ADVERSARIAL SEARCH. Chapter 5

Similar documents
Game playing. Chapter 6. Chapter 6 1

Games vs. search problems. Game playing Chapter 6. Outline. Game tree (2-player, deterministic, turns) Types of games. Minimax

Game playing. Chapter 6. Chapter 6 1

CS 380: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

CS 380: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADVERSARIAL SEARCH. Santiago Ontañón

Game playing. Outline

Game Playing. Philipp Koehn. 29 September 2015

Outline. Game playing. Types of games. Games vs. search problems. Minimax. Game tree (2-player, deterministic, turns) Games

Game Playing: Adversarial Search. Chapter 5

Games vs. search problems. Adversarial Search. Types of games. Outline

Game Playing. Dr. Richard J. Povinelli. Page 1. rev 1.1, 9/14/2003

Game playing. Chapter 5. Chapter 5 1

Lecture 5: Game Playing (Adversarial Search)

Today. Nondeterministic games: backgammon. Algorithm for nondeterministic games. Nondeterministic games in general. See Russell and Norvig, chapter 6

Game playing. Chapter 5, Sections 1 6

Game playing. Chapter 5, Sections 1{5. AIMA Slides cstuart Russell and Peter Norvig, 1998 Chapter 5, Sections 1{5 1

Adversarial search (game playing)

Artificial Intelligence, CS, Nanjing University Spring, 2018, Yang Yu. Lecture 4: Search 3.

Ch.4 AI and Games. Hantao Zhang. The University of Iowa Department of Computer Science. hzhang/c145

Artificial Intelligence. Topic 5. Game playing

Last update: March 9, Game playing. CMSC 421, Chapter 6. CMSC 421, Chapter 6 1

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring Game Playing in Practice

Adversarial Search (a.k.a. Game Playing)

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence 1: game playing

Adversarial Search and Game Playing

Programming Project 1: Pacman (Due )

Adversarial Search Lecture 7

Artificial Intelligence

6. Games. COMP9414/ 9814/ 3411: Artificial Intelligence. Outline. Mechanical Turk. Origins. origins. motivation. minimax search

CS440/ECE448 Lecture 9: Minimax Search. Slides by Svetlana Lazebnik 9/2016 Modified by Mark Hasegawa-Johnson 9/2017

CS 331: Artificial Intelligence Adversarial Search II. Outline

Game Playing. Why do AI researchers study game playing? 1. It s a good reasoning problem, formal and nontrivial.

COMP219: COMP219: Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Dr. Annabel Latham Lecture 12: Game Playing Overview Games and Search

Adversarial Search. Chapter 5. Mausam (Based on slides of Stuart Russell, Andrew Parks, Henry Kautz, Linda Shapiro) 1

Today. Types of Game. Games and Search 1/18/2010. COMP210: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 10. Game playing

Adversarial Search. Hal Daumé III. Computer Science University of Maryland CS 421: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence 9 Feb 2012

Artificial Intelligence

Adversarial Search and Game Playing. Russell and Norvig: Chapter 5

Game-Playing & Adversarial Search

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring Announcements

Games CSE 473. Kasparov Vs. Deep Junior August 2, 2003 Match ends in a 3 / 3 tie!

Ar#ficial)Intelligence!!

Announcements. Homework 1. Project 1. Due tonight at 11:59pm. Due Friday 2/8 at 4:00pm. Electronic HW1 Written HW1

Artificial Intelligence. Minimax and alpha-beta pruning

Adversarial Search. Soleymani. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3 rd Edition, Chapter 5

Adversarial Search and Game- Playing C H A P T E R 6 C M P T : S P R I N G H A S S A N K H O S R A V I

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 13: Game Playing

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring 2007

Artificial Intelligence

Games and Adversarial Search

Outline. Game Playing. Game Problems. Game Problems. Types of games Playing a perfect game. Playing an imperfect game

Adversarial Search. Human-aware Robotics. 2018/01/25 Chapter 5 in R&N 3rd Ø Announcement: Slides for this lecture are here:

Game-playing AIs: Games and Adversarial Search FINAL SET (w/ pruning study examples) AIMA

Adversarial Search 1

Adversarial Search Aka Games

School of EECS Washington State University. Artificial Intelligence

Announcements. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Spring Game Playing State-of-the-Art. Overview. Game Playing. GamesCrafters

CS 771 Artificial Intelligence. Adversarial Search

CS 4700: Foundations of Artificial Intelligence

Game Playing State-of-the-Art

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence. Overview

Adversarial Search. CMPSCI 383 September 29, 2011

Adversarial Search. Rob Platt Northeastern University. Some images and slides are used from: AIMA CS188 UC Berkeley

Artificial Intelligence Adversarial Search

Game Playing State-of-the-Art CSE 473: Artificial Intelligence Fall Deterministic Games. Zero-Sum Games 10/13/17. Adversarial Search

CS 5522: Artificial Intelligence II

Artificial Intelligence

Adversarial Search. Read AIMA Chapter CIS 421/521 - Intro to AI 1

Solving Problems by Searching: Adversarial Search

Adversarial Search (Game Playing)

Local Search. Hill Climbing. Hill Climbing Diagram. Simulated Annealing. Simulated Annealing. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

Game Playing AI Class 8 Ch , 5.4.1, 5.5

CSE 573: Artificial Intelligence Autumn 2010

Foundations of Artificial Intelligence

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (CS 370D)

More Adversarial Search

Foundations of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence

CS 2710 Foundations of AI. Lecture 9. Adversarial search. CS 2710 Foundations of AI. Game search

Announcements. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall Local Search. Hill Climbing. Simulated Annealing. Hill Climbing Diagram

Foundations of AI. 6. Adversarial Search. Search Strategies for Games, Games with Chance, State of the Art. Wolfram Burgard & Bernhard Nebel

CSE 473: Artificial Intelligence. Outline

Game Playing State-of-the-Art. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence. Behavior from Computation. Video of Demo Mystery Pacman. Adversarial Search

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence

Adversarial Search. Chapter 5. Mausam (Based on slides of Stuart Russell, Andrew Parks, Henry Kautz, Linda Shapiro, Diane Cook) 1

Contents. Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Problems. Why Board Games?

Games (adversarial search problems)

Intuition Mini-Max 2

ADVERSARIAL SEARCH. Today. Reading. Goals. AIMA Chapter Read , Skim 5.7

CS 1571 Introduction to AI Lecture 12. Adversarial search. CS 1571 Intro to AI. Announcements

Set 4: Game-Playing. ICS 271 Fall 2017 Kalev Kask

CITS3001. Algorithms, Agents and Artificial Intelligence. Semester 2, 2016 Tim French

ADVERSARIAL SEARCH. Today. Reading. Goals. AIMA Chapter , 5.7,5.8

CSE 473: Artificial Intelligence Autumn 2011

Adversarial Search. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

Adversarial Search. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

CS 440 / ECE 448 Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Spring 2010 Lecture #5

CSE 573: Artificial Intelligence

Adversary Search. Ref: Chapter 5

Transcription:

ADVERSARIAL SEARCH Chapter 5... every game of skill is susceptible of being played by an automaton. from Charles Babbage, The Life of a Philosopher, 1832.

Outline Games Perfect play minimax decisions α β pruning Resource limits and approximate evaluation Games of chance Games of imperfect information Chapter 6 2

Games vs. search problems Unpredictable opponent solution is a strategy specifying a move for every possible opponent reply Time limits unlikely to find goal, must approximate Plan of attack: Computer considers possible lines of play (Babbage, 1846) Algorithm for perfect play (Zermelo, 1912; Von Neumann, 1944) Finite horizon, approximate evaluation (Zuse, 1945; Wiener, 1948; Shannon, 1950) First chess program (Turing, 1951) Machine learning to improve evaluation accuracy (Samuel, 1952 57) Pruning to allow deeper search (McCarthy, 1956) Chapter 6 3

Types of games perfect information imperfect information deterministic chess, checkers, go, othello battleships, blind tictactoe chance backgammon monopoly bridge, poker, scrabble nuclear war Chapter 6 4

Game tree (2-player, deterministic, turns) MA () MIN (O) MA () O O O... MIN (O) O O O............... TERMINAL Utility O O O O O O O O O O 1 0 +1... Chapter 6 5

Minimax Perfect play for deterministic, perfect-information games Idea: choose move to position with highest minimax value = best achievable payoff against best play E.g., 2-ply game: MA 3 A 1 A 2 A 3 MIN 3 2 2 A 11 A 13 A 21 A 22 A 23 A 32 A 33 A 12 A 31 3 12 8 2 4 6 14 5 2 Chapter 6 6

Minimax algorithm function Minimax-Decision(state) returns an action inputs: state, current state in game return the a in Actions(state) maximizing Min-Value(Result(a, state)) function Max-Value(state) returns a utility value if Terminal-Test(state) then return Utility(state) v for a, s in Successors(state) do v Max(v, Min-Value(s)) return v function Min-Value(state) returns a utility value if Terminal-Test(state) then return Utility(state) v for a, s in Successors(state) do v Min(v, Max-Value(s)) return v Chapter 6 7

Properties of minimax Complete?? Chapter 6 8

Properties of minimax Complete?? Only if tree is finite (chess has specific rules for this). NB a finite strategy can exist even in an infinite tree! Optimal?? Chapter 6 9

Properties of minimax Complete?? Yes, if tree is finite (chess has specific rules for this) Optimal?? Yes, against an optimal opponent. Otherwise?? Time complexity?? Chapter 6 10

Properties of minimax Complete?? Yes, if tree is finite (chess has specific rules for this) Optimal?? Yes, against an optimal opponent. Otherwise?? Time complexity?? O(b m ) Space complexity?? Chapter 6 11

Properties of minimax Complete?? Yes, if tree is finite (chess has specific rules for this) Optimal?? Yes, against an optimal opponent. Otherwise?? Time complexity?? O(b m ) Space complexity?? O(bm) (depth-first exploration) For chess, b 35, m 100 for reasonable games exact solution completely infeasible But do we need to explore every path? Chapter 6 12

α β pruning example MA 3 MIN 3 3 12 8 Chapter 6 13

α β pruning example MA 3 MIN 3 2 3 12 8 2 Chapter 6 14

α β pruning example MA 3 MIN 3 2 14 3 12 8 2 14 Chapter 6 15

α β pruning example MA 3 MIN 3 2 14 5 3 12 8 2 14 5 Chapter 6 16

α β pruning example MA 3 3 MIN 3 2 14 5 2 3 12 8 2 14 5 2 Chapter 6 17

Why is it called α β? MA MIN...... MA MIN V α is the best value (to max) found so far off the current path If V is worse than α, max will avoid it prune that branch Define β similarly for min Chapter 6 18

Pruning does not affect final result Properties of α β Good move ordering improves effectiveness of pruning With perfect ordering, time complexity = O(b m/2 ) doubles solvable depth A simple example of the value of reasoning about which computations are relevant (a form of metareasoning) Unfortunately, 35 50 is still impossible! Chapter 6 20

Resource limits Standard approach: Use Cutoff-Test instead of Terminal-Test e.g., depth limit (perhaps add quiescence search) Use Eval instead of Utility i.e., evaluation function that estimates desirability of position Suppose we have 100 seconds, explore 10 4 nodes/second 10 6 nodes per move 35 8/2 α β reaches depth 8 pretty good chess program Chapter 6 21

Evaluation functions Black to move White slightly better White to move Black winning For chess, typically linear weighted sum of features Eval(s) = w 1 f 1 (s) + w 2 f 2 (s) +... + w n f n (s) e.g., w 1 = 9 with f 1 (s) = (number of white queens) (number of black queens), etc. Chapter 6 22

Digression: Exact values don t matter MA MIN 1 2 1 20 1 2 2 4 1 20 20 400 Behaviour is preserved under any monotonic transformation of Eval Only the order matters: payoff in deterministic games acts as an ordinal utility function Chapter 6 23

How to achieve a good game of chess? Extensively tuned evaluation function Cutoff test with quiescence search Large transposition table [i.e., hash of previously seen positions, saved for re-use] Use of alpha-beta, with extra pruning Large database of optimal opening and endgame moves Fast computer!

Exercise Tic-tac-toe Define n as the number of rows, columns, or diagonals with exactly n s and no O s. Similarly, O n is the number of rows, columns, or diagonals with exactly n O s and no s. The utility function assigns +1 to any position with 3 = 1 and - 1 for any position with O 3 = 1. All other terminal positions have utility 0. For non-terminal positions, we use a linear evaluation function defined as Eval(s) = 3 2 (s) + 1 (s) (3O 2 (s)+o 1 (s)) a) Approximately how many games of tic-tac-toe are there?

Exercise Tic-tac-toe Define n as the number of rows, columns, or diagonals with exactly n s and no O s. Similarly, O n is the number of rows, columns, or diagonals with exactly n O s and no s. The utility function assigns +1 to any position with 3 = 1 and - 1 for any position with O 3 = 1. All other terminal positions have utility 0. For non-terminal positions, we use a linear evaluation function defined as Eval(s) = 3 2 (s) + 1 (s) (3O 2 (s)+o 1 (s)) a) Approximately how many games of tic-tac-toe are there? 9! = the number of move sequences that fill up the board (although many wins and losses occur before that)

Exercise Tic-tac-toe b) What does the game tree look like (taking symmetry into account)?

Exercise Prove correctness of α-β Question is whether to prune n j, which is a max-node and descendent of n 1 Basic idea is to prune it iff the minimax value of n 1 can be shown to be independent of the value of n j Node n 1 takes on the minimum value among its children n 1 = min(n 2, n 21,, n 2b2 ). Find a similar expression for n 2 and hence an expression for n 1 in terms of n j.

Nondeterministic games: backgammon 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 Chapter 6 25

Nondeterministic games in general In nondeterministic games, chance introduced by dice, card-shuffling Simplified example with coin-flipping: MA CHANCE 3 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MIN 2 4 0 2 2 4 7 4 6 0 5 2 Chapter 6 26

Algorithm for nondeterministic games Expectiminimax gives perfect play Just like Minimax, except we must also handle chance nodes:... if state is a Max node then return the highest ExpectiMinimax-Value of Successors(state) if state is a Min node then return the lowest ExpectiMinimax-Value of Successors(state) if state is a chance node then return average of ExpectiMinimax-Value of Successors(state)... Chapter 6 27

Nondeterministic games in practice Dice rolls increase b: 21 possible rolls with 2 dice Backgammon 20 legal moves (can be 6,000 with 1-1 roll) depth 4 = 20 (21 20) 3 1.2 10 9 As depth increases, probability of reaching a given node shrinks value of lookahead is diminished α β pruning is much less effective TDGammon uses depth-2 search + very good Eval world-champion level Chapter 6 28

Digression: Exact values DO matter MA DICE 2.1 1.3.9.1.9.1 21 40.9.9.1.9.1 MIN 2 3 1 4 20 30 1 400 2 2 3 3 1 1 4 4 20 20 30 30 1 1 400 400 Behaviour is preserved only by positive linear transformation of Eval Hence Eval should be proportional to the expected payoff Chapter 6 29

Games of imperfect information E.g., card games, where opponent s initial cards are unknown Typically we can calculate a probability for each possible deal Seems just like having one big dice roll at the beginning of the game Idea: compute the minimax value of each action in each deal, then choose the action with highest expected value over all deals Special case: if an action is optimal for all deals, it s optimal. GIB, current best bridge program, approximates this idea by 1) generating 100 deals consistent with bidding information 2) picking the action that wins most tricks on average Chapter 6 30

Commonsense example Road A leads to a small heap of gold pieces Road B leads to a fork: take the left fork and you ll find a mound of jewels; take the right fork and you ll be run over by a bus. Chapter 6 34

Commonsense example Road A leads to a small heap of gold pieces Road B leads to a fork: take the left fork and you ll find a mound of jewels; take the right fork and you ll be run over by a bus. Road A leads to a small heap of gold pieces Road B leads to a fork: take the left fork and you ll be run over by a bus; take the right fork and you ll find a mound of jewels. Chapter 6 35

Commonsense example Road A leads to a small heap of gold pieces Road B leads to a fork: take the left fork and you ll find a mound of jewels; take the right fork and you ll be run over by a bus. Road A leads to a small heap of gold pieces Road B leads to a fork: take the left fork and you ll be run over by a bus; take the right fork and you ll find a mound of jewels. Road A leads to a small heap of gold pieces Road B leads to a fork: guess correctly and you ll find a mound of jewels; guess incorrectly and you ll be run over by a bus. Chapter 6 36

Proper analysis * Intuition that the value of an action is the average of its values in all actual states is WRONG With partial observability, value of an action depends on the information state or belief state the agent is in Can generate and search a tree of information states Leads to rational behaviors such as Acting to obtain information Signalling to one s partner Acting randomly to minimize information disclosure Chapter 6 37

Summary Games are fun to work on! (and dangerous) They illustrate several important points about AI perfection is unattainable must approximate good idea to think about what to think about uncertainty constrains the assignment of values to states optimal decisions depend on information state, not real state Games are to AI as grand prix racing is to automobile design Chapter 6 38

Exercise Chess Storage Suppose you have a chess program that can evaluate 10 million nodes per second. (There are approximately 10 47 legal game positions in chess.) a) What is a compact representation of a game state for storage in a transposition table? (Note that there are 32 pieces in chess, and 64 squares on the board. Presume 8-bit bytes.)

Reading Assignment For next week: Chapter 7 Logical Agents Tuesday: 7.1-7.4 Thursday: 7.5-7.7