC DATE: August 25, 2011 (Revised June 13, 2012) COPIES: Marek Trzaski, MRC; Greg Moore, Ecoplans OUR FILE: 7695 SUBJECT: Tremaine Road Class EA Derry Rd. to Britannia Rd. 1. INTRODUCTION Halton Region retained MRC to undertake the Tremaine Road, from Derry Road to Britannia Road, Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study in the Town of Milton. This study is being conducted in accordance with Schedule C of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (October 2000, amended 2007 & 2011), which is approved under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act. As part of the Class EA Study, a noise assessment was conducted by MRC which is documented herein. 2. STUDY AREA Tremaine Road is currently a rural north-south two-lane arterial road (Regional Road 22) beginning at Dundas Street in the Town of Oakville/City of Burlington extending north of Highway 401 in the Town of Milton. Located on the west periphery of the Town of Milton, the Tremaine Road corridor traverses through rural area in the south and then into the Milton Urban Area in the north. The Region of Halton Official Plan and the Transportation Master Plan envision Tremaine Road as a major north-south arterial providing regional connection west of the Town of Milton. A new Tremaine Road interchange at Highway 401 is also planned and currently in detailed design. Tremaine Road is also the border between the Town of Milton Urban Area and the protected Niagara Escarpment natural/rural area from Highway 401 to south of Derry Road. The Town of Milton Urban Area has been expanded further south to Britannia Road (RR 6), as envisioned in the Sherwood Survey Secondary Plan and the Boyne Survey Secondary Plan. The Town of Milton is also planning the development of the Milton Education Village located on the west side of Tremaine Road extending from south of Derry Road to Britannia Road. Exhibit 2-1 below illustrates the study area.

Exhibit 2-1 Study Area MAIN ST TREMAINE RD (REG. RD. 22) BELL SCHOOL LINE DERRY RD (REG. RD. 7) STUDY AREA SCOTT BLVD FIRST LINE CNR BRITANNIA RD (REG. RD 6) 3. METHODOLOGY Noise levels are predicted in decibels in the A-weighted dba scale, which best approximates the human perception of sound over a specified time period. An increase of 2 3 decibels in noise levels is considered to be just perceivable to the average person. It should be noted that a 3 dba increase in noise equates to a doubling of traffic volumes. 3.1 Ministry of the Environment Guidelines Since roadway sound levels vary over time, the noise descriptor used in Ontario to assess noise is the equivalent sound level, Leq. Leq is identified as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying sound level over a specified time period. For the purposes of assessing municipal roadway noise, Leq is calculated on the basis of the 16 hour daytime period, 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. For Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs) under new development, the provincial objective for sound level is 55 dba for the daytime period (for calculation purposes this is defined as 3 metres from the back of the house, at a height of 1.5m). Based on the Ministry of Environment (MOE) / Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Noise Protocol, where a new or expanded roadway is proposed adjacent to a Noise Sensitive Area Page 2 of 6

(NSA), the MOE requires that the future noise level with and without the facility be compared. Where increases in noise levels are predicted, the following actions are recommended: 0 to 5 dba increase - no action is required greater than 5 dba - investigate noise control measures within the right-of-way Where introduced, noise control measures should achieve a minimum of 5 dba attenuation over the first row receivers. Noise control measures should mitigate to ambient, as administratively, economically, and technically feasible. The Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method (ORNAMENT), which was developed by the Ministry of the Environment, is used to assess potential noise impacts on existing residential areas where changes are proposed to existing roads. ORNAMENT, based on a model developed by the United States Federal Highway Administration, is designed for land use planning and has been modified for use on a personal computer using the STAMSON 5.0 computer program. The program is used to predict noise levels generated from road sources at the outdoor activity areas (typically backyards) of Noise Sensitive Areas (NSAs). It considers numerous variables including traffic volumes, percentage of trucks, distance from roadway, road grade, posted speed, topography, barriers and vegetation. 3.2 Proposed Future Development Where new development is proposed, developers will be required to submit noise study reports as per the MOE requirements for approval. Based on MOE requirements, those who develop land for residential uses adjacent to an existing or planned noise generator (i.e. highway, roadway, factory, etc.) are responsible for ensuring that noise levels in the outdoor living area are consistent with the provincial objective of 55 dba ten years after construction. In such cases, it is the responsibility of the developer to identify and implement indoor and outdoor noise attenuation (i.e. noise walls, air conditioning, forced ventilation, etc.). Even with noise attenuation measures, if the provincial objective of 55 dba cannot be achieved ten years after construction, noise warning clauses are required on title of those properties affected. Within the study area for the, the following recently constructed and proposed future developments are noted: Proposed residential condo development east of Tremaine Road, south of Derry Road Existing Residential Development east of Tremaine Road between south of Derry Road to south of Dymott Avenue Proposed Residential Development east of Tremaine Road, north of Louis St. Laurent Avenue Given that future noise levels for the above developments would have been addressed as part of the land use planning approvals process, the noise analysis for the did not account for the potential noise impacts to these proposed and recent developments. 4. NOISE SENSITIVE AREAS (NSAs) Noise Sensitive Areas (NSAs) within the study area were identified in accordance with the criteria outlined in the MTO/MOE Noise Protocol. Based on the review of the study area, four (4) receiver locations were identified to represent the NSAs along Tremaine Road (shown in Exhibit 4-1). Page 3 of 6

As noted in Section 2, the study area is currently being redeveloped on the east side of Tremaine Road for residential uses, as envisioned in the Sherwood Survey Secondary Plan and the ongoing Boyne Survey Secondary Plan. Also, further development of lands west of Tremaine Road between south of Derry Road and Britannia Road, known as Milton Education Village, is being planned by the Town of Milton. It is anticipated that most of the existing NSAs east (south of Louis St. Laurent Avenue), and west (south of Derry Road to Britannia Road) of Tremaine Road will no longer exist in the future. Nonetheless, they were included since some approved plans are not in place. 5. NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT The review of potential noise impacts assumed that the future Tremaine Road is the dominant noise source within the study area given the proximity of the NSAs to the roadway. Noise modelling was carried out for the following scenarios: Future noise levels (Year 2031) without Tremaine Road widening Future noise levels (Year 2031) with Tremaine Road widening to six lanes The following factors used in the noise impact assessment are summarized in Table 5-1. Exhibit 5-1 Factors Used in the Noise Analysis Factor Noise Descriptor Posted Speed Traffic Volumes Tremaine Road (AADT Year 2031) Truck Percentages (Medium/Heavy) Receptor Height Assumptions Future Conditions: L eq (16 hr) 80 km/h Future Without Proposed Widening 60 km/h Future With Proposed Widening Future Conditions Without Proposed Widening: Between Derry Road and Britannia Road 12,000 (assumed capacity of 2 lane urban road) Future Conditions With Proposed Widening: Between Derry Road and Louis St. Laurent Avenue 44,000 Between Louis St. Laurent Avenue and Britannia Road 31,000 1.8 % / 1.4 % 1.5 m above the ground Page 4 of 6

R2 R3 R1 R4 Match Line Match Line Tremaine Road Derry Road to Britannia Rd Class Environmental Assessment Noise Receiver Locations Exhibit 4-1

Noise levels were calculated at the selected receiver locations as shown in Exhibit 4-1 with and without the proposed improvements to Tremaine Road. Table 5-2 summarizes the calculated future noise levels at the receiver locations, the predicted change in future noise levels due to the proposed improvements to Tremaine Road, and whether or not the consideration of noise mitigation is required based on the Ministry of Environment (MOE) / Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Noise Protocol. STAMSON output sheets for are on file with MRC and Halton Region. As shown in Table 5-2, the predicted increases in future noise levels are less than 5 dba for all receiver locations as a result of the proposed improvements to Tremaine Road. Given this, the consideration of noise mitigation is not warranted based on MTO/MOE criteria. Receiver Table 5-2 Summary of Calculated Noise Levels Projected Noise Level (Year 2031) dba Leq (16) Without Proposed Improvements With Proposed Improvements Projected Change (dba) Consideration of Noise Mitigation Required Based on MTO/MOE Criteria ( 5 dba change) R1 53.0 53.3 + 0.3 No R2 50.8 52.5 + 1.7 No R3 53.7 55.2 + 1.5 No R4 51.3 54.4 + 3.1 No 6. CONCLUSION The predicted increase in noise levels are less than 5 dba with the proposed improvements on Tremaine Road at all receiver locations. Therefore, the consideration of noise mitigation is not warranted based on MTO/MOE Noise Protocol. Page 6 of 6