ACS-Lite. The Next Generation of Traffic Signal Control. Eddie Curtis, FHWA HOTM / Resource Center February 28, 2007

Similar documents
Adaptive Signal Control in Tyler Texas

Roadmap to Successful Deployment of Adaptive Systems

OPAC Adaptive Engine Pinellas County Deployment

City of Surrey Adaptive Signal Control Pilot Project

AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Signal Performance Metrics Charlie Wetzel, PE, PTOE

Adaptive signal Control. Tom Mathew

True Adaptive Signal Control A Comparison of Alternatives Technical Paper #1154

Columbus Computerized Traffic Signal System

EVALUATING AN ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM IN GRESHAM. James M. Peters, P.E., P.T.O.E., Jay McCoy, P.E., Robert Bertini, Ph.D., P.E.

Next Generation of Adaptive Traffic Signal Control

Traffic Signal Timing Coordination. Innovation for better mobility

Validation Plan: Mitchell Hammock Road. Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System. Prepared by: City of Oviedo. Draft 1: June 2015

Currently 2 vacant engineer positions (1 Engineer level, 1 Managing Engineer level)

Getting Through the Green: Smarter Traffic Management with Adaptive Signal Control

Assessing the Performance of Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Strategies

1 of REV:0

Applicability of Adaptive Traffic Control Systems in Nevada s Urban Areas

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Area Traffic Control

Adaptive Signal System Mt. Juliet, TN. SR-171 (Mt. Juliet Road)

ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL PILOT PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF SURREY

Agenda. Analysis Tool Selection and Mesoscopic Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Applications:

Joint OCTEC / ITS-CA Southern Section Luncheon Meeting. February 22, 2018

0-6920: PROACTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND COORDINATION FOR CONGESTION MITIGATION ON ARTERIAL ROADS. TxDOT Houston District

MOBILITY RESEARCH NEEDS FROM THE GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE

Event-Based Data Collection for Generating Actuated Controller Performance Measures

Model-based Design of Coordinated Traffic Controllers

Georgia s Regional Traffic Operations Program

I-85 Integrated Corridor Management. Jennifer Portanova, PE, CPM Sreekanth Sunny Nandagiri, PE, PMP

Signal Patterns for Improving Light Rail Operation By Wintana Miller and Mark Madden DKS Associates

Traffic Controller Timing Processes

Effectiveness of Adaptive Traffic Control for Arterial Signal Management: Modeling Results

UDOT AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Area Traffic Control System (ATCS)

Automatic Generation of Traffic Signal Timing Plan

Flow-based Adaptive Split Signal Control

Development and Application of On-Line Strategi for Optimal Intersection Control (Phase Ill) 1II II! IIi1111 III. I k I I I

The WISE Experience. Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) September 20, Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D. Director of Modeling, AMBAG

Configuration Methodology for Traffic-Responsive Plan Selection: A Global Perspective

UTAH S EXPERIENCE WITH AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Next Generation Traffic Control with Connected and Automated Vehicles

ANALYTICAL TOOLS FOR LOOP DETECTORS, TRAFFIC MONITORING, AND RAMP METERING SYSTEMS.

City of Orlando Alpha Test July 10, 2000

Abilene District Traffic Signal Timing and Capacity Analysis

Detector-Health Classification for Quality Control of Traffic Counting Data (at MnDOT) NATMEC, 2018 Taek M.Kwon, Ph.D University of Minnesota Duluth

Synthesis Study of Texas Signal Control Systems: Technical Report

July/August/September Traffic Adaptive Installation Preparation, July-September 2017

Signal Coordination for Arterials and Networks CIVL 4162/6162

Signalized Corridor Assessment

Design Guidelines for Deploying Closed Loop Systems

Use of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in FSUTMS in Support of Transportation Planning in Florida

ASSESSING DETERIORATION OF PRETIMED, ACTUATED- COORDINATED, AND SCOOT CONTROL REGIMES IN SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT. Aleksandar Stevanovic

An Operational Test of Adaptive Signal Control. Campbell Road Corridor Richardson, Texas

FM 691 CORRIDOR STUDY

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Managing traffic through Signal Performance Measures in Pima County

Deploying Transit Signal Priority Systems

DESIGN OF VEHICLE ACTUATED SIGNAL FOR A MAJOR CORRIDOR IN CHENNAI USING SIMULATION

USING BLUETOOTH TM TO MEASURE TRAVEL TIME ALONG ARTERIAL CORRIDORS

AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Critical Infrastructure Elements for SPMs

WHITE PAPER BENEFITS OF OPTICOM GPS. Upgrading from Infrared to GPS Emergency Vehicle Preemption GLOB A L TRAFFIC TE CHNOLOGIE S

Performance Measures for Local Agency Traffic Signals

REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETIMING PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Integrated Corridor Management. Brian Cronin USDOT ITS Joint Program Office October 14, 2014

Optimization of Time of Day Plan Scheduling Using a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm

Study Description. November 29, Overpass Road Alternatives Public Workshop

Just Announced! General Registration : Includes all three days of Technical Sessions, $150 for Florida Section Members / $300 for Nonmembers

SARASOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT

Complete Streets & PPM to FDM Update

Methodology to Assess Traffic Signal Transition Strategies. Employed to Exit Preemption Control

Enhanced Traffic Signal Operation using Connected Vehicle Data

Chapter 39. Vehicle Actuated Signals Introduction Vehicle-Actuated Signals Basic Principles

Objective 1: Performance Measures for a Signalized Arterial System

Mapping the capacity and performance of the arterial road network in Adelaide

WELCOME SMART WATER NETWORKS SENSORS & COMMUNICATIONS FOR. Andy Newland Regional Sales Director Asia Pacific

Arterial Connected Vehicle Test Bed Deployment and Lessons Learned

San Antonio Wrong Way Driver Initiative

M-0418 REV:0

Battery saving communication modes for wireless freeway traffic sensors

PennDOT District 6-0 Signal Retiming Initiative The Route 611 Story

Aesthetic Steering Committee Meeting No. 8

Economics and Software Engineering: Transdisciplinary Issues in Research and Education

A Fuzzy Signal Controller for Isolated Intersections

ON USING PERFECT SIGNAL PROGRESSION AS THE BASIS FOR ARTERIAL DESIGN: A NEW PERSPECTIVE

SIGNAL TIMING MANUAL. NCHRP Report 812. Second Edition

Advanced Traffic Signal Control System Installed in Phuket City, Kingdom of Thailand

Transportation Data Potpourri in Frisco

Deep Creek Canyon US Highway 12

Comparison of Simulation-Based Dynamic Traffic Assignment Approaches for Planning and Operations Management

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES

Improving method of real-time offset tuning for arterial signal coordination using probe trajectory data

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) System Replacement Concept Detail and Technical Requirements

Precast Concrete Pavement

2017 San Juan College Luminarias 6:00pm - 11:30pm

A COMPACT, AGILE, LOW-PHASE-NOISE FREQUENCY SOURCE WITH AM, FM AND PULSE MODULATION CAPABILITIES

WESTERN AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRIORITY FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL

Addressing Issues with GPS Data Accuracy and Position Update Rate for Field Traffic Studies

DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF AN ARTERIAL ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING. A Dissertation YUANCHANG XIE

Smart, Sustainable Scoot Alternative vehicle detection for SCOOT applications

Transcription:

ACS-Lite The Next Generation of Traffic Signal Control Eddie Curtis, FHWA HOTM / Resource Center February 28, 2007

Outline Background on adaptive traffic signal Systems ACS-Lite Goals Development Functionality Field Test Next steps

Traffic Signal Control Evolution Late 1960s Mid to Late 1980s Mid 1990s 2000 Open Loop System With Traffic Detection Closed Loop Control Central Timing Plan selection by Field Master Closed Loop Adaptive Control Timing Plan selection by Field Master (ACS-Lite) Centralized Control UTCS Central Control Interval or Phase Control Traffic Responsive / Adaptive Control SCAT SCOOT ATCS Adaptive Control RHODES OPAC

Benefits of Adaptive Signal Timing Responsive to traffic conditions Reduce traffic delay Delays onset of saturated conditions Reduces or eliminates the need to retime traffic signals $1800 $3500 / intersection Improvements over Time Of Day plans Travel time Delay Stops Fuel consumption Data collection and archiving

Adaptive Control Deployment

Adaptive Control Deployment SCATS SCOOT OPAC RHODES ATCS OTHER # of Systems 10 4 5 4 1 1 # of Signals 906 193 62 41 756 10

Disadvantages High capital cost $$$ Requires extensive calibration & monitoring Requires active maintenance of traffic detectors Communications overhead More technical staffing

FHWA Goals for ACS-Lite Low cost Leverage existing infrastructure Standard US-style actuated controllers and logic (rings, phases, splits, barriers, gap-out/extension, etc.) Typical agency detector layouts Typical communications Retro-fit with major US signal system vendors Reduce agency expenditure for adaptive control Operate without connectivity to a TMC Use NTCIP

Project Team

Adaptive Control Software Lite (Outcome) Based on Rhodes TOD Plans for base signal timing Closed Loops Field Master Based Architecture Target Market 20,000 Systems 200,000 Intersections Minimizes Traffic Detection needs Low bandwidth communications

ACS-Lite Functionality Architecture Algorithms Detection layout Data acquisition Split tuning process Offset tuning process

ACS-Lite System Architecture ACS-Lite Optional Protocol Translation Vendor Field Master 9600bps, up to 12 controllers NTCIP Vendor Specific or NTCIP Optional Field Processor NTCIP + ACS-Lite firmware upgrade

ACS-Lite Algorithms Architecture Day-by-Day / Month-Month Time-of-Day Tuner 2007 TOD Plans - cycle, splits, offsets - pattern switch times Cycle by cycle Run-time Refiner Transition Management 2007 Active Plan - cycle, splits, offsets - active pattern Plan Changes - transition method Second-bysecond actuated control handled by local controller Master Controller local local local local Arterial

Web-based User Interface Configuration / Setup Communications Adaptive Settings Links Detectors TOD Schedule Archive data retrieval Status Split tuning status Offset tuning status Pattern history Phase timing data Event log Detector status

ACS-Lite Detection Layout Need detectors at stop-bar of coordinated phases for split tuning Phase Utilization Detectors Split Tuning Flow Profile Detectors Offset Tuning Set-back loops for coordinated phases can also used for split tuning AND offset tuning (<100 from stop bar)

Data per phase interval Occupancy values per second Correlated to Red/Green/Yellow Cycle 1 Second-by-second Occupancy 37s 49s 4s

Cycle-by-cycle phase and detector data Phase Timing Volume/Occupancy

Average occupancy over last few cycles Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Averaging Cycle 3 Cycle 4

Balance phase utilization on all splits

Balance phase utilization on all splits Example shows more time is necessary on phase 4

Offset Tuning Average cyclic occupancy profiles Example shows need to move offset so green corresponds with traffic earlier in cycle statistical flow profile

Field trials McCain El Cajon (San Diego), California Eagle/Siemens Houston, Texas Econolite Gahanna (Columbus), Ohio Peek/Quixote Bradenton (St. Petersburg/Tampa), Florida

Gahanna, OH field test location (Econolite) Hamilton Rd I-270 SB Ramp I-270 NB Ramp Morrison Road Rocky Fork Drive Lincoln High School Granville Street Kroger Entrance Rocky Square Fork Shopping Center Clark State Road N

Split tuning locations I-270 SB Ramp Loops Morrison Road Video/loops Granville Street Loops Clark State Road Loops/video N

Offset selection locations All intersections Video/loops Selection of an offset progression pattern, rather than tuning Limitation of advanced loop stations N

Gahanna, OH field test results 4 Results - Number of Stops 3 2 Before After 1 0 Total ALL NB ALL SB ALL ALL AM ALL PM

Gahanna, OH field test results Before (per veh) After (per veh) Savings (per veh) Peak Hours (all vehs) Peak Hours Savings Total Delay (hour) 0.03761 0.03758 0.00003 0.15588 $1.89 Total Stops 3.5 2.9 0.6 3117.6 $43.65 Fuel (Liters) 0.390 0.373 0.017 89.287 $53.08 Peak Hours Benefit $98.61 Daily Benefit $340.03 Annual Benefit $88,500.00 1 Peak hours = Average savings*(average Corridor Peak Hour Volume*4 peak hours) Unit Costs: Total Delay $12.10 per hour Stops $0.014 per stop Fuel Consumed $0.59 per liter ($2.25 per gallon)

Houston, TX field test location (Eagle) West Little York Road Yorktown Crossing Parkway Timber Creek Place Lane Addicks Satsuma Road Keith-Harrow Boulevard Loch Katrine Lane Cairnway Drive Clay Road State Route 6 To US290 N To I-10

Houston Split tuning locations Clay Road Video Kieth-Harrow Boulevard Loops West Little York Road Video/loops State Route 6 To US290 N To I-10

Offset tuning locations All intersections Mix of video/loops State Route 6 To US290 N To I-10

Houston, TX field test results Results - Travel Time 300 250 200 150 100 Seconds 50 0 Before After Total ALL NB ALL SB ALL ALL AM ALL PM

Houston, TX field test results Before (per veh) After (per veh) Savings (per veh) Peak Hours (all vehs) Peak Hours Savings Total Delay (hour) 0.01856 0.01214 0.00642 39.16252 $473.87 Total Stops 1.7 1.2 0.5 3051.6 $42.72 Fuel (Liters) 0.490 0.455 0.035 214.837 $127.71 Peak Hours Benefit $644.30 Daily Benefit $2,221.72 Annual Benefit $577,648.12 Unit Costs: Total Delay $12.10 per hour Stops $0.014 per stop Fuel Consumed $0.59 per liter ($2.25 per gallon)

Bradenton, FL field test location SR 70 (PEEK) Caruso Road Natalie Way 45 th Street 39 th Street 37 th Street 33 rd Street 31 st Street US301 US301 & 51 st (to north, not shown) To Palmetto & St. Pete To I-75 To Sarasota

Bradenton, FL split tuning locations Caruso Road Loops/video 45 th Street loops 33 rd Street loops US301 loops To Palmetto & St. Pete To I-75 To Sarasota

Bradenton, FL offset tuning locations All intersections Mostly loops (video at Caruso) Considered fixing offset at 31 st between US301 and 33 rd Critical short link Tuning improved performance To Palmetto & St. Pete To I-75 To Sarasota

Bradenton, FL field test results Results Stopped Delay

Bradenton, FL field test results Results Number of Stops

Benefits Reduces the need for traffic signal retiming Reduces Delay/Travel Time Stops Fuel consumption Low Cost Low Bandwidth communications Functions with existing controllers

Future Enhancements FY 2007 Time of Day Tuner Long Term Timing Plan Maintenance Time of Day Schedule Switch Points Run Time Refiner Cycle length tuning Transition Manager Best Way

NEXT Steps 5 Early Adopters Workshop for evaluating Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Needs Support Deployments Contact Vendor or FHWA for more information

QUESTIONS??? http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/arterial_mgmt/index.htm Email: ACS-Lite@dot.gov

Eddie Curtis, P.E. Traffic Management Specialist Phone: (404) 562-3920 eddie.curtis@fhwa.dot.gov