Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

Similar documents
Acoustic Assessment Report Silvercreek Solar Park Transformer Station Aylmer, Ontario

APPENDIX M NOISE ANALYSIS

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

Appendix N. Preliminary Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Fairview Wind Project Township of Clearview (Stayner), Ontario

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

NOISE IMPACT STUDY. Benton Boarding and Daycare 5673 Fourth Line Road Ottawa, Ontario City of Ottawa File No. D

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

REVISED NOISE IMPACT STUDY

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

REP N Bank St. Rooftop Patio Noise Study. N45 Architecture Inc. 852 Bank Street Project Rooftop Patio Environmental Noise Study

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia

November 12, Mr. Bryan Tripp Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc. 34 Harvard Road Guelph, ON N1G 4V8

Sound Reflection from a Motorway Barrier

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

Assured Monitoring Group

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

Field noise measurement in the huge industrial plants for accurate prediction

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

ITV CORONATION STREET PRODUCTION FACILITY, TRAFFORD WHARF ROAD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT OF PROPOSED METROLINK LINE

January 2012 Noise Impact Assessment Report for Proposed Cable Tow System For Wakeboarding & Water-skiing Grand Canal Dock, Dublin 4

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Q. Will prevailing winds and wind speeds be taken into account in the noise study?

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental.

Acoustic Assessment Report Whittington Wind Farm Project Township of Amaranth (Whittington), Ontario

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics acoustical study for the City of St. Petersburg.

FINAL Acoustic Assessment Report Hydro One Networks Inc. Clarington Transformer Station

METHODOLOGY FOR VERIFICATION OF SOFTWARE FOR NOISE ATTENUATION CALCULATION ACCORDING TO ISO STANDARD

Liddell Coal Operations

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

Research Article Study on Noise Prediction Model and Control Schemes for Substation

July 8, Mr. Bryan Tripp Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc. 34 Harvard Road Guelph, ON N1G 4V8

Noise walls Some Noise Facts

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Roche Ireland Limited

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

Roche Ireland Limited

Problems with the INM: Part 2 Atmospheric Attenuation

Liddell Coal Operations

Information for Operators of Digitally Modulated Radio Systems in Licence-Exempt Radio Frequency Bands

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath

Terms of Reference of Aircraft Noise at IGI Airport, New Delhi

Investigation of Noise Spectrum Characteristics for an Evaluation of Railway Noise Barriers

noise is generally defined as unwanted sound

2.8 NOISE. Chapter IX 2. Comments and Responses CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Comment

The Research on Application of Cadna/A Software in Noise Prediction of Urban Substation

Compliance Noise Survey & Assessment

Southwest Anthony Henday Drive At Wedgewood Heights Residential Neighborhood in Edmonton, AB

A Brief Review Of The Hoosac Wind Turbine Noise Studies

Liddell Coal Operations

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

City and Borough of Juneau

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH

Sheringham Shoal Cawston, Norfolk. Substation Noise Assessment Summary

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Control of noise from the operation of stationary systems

Children's Center Noise Monitoring Monday, June 17, 2013

HIIUMAA OFFSHORE WINDFARM, ESTONIA LOW FREQUENCY NOISE AND INFRASOUND SURVEY

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

SILVERSTONE CIRCUIT MASTERPLAN APPENDIX H NOISE & VIBRATION

HARMONOISE: NOISE PREDICTIONS AND THE NEW EUROPEAN HARMONISED PREDICTION MODEL

Bickerdike Allen Partners

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Proposed Hydropower Archimedean Screw Osney Lock and Weir, Oxford. Noise Impact Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT

91 Street Earth Berm Removal in Edmonton, Alberta

Assessment of rail noise based on generic shape of the pass-by time history

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Automated detection and analysis of amplitude modulation at a residence and wind turbine

Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire

Acoustics Technical Note

Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems

Children's Center Noise Monitoring Monday, January 14, 2013

Barlow Solar Energy Centre Acoustic Assessment Report

ECMA-108. Measurement of Highfrequency. emitted by Information Technology and Telecommunications Equipment. 5 th Edition / December 2010

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

CALGARY SOUTHEAST STONEY TRAIL Detailed Design 17th Avenue SE to Macleod Trail South (Hwy 2A) Calgary, Alberta

IS INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation

THE CASE FOR SPECTRAL BASELINE NOISE MONITORING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT.

David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner

Children's Center Noise Monitoring Monday, December 31, 2012

Transcription:

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

Acoustics The study of sound and its properties is known as acoustics. By considering basic physical properties of sound and the acoustic environment, the potential effect of excess or unwanted sound (i.e., noise) can be modelled prior to construction of the sound source. The relevant acoustics used for modelling the sound levels from outdoor power transformers are found in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation (ISO, 1996). The principal factor determining the attenuation (reduction) of sound outdoors is the separation distance between the sound source and the receptor. Simply, the further the receptor is from the source, the less sound it will receive from that source. The relationship between the sound attenuation and distance is logarithmic, thus the sound perceived will decrease rapidly in the areas very near to outdoor sound source(s), but more gradually as the separation distance becomes greater. See Figure 1 below for a chart illustrating this reduction. Other factors that influence sound propagation are included in ISO 9613-2. These account for atmospheric, meteorological and physical conditions that will slightly affect sound propagation (relative to the attenuation due to the source/receptor separation distance). Some factors considered include: surrounding topography; the ground surface between the source and receptor; acoustic frequency range(s) of the sound; surrounding development; and influence of screens/barriers between the source and receptor. The effects of these other factors are not included in Figure 1 since their combined influence is unique to each location.

0 Change in sound level perceived at receptor (db) -10-20 -30-40 -50-60 -70 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance from source (m) Figure 1: Sound reduction resulting from source/receptor separation distance Typical Noise Approval Requirements High-voltage power transformers are subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) related to their sound emissions as required under Section 9 of Ontario s EPA. In order to obtain an ECA, Hydro One submits an application package that meets the criteria set out in NPC-233 (MOE, 1995) to MOE for a technical review by the Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch. The application package includes a description of the site, the surrounding areas, and detailed information about the proposed sound sources. Based on this information, an assessment is made of noise levels at nearby receptors and an ECA is issued if compliance with MOE noise guidelines is predicted. When the nearest receptors are within 500 metres of the site, a detailed acoustic assessment must be performed and the results reported in an Acoustic Assessment Report (AAR) as part of the ECA application. An acoustic assessment evaluates the existing acoustic environment at the proposed site and uses predictive modelling to anticipate what sound levels may occur due to the proposed sound sources associated with the station. If a sound

level above MOE noise guidelines is expected, the acoustic assessment also identifies appropriate noise control measures for the site. Hydro One has successfully used noise barriers and specialized transformers and cooling fans to control sound at several stations. The final AAR includes detailed descriptions of the site and proposed sound sources, a summary of the acoustic assessment results, and specifications for sound control measures (as needed). If the reviewer is confident that the proposed transformers will satisfy noise guidelines based on the application, an ECA will be issued for the equipment. When the nearest receptors are further than 500 metres away, a detailed acoustic assessment is not required for the application. Instead, the MOE has developed a Noise Screening Process (PIBS 4871), which provides the MOE reviewer with enough information to review the ECA application. The ECA issued by the MOE will establish noise limits for the approved sound sources based on MOE noise guidelines. Based on the normal operation on Hydro One sites, generally the noise limits are 45 dba in Class 1 or 2 acoustical areas or 40 dba in Class 3 acoustical areas, but may be louder based on existing background noise levels. The acoustical class of a site is determined by the predominant sounds of the area. A Class 1 area is typical of a major population centre, where the background noise is dominated by the urban hum. A Class 3 area is a rural area with an acoustical environment that is dominated by natural sounds having little or no road traffic. A Class 2 area has a mix of the acoustic environments found in Class 1 and 3 areas. A Class 2 area is distinguished from a Class 1 and Class 3 area primarily by the timing of the noisiest periods of the day and the amount of audible human activity at the site (MOE, 1995).

References Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2006. IEEE Standard Test Code for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and Regulating Transformers. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1996. Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation. Ministry of the Environment (MOE). MOE. 1995. Information to be Submitted for Approval of Stationary Sources of Sound (Publication NPC-233). http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/3405e.pdf. MOE. 1995. Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 3 Areas (Rural) (Publication NPC-232). http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/3405e.pdf. MOE. 1995. Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2 Areas (Urban) (Publication NPC-205). http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/3405e.pdf. MOE. 2005. Noise Screening Process for S.9 Applications (PIBS 4871). http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/4871e.pdf.

Environmental Noise Checklist Site: Proposed Clarington site Noise Sources How many transformers are proposed at this site? 4 What is their electrical rating? 750 MVA; 500/230 kv What is the specified maximum sound level? i 74 dba Noise Receptors What is the land use according to the local official plan for the area(s) adjacent to the proposed site? Residential Agricultural Commercial Industrial Institutional Utility Park Greenbelt/Conservation Other(s): Receptors within approximately 500 metres of the proposed site? ii Permanent or seasonal residences Hospitals Hotels/motels Campgrounds Nursing/retirement homes Schools Rental residences Places of worship See the attached map identifying the four nearest points of reception (POR) described below. Name Description Distance (metres) POR1 Residence 290 POR2 Farm building and residence 400 POR3 Residence 880 POR4 Residence 1060 What is the Acoustic Class of the noise environment at the receptors Class 1 or 2 as per MOE guidelines NPC -205 & NPC-232? iii Class 3 Noise Approval Requirements Is an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) under s.9 of the Environmental Protection Act required? Yes No Is a detailed technical Acoustic Assessment Report (AAR) necessary for the C of A process? Definitely (<500 m separation) Unlikely (>500m separation) Are noise control measures (i.e., acoustic barriers, specialized equipment) necessary to meet the applicable Ministry of the Environment noise guidelines? Likely Unlikely To be determined by AAR i Maximum sound level rating as specified in Hydro One procurement specifications, as a measure of sound pressure per standard IEEE C57.12.90-2006. Actual operating sound levels of the installed transformers are generally quieter than specified maximum. ii According to the MOE Noise Screening Process (PIBS 4871), electrical power transmission, control and distribution facilities do not require an acoustic assessment for approval when the nearest sensitive receptor is more than 500 metres away. This distance is based on conservative assumptions; noise levels at or below guidelines occur at shorter distances for most Hydro One facilities. iii The acoustic class determines the applicable noise guidelines for the site. Based on Hydro One s typical operating conditions, in Class 1 and 2 areas the sound level limit is the typical One Hour Level Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) measured at the receptor, starting from a minimum value of 45 dba (MOE publication NPC-205). For Class 3 areas, the minimum limit is 40 dba at the receptor. In either case the may be higher based on background sound level measurements (NPC-232).