CUT GRADE. Proportions Polish Symmetry. AV. DIAMETER = 100 % % TABLE WIDTH % CROWN HEIGHT CROWN ANGLE % GIRDLE PAVILION ANGLE

Similar documents
CUT GRADE. Proportions Polish Symmetry

Cut GRADE AV. DIAMETER = 100 % % TABLE WIDTH % CROWN HEIGHT CROWN ANGLE % GIRDLE PAVILION ANGLE. % TOTAL DEPTH SUM α & β % PAVILION DEPTH % CULET

STANDARD TEST METHOD 6

eos fancy The perfect girdle for all shapes

AVALON+ The ultimate smoothness check while polishing

STANDARD TEST METHOD 5

GUIDELINES: HEARTS AND ARROWS BY HRD ANTWERP

Enter our Bespoke section and we will guide you step by step to select and design your own diamond piece.

How the Laboratory Describes Round Unmodified Brilliant Cut Diamonds

...what you don t see is what you get!...

Cut Quality. The Diamond Course

IS Doc: MTD 10 (4446)W

Basic Glossary of Jewelry Terms

Pricing Color: The Methodology & Challenges Richard B. Drucker, GG (GIA), Honorary FGA

. HOW AMAZING IS THAT!!

United States Patent (19)

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIAMOND GRADING & RESEARCH. Grading Standards. Version 1.2 February 2016

PROJECT ASSURE DIAMOND VERIFICATION INSTRUMENT STANDARD REPORT. Summary Report for: HRD Antwerp M-Screen+ Diamond Tester

Production Standards Best Practices for CAD/CAM Services

Research and Technology Illuminate the Cut Grade

Diamonds were created anywhere from 1 Billion 3.3 Billion years ago... almost as old as the Earth itself!

2

Pasadena, CA (P) Sample Deluxe Appraisal Report for Insurance Scheduling

BIRKS BRIDAL QUALITY MANUAL

WHAT IS A DIAMOND? HOW ARE DIAMONDS TRANSFORMED FROM ROUGH TO POLISHED?

DIAMONDS & SETTINGS Refraction & Reflection

EDITORIAL 157 Demystifying Diamond Cut William E. Boyajian. 184 Cultured Abalone Blister Pearls from New Zealand Cheryl Y.

MODELING THE APPEARANCE OF THE ROUND BRILLIANT CUT DIAMOND: AN ANALYSIS OF FIRE, AND MORE ABOUT BRILLIANCE

Key: This info is NOT part of the beginner s track This needs pictures and video of REAL stones, not just GemCAD This needs updating and filling in

CLASS views from detail on a grid paper. (use appropriate line types to show features) - Optional views. Turn in for grading on class 6 (06/04)

A Diamonds Story. The Origins

Multiview Drawing. Definition: Graphical representation of a 3- dimensional object on one plane (sheet of paper) using two or more views.

Accordance in round brilliant diamond cutting

United States Patent 19 Freiesleben

Engineering drawing. Semester I/II Mechanical Engineering Department Technical University of Gdańsk. Lecture 8

$80 (1 st ) $70 (2 nd ) $60 (3 rd )

ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION

Chapter 5 SECTIONS OF SOLIDS 5.1 INTRODUCTION

ARTICLE 28 VISUAL EXAMINATION STANDARDS

Sale 394 Lot 269 A Carat Octagonal Step Cut Fancy Yellow Diamond, measuring approximately x x 8.63 mm, together with a yellow gold r

Glass Box Projection. Gives you 6 sides to view of an object. 10/2/14 2

Friendly Systems Brilliant Results

Chapter 2: Dimensioning Basic Topics Advanced Topics Exercises

Thank you for checking out the KonzukTry Before You Buy program. We hope to make your challenging decision easy (well, easier).

GIA Import File Usage (GSR)

ISO 1101 Geometrical product specifications (GPS) Geometrical tolerancing Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out

LIGHT-REFLECTION AND REFRACTION

CHEVRON TOUGHENED GLASS SPECIFICATIONS

Skill Improvement Program

Basic design rules for laser sintering. EOS Krailling, 2012

Outline: Introduction: What is SPM, history STM AFM Image treatment Advanced SPM techniques Applications in semiconductor research and industry

Optical Window Design for ALS Devices updated by Kerry Glover and Dave Mehrl February 2010

Drill Bit Sharpening Attachment. Parts

Helium reports documentation. Creating and customizing Helium reports. Using RTF report templates. May 19, 2006

SAMPLE QUESTION PAPER III ENGINEERING GRAPHICS (046) Time Allowed: 3 hours Maximum Marks: 70

Fundamental Characterizations of Diamond Disc, Pad, and Retaining Ring Wear in Chemical Mechanical Planarization Processes

GE 6152 ENGINEERING GRAPHICS

Graduierung geschliffener Diamanten Teil 1: Terminologie und Klassifizierung. Grading polished diamonds Part 1: Terminology and classification

Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing

ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS. Ms. Sicola

Unit-5 ISOMETRIC PROJECTION

THE VILLAGES GEM & MINERAL SOCIETY FACETING

Radial Polarization Converter With LC Driver USER MANUAL

GEMSCRIPTOR DT-150-R

Sketching in SciTech. What you need to know for graphic communication

Orthographic Projection

Opto Engineering S.r.l.

ENGINEERING GRAPHICS ESSENTIALS. (A Text and Lecture Aid) Second Edition. Kirstie Plantenberg University of Detroit Mercy SDC PUBLICATIONS

EDITORIAL FEATURE ARTICLE NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES

Properties of Structured Light

Chapter 6. Architectural Lines and Lettering

Mechanical Drawing. Unit 2 Study Guide for Chapters 6-10

ENGINEERING DRAWING LECTURE 4

Thickness Measurement with Laser Displacement Sensors

DRAWING INSTRUMENTS AND THEIR USES

ARCoptix. Radial Polarization Converter. Arcoptix S.A Ch. Trois-portes Neuchâtel Switzerland Mail: Tel:

Drawing Daisy Wheel Angles and Triangles

Compliments of GreatScopes Microscopes

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,386,952 B1

French Sculpted Acrylic Competition Rules, Criteria & Judge instruction Competition Rules

Test Answers and Exam Booklet. Geometric Tolerancing

Sectional Views. DFTG-1305 Technical Drafting by Prof. Francis Ha. Session 6. Geisecke s textbook: 14 th Ed. Chapter 7 p th Ed. Chapter 8 p.

Downloaded from ENGINEERING DRAWING. Time allowed : 3 hours Maximum Marks : 70

ME 114 Engineering Drawing II

End-of-Chapter Exercises

Kent Slope Top Bollard KST-101/3

Graphical Communication

Student Name: Teacher: Date: District: Rowan. Assessment: 9_12 T and I IC61 - Drafting I Test 1. Description: Unit C - Sketching - Test 2.

The Principles and Elements of Design. These are the building blocks of all good floral design

Elements Of Art Study Guide

Lecture 3: Geometrical Optics 1. Spherical Waves. From Waves to Rays. Lenses. Chromatic Aberrations. Mirrors. Outline

Change of position method:-

Final Review. The Diamond Course ND OL 2015

Contents. Notes on the use of this publication

Acceptance & Submission Guidelines Diamonds

SAMPLE QUESTION PAPER II ENGINEERING GRAPHICS (046)

Chemistry 985. Some constants: q e 1.602x10 19 Coul, ɛ x10 12 F/m h 6.626x10 34 J-s, c m/s, 1 atm = 760 Torr = 101,325 Pa

Copyrighted Material. Copyrighted Material. Copyrighted. Copyrighted. Material

Geometry Controls and Report

Bona Abrasives. High-performance abrasives for a perfect surface finish

Transcription:

www.hrdantwerp.be CUT GRADE Proportions Polish Symmetry AV. DIAMETER = 100 % % TABLE WIDTH % CROWN HEIGHT CROWN ANGLE % GIRDLE PAVILION ANGLE % TOTAL DEPTH SUM α & β % PAVILION DEPTH % LENGTH HALVES CROWN % CULET % LENGTH HALVES PAVILION Width OF table HEIGHT OF crown girdle DEPTH OF pavilion Well cut Too Deep Too shallow

Definition of Cut Grade The description of the Cut Grade on a certificate is subdivided into 3 grades: proportions, polish and symmetry. Each grade is divided into 4 categories: Excellent, Very Good, Good and Fair. The proportions are determinative for the brilliancy and the fire of the diamond. The polish describes the finish of the facets. The symmetry describes the variations of the different parameters which define the proportions. HRD Antwerp Cut Grade Proportions Polish Symmetry Excellent Excellent Excellent Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair 2 HRD Antwerp Cut Grade

Proportions Determination of proportions For a diamond to show an optimal combination of brilliancy and fire, it has to be polished with due attention to the angles of inclination and proportional relations between the various parts of the stone. If the angles and proportions are not optimal, this can lead to the appearance of one or more specific effects in the stone, which are detrimental to its beauty. When grading the proportions of a polished diamond, the main issue is therefore to evaluate if, and if so to what extent, these effects occur. Parameters that can characterize the proportions for the round brilliant The crown angle (β) The pavilion angle (α) The proportion of the table width to the diameter (% t) The proportion of the crown height to the diameter (% hc) The proportion of the pavilion depth to the diameter (% hp) The proportion of the girdle thickness to the diameter (% a) The culet size (% culet) The proportion of the total depth to the diameter (% td) The sum of the crown- and pavilion angle (α+β) The half length of the upper girdle facets The half length of the lower girdle facets The fish eye effect The effect culet visible in the bezels Profile of a diamond and the different parameters AV. DIAMETER = 100 % % TABLE WIDTH % CROWN HEIGHT CROWN ANGLE % GIRDLE PAVILION ANGLE % TOTAL DEPTH SUM α & β % PAVILION DEPTH % LENGTH HALVES CROWN % CULET % LENGTH HALVES PAVILION HRD Antwerp Cut Grade 3

Proportions Overview of the different parameters per category Fair Good Very Good Excellent Very Good Good Fair Crown angle (β) up to 25.9 26.0 to 27.9 28.0 to 31.9 32.0 to 36.0 36.1 to 37.7 37.8 to 40.0 40.1 and up Pavilion angle (α) up to 38.4 38.5 to 39.5 39.6 to 40.5 40.6 to 41.8 41.9 to 42.1 42.2 to 43.1 43.2 and up Table width up to 49.0% 50.0 to 51.0% 52.0% 53.0 to 62.0% 63.0 to 66.0% 67.0 to 70.0% 71.0% and up Crown height up to 8.5% 9.0 to 10.5% 11.0 to 11.5% 12.0 to 16.0% 16.5 to 18.0% 18.5 to 19.5% 20.0% and up Pavilion depth up to 39.5% 40.0 to 41.0% 41.5 to 4 43.0 to 44.5% 45.0% 45.5 to 46.5% 47.0% and up Girdle up to 0.5% 1.0 to 1.5% 2.0% 2.5 to 4.5% 5.0 to 5.5% 6.0 to 7.5% 8.0% and up Culet size 0.0 to 0.9% 1.0 to 1.9% 2.0 to 3.9% 4.0% and up Total depth up to 52.9% 53.0 to 55.4% 55.5 to 58.4% 58.5 to 63.0% 63.1 to 64.4% 64.5 to 66.9% 67.0% and up Sum α and β up to 67.9 68.0 to 69.9 70.0 to 72.4 72.5 to 77.0 77.1 to 79.4 79.5 to 80.4 80.5 and up Half length crown up to 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0 to 55.0% 60.0% 65.0% 70.0% and up Half length pavilion up to 60.0% 65.0 to 70.0% 75.0% 75.0 to 85.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% and up Fish-eye effect Excellent Good Fair Culet in bezels Excellent Good Fair If the measurement results are classified in two different categories, the lowest proportion grade is considered to be the overall reading. Effects that can be perceived when observing the stone perpendicular to the table Fish Eye: The reflection of the girdle is partially or completely visible in the table (small pavilion angle and a large table width). Culet visible in the bezels: The diamond shows an abnormal amount of scintillation, due to the culet and the surrounding facets being visible through the bezels (a large total depth and crown angle). 4 HRD Antwerp Cut Grade

Proportions Relation Table Width - Crown Height Table width (%) 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Crown height (%) 19.5 38.0 38.5 39.1 39.7 40.3 40.9 41.6 42.2 42.9 43.6 44.3 45.0 45.7 46.5 47.3 48.1 48.9 49.8 50.6 51.5 52.4 19.0 37.2 37.8 38.4 39.0 39.6 40.2 40.8 41.5 42.1 42.8 43.5 44.3 45.0 45.8 46.5 47.4 48.2 49.0 49.9 50.8 51.7 18.5 36.5 37.1 37.6 38.2 38.8 39.4 40.1 40.7 41.4 42.1 42.8 43.5 44.2 45.0 45.8 46.6 47.4 48.3 49.1 50.0 51.0 18.0 35.8 36.3 36.9 37.5 38.0 38.7 39.3 39.9 40.6 41.3 42.0 42.7 43.5 44.2 45.0 45.8 46.6 47.5 48.4 49.3 50.2 17.5 35.0 35.5 36.1 36.7 37.3 37.9 38.5 39.1 39.8 40.5 41.2 41.9 42.6 43.4 44.2 45.0 45.8 46.7 47.6 48.5 49.4 17.0 34.2 34.8 35.3 35.9 36.5 37.1 37.7 38.3 39.0 39.7 40.4 41.1 41.8 42.6 43.4 44.2 45.0 45.9 46.7 47.6 48.6 16.5 33.4 34.0 34.5 35.1 35.7 36.3 36.9 37.5 38.2 38.8 39.5 40.2 41.0 41.7 42.5 43.3 44.1 45.0 45.9 46.8 47.7 16.0 32.6 33.1 33.7 34.2 34.8 35.4 36.0 36.7 37.3 38.0 38.7 39.4 40.1 40.9 41.6 42.4 43.3 44.1 45.0 45.9 46.8 15.5 31.8 32.3 32.9 33.4 34.0 34.6 35.2 35.8 36.4 37.1 37.8 38.5 39.2 40.0 40.7 41.5 42.4 43.2 44.1 45.0 45.9 15.0 31.0 31.5 32.0 32.6 33.1 33.7 34.3 34.9 35.5 36.2 36.9 37.6 38.3 39.0 39.8 40.6 41.4 42.3 43.2 44.1 45.0 14.5 30.1 30.6 31.1 31.7 32.2 32.8 33.4 34.0 34.6 35.3 35.9 36.6 37.3 38.1 38.9 39.6 40.5 41.3 42.2 43.1 44.0 14.0 29.2 29.7 30.3 30.8 31.3 31.9 32.5 33.1 33.7 34.3 35.0 35.7 36.4 37.1 37.9 38.7 39.5 40.3 41.2 42.1 43.0 13.5 28.4 28.9 29.4 29.9 30.4 31.0 31.5 32.1 32.7 33.4 34.0 34.7 35.4 36.1 36.9 37.6 38.5 39.3 40.2 41.1 42.0 13.0 27.5 28.0 28.4 29.0 29.5 30.0 30.6 31.2 31.8 32.4 33.0 33.7 34.4 35.1 35.8 36.6 37.4 38.2 39.1 40.0 40.9 12.5 26.6 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.1 29.6 30.2 30.8 31.4 32.0 32.7 33.3 34.0 34.8 35.5 36.3 37.1 38.0 38.9 39.8 12.0 25.6 26.1 26.6 27.1 27.6 28.1 28.6 29.2 29.7 30.3 31.0 31.6 32.3 33.0 33.7 34.4 35.2 36.0 36.9 37.7 38.7 11.5 24.7 25.1 25.6 26.1 26.6 27.1 27.6 28.1 28.7 29.3 29.9 30.5 31.2 31.9 32.6 33.3 34.1 34.9 35.7 36.6 37.5 11.0 23.7 24.2 24.6 25.1 25.6 26.1 26.6 27.1 27.6 28.2 28.8 29.4 30.1 30.7 31.4 32.2 32.9 33.7 34.5 35.4 36.3 10.5 22.8 23.2 23.6 24.1 24.5 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.6 27.1 27.7 28.3 28.9 29.6 30.3 31.0 31.7 32.5 33.3 34.1 35.0 10.0 21.8 22.2 22.6 23.1 23.5 24.0 24.4 24.9 25.5 26.0 26.6 27.1 27.8 28.4 29.1 29.7 30.5 31.2 32.0 32.8 33.7 9.5 20.8 21.2 21.6 22.0 22.4 22.9 23.4 23.8 24.3 24.9 25.4 26.0 26.6 27.2 27.8 28.5 29.2 29.9 30.7 31.5 32.3 9.0 19.8 20.2 20.6 21.0 21.4 21.8 22.2 22.7 23.2 23.7 24.2 24.8 25.3 25.9 26.6 27.2 27.9 28.6 29.4 30.1 31.0 Excellent Very Good Good Fair Bezel angle ( ) Crown height (%) Table width (%) 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 19.5 38.0 38.5 39.1 39.7 40.3 40.9 41.6 42.2 42.9 43.6 44.3 45.0 45.7 46.5 47.3 48.1 48.9 49.8 50.6 51.5 52.4 19.0 37.2 37.8 38.4 39.0 39.6 40.2 40.8 41.5 42.1 42.8 43.5 44.3 45.0 45.8 46.5 47.4 48.2 49.0 49.9 50.8 51.7 18.5 36.5 37.1 37.6 38.2 38.8 39.4 40.1 40.7 41.4 42.1 42.8 43.5 44.2 45.0 45.8 46.6 47.4 48.3 49.1 50.0 51.0 18.0 35.8 36.3 36.9 37.5 38.0 38.7 39.3 39.9 40.6 41.3 42.0 42.7 43.5 44.2 45.0 45.8 46.6 47.5 48.4 49.3 50.2 17.5 35.0 35.5 36.1 36.7 37.3 37.9 38.5 39.1 39.8 40.5 41.2 41.9 42.6 Pavilion 43.4 44.2angle 45.0 45.8 46.7 47.6 48.5 49.4 17.0 34.2 34.8 35.3 35.9 36.5 37.1 37.7 38.3 39.0 39.7 40.4 41.1 41.8 maximum 42.6 43.4 44.2 45.0 45.9 46.7 47.6 48.6 16.5 33.4 34.0 34.5 35.1 35.7 36.3 36.9 37.5 38.2 38.8 39.5 40.2 41.0 41.7 41.1 42.5 43.3 44.1 45.0 45.9 46.8 47.7 16.0 32.6 33.1 33.7 34.2 34.8 35.4 36.0 36.7 37.3 38.0 38.7 39.4 40.1 40.9 41.6 42.4 43.3 44.1 45.0 45.9 46.8 15.5 31.8 32.3 32.9 33.4 34.0 34.6 35.2 35.8 36.4 37.1 37.8 38.5 39.2 40.0 40.7 41.5 42.4 43.2 44.1 45.0 45.9 15.0 31.0 31.5 32.0 32.6 33.1 33.7 34.3 34.9 35.5 36.2 36.9 37.6 38.3 39.0 39.8 40.6 41.4 42.3 43.2 44.1 45.0 14.5 14.530.1 30.6 31.1 31.7 32.2 32.8 33.4 34.0 34.6 35.335.9 36.6 37.3 38.1 38.9 39.6 40.5 41.3 42.2 43.1 44.0 14.0 29.2 29.7 30.3 30.8 31.3 31.9 32.5 33.1 33.7 34.3 35.0 35.7 36.4 37.1 37.9 38.7 39.5 40.3 41.2 42.1 43.0 13.5 28.4 28.9 29.4 29.9 30.4 31.0 31.5 32.1 32.7 33.4 34.0 34.7 35.4 36.1 36.9 37.6 38.5 39.3 40.2 41.1 42.0 13.0 27.5 28.0 28.4 29.0 29.5 30.0 30.6 31.2 31.8 32.4 33.0 33.7 34.4 35.1 35.8 36.6 37.4 38.2 39.1 40.0 40.9 12.5 26.6 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.1 29.6 30.2 30.8 31.4 32.0 32.7 33.3 34.0 34.8 35.5 36.3 37.1 38.0 38.9 39.8 12.0 25.6 26.1 26.6 27.1 27.6 28.1 28.6 29.2 29.7 30.3 31.0 31.6 32.3 33.0 33.7 34.4 35.2 36.0 36.9 37.7 38.7 11.5 24.7 25.1 25.6 26.1 26.6 27.1 27.6 28.1 28.7 29.3 29.9 30.5 31.2 31.9 32.6 33.3 34.1 34.9 35.7 36.6 37.5 11.0 23.7 24.2 24.6 25.1 25.6 26.1 26.6 27.1 27.6 28.2 28.8 29.4 30.1 30.7 31.4 32.2 32.9 33.7 34.5 35.4 36.3 10.5 22.8 23.2 23.6 24.1 24.5 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.6 27.1 27.7 28.3 28.9 29.6 30.3 31.0 31.7 32.5 33.3 34.1 35.0 10.0 21.8 22.2 22.6 23.1 23.5 24.0 24.4 24.9 25.5 26.0 26.6 27.1 27.8 28.4 29.1 29.7 30.5 31.2 32.0 32.8 33.7 9.5 20.8 21.2 21.6 22.0 22.4 22.9 23.4 23.8 24.3 24.9 25.4 26.0 26.6 27.2 27.8 28.5 29.2 29.9 30.7 31.5 32.3 9.0 19.8 20.2 20.6 21.0 21.4 21.8 22.2 22.7 23.2 23.7 24.2 24.8 25.3 25.9 26.6 27.2 27.9 28.6 29.4 30.1 31.0 60 Excellent Very Good Good Fair Bezel angle ( ) HRD Antwerp Cut Grade 5

Proportions Description of the girdle and influence on the proportions Description of the girdle Measured value Proportion Grade Extremely thin 0.0 0.5% Fair Very thin 1.0 1.5% Good 2.0% Very Good Thin Excellent 3.0 4.5% Medium 5.0% Very Good 5.5% Thick 6.0% Good Very thick 6.5 7.5% Extremely thick 8.0% and up Fair The influence of the culet size on the proportions Description of the culet Culet Size Proportion Grade Pointed 0.0% (< 0.033 mm) Excellent 0.1% (0.033 mm) 0.9% 1.0 1.9% Very Good 2.0 3.9% Good Large 4.0% and up Fair 6 HRD Antwerp Cut Grade

Polish Polish defines all external characteristics of the diamond. These characteristics are mostly the result of polishing the diamond. The characteristics being graded Scratches Percussion figures Beard Polishing lines Abraded facet edges Pit Nick Burn marks Laser marks Extra facets Naturals Description of the polish Polish Observation with loupe 10x Excellent Very Good Good Fair Characteristics, not or very difficult to find with a loupe 10x Characteristics, difficult to find with a loupe 10x Characteristics, easy to find with a loupe 10x Characteristics, very easy to find with a loupe 10x HRD Antwerp Cut Grade 7

Symmetry Determination of symmetry The symmetry describes the variations of the different parameters which define the proportions. Measurable deviations Symmetry-deviations Excellent Very Good Good Fair Unroundness < 1.0% < 2.0% < 4.0% 4.0% and up Variation in crown height < 1.0% < 2.0% < 5.0% 5.0% and up Variation in pavilion depth < 2.0% < 3.0% < 6.0% 6.0% and up Table out of centre < 1.0% < 2.0% < 5.0% 5.0% and up Culet out of centre < 1.0% < 2.0% < 5.0% 5.0% and up Table and culet out of centre < 1.0% < 2.0% < 5.0% 5.0% and up Variation on the table width < 2.0% < 4.0% < 8.0% 8.0% and up Single cut effect < 0.8% < 2.0% < 4.0% 4.0% and up Deviation on the crown angles < 2.0 < 4.0 < 8.0 8.0 and up Deviation on the pavilion angles < 1.0 < 2.0 < 4.0 4.0 and up Deviation on the angles of the lower girdle facets < 1.0 < 2.0 < 4.0 4.0 and up Not measurable deviations Deviation of the bezels Deviation of the pavilions Cone-shaped girdle Visual deviations Misalignment Girdle partly faceted Bow tie effect Deviation on the girdle thickness (on max & min) Deviation on the angles of the upper girdle facets Information about the effects Single Cut effect: The diamond looks as if it has less facets than are really present. A single cut effect is caused by the angles of the bezels / pavilions and the halves of the bezels / pavilions side. Bow tie effect: Through the crown side, two dark zones in the shape of a bow tie can be seen. 8 HRD Antwerp Cut Grade

Symmetry deviations Overview of the different symmetry deviations 1. Girdle outline not circular 15. Crown side not aligned to pavilion side 2. Slanting table 16. Cone-shaped girdle 3. Sloping girdle 17. Girdle partly faceted 4. Culet out of centre 20. Pavilion facets not symmetrical 5. Table out of centre 22. Pavilion facets not pointing up 6. Table and culet out of centre in opposite direction 23. Deviation on the bezel angles 7. Table and/or star facets not symmetrical 24. Deviation on the pavilion angles 10. Bezels not symmetrical 25. Deviation on the angles of the upper girdle facets 12. Crown facets not pointing up 26. Deviation on the angles of the lower girdle facets 13. Varying girdle thickness BOW-TIE 14. Single cut effect (due to alternating girdle thickness) HRD Antwerp Cut Grade 9

Symmetry deviations Different symmetry deviations of the girdle Perfect symmetry (Bezels) (Halves) 1% (Valley) average(h) = average(b) = variation girdle height (B & H) = max (B&H) min (B&H) = 2.5 2.5 = 0% variation girdle height (V) = max (V) min (V) = 1 1 = 0% variation girdle height = max [variation girdle height (B & H) & variation girdle height (V)] = 0% (<1%) => Exc single cut = average (H) average (B) = 2.5 2.5 = 0% (<0.8%) => Exc Single cut effect 2.3% (Bezels) 2.7% (Halves) 1% (Valley) average(h) = 2.7% average(b) = 2.3% variation girdle height (B & H) = max (B&H) min (B&H) = 2.7 2.3 = 0.4% variation girdle height (V) = max (V) min (V) = 1 1 = 0% variation girdle height = max [variation girdle height (B & H) & variation girdle height (V)] = 0.4% (<1%) => Exc single cut = average (H) average (B) = 2.7 2.3 = 0.4% (<0.8%) => Exc Variation girdle height 3.4% 1.5% average(h) = 2.6% average(b) = variation girdle height (B & H) = max (B&H) min (B&H) = 3.4 2.5 = 0.9% variation girdle height (V) = max (V) min (V) = 1.5 1.5 = 0% variation girdle height = max [variation girdle height (B & H) & variation girdle height (V)] = 0.9% (<1%) => Exc single cut = average (H) average (B) = 2.6 2.5 = 0.1% (<0.8%) => Exc Variation girdle height Vmin = 0.5% Vmax = 1.5% Bmin = 2% Bmax = 3% Hmin = 2% Hmax = 3% 1% average(h) = average(b) = variation girdle height (B & H) = max (B&H) min (B&H) = 3 2 = 1% variation girdle height (V) = max (V) min (V) = 1.5 0.5 = 1% variation girdle height = max [variation girdle height (B & H) & variation girdle height (V)] = 1% (<1%) => not Exc single cut = average (H) average (B) = 2.5 2.5 = 0% (<0.8%) => Exc Illustrations: WTOCD 10 HRD Antwerp Cut Grade

Conclusion The proportion grade is based on the average of the measured values. If there is a large deviation on one or more values, the beauty of the diamond can be influenced. The table below shows the influence of symmetry and/or polish on the final proportion grade. Proportions Pol. / Sym. Excellent Very Good Good Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Very Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Updated July 2014 HRD Antwerp Cut Grade 11

For more information, please contact: Hoveniersstraat 22, BE-2018 Antwerp, Belgium Tel.: +32 3 222 06 25 Fax: +32 3 222 06 30 diamondlab@hrdantwerp.be www.hrdantwerp.be