Agency Report Na/onal Ins/tute for Space Research INPE Brazil. Lubia Vinhas. WGISS/CEOS 42 Mee/ng, September 2016, Frasca/, Italy

Similar documents
PLANET IMAGERY PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS PLANET.COM

Abstract Quickbird Vs Aerial photos in identifying man-made objects

KOMPSAT Constellation. November 2012 Satrec Initiative

Geometric Quality Assessment of CBERS-2. Julio d Alge Ricardo Cartaxo Guaraci Erthal

NON-PHOTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS: Multispectral Scanners Medium and coarse resolution sensor comparisons: Landsat, SPOT, AVHRR and MODIS

GEOMETRIC RECTIFICATION OF EUROPEAN HISTORICAL ARCHIVES OF LANDSAT 1-3 MSS IMAGERY

Update on Landsat Program and Landsat Data Continuity Mission

Aral Sea profile Selection of area 24 February April May 1998

Monitoring Natural Disasters with Small Satellites Smart Satellite Based Geospatial System for Environmental Protection

Data Sharing Issues in SE Asia

Copernicus Introduction Lisbon, Portugal 13 th & 14 th February 2014

OVERVIEW OF KOMPSAT-3A CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION

STRIPING NOISE REMOVAL OF IMAGES ACQUIRED BY CBERS 2 CCD CAMERA SENSOR

Rapideye (2008 -> ) Not just another high resolution satellite sensor. 5 satellites RapidEye constellation. 5 million km² daily collection capacity

Lecture 6: Multispectral Earth Resource Satellites. The University at Albany Fall 2018 Geography and Planning

Sentinel-2 Products and Algorithms

MODULE 2 Sensors and Platforms

Final Examination Introduction to Remote Sensing. Time: 1.5 hrs Max. Marks: 50. Section-I (50 x 1 = 50 Marks)

Staring Imaging Overview

FORMOSAT-5. - Launch Campaign-

Remote Sensing Platforms

The use of satellite images to forecast agricultural

Geospatial Vision and Policies Korean Industry View 26 November, 2014 SI Imaging Services

9/12/2011. Training Course Remote Sensing Basic Theory & Image Processing Methods September 2011

Digital database creation of historical Remote Sensing Satellite data from Film Archives A case study

ERS/ENVISAT ASAR Data Products and Services

Advanced Optical Satellite (ALOS-3) Overviews

PLANET IMAGERY PRODUCT SPECIFICATION: PLANETSCOPE & RAPIDEYE

Operational Space-Based Imaging Systems

Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (CHRIS) siraelectro-optics

Remote Sensing Platforms

Sentinel-1 System Overview

ROLE OF SATELLITE DATA APPLICATION IN CADASTRAL MAP AND DIGITIZATION OF LAND RECORDS DR.T. RAVISANKAR GROUP HEAD (LRUMG) RSAA/NRSC/ISRO /DOS HYDERABAD

PLANET IMAGERY PRODUCT SPECIFICATION: PLANETSCOPE & RAPIDEYE

Japan's Greenhouse Gases Observation from Space

EnMAP Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program

NEXT GENERATION HYPER RESOLUTION WIDE SWATH AND MULTI_CHANNEL OPTICAL PAYLOAD FOR CBERS SERIES

Remote Sensing Exam 2 Study Guide

Sources of Geographic Information

EARTH OBSERVATION WITH SMALL SATELLITES

The availability of cloud free Landsat TM and ETM+ land observations and implications for global Landsat data production

Introduction to KOMPSAT

HyperSTREEGO A Reactive Multispectral Optical Payload for Small Satellites

Introduction to image processing for remote sensing: Practical examples

DESIS Applications & Processing Extracted from Teledyne & DLR Presentations to JACIE April 14, Ray Perkins, Teledyne Brown Engineering

PLANET: IMAGING THE EARTH EVERY DAY

The studies began when the Tiros satellites (1960) provided man s first synoptic view of the Earth s weather systems.

High Resolution Sensor Test Comparison with SPOT, KFA1000, KVR1000, IRS-1C and DPA in Lower Saxony

US Commercial Imaging Satellites

(CSES) Introduction for China Seismo- Electromagnetic Satellite

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Landsat Update. Jeff Masek, NASA GSFC Jim Irons, NASA GSFC. April 3, 2012 LCLUC Meeting.

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY SOVZOND JSC компания «Совзонд»

Mission requirements and satellite overview

Innovation Needs Support: Two Examples of German Support Strategy in Satcom

Futrajaya, Malaysia JULY 12, Jeong Heon SONG. Korea Aerospace Research Institution

Not just another high resolution satellite sensor

Sensor resolutions from space: the tension between temporal, spectral, spatial and swath. David Bruce UniSA and ISU

9/12/2011. Training Course Remote Sensing Basic Theory & Image Processing Methods September 2011

ANALYSIS OF LAND COVER AND LAND USE CHANGES USING SENTINEL-2 IMAGES

DIGITAL EARTH: BRIDGING THE SCALES FROM GLOBAL TO LOCAL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 8. Remote sensing

The first part of Module three, data and tools, presents some of the resources available on the internet to get images from the satellites presented

Some Basic Concepts of Remote Sensing. Lecture 2 August 31, 2005

NASA Missions and Products: Update. Garik Gutman, LCLUC Program Manager NASA Headquarters Washington, DC

From Proba-V to Proba-MVA

The Sentinel-1 Constellation

China-Brazil Cooperation: CBERS

EXAMPLES OF TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS PRODUCED FROM SPACE AND ACHIEVED ACCURACY CARAVAN Workshop on Mapping from Space, Phnom Penh, June 2000

Biomass, a polarimetric interferometric P-band SAR mission

SEA GRASS MAPPING FROM SATELLITE DATA

EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD

R a d i o m e t r i c C a l i b r a t i o n N e t w o r k o f A u t o m a t e d I n s t r u m e n t s

International Conference on Space Optics ICSO 2014 La Caleta, Tenerife, Canary Islands 7 10 October /cso _2014 ono ' r

MAPS AND SATELLITE IMAGES TOOLS FOR AN EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF THE HISTORIC CENTER OF SIGHISOARA, AN UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE

Geomatica OrthoEngine Orthorectifying SPOT6 data

WHAT IS NEXT IN EARTH OBSERVATION. SkyMed Mission

ASSESSMENT BY ESA OF GCOS CLIMATE MONITORING PRINCIPLES FOR GMES

National Remote Sensing Center of China Agency Report

Microsatellite Constellation for Earth Observation in the Thermal Infrared Region

Geostationary satellites

The Biomass Mission, status of the satellite system

An Alternative Source of Very High-resolution Imagery The Resurs-DK1 Satellite

Satellite/Aircraft Imaging Systems Imaging Sensors Standard scanner designs Image data formats

sunspace experience with sumbandilasat

Kazuhiro TANAKA GCOM project team/jaxa April, 2016

Landsat 8 Pansharpen and Mosaic Geomatica 2015 Tutorial

Int n r t o r d o u d c u ti t on o n to t o Remote Sensing

Disruptive technologies and future trends of small satellites

PIXELS. For the People: HiRISE Data Products

CHAPTER 7: Multispectral Remote Sensing

Light penetration within a clear water body. E z = E 0 e -kz

Leica ADS80 - Digital Airborne Imaging Solution NAIP, Salt Lake City 4 December 2008

An Introduction to Geomatics. Prepared by: Dr. Maher A. El-Hallaq خاص بطلبة مساق مقدمة في علم. Associate Professor of Surveying IUG

Application of GIS to Fast Track Planning and Monitoring of Development Agenda

Results of Hodoyoshi-3 and -4 Earth Observation Missions

News on Image Acquisition for the CwRS Campaign new sensors and changes

EO Sensors : ISRO Past, Current & Future

SDCG-5 Session 2. Landsat 7/8 status and 2013 Implementation Plan (Element 1)

Introduction to Radar

Introduction to Remote Sensing Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing. Mads Olander Rasmussen

Transcription:

Agency Report Na/onal Ins/tute for Space Research INPE Brazil Lubia Vinhas WGISS/CEOS 42 Mee/ng, September 2016, Frasca/, Italy

INPE: CONVERTING DATA INTO KNOWLEDGE SATELLITES Earth observa/on, scien/fic, and data collec/on satellites GROUND SYSTEMS Satellite control, recep/on, processing and distribu/on of satellite data ANALYSIS AND MODELLING Space Weather, Weather Predic/on and Earth System Science SOCIETAL BENEFITS Innova/ve products to meet Brazil s needs

Fostering the concept of public- good data Brazil, 2004 INPE set a free data policy for CBERS in Brazil CBERS data available free of charges on the Web Impacts on EO consulting and services in Brazil Increasing EO data distribution for society South Africa, 2007 Announcement of the CBERS for Africa Initiative Extension of CBERS free data policy for Africa America, 2008 USGS adopted a free data policy for Landsat Landsat image data also available free of charges Europe, 2009 ESA announced a free data policy for Sentinels

CBERS Program - Status CBERS-3 was lost after a failure in the last stage of the launching rocket in 2013. CBERS-4 was successfully launched in December 2014. CBERS-4 images have been regularly acquired in Cuiabá. Commissioning phase was executed from December 2015 to May 2016 to assess and validate CBERS-4 cameras. Images are available on the web (www2.dgi.inpe.br/cdsr).

CBERS 3 & 4 2 nd genera/on series Sun- synchronous orbit Al/tude = 778 km Inclina/on = 98.5º Nodal period = 100.26 minutes Repeat cycle = 26 days Descending node at 10h30 local /me

CBERS 3 & 4 2 nd genera/on series Parameter CBERS 1, 2, 2B CBERS 3, 4 Total mass 1,450 kg 2,020 kg Power 1,100 W 2,300 W Data rate 100 Mbit/s 305 Mbit/s Design life/me 2 years 3 years

CBERS 3 & 4 cameras Payloads MUX PAN IRS WFI Manufacturer Brazil China China Brazil Type Pushbroom Pushbroom Scanner Pushbroom Revisit /me 26 days 52 days (nadir opera/on) side looking (32 degrees) 26 days 5 days Quan/za/on 8 bits 8 bits 8 bits 10 bits Data rate 68 Mbits/s 67, 100 Mbits/s 17 Mbits/s 53 Mbits/s Compression 2:1 pan band

CBERS 3 & 4 cameras Payloads MUX PAN IRS WFI Band 1 0.45-0.52 µm 0.51-0.73 µm 0.77-0.89 µm 0.45-0.52 µm Band 2 0.52-0.59 µm 0.52-0.59 µm 1.55-1.75 µm 0.52-0.59 µm Band 3 0.63-0.69 µm 0.63-0.69 µm 2.08-2.35 µm 0.63-0.69 µm Band 4 0.77-0.89 µm 0.77-0.89 µm 10.4-12.5 µm 0.77-0.89 µm Resolu/on 20 m 5 m, 10 m 40 m, 80 m 70 m Swath width 120 km 60 km 120 km 866 km

Basic processing levels of CBERS- 4 L0: raw image data. L1: radiometrically corrected images. L2: L1 plus geometric system-correction. L3: L2 plus registration through ground control points. L4: L2 plus registration through ground control points and terrain correction (orthorectification). L3 and L4 are processed automatically by means of image correlation techniques and geometric transformations.

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for MUX Points Scenes L4 (m) L4 > 50 330 12.112 2.165 1.0002 0.0011 1.0000 0.0002 > 40 489 11.981 2.247 1.0002 0.0012 1.0000 0.0002 > 30 686 12.192 2.676 1.0001 0.0013 1.0000 0.0002 > 20 996 12.154 2.944 1.0001 0.0014 1.0000 0.0006 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) Landsat- 8 images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for MUX Points Scenes L3 (m) L3 > 50 15 18.277 3.229 1.0004 0.0005 0.9999 0.0002 Points Scenes L2 AGer translahon (m) L2 AGer translahon > 50 386 30.427 28.931 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) Landsat- 8 images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for WFI Points Scenes L4 (m) L4 > 200 4 62.014 3.446 0.9993 0.0005 1.0000 0.0000 > 150 5 61.227 3.416 0.9994 0.0005 1.0000 0.0000 > 100 8 62.256 3.198 0.9995 0.0004 1.0000 0.0000 > 50 13 63.089 4.461 0.9994 0.0004 1.0000 0.0001 Ground control points extracted from subsampled terrain- corrected Landsat- 8 images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for WFI Points Scenes L3 (m) L3 > 50 11 72.116 27.360 1.0015 0.0034 1.0000 0.0001 Points Scenes L2 AGer translahon (m) L2 AGer translahon > 150 21 184.197 103.466 Ground control points extracted from subsampled terrain- corrected Landsat- 8 images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for PAN5 Points Scenes L4 (m) L4 > 50 51 13.060 2.157 1.0001 0.0028 1.0000 0.0001 > 40 66 12.997 2.072 1.0002 0.0028 1.0000 0.0001 > 30 82 12.806 2.113 1.0004 0.0026 1.0000 0.0001 > 20 105 12.899 2.223 1.0002 0.0028 1.0000 0.0001 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) RapidEye images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for PAN5 Points Scenes L3 (m) L3 > 20 7 11.346 1.810 1.0023 0.0003 1.0000 0.0000 Points Scenes L2 AGer translahon (m) L2 AGer translahon > 50 52 46.731 12.797 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) RapidEye images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for PAN10 Points Scenes L4 (m) L4 > 50 120 15.340 2.362 1.0001 0.0026 1.0000 0.0001 > 40 141 15.194 2.517 1.0000 0.0026 1.0000 0.0001 > 30 164 15.249 2.564 1.0000 0.0027 1.0000 0.0001 > 20 194 15.193 2.701 1.0000 0.0027 1.0000 0.0001 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) RapidEye images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for PAN10 Points Scenes L3 (m) L3 > 20 7 17.822 3.661 0.9963 0.0003 1.0002 0.0001 Points Scenes L2 AGer translahon (m) L2 AGer translahon > 50 130 45.037 18.087 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) RapidEye images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for IRS Points Scenes L4 (m) L4 > 50 2 29.787 1.592 0.9981 0.0009 0.9963 0.0000 > 40 4 34.376 5.222 0.9994 0.0015 0.9960 0.0005 > 30 6 34.556 4.272 1.0001 0.0015 0.9959 0.0004 > 20 10 34.008 4.238 1.0001 0.0013 0.9960 0.0005 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) Landsat- 8 images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Internal accuracy es/ma/on for IRS Points Scenes L3 (m) L3 > 5 11 43.648 11.795 0.9999 0.0015 1.0003 0.0030 Points Scenes L2 AGer translahon (m) L2 AGer translahon > 50 2 146.455 9.155 Ground control points extracted from terrain- corrected (orthorec/fied) Landsat- 8 images : root mean square error; : standard devia/on; CT: across- track; AT: along- track

Summarizing MUX L4 images are suitable for mapping at scales 1:50,000 and smaller. WFI L4 images are suitable for mapping at scales 1:250,000 and smaller. PAN5 and PAN10 L4 images are suitable for mapping at scales 1:50,000 and smaller. IRS L4 images are suitable for mapping at scales 1:100,000 and smaller. These conclusions are based on the comparison of resulting s with commonly accepted cartographic standards.

Summarizing MUX L4 images are extremely consistent in time in terms of their geometric internal accuracies. Although WFI L4 images have acceptable geometric internal accuracies, a refinement in the optical distortion model of the two optical systems of the camera is still being analyzed. PAN5 and PAN10 L4 images have acceptable geometric internal accuracies that are about to be improved by the application of optical distortion models provided recently by our Chinese partners. IRS L4 geometric internal accuracies are not as acceptable as it should be, as a result of inaccurate modeling of its camera push broom system.

SOME IMAGES

Brasilia, DF, Brazil - MUX

Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil - PAN - 10

EUA WFI

Uyuni Salar, Chile WFI

Uyuni Salar, Chile Pan 10

Distribu/on Images are available on the web (www2.dgi.inpe.br/cdsr). 21,381 scenes last 2 months: 9,117 MUX, 5,299 PAN 10, 4,274 PAN 5, 2,089 WFI and 602 IRS

Distribu/on PHP access API to support CWIC connector

Discovery OpenSearch prototype implementation

Discovery OpenSearch prototype implementation

CBERS 4A equipment reuse Sun- synchronous orbit Al/tude = 628 km Inclina/on = 97.89º Repeat cycle = 31 days Descending node at 10h30 local /me Launching: 2018

CBERS 4A cameras Payloads MUX WPM WFI Manufacturer Brazil China Brazil Type Pushbroom Pushbroom TDI Pushbroom Revisit /me 31 days 31 days 5 days Quan/za/on 8 bits 10 bits 10 bits Swath width 95 km 92 km 684 km

CBERS 4A cameras Payloads MUX WPM WFI Band 1 0.45-0.52 µm 0.45-0.52 µm 0.45-0.52 µm Band 2 0.52-0.59 µm 0.52-0.59 µm 0.52-0.59 µm Band 3 0.63-0.69 µm 0.63-0.69 µm 0.63-0.69 µm Band 4 0.77-0.89 µm 0.77-0.89 µm 0.77-0.89 µm Band 5 (PAN) 0.45-0.90 µm Resolu/on 16 m 2 m, 8 m 55 m

lubia.vinhas@inpe.br OBRIGADO. GRAZIE.