Telecommunications Law

Similar documents
City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY

ZONING ORDINANCES AND TELECOM PROVIDERS CAN WE LIVE IN HARMONY?

March 9, Planning Commission. Benjamin J. Ziskal, AICP, CEcD Assistant Planning Director

COUNCIL ACTION FORM WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES TEXT AMENDMENT

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

DPA : Telecommunications and Small Cell Facilities

COUNTY OF CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING. July 31, :00 PM. Commissioners Chamber

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

5 February 11, 2015 Public Hearing

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1926

Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Meeting. Neighborhood Leaders Meeting May 8, 2014

CHAPTER TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

County of Orange Proposed Wireless Communications Facilities Within County Highways Ordinance Draft September 30, 2015

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL. INTRODUCED BY MICCARELLI, FARRY, D. COSTA, SNYDER, DiGIROLAMO AND MURT, JUNE 26, 2017

SECTION 35 ANTENNAS AND TOWERS

WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE, WYOMING:

S 0342 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Draft ORDINANCE NO.

CITY OF PINE CITY SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES

Modify Section , Major Impact Services and Utilities, of Chapter (Civic Use Types):

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY

Building Canada s Advanced Wireless Networks: Protocol Development

Notice of Proposed Amendment Request for Expedited Review

Amendments to the Wichita-Sedgwick County of the Unified Zoning Code Required by K.S.A & FCC Declaratory Ruling

Telecommunications. A Presentation to the Georgia Planning Association. David C. Kirk, AICP Troutman Sanders LLP

ARTICLE 25 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS AND ANTENNAS Updated

Agenda Town of Duck Planning Board Regular Meeting Paul F. Keller Meeting Hall Wednesday, October 11, :30 p.m.

ORDINANCE NUMBER: SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT ORDINANCE

M E M O R A N D U M. Update of April 11, 2016 Memorandum on Regulation of WITN s Poles in Local Right-of-Way 1

WHEREAS, the City of (the City ) is an Illinois municipality in. accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and,

MODEL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE for Siting of "Small Cell" Telecommunication Infrastructure in Public Rights-Of-Way

: PERSONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE FACILITIES: REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

CITY OF RICE LAKE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS ORDINANCE NO. 52 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

City/County Design Guidelines for Wireless Communication Facility in the Right of Way. Acquire Agreement with City of Knoxville/Knox County

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Chapter 15

BLADEN COUNTY Wireless Communication Facility Ordinance

Kenton County Planning Commission 1 REGULATIONS FOR CELLULAR ANTENNA TOWERS AND DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM TOWERS IN KENTON COUNTY

# Insite RE Inc./ Verizon Wireless Special Use Permit Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

2. As such, Proponents of Antenna Systems do not require permitting of any kind from the Town.

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1874

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ENACTING TITLE 19 OF THE CENTERVILLE MUNICIPAL

Frequently Asked Questions about Wireless Facilities on Wooden Utility Poles and Streetlight Poles

Sec Radio, television, satellite dish and communications antennas and towers.

Chapter 22 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS, ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION BASE SITES APPLICATION

David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner

Receiving and Transmitting Antennas, Communication and Broadcast Towers

Radiocommunication Facility Review Protocol

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT&T Proposed Telecommunications Facility 2700 Watt Avenue APN#

C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).

Initial Comments on DRI Application for Wakeby Road Cell Tower September 26, 2017

Summerlin South Community Association. Model Rules for Installation of Antennas in Planned Unit Developments. Satellite Antenna Resolution & Criteria

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Planning Commission clarified minor changes to the SAF ordinance on May 24, 2018; and

PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT

City of Burbank. Planning and Transportation Division WIRELESS AND DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM ( DAS ) PROJECTS SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM

Wireless Facility Engineering Review

Stakeholder Meeting City of Grand Junction & Mesa County

AN ORDINANCE REGULATING COMMUNICATION TOWERS IN SAMPSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ARTICLE I AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

EFFECTIVE AUGUST XX, 2016 UNLESS APPEALED PRIOR TO THAT DATE

Wireless Communication Facility Development Ordinance

Guide to Assist Land-use Authorities in Developing Antenna System Siting Protocols

Verizon Wireless Albemarle County s Wireless Policy on Co-locations. August 31, Executive Summary

CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY SITE APPLICATION / MODIFICATION REQUEST FORM

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1415

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR WIRELESS PROJECTS

Moline Illinois CODE OF ORDINANCES. Art. IX. Miscellaneous DIVISION 3. IN-BUILDING EMERGENCY RADIO SYSTEM COVERAGE

CHAPTER ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers 333 South Meridian, Puyallup Wednesday, February 7, :30 PM

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City issued a SEPA Determination of Non-significance on April 7, 2003, consistent with RCW 43.

VINTAGE ORIGINAL ART MURAL REGISTRATION PROCESS

DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 18, 2015

ORDINANCE NO

Small Cell Infrastructure in Denver

Attachment A. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:

RF EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT. Verizon Wireless. Report Status: Verizon Wireless is Compliant

DEP 2008 ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS CHAPTER ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

Site Plan/Building Permit Review

Town of Burlington Small Wireless Facility. and similar structures. Design Rules and Regulations

Wireless Broadband Zoning Bylaw Review Project. December 2012

CITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET

LOCAL REGULATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

City of Astoria Development Code ARTICLE 15 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICE FACILITIES

TITLE 9 DIVISION 24: COMMUNICATION ORDINANCE

Consultation on Amendments to Industry Canada s Antenna Tower Siting Procedures

SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION

CITY OF WHITE PLAINS STANDARD DESIGN CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES

DARK SKIES ORDINANCE

[LLNVS L PQ0000. LVRWF09F1840; N ; MO# ; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and a Possible

WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305

City of Greater Sudbury Radio-communication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems Public Consultation Protocol

Planning Commission meeting

Ordinance DT-O AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE DU PAGE COUNTY CODE RELATIVE TO WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

City of Laguna Hills Application for a Conditional Use Permit Project Information and Justification

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

CITY OF REDMOND Community Development Department

Transcription:

FCC s Wireless Facility Rules Implementing Section 6409(a) League of California Cities City Attorneys Conference Monterey, May 6, 2015 PRESENTED BY Harriet A. Steiner City Attorney, Davis 2015 Best Best & Krieger LLP

FCC Report and Order 155 Page Report and Order Adopted October 17, Released October 21, Published in Fed. Register on January 9, 2015 http://www.bbknowledge.com /land-use/new-fcc-rules-willrequire-new-approach-tositing-of-wireless-facilities/

FCC Report and Order Modifications to Shot Clock Mandatory 6409(a) collocations NEPA/Historic Preservation Temporary Towers

Overview Wireless deployment is accelerating and changing Towers v. DAS/Small Cells Shot Clock 6409(a) Collocations

Traditional Towers

Small cells and Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS)

Siting Challenges Are Increasing Cell Sites 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 131,350 210,360 285,561 AT&T Wireless alone has plans to deploy over 1,000 Distributed Antenna Systems and over 40,000 small cells. 50,000 38,650 0 Jun-97 Jun-02 Jun-07 Jun-12 Source: CTIA Wireless Quick Facts ctia.org

Shot Clock Existing law: 90 days to process collocations 150 days for new towers Shot Clock exists independently of Permit Streamlining Act FCC Order New 60 day shot clock for 6409(a) collocations

In addition, Shot Clocks operate in five new ways: 1. Clock starts to run when application submitted, not when deemed complete

2. After incompleteness notice and response, local governments have 10 days to notify applicant of requested information still missing 3. Local government must specify the code provision, ordinance, or other publically-stated procedure that requires missing info.

4. Shot clocks run regardless of local moratoria 5. Shot clocks apply to DAS and small cells, if they are used for personal wireless service

Remedies for Shot Clock violations Towers and Collocations Presumption of reasonableness 30-day SOL for carriers 6409(a) Collocations Deemed granted Tolling available

Shot Clock Takeaways Need to ensure staff is accurately calendaring and calculating timelines Check your application forms to ensure they specify all required information Create record of reasonableness for towers and traditional collocations Coordinate with staff early ( fast track wireless projects?)

Section 6409(a) (a) Facility modifications. (1) In general. Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) Eligible facilities request. For purposes of this subsection, the term eligible facilities request means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment. (3) Applicability of environmental laws. Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to relieve the Commission from the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

Section 6409(a) State and local governments may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station.

Understanding the Rule by Parsing it

Existing wireless tower or base station may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Wireless Tower DEFINED AS: any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting any Commission-licensed or authorized antennas and their associated facilities.

Wireless Tower

Base Station DEFINED AS: the equipment and non-tower supporting structure at a fixed location that enable Commission-licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network. IN ENGLISH: the transmission equipment itself and any non-tower structure that supports transmission equipment under a valid permit for a wireless use.

Base Station Non-tower structures with legally permitted wireless transmission equipment

FCC adopts modified objective standard that evaluates 6 factors may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

1. Height 2. Width 3. New Equipment Cabinets 4. Deployment/Excavation Beyond Site 5. Concealment Elements 6. Other Conditions may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Height: A substantial change occurs only if: For towers other than towers in the rights-of-way: If the modification increases the tower by: More than 10%; or The height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet,... whichever is greater. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Height: A substantial change occurs only if: For towers in the rights-of-way and all base stations: If the modification increases the facility by: More than 10%; or More than 10 feet,... whichever is greater. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Height: A substantial change occurs only if: Baseline for measurement: In both cases, height is measured from the dimensions of the tower or base station (as it had been previously lawfully modified) on February 22, 2012, except for deployments separated horizontally, for which height is measured from the original support structure only. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Width: A substantial change occurs only if: For towers other than towers in the rights-of-way: It involves adding an appurtenance that would protrude from the edge of the tower: More than 20 feet; or More than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance,... whichever is greater. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Width: A substantial change occurs only if: For other towers and all base stations: It involves adding an appurtenance that would protrude from the edge of the structure: More than 6 feet. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Equipment Cabinets: Generally: A substantial change occurs only if: If it involves installing more than the standard number of cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four cabinets. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

A substantial change occurs only if: Equipment Cabinets: For towers in the rights-of-way and all base stations: If it involves installation of any cabinets if there are no pre-existing cabinets, or involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than 10% larger in height or overall volume than any other associated ground cabinets may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Excavation/Deployment Beyond Site A substantial change occurs only if: The request involves excavation or deployment outside the current site. Site is: For towers other than those in the rights-of-way: the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Excavation/Deployment Beyond Site A substantial change occurs only if: The request involves excavation or deployment outside the current site. Site is: For towers in the rights-of-way and base stations: Further restricted to the area in proximity to the structure and to other transmission equipment already deployed on the ground may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

A substantial change occurs only if: Defeat Concealment Elements For concealed or stealth-designed facilities, if a modification would: defeat the concealments elements of the wireless tower or base station. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Stealth

Stealth Defeated

A substantial change occurs only if: Defeat Other Conditions The modification would not comply with other conditions imposed on the applicable wireless tower or base station, unless the noncompliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the substantial change thresholds. Examples: Fencing, access to the site, drainage may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

All modifications remain subject to building codes and other non-discretionary structural and safety codes. may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

Requests must still comply with any relevant Federal requirement, including FAA, NEPA, and NHPA requirements may not deny, and shall approve, any [request that involves collocation, removal, or replacement of transmission equipment] for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station

May Not Deny, and Shall Approve CONDITIONAL APPROVAL NOT TANTAMOUNT TO A DENIAL Generally prohibits/invalidates conditions of approval that: set limits lower than the criteria for a substantial change, or impose subjective standards Probably still valid conditions include drainage, landscaping, maintenance, lighting, fencing, access, indemnification, compliance with all generally applicable laws, etc.

6409(a): Other Items of Note FCC refused to apply different standards for legal non-conforming use No amortization or restrictions on expansion 6409(a) does not apply to proprietary rights FCC declined to determine whether preference for locating on municipal property was legal (But see Gov. Code sec 65964)

6409(a ): Other Items of Note OBJECTIVE: based on height, width, # of cabinets, excavation, camouflage and compliance with certain prior conditions of approval Provides generally lower thresholds for sites in the ROW and mounted on buildings. Effectively creates an invisible envelope around a structure within which wireless infrastructure can freely modify their transmission equipment DISJUNCTIVE: must comply with all measures (violate one and it s a substantial change) CUMULATIVE: establishes a lifetime cumulative limit.

6409(a): Is this really legal? Majority of the rules went into effect on April 8 th The deemed grant rules and the time frames for action on an application remain under OMB City of Arlington, VA et al. (including LA, Ontario, Redwood City, San Jose, Burlingame and Apple Valley) have challenged the regulations in the 4 th Cir. (Case No. 15-1240)

6409(a): Suggested Responses Review your wireless ordinance 50-foot height limit is now 60 or 70-foot limit (reduce permitted height?) Utilize proprietary rights to the extent possible Outside ROW: generally towers Inside ROW: generally DAS, small cell (Public Utilities Code Sec 7901)

6409(a): Suggested Responses Review Your Application Form and Process Do s Don ts Require applicants to claim 6409(a) status Require information to show that 6409(a) applies (including building and safety code compliance) Include citations to application requirements by code, etc. Require applicants to demonstrate the business case for the facility Require coverage information Miss the Shot Clock deadlines (completeness and decision)

6409(a): Things to Ponder 6409(a) only applies to facilities approved by a state or local agency Distinction between by right and exempt facilities? What about stealthing? Increase height of stealthing to avoid defeating concealment Do 6409(a) collocations have federal rights, state rights, federal and state rights, no rights? Does it matter? Is a 6409(a) collocation non-conforming if 6409(a) is overturned or modified?

6409(a): California Concerns Gov. Code sec 65850.6, 65964 govern wireless deployment (i.e., generally permits must be 10-years) Is 6409(a) approval a permit? What about when permit for underlying facility expires? CEQA Review of New Facilities and 6409(a) Collocations 6409(a): non-discretionary? New Towers: assume post-6409(a) collocation as whole of the project?

Thank you for attending. Harriet A. Steiner Partner Best Best & Krieger LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700 Phone: 916-325-4000 (main) 916-551-2821 (direct) Email: harriet.steiner@bbklaw.com www.bbklaw.com