Survey of Institutional Readiness

Similar documents
Digital Preservation Program: Organizational Policy Framework (06/07/2010)

Strategy for a Digital Preservation Program. Library and Archives Canada

University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries. Digital Preservation Policy, Version 1.3

NCRIS Capability 5.7: Population Health and Clinical Data Linkage

REPORT ON THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MEMORY OF THE WORLD IN THE DIGITAL AGE: DIGITIZATION AND PRESERVATION OUTLINE

SERBIA. National Development Plan. November

Catching Up: Creating a Digital Preservation Policy After the Fact

The Digital National Library of Scotland Strategic Plan

Department of Arts and Culture NATIONAL POLICY ON THE DIGITISATION OF HERITAGE RESOURCES

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

University of Kansas. The University of Kansas Libraries

Digitisation Plan

United Nations Statistics Division Programme in Support of the 2020 Round of Population and Housing Censuses

Royal Pavilion & Museums DRAFT Digital Preservation Policy 2018

Life Cycle Management of Station Equipment & Apparatus Interest Group (LCMSEA) Getting Started with an Asset Management Program (Continued)

General Information. 1. Institution Name. 2. City and State: 3. Prepared by (name): 4. Title: 5. address: Page 1

IP KEY SOUTH EAST ASIA ANNUAL WORK PLAN FOR 2018

Cheryl Walters Tawnya Keller Chris Erickson ULA 2012

EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON CONTEMPORARY PRACTICES IN CENSUS MAPPING AND USE OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS New York, 29 May - 1 June 2007

Digital Preservation Assessment: Readying Cultural Heritage Institutions for Digital Preservation

InterPARES Project. The Future of Our Digital Memory. The Contribution of the InterPARES Project to the Preservation of the Memory of the World

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Planetary Science Technology Review Panel Final Report Summary

System of Systems Software Assurance

REPORT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON THE 2010 WORLD PROGRAM ON POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUSES

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT ALLOWABLE USES OF 911 FEES Updated January, 2018

Starting a Digital Preservation Program

ANNEXES FOLLOW-UP OF RECOMMENDATIONS BY ORDER OF PRIORITY

2016 Smart Cities Survey Summary Report of Survey Results

Collection care and conservation policy

The Library's approach to selection for digitisation

COAL CREEK COMMUNITY PARK MUSEUM AND COLLECTION POLICY

PRESERVATION POLICY HOWARD-TILTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY Updated July 2013 PRESERVATION PRIORITIES AND SELECTION FOR TREATMENT

National Policy on Digital Preservation for India A Basic Framework

UPGRADE YOUR MPT NETWORK THE SMART WAY. harris.com #harriscorp

Globalisation increasingly affects how companies in OECD countries

Trends in. Archives. Practice MODULE 8. Steve Marks. with an Introduction by Bruce Ambacher. Edited by Michael Shallcross

9-800 MHz Countywide Coordinated Communications System (CCCS) Upgrade

STATEMENT OF WORK Environmental Assessment for the Red Cliffs/Long Valley Land Exchange in Washington County, Utah

This policy sets out how Legacy Foresight and its Associates will seek to ensure compliance with the legislation.

Score grid for SBO projects with an economic finality version January 2019

What We Heard Report Inspection Modernization: The Case for Change Consultation from June 1 to July 31, 2012

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Digital Preservation Policy

GUITAR PRO SOFTWARE END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT (EULA)

European Ground Systems Common Core

ART COLLECTION POLICY

Interoperable systems that are trusted and secure

PRESERVATION OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN DIGITAL ERA

Lewis-Clark State College No Date 2/87 Rev. Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7

1. Context. 2. Vision

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

2-800 MHz CCCS Sys Extension

Opportunities and Challenges for Open Innovation

An investigative report on current long-term digital preservation situation among major Chinese libraries

Rosatom Approach to IPR Management in Collaborative Projects on Innovations

COLLABORATION PROTOCOL BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN AND THE CAPE HIGHER EDUCATION CONSORTIUM

Establishing a reference framework for assessing the Socio-economic impact of Research Infrastructures

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

Statement of Collecting Policy

Inclusion: All members of our community are welcome, and we will make changes, when necessary, to make sure all feel welcome.

Preservation of nuclear information and records

Translation University of Tokyo Intellectual Property Policy

DISPOSITION POLICY. This Policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on March 14, 2017.

Strategic Plan Engaging People with Art

The importance of linking electronic resources and their licence terms: a project to implement ONIX for Licensing Terms for UK academic institutions

Image Digitization: Best Practices and Training

Certification Report on CLOCKSS

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

SUSTAINABILITY MATERIALITY OVERVIEW

Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL s Advanced CANDU Reactor ACR

Public Art Network Best Practice Goals and Guidelines

National Innovation System of Mongolia

Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities Top Ups

Intellectual Property, Vaccine Production and Technology Transfer

part of our cultural heritage? University of Freiburg, Germany

Amgueddfa Cymru National Museum Wales. Collection Care & Conservation Policy

Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution

Computing Requirements of Sri Lankan Scientific Community

The ALA and ARL Position on Access and Digital Preservation: A Response to the Section 108 Study Group

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

RFP No. 794/18/10/2017. Research Design and Implementation Requirements: Centres of Competence Research Project

PHOTOGRAPHIC RESTORATION & PRESERVATION

INFS 326: COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT MRS. FLORENCE O. ENTSUA-MENSAH

Research Data Preservation in Canada A White Paper

Digital Preservation:

Institutional Sustainable Development Policy

5 TH MANAGEMENT SEMINARS FOR HEADS OF NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICES (NSO) IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC SEPTEMBER 2006, DAEJEON, REPUBLIC OF KOREA

International Sculpture Garden Relationship Statement

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANTS Attached Technical Assistance on Sri Lanka: Expressway Operations Improvement Project

INFS 326: COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT

LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES POLICY

DIGITAL DATA SUBMISSION STANDARDS Procedures and Guidelines

Score grid for SBO projects with a societal finality version January 2018

Version 2.2 April Census Local Update of Census Addresses Operation (LUCA) Frequently Asked Questions

Mission Capability Packages

Research on the Capability Maturity Model of Digital Library Knowledge. Management

Pan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview

Disposing of objects you may not own

European Nuclear Education Network Association

Transcription:

Survey of Institutional Readiness We created this checklist to help you prepare for the workshop and to get you to think about your organization's digital assets in terms of scope, priorities, resources, and overall readiness to address digital preservation concerns. You will see that the themes of organizational, technological, and resource concerns, which are interwoven throughout the tutorial and workshop, are also reflected in this checklist. Organizational infrastructure confirms institutional commitment to digital preservation, sets the goals and priorities for the program, and acknowledges accepted community practice and standards. The technological infrastructure translates the objectives of the program into technical requirements, recommends and initiates appropriate solutions, and assumes responsibility for ensuring that the organization is able to meet the technological needs of the program over time. Sound decision making for digital preservation is a joint activity that brings together the both organizational and technological components. Undergirding the program are resource commitments funding, staff, training, services, etc. that need to be identified and secured as an on-going commitment of the institution. Do not be alarmed if you answer no to most or all of the questions. This survey is intended to help you take stock of the requisite components of a digital preservation program and to help you begin or proceed with your digital preservation planning. A. Organizational Infrastructure Organizational readiness is best reflected in the development and adoption of explicit policies that address digital preservation commitments and decisions. Often an organization undertakes a program without first ensuring that the necessary policies and controls are in place. Mission 1. Can your institution's mission statement be interpreted as supporting a long-term commitment to the preservation of valuable digital materials that your agency has acquired or created? Policies and Procedures 2. Do you have written policies and procedures that address long-term access (as opposed to those covering digitization)? If No or Don't know, skip to Section B. If Yes, continue to 2a. go to question 2a skip to Section B skip to Section B

2a. Do you have a written agreement with principal stakeholders on defined roles and responsibilities? 2b. Do you have policies and guidelines covering selection, de-selection, and acquisition? 2c. Have you defined and promulgated quality creation requirements and procedures? 2d. Are comprehensive deposit guidelines in place? 2e. Do you have written transfer requirements? 2f. Have you explicitly defined preservation strategies that are appropriate to digital collections and objects that you have committed to preserving? If yes, please describe: Authority 3. If you answered yes to any part of question 2, were these digital preservation documents vetted by senior management? Fully Partially, but in progress Implementation 4. Has your organization implemented the policies and practices contained in these documents? Fully Partially, but in progress

B. Technological Infrastructure Organizations tend to rely on or create digital content first and address long-term access later. This section addresses current and planned digital objects and collections, storage management, and depositories. Digital Collections 5. Do you currently have the following types of digital objects that your institution has committed to maintaining over time? (Some objects may fall into multiple categories. Please check all that apply.) Licensed e-journal files (articles, issues, journals) Institutional records (in any format) Websites Email Word processing files Digital image files PDF files Numeric data files Databases and spreadsheets Geographic information systems (GIS) Audiovisual files Other (please list)

6. Are there any digital materials in your holdings for which you lack the operational and/or technical capacity to mount, read, and access? If yes, please describe: Archival Storage 7. Are you using any of these kinds of file storage: (Please check all that apply.) Online (i.e. spinning magnetic disk) Magnetic tape CD, DVD, or other optical or magneto-optical disk Solid state Other (please list) Storage Practice 8. Does your storage program include: (Please check all that apply.) the use of high quality storage media? an access-controlled area for the machines and media on which files are stored? an environmentally-controlled area for storage media? a disaster recovery plan? a media testing program? a media refreshing/migration plan? backup offsite storage for backups Other (Please describe.)

Obsolescence 9. Have you undertaken any actions to extend the life of digital content that is threatened by obsolescence of file formats, storage media, and the supporting hardware to access it or other associated hardware and software? File Formats Storage Media Storage Drive 10. What actions have you taken? Depository 11. Have you established any kind of digital depository arrangements for managing your digital collections over time? Depository Development 12. If yes, have you: developed a depository in-house? acquired proprietary software to implement the depository? acquired open-source software to implement the depository? outsourced the development/maintenance of the depository? contracted with a third party organization for depository services? joined a consortium for developing/delivering depository services? made other arrangements? (describe) If you have checked any of these, please bring whatever documentation you have of the arrangements. Security 13. Does your depository have security and other mechanisms in place to ensure the integrity of objects in the depository against intentional or accidental security threats? OAIS Compliance 14. Is your organization committed to the development or use of an OAIS-compliant depository for the long-term preservation of digital objects that are or will be within the scope of your preservation program?

C. Resources Once the need to establish a digital preservation program is recognized and there is the will to do so, the organization must be ready to build and sustain the program. This section covers resources: financial, human, and technical. Sustainable Funding 15. Does your institution currently have funding dedicated for the long-term maintenance of your digital collections? If yes, please describe the extent and nature of funding. If no, please outline potential sources and plans for acquiring funding. Staffing 16. Are there staff specifically charged with digital preservation responsibility at your institution? 16a. If yes, how many? 16b. If yes, please list their titles. 17. Is there adequate organizational expertise to develop a digital preservation program? 18. Is there adequate technical expertise to develop a digital preservation program? 19. Does senior management view digital preservation as a key priority?

20. Is there adequate support for staff training in digital preservation? 21. Does your institution currently use outside sources of expertise for digital preservation (e.g., consultants, contracts)? Technological Infrastructure 22. Is the current technological infrastructure at your organization adequate to build and/or sustain a digital preservation program, with requisite upgrades and enhancements overtime? Please discuss the status of the infrastructure and potential concerns. 23. Has your institution dedicated funds for technology development, replacement, and upgrades as an annual expense? Administrative Structure 24. Would the digital preservation program be: incorporated into existing units? a separate unit? 25. How would you rank the following factors as threats to the loss of digital materials at your institution within the next three years? 1=greatest threat, 5=smallest threat Technological obsolescence Insufficient policies or plans for preservation Insufficient resources for preservation Inadequate support from senior staff Lack of expertise Other: please describe: