Report on Policy Action Plan

Similar documents
demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Framework Programme 7

European Circular Economy Stakeholder Conference Brussels, February 2018 Civil Society Perspectives

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Werner Wobbe. Employed at the European Commission, Directorate General Research and Innovation

Roadmap Pitch: Road2CPS - Roadmapping Project Platforms4CPS Roadmap Workshop

FP7 Funding Opportunities for the ICT Industry

Production research at European level supports regions and SMEs

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

COST FP9 Position Paper

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

ARTEMIS The Embedded Systems European Technology Platform

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

Europäischer Forschungsraum und Foresight

Comments from CEN CENELEC on COM(2010) 245 of 19 May 2010 on "A Digital Agenda for Europe"

Strategic Policy Forum: A Roadmap for Digital Entrepreneurship

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

HORIZON Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies (LEIT)

Position Paper. CEN-CENELEC Response to COM (2010) 546 on the Innovation Union

PPP InfoDay Brussels, July 2012

FP7 ICT Work Programme

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Workshop on Enabling Technologies in CSF for EU Research and Innovation Funding

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

How to identify and prioritise research issues?

Brief presentation of the results Ioana ISPAS ERA NET COFUND Expert Group

Factories of the Future 2020 Roadmap. PPP Info Days 9 July 2012 Rikardo Bueno Anirban Majumdar

Enabling ICT for. development

Ageing: challenge and opportunity

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

HORIZON 2020 BLUE GROWTH

Robotics: from FP7 to Horizon Libor Král, Head of Unit Unit A2 - Robotics DG Communication Networks, Content and Technology European Commission

EUREKA in the ERA INTRODUCTION

Horizon Work Programme Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies - Introduction

Research and Innovation Strategy for the Smart Specialisation of Catalonia. Brussels March 20th, 2014

The BLUEMED Initiative: RESEARCH AND INNOVATION INITIATIVE FOR BLUE JOBS AND GROWTH IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Developing Research Infrastructures for 2020 and beyond

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

Seoul Initiative on the 4 th Industrial Revolution

ICT in HORIZON 2020 Societal Challenges

RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information

Welcome to the future of energy

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

Promoting citizen-based services through local cultural partnerships

Commission proposal for Horizon Europe. #HorizonEU THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME ( )

Smart Specialization Platform:

A guide to ICT-related activities in WP

Introducing the 7 th Community Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development ( ) 2013)

Developing Research Infrastructures for 2020 and beyond

THE BLUEMED INITIATIVE AND ITS STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA

Economic and Social Council

SEAS-ERA STRATEGIC FORUM

HORIZON H2020: tourism-related calls

7656/18 CF/MI/nj 1 DG G 3 C

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

Citizens' Observatories & Crowdsourcing Novel ways to engage citizens in science and environmental policy-making

Our digital future. SEPA online. Facilitating effective engagement. Enabling business excellence. Sharing environmental information

SMART CITIES Presentation

Potential areas of industrial interest relevant for cross-cutting KETs in the Electronics and Communication Systems domain

An ecosystem to accelerate the uptake of innovation in materials technology

Advanced Impacts evaluation Methodology for innovative freight transport Solutions

A4BLUE - Adaptive Automation in Assembly For BLUE collar workers satisfaction in Evolvable context

Publishable summary. 1 P a g e

Home platforms and services: On the need for synergies between research and Standardisation

Horizon 2020 and Photonics

POSITION OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ITALY (CNR) ON HORIZON 2020

Transforming Consumer and Health-Oriented Society through Science and Innovation. SBRA meeting 20 June 2018

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

Horizon 2020 and CAP towards 2020

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

POSITION PAPER. GREEN PAPER From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding

Research Development Request - Profile Template. European Commission

ECCA survey on clusters` Circular Construction portfolio

An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era

Digital Innovation Hubs & Smart Specialisation

A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

Ageing Well in the Information Society

Consultancy on Technological Foresight

BONUS EEIG- (Article 185, ex.169) the Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development Programme

Towards a systemic approach to unlock the transformative power of service innovation

Franco German press release. following the interview between Ministers Le Maire and Altmaier, 18 December.

ICT : Internet of Things and Platforms for Connected Smart Objects

ARTEMIS Industry Association. ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking ARTEMIS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION & JOINT UNDERTAKING

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

The Rolling Agenda. 3-year strategic programme and 2-year work programme, what about it? Opportunities and obstacles

FET Flagships in Horizon 2020

EUROPEAN INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP FOR ACTIVE AND HEALTHY AGEING

First "Digitising European Industry" Stakeholder Forum, 01 February 2017, Essen

The Role of the EU Regions in Supporting Robotics

Success Stories within Factories of the Future

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

PROJECT FACT SHEET GREEK-GERMANY CO-FUNDED PROJECT. project proposal to the funding measure

APEC Chile 2019 Chile s Priorities

ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS COMMISSION PRAMONĖ 4.0 OF 2017

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

Transcription:

Report on Policy Action Plan EPES Project Eco-Process Engineering System For Composition of Services to Optimize Product Life-cycle FoF-ICT-2011.7.3-285093 Public Project Report Project Facts: Duration: 36 Months (September 2011 August 2014) Programme: FP7 ICT Website: http://www.epes-project.eu The EPES Project is co-funded by the European Commission under the FoF-ICT theme of the 7th Framework Programme (2007-2013)

Copyright Copyright 2012 by EPES Consortium All rights reserved. No part of this project report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, scanning, or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher. Except for quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review. Trademarked names may appear in this report. Rather than use a trademark symbol with every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use the names only in an editorial fashion and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. The EPES project has no influence on the websites mentioned in this report and is not aware of any illegal content on the pages referenced. Moreover, EPES dissociates itself explicitly from all mentioned websites. This statement is valid for all links within this report. This publication was completed with the support of the European Commission under the 7 th Framework Programme. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the Commission's own position. EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page II

Authors and EPES Project Partners Authors and EPES Project Partners Fundacion Tecnalia Research & Innovation http://www.tecnalia.com Spain ATB Institut für angewandte Systemtechnik Bremen GmbH http://www.atb-bremen.de Germany Sisteplant SL http://www.sisteplant.com Spain VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland http://www.vtt.fi Finland Esteco S.p.A. http://www.esteco.com Italy Grupo Tamoin SA http://www.tamoin.com Spain nkt Cables GmbH http://www.nktcables.com Germany EADS Innovation Works UK http://www.eads.com UK EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page III

Summary Summary This document represents the Deliverable D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan of the EPES Project and it explains the actions planned to be undertaken by the EPES Consortium towards gathering recommendations for European policy makers and building a Policy Action Plan (PAP). The EPES Project Consortium began by analysing three key Initiatives of the EU Commission within the frame of the Europe 2020 strategy, which are relevant for the scope of the project: Digital Agenda for Europe Initiative, which aims to deliver sustainable economic and social benefits from a digital single market based on fast and ultra-fast internet and interoperable applications Innovation Union Initiative, which aims to achieve a strategic approach to innovation, being closely aligned and mutually reinforcing EU and national/regional policies Resource Efficient Europe Initiative, which supports the shift towards a resourceefficient, low-carbon economy to achieve sustainable growth The purpose of this analysis was to identify relevant areas for European policy makers and the obstacles they are facing. Out of the relevant areas, those have been selected which are actionable within the scope of the EPES project. Then, a broad strategy for the EPES Project has been devised for tackling the obstacles within these actionable areas, also delineating the expected impact of the proposed actions. The strategy and targeted impact are not defined in detail at this stage; their definition is an iterative process, so the actions to be taken as part of the PAP, as well as the metrics for measuring their impact, will be more detailed in the next versions of this deliverable. EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page V

Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 11 1.1 Document Purpose... 11 1.2 Approach... 11 1.3 Document Structure... 12 2 Motivation... 13 2.1 Overlap between EPES Project Scope and EU Commission Initiatives... 13 2.2 Digital Agenda for Europe Initiative (DAEI)... 14 2.3 Innovation Union Initiative (IUI)... 15 2.4 Resource Efficient Europe Initiative (REEI)... 15 3 Actionable Areas... 17 3.1 Actionable Areas within the EPES Project... 17 3.2 Interaction with other projects... 17 3.2.1 Individual Projects... 18 3.2.2 FInES Cluster... 20 4 Conclusions... 21 EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page VII

Abbreviations Abbreviations a.m. AmI AmIEMeasure API DAEI e.g. etc. EU i.e. ICT IT IUI PAP R&D REEI SME SW w.r.t. WP afore mentioned Ambient Intelligence AmI-based Energy Use related Process Measuring System Application Programming Interface Digital Agenda for Europe Initiative exempli gratia = for example et cetera European Union id est = that is to say Information and Communication Technology Information Technology Innovation Union Initiative Policy Action Plan Research and Development Resource Efficient Europe Initiative Small and Medium Sized Enterprise Software with respect to Workpackage EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page IX

Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 Document Purpose This document presents the deliverable D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan, which is the result of Task T740 Policy and Societal Impact from Work Package WP700, Exploitation and Dissemination. It summarizes the activities which have occurred within the first year of the EPES project, explaining the strategy of the EPES Consortium towards gathering recommendations for European policy makers and working towards a Policy Action Plan (PAP). 1.2 Approach The EPES project intends to identify the policy priorities actionable within the frame of the project and which are under the umbrella of the Commission's ICT Programme and Europe 2020 priorities. The approach applied by the EPES Consortium is presented next (also see Figure 1-1 below). A starting point has been the analysis of three key Initiatives of the EU Commission, which are used as reference documents for the development of the PAP: the "Innovation Union" Initiative (IUI, aiming to achieve a strategic approach to innovation, being closely aligned and mutually reinforcing EU and national/regional policies), the "Digital Agenda for Europe" Initiative (DAEI, aiming to deliver sustainable economic and social benefits from a digital single market based on fast and ultra-fast internet and interoperable applications ), as well as the Resource Efficient Europe Initiative (REEI, supporting the shift towards a resource-efficient, low-carbon economy to achieve sustainable growth) The purpose of this analysis was to identify areas which are both relevant for European policy makers, but also actionable within the scope of the project. The results of this analysis are the first inputs for a broad strategy for the EPES Project towards the development of the PAP. Figure 1-1. Approach for collecting PAP recommendations The EPES Consortium is also constantly analyzing potential societal stakeholders, groups and policy makers that are relevant to the adoption of project results, in order to support the development of targeted actions to acquire their motivation and to sustain the deployment of the project results. EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 11

Introduction Clustering is also an important activity where relevant research areas can be identified. The EPES Project is part of the FInES Cluster 1. Interaction with other projects is expected to offer valuable insight into identifying relevant policy priorities and synchronizing actions to be taken under the PAP. At this stage, the strategy towards the development of the PAP and the targeted impact are not defined in detail. In order to react swiftly and be flexible to changes in priorities, the definition of the PAP is an iterative process, so new and more detailed actions to be taken as part of the PAP, as well as improved metrics for measuring their impact, will be detailed in future versions of this deliverable. 1.3 Document Structure The document is structured as follows: Section 1 presents the purpose of the document and the report s position in the project, as well as approach applied. Section 2 provides the motivation for a PAP, with the help of Communications within the three relevant Initiatives of the EU Commission Section 3 presents the EPES actionable areas which will contribute to building a Policy Action Plan, also highlighting their applicability in EPES s collaboration with three selected projects and within the FInES Cluster. Section 4 presents the conclusions drawn, in the form of the planned process for achieving the expected results, and the strategy for using these results to generate recommendations collected in a Policy Action Plan. 1 http://www.fines-cluster.eu EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 12

Motivation 2 Motivation This section presents the motivation driving forward the development of a PAP. The current EU research challenges are presented, as seen through three Initiatives relevant for the EPES Project. For these challenges, the broad actions proposed at EU Commission level are captured here for reference. In the next section 2.1, the areas and actions defined in the Initiatives are filtered to select only those which are actionable within the scope of the EPES project. 2.1 Overlap between EPES Project Scope and EU Commission Initiatives The EPES Project intends to develop a novel eco process engineering system which will support the Product Service System. Within the project, ICT Tools and a methodology will be produced, aiming to support: Continuous improvement of products in operation along their life cycle Applying best up to date technologies for end of life disposal of products and for improving future product designs In this way, product engineering teams can exploit sustainability intelligence to adapt design, operation and disposal strategies through managed eco-constraints relevant to their market contexts. Figure 2-1 below illustrates the overlap existing between the actionable areas within the EPES project and the Europe 2020 Flagship Initiatives. Figure 2-1. Europe 2020 Flagship Initiatives which are actionable within EPES The EPES project can contribute to the Innovation Union, Digital Agenda for Europe, and Resource Efficient Europe Initiatives, as they address areas which are actionable within the scope of the project: Digital Agenda for Europe Initiative Aims to deliver sustainable economic and social benefits from a digital single market based on fast and ultra-fast internet and interoperable applications EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 13

Motivation Innovation Union Initiative Aims to achieve a strategic approach to innovation Closely aligned and mutually reinforcing EU and national/regional policies Resource Efficient Europe Initiative Supports the shift towards a resource-efficient, low-carbon economy to achieve sustainable growth The next sections present these initiatives, showing what obstacles they identify and what general actions they suggest for alleviating the existing problems. 2.2 Digital Agenda for Europe Initiative (DAEI) Digital Agenda for Europe is one of the seven flagship initiatives identified within the Europe 2020 2 strategy, with the purpose of boosting growth and jobs. It is part of the Smart Growth initiative, and its overall aim is to deliver sustainable economic and social benefits from a digital single market. The main obstacles to a digital single market which are identified in the DAEI Communication 3, together with areas identified for tackling these problems, are presented in Table 2-1 below. Table 2-1. Digital Agenda for Europe: obstacles and actionable areas Identified obstacles Actionable areas for tackling problems Fragmented digital markets Opening up access to content Making online and cross-border transactions straightforward Building digital confidence Reinforcing the single market for telecommunication services Lack of interoperability Improving ICT standard-setting Promoting better use of standards Rising cybercrime and risk of low trust in networks Enhancing interoperability through coordination Trust and security Lack of investment in networks Guarantee universal broadband coverage with increasing speeds Foster the deployment of Next-Generation Access networks Open and neutral internet Insufficient research and innovation efforts Step up efforts and efficiency Driving ICT innovation by exploiting the single market Industry-led initiatives for open innovation Lack of digital literacy and skills Digital literacy and skills Inclusive digital services Missed opportunities in addressing societal challenges ICT for environment Sustainable healthcare and ICT-based support for dignified and independent living 2 http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm 3 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=com:2010:0245:fin:en:html, retrieved on the 1 st of June, 2012 EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 14

Motivation Promoting cultural diversity and creative content egovernment Intelligent Transport Systems for efficient transport and better mobility International aspects of the Digital Agenda 2.3 Innovation Union Initiative (IUI) Innovation Union is another one of the seven flagship initiatives identified within the Europe 2020 strategy, with the purpose of boosting growth and jobs. Like the DAEI, it is part of the Smart Growth initiative. As such, this Communication 4 of the IUI identifies innovation as being at the heart of the Europe 2020 strategy, with Europe currently facing what is called an innovation emergency : an environment that is fragmented and insufficiently innovation-friendly. The main weaknesses in European research which are identified in the IUI are: Under-investment in European knowledge foundation Unsatisfactory framework conditions (poor access to finance, slow standardisation, ineffective use of public procurement) Too much fragmentation and costly duplication Under these circumstances, the IUI calls for a more strategic approach to innovation. In particular, in order to achieve the Innovation Union, the following necessary aspects are highlighted: 1. Continued investing in education, R&D, innovation and ICTs 2. Tackling fragmentation 3. Modernising education systems at all levels 4. Completing the European Research Area, so that working and cooperating across the EU can be done as easily as within national borders 5. Simplifying access to EU programmes 6. Boosting the framework programme s contribution to nurturing fast-growing SMEs 7. Getting more innovation out of research 8. Removing barriers preventing entrepreneurs from bringing ideas to the market 9. Launching European Innovation Partnerships 10. Improved work with international partners 2.4 Resource Efficient Europe Initiative (REEI) The REEI is part of the Sustainable Growth group of initiatives under the Europe 2020 strategy. In one of its key Communications 5, it describes the three necessary conditions for enjoying the benefits of a resource-efficient and low-carbon economy: Coordinated action in a wide range of policy areas, with political visibility and support 4 http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/innovation-union-communicationbrochure_en.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none, retrieved on the 1 st of June, 2012 5 http://ec.europa.eu/resource-efficient-europe/pdf/resource_efficient_europe_en.pdf, retrieved on the 1 st of June, 2012 EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 15

Motivation Urgent action due to long investment lead-times Empowering consumers to move to resource-efficient consumption, to drive continuous innovation and ensure that efficiency gains are not lost The suggested area which is most applicable to the EPES project s scope is the improvement of products design, which can both decrease the demand for energy and raw materials, and make those products more durable and easier to recycle. It also acts as a stimulus to innovation, creating business opportunities and new jobs. EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 16

Actionable Areas 3 Actionable Areas In the previous section, areas of high interest for the Europe 2020 strategy have been presented, together with the obstacles they face. In order to devise a strategy for the EPES project s contribution to these areas, they are filtered even more, to find those specific areas which are directly actionable within the scope of the project. Section 4 then presents the targeted results within these areas, as well as a strategy for using these results as basis for recommendations within a PAP. 3.1 Actionable Areas within the EPES Project The DAEI, IUI, and REEI describe areas of interest together with the identified obstacles in a general way, at a high-level view. Out of these, the big groups of actionable areas identified for the EPES project are illustrated at a glance in Figure 3-1 below and in more detail in Table 3-1: Figure 3-1. High-level view of actionable areas within EPES Table 3-1. Detailed actionable areas within the scope of the EPES project Obstacles to be tackled within EPES Lack of interoperability Insufficient research and innovation efforts Fragmentation and costly duplication Missed opportunities in addressing societal challenges Actionable area Detailed areas to be supported within EPES Interoperability Promoting better use of standards Enhancing interoperability through coordination Research roadmaps Step up efforts and efficiency Driving ICT innovation by exploiting the single market Industry-led initiatives for open innovation Fragmentation Tackling duplication Societal challenges ICT for environment 3.2 Interaction with other projects The plans for the EPES project s interaction with other projects have been described in detail in Deliverable D700.4, Dissemination Strategy and FInES Cluster Collaboration Plan (delivered in M6), and also in D700.5.1, Report on FInES Cluster Activities (delivered in M12). This section EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 17

Actionable Areas is dedicated to highlighting those aspects of interaction which fall within the identified EPES actionable areas and which can potentially contribute to the Policy Action Plan. 3.2.1 Individual Projects This section presents the collaboration between EPES and three other projects (PREMANUS, ComVantage, and Bivee), showing how activities related to their common aspects are expected to contribute to the PAP. Figure 3-2 below shows the overlap of actionable areas between EPES and the considered projects. Figure 3-2. Actionable area commonalities between EPES and other projects 3.2.1.1 PREMANUS Project The goal of the PREMANUS project 6 is to overcome the asymmetric distribution of information in the end-of-life recovery of products by connecting OEMs and subcontractors, with a special emphasis on remanufacturing. To achieve this goal, PREMANUS will provide an on-demand middleware which combines product information and product services within one service oriented architecture. In addition to closing the information gap, the PREMANUS middleware would compute end-of-life-specific KPIs based on product usage data and make recommendations to its users regarding the viability (in terms of profitability, scope, and time) of remanufacturing a product. The collaboration between PREMANUS and EPES focuses on the following topics within the common actionable areas: Interoperability Identification and agreements regarding the use of common ICT standards Development that takes into account interoperability and platform compatibility Sharing knowledge and expertise on existing software which can be used to maximize interoperability Research roadmaps Research on methods and tools for managing data capture on product usage along its life cycle and disposal Collaboration in dissemination: special sessions in conferences, joint workshops, joint presentations, etc. 6 http://www.premanus.eu/ EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 18

Actionable Areas Fragmentation Sharing and combining KPIs o Used in EPES for optimizing the maintenance process o Used in PREMANUS for decision support within the remanufacturing process 3.2.1.2 ComVantage Project The ComVantage project 7 intends to offer a collaborative manufacturing network for companies of any size, in order to achieve competitive advantage and sustainable business operations. The collaboration space will be an extension to existing business and engineering software, which enables the sharing of selected business data and machine data of inter-organisational relevance to increase efficiency and flexibility of production processes throughout a dynamic network of manufacturers. Within the envisaged web-based collaboration space, experts interact with on-site workforces, customers interact with producing parties, and service technicians interact with construction engineers or diagnostic teams independent of any location. The project has the following technical objectives: Secure collaboration via a dynamic and decentralised access to information Easy to handle and trustful collaboration apps for mobile interaction Collaboration apps with verified added-value The collaboration between ComVantage and EPES focuses on the following topics within the common actionable areas: Research roadmaps Collaboration on business networks research Collaboration in dissemination: special sessions in conferences, joint workshops, joint presentations, etc. Optimisation of product design and product innovation Societal challenges Continuous improvement of operational excellence with respect to economical as well as ecological sustainability 3.2.1.3 Bivee Project The Bivee project 8 seeks to take the risk out of optimising complex supply and productions chains by creating a safe, virtual representation of organisations, products and processes. The motivation behind the project is that process change and real innovation is difficult to achieve when organisations are closely linked and interdependent, forming a virtual, networked enterprise. Such an enterprise needs to continually improve production processes and needs to have a means to generate ideas for change, test those ideas in a safe environment, implement the ideas, and then monitor their impact. For this purpose, the project aims to develop a conceptual reference framework, a novel management method, and a service-oriented ICT platform to enable business innovation in virtual factories and enterprises. 7 http://www.comvantage.eu/ 8 http://www.bivee.eu/ EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 19

Actionable Areas The collaboration between Bivee and EPES focuses on the following topics within the common actionable areas: Interoperability ICT platform to enable business innovation in virtual factories and enterprises Fragmentation Collaboration on KPIs related to innovation Research roadmaps Collaboration in dissemination: special sessions in conferences, joint workshops, joint presentations, etc. 3.2.2 FInES Cluster The EPES Project is a member of the FInES Cluster 9. It is involved in the following two Task Forces: Task Force on Manufacture and Industry Relationships 10, with the purpose of involving a broad range of industrial and other enterprises in the work and the results obtained in the various research projects in the FInES cluster, and beyond. Research Roadmap Task Force 11, with the goal to produce the new FInES Research Roadmap. As such, the EPES project is ideally placed to contribute with recommendations within the actionable areas of Interoperability & Fragmentation (due to its contacts with the industry in the first task force) and Research Roadmaps (due to its involvement in the second task force). With the expected re-shaping of the FInES research domain into a Net Innovation research domain in the new Directorate E 12, some adjustments will need to be done. The EPES project is, however, committed to continuing its collaborative activities. 9 http://www.fines-cluster.eu 10 http://www.fines-cluster.eu/fines/mw/index.php/manufacture_and_industry_task_force 11 http://www.fines-cluster.eu/fines/mw/index.php/fines_research_roadmap_task_force 12 http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/mission/index_en.htm#dire EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 20

Conclusions 4 Conclusions Starting from the actionable areas presented in section 3.1, the EPES Consortium has defined expected results and ways to measure and use them in the future as basis for Policy Action Plan recommendations. Table 4-1 below presents the results, the planned process of achieving these results, and the strategy of the EPES Consortium for using these results to generate recommendations collected in a Policy Action Plan. The first recommendations will be collected and presented in the second version of the Deliverable D700.6.2, Report on Policy Action Plan, which is due in M24 of the project. EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 21

Conclusions Table 4-1. Targeted results and strategy for Policy Action Plan recommendations Actionable Area Interoperability Research Roadmaps High-level action and Targeted results Identification of common standards used by the SME end-users and their technological eco-systems. Identification of standards within the key areas of the EPES project that could gain by having higher visibility, while at the same time maintaining the competitiveness of SMEs currently using them. Usage of open standards and platforms throughout the life-cycle of the EPES project. Support of targeted development of innovation clusters in the key fields of the projects. Recommendations for joint technology roadmaps, from research to commercialisation, based on the lessons learned within EPES. Knowledge transfer activities and dissemination of results. Steps to achieving results Identify common standards used by the EPES SME end-users and their ecosystems Evaluate standards based on criteria such as openness, usage, and bodies involved in maintaining them Select most appropriate/most used standards Identify companies in different sectors that could use the EPES project results Use inputs from such companies to make standards more generic (where applicable) Identify open standards and platforms currently in use with EPES end-users Investigate tools used in EPES by criteria such as their efficiency, appropriateness, ease of use, licensing status Within the key fields of the project, identify open problems which are most urgent to the industry Identify partners which can tackle these open problems Form innovation clusters Identify similar projects from different clusters and cooperate for generating these recommendations Dissemination of the results together (each project recommends to other projects of the cluster). Policy Action Plan recommendation strategy Recommend selected standards to policy makers for reinforcing their position in the industry Recommend generic standards to policy makers for reinforcing their position in the industry Recommend the most used / most appropriate standards to policy makers Outputs from innovation clusters can be used to support recommendations for future research directions Extract from joint technology roadmaps the most important directions and forward them to policy makers to help shape future research Fragmentation / Build modular systems, which can Specify the modules as compo- Release libraries as open source EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 22

Conclusions Interoperability be used as components, instead of developing them anew. A study on the degree of modularity attainable by systems developed for the key areas of the EPES project could help other projects in these areas. nents, thinking of the usage in the industrial business cases and of the future possible applications Apply the principles of modularity and loose coupling during development to clearly separate generic from specific components Group generic components in libraries that can be reused in other projects software that can be evaluated by industry as candidate for standard software to be used in future projects in the field Societal Challenges The project intends to exploit sustainability intelligence through managed eco-constraints. The metrics used in the projects can serve as basis for generic metrics. Identify specific metrics which are useful for exploiting sustainability intelligence Crystallize project-specific metrics into generic metrics Use found generic metrics as recommendations for standard metrics to be adopted within industry EPES D700.6.1 Report on Policy Action Plan Page 23