Introductions. Characterizing Knowledge Management Tools

Similar documents
A Knowledge-Centric Approach for Complex Systems. Chris R. Powell 1/29/2015

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN ICED 03 STOCKHOLM, AUGUST 19-21, 2003

PERSPECTIVE. Knowledge based Engineering (KBE) Key Product Development Technology to Enhance Competitiveness. Abstract. Devaraja Holla V.

Interoperable systems that are trusted and secure

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS

Determine the Future of Lean Dr. Rupy Sawhney and Enrique Macias de Anda

Survey of Institutional Readiness

Integrated Product Development: Linking Business and Engineering Disciplines in the Classroom

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

User Experience Questionnaire Handbook

Digital Engineering Support to Mission Engineering

An Introduction to a Taxonomy of Information Privacy in Collaborative Environments

GUIDE TO SPEAKING POINTS:

ENHANCED HUMAN-AGENT INTERACTION: AUGMENTING INTERACTION MODELS WITH EMBODIED AGENTS BY SERAFIN BENTO. MASTER OF SCIENCE in INFORMATION SYSTEMS

First steps towards a mereo-operandi theory for a system feature-based architecting of cyber-physical systems

CSTA K- 12 Computer Science Standards: Mapped to STEM, Common Core, and Partnership for the 21 st Century Standards

Course Syllabus. P age 1 5

Introduction to Computer Science - PLTW #9340

2018 ASSESS Update. Analysis, Simulation and Systems Engineering Software Strategies

Change of Paradigm in Knowledge Management. Framework for the Collaborative Production and Exchange of Knowledge

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication

OVERVIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TECHNOLOGIES. Presented by: WTI

KNOWLEDGE-BASED CONTROL AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS

Information and Communications Technology and Environmental Regulation: Critical Perspectives

Methodology for Agent-Oriented Software

Regional Innovation Policies: System Failures, Knowledge Bases and Construction Regional Advantage

InterPARES Project. The Future of Our Digital Memory. The Contribution of the InterPARES Project to the Preservation of the Memory of the World

APPROXIMATE KNOWLEDGE OF MANY AGENTS AND DISCOVERY SYSTEMS

Creating Scientific Concepts

Modeling support systems for multi-modal design of physical environments

Design thinking, process and creative techniques

Indiana K-12 Computer Science Standards

Years 9 and 10 standard elaborations Australian Curriculum: Digital Technologies

Human-Swarm Interaction

Abstract. Justification. Scope. RSC/RelationshipWG/1 8 August 2016 Page 1 of 31. RDA Steering Committee

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK Updated August 2017

A FRAMEWORK FOR PERFORMING V&V WITHIN REUSE-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Representing a Body of Knowledge

Expression Of Interest

BID October - Course Descriptions & Standardized Outcomes

Industry 4.0: the new challenge for the Italian textile machinery industry

Transferring knowledge from operations to the design and optimization of work systems: bridging the offshore/onshore gap

EIE 528 Power System Operation & Control(2 Units)

An Introduction to Agent-based

Telecoms and Tech Week

Socio-cognitive Engineering

REPRESENTATION, RE-REPRESENTATION AND EMERGENCE IN COLLABORATIVE COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DESIGN

Communication and Culture Concentration 2013

Chapter 1 The Field of Computing. Slides Modified by Vicky Seno

Development and Integration of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Innovation Acceleration

Goals for this Lecture. Lecture 5: Introduction to Analysis. Requirements Engineering. IEEE definition of requirement

COMOS Walkinside 10.2

Argumentative Interactions in Online Asynchronous Communication

Digitisation Plan

Software-Intensive Systems Producibility

B222A. Management technology and innovation

Library Special Collections Mission, Principles, and Directions. Introduction

LIS 688 DigiLib Amanda Goodman Fall 2010

UNIT-III LIFE-CYCLE PHASES

Fostering Innovative Ideas and Accelerating them into the Market

Correlating 21st Century Skills Assessment reports with South Dakota Standards

Cognitive Edge Making sense of complexity

Dynamic Cities and Creative Clusters

MEDIA AND INFORMATION

Towards an MDA-based development methodology 1

2018 NISO Calendar of Educational Events

Engineering Informatics:

Joining Forces University of Art and Design Helsinki September 22-24, 2005

Cooperation and Control in Innovation Networks

Automated Test Summit 2005 Keynote

Strategic Information Management: Issues

NRC Workshop on NASA Technologies

Siân Bayne, Assistant Principal Digital Jennifer Williams, Project Manager, Institute for Academic Michael

TECHNICAL TRAINING ON ENERGY PLANNING LONG-RANGE ENERGY ALTERNATIVES PLANNING SYSTEM (LEAP) AND OTHER CONTEMPORARY PLANNING APPROACHES

ty of solutions to the societal needs and problems. This perspective links the knowledge-base of the society with its problem-suite and may help

SDN Architecture 1.0 Overview. November, 2014

Mission Capability Packages

What is Digital Literacy and Why is it Important?

Communication Major. Major Requirements

BODILY NON-VERBAL INTERACTION WITH VIRTUAL CHARACTERS

The Semantics of Innovation Exploring the deep nature of innovation IC3K, Rome, October 2014

in the New Zealand Curriculum

AIEDAM Special Issue: Sketching, and Pen-based Design Interaction Edited by: Maria C. Yang and Levent Burak Kara

VISUALIZING CONTINUITY BETWEEN 2D AND 3D GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONS

RoboCup. Presented by Shane Murphy April 24, 2003

BSc in Music, Media & Performance Technology

Compendium Overview. By John Hagel and John Seely Brown

User Research in Fractal Spaces:

SECTION 2. Computer Applications Technology

Stanford Center for AI Safety

BIM and Urban Infrastructure

10. Personas. Plan for ISSD Lecture #10. 1 October Bob Glushko. Roadmap to the lectures. Stakeholders, users, and personas

ENSURING READINESS WITH ANALYTIC INSIGHT

Lifecycle of Emergence Using Emergence to Take Social Innovations to Scale

Human-Computer Interaction

Using Emergence to Take Social Innovations to Scale Margaret Wheatley & Deborah Frieze 2006

The Science In Computer Science

SWEN 256 Software Process & Project Management

Transcription:

Characterizing Knowledge Management Tools Half-day Tutorial Developed by Kurt W. Conrad, Brian (Bo) Newman, and Dr. Art Murray Presented by Kurt W. Conrad conrad@sagebrushgroup.com Based on A ramework for Characterizing Knowledge Management Methods, Practices and Technologies, Newman and Conrad, 1999 rom The Knowledge Management Theory Papers A series of papers on the theories, processes and practices behind Knowledge Management Introductions Name Organization Why are you attending this tutorial? What are you hoping to get out of it? Specific areas of interest (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 1 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 2 Introducing Kurt Conrad Director of Knowledge Management for Tomorrow arm Specializes in Enterprise document management Strategic planning and mediation Process and methodology development SGML, XML, and related standards kurt@tomorrowfarm.com, kurt.conrad@km-forum.org, conrad@sagebrushgroup.com Introducing Bo Newman ounder of the KM orum Recognized as one of top 10 KM practitioners Active in development of supporting theories and practices for over 15 years bo.newman@km-forum.org (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 3 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 4 1

Introducing Dr. Art Murray President of Telart Technologies, Inc. 24 years experience leading advanced information and knowledge systems initiatives Adjunct professor in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at The George Washington University Collaborates with American and Russian scientists to integrate western and eastern approaches to KM Introducing KM orum The original, virtual community of practice that focused on discussing and exploring the foundations of what has now become Knowledge Management www.km-forum.org (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 5 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 6 Introducing Tomorrow arm Strategically integrates creativity and technology to produce effective digital media Highly-dynamic, database-driven web sites for cutting-edge dot-coms ilm and video production for advertising, marketing, and corporate communications CD-ROM and DVD production for marketing, instruction, and entertainment www.tomorrowfarm.com Why Characterize Tools? Any tool can enhance knowledge Improve knowledge flow Intelligize behaviors Increase organizational value Individual tools are not same as a comprehensive KM solution Tools can t manage knowledge (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 7 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 8 2

Why Characterize Tools? The Chaos that is KM KM technology market undermines understanding Everything is labeled KM No clear distinctions or differentiation Not clear how things fit together Difficult to integrate methods, practices, and technologies Characterization is one answer to the chaos Tutorial Overview Combination of lecture and small group exercises Goals Introduce the KM Tool Characterization ramework Use KMTC to assess potential impacts of tools on Knowledge lows Review other potential applications of the Characterization ramework (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 9 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 10 Tutorial Overview Agenda Module 1: Key Terms and Concepts Module 2: ramework Overview Module 3: Practice Session Selection of Topics Small Group Analysis Reporting of indings Module 4: Advanced Usage Wrap-Up (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 11 Module 1: Key Terms and Concepts (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 12 3

Key Terms and Concepts Origins of Concepts Outgrowth of Newman s study of knowledge lifecycles and development of his General Knowledge Model Refined through Conrad s application to strategic IT and organizational development initiatives irst formalized to support Murray s Introduction to Knowledge Management course, currently being taught at George Washington University Key Terms and Concepts Knowledge lows Knowledge flows comprise the set of processes, events, and activities through which data, information, knowledge, and meta-knowledge are transformed from one state to another resulting in, but not limited to, knowledge creation and capture, retention, transfer, and use. (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 13 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 14 Key Terms and Concepts Knowledge low Elements Agents Knowledge Artifacts Activities (agent behaviors organized by activity area) Note: No matter where you start introducing these concepts, you have to start somewhere else Key Terms and Concepts Agents Agents perform all actions and make all decisions within a knowledge flow Agents come in various types Individuals: Who don't perform a given task the exact same way every time Automated agents: Which can t deal with tacit knowledge Organizations: Who can neither read nor write The same behavioral models do not apply to all types of agents (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 15 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 16 4

Key Terms and Concepts - Agents Individuals as Agents Key behavioral traits Inconsistency, creativity, adaptability, etc. Strengths Able to deal with wide ranges of abstraction, codification, and representation Original multi-media agent Weaknesses Imperfect memory: forget and change Unstable ontologies (world views) Not good at repetitive behavior (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 17 Key Terms and Concepts - Agents Automated Agents Key behavioral traits Excel at dealing with explicit artifacts Highly-engineered Strengths Exacting repetitiveness, high speed High-volume, stable memory Weaknesses Lack of foresight Inability to handle tacit artifacts Weak adaptation behaviors (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 18 Key Terms and Concepts - Agents Organizational Agents Key behavioral traits Slow to change Long-lived Unable to make decisions and take action Strengths Leverage multiple skills and talents Cultural stability Predictable behavior Weaknesses Resistance to change and new paradigms (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 19 Key Terms and Concepts Knowledge Artifacts Knowledge artifacts flow among and form the linkages between the activities and events that comprise knowledge flows. As processes speed up, artifact life spans get shorter (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 20 5

Key Terms and Concepts - Artifacts Artifact Characteristics Artifacts differ in codification, rendering, abstraction, and articulation Current differentiations Explicit artifacts Implicit artifacts Tacit artifacts Artifacts are passive Have you ever seen a financial report make a decision, or a book on aerodynamics build an airplane? (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 21 Key Terms and Concepts - Artifacts Explicit Artifacts Can be directly and completely transferred from one agent to another Normally codified so that we can touch, see, hear, feel, and or manipulate them Books Reports Data files Other forms that have a physical manifestation (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 22 Key Terms and Concepts - Artifacts Implicit Artifacts Meaning is not explicitly captured, but can be inferred Incomplete codification Need for additional context Most difficult concept of the three Gray zone Often confused with tacit Represent vast bulk of human communications Key Terms and Concepts - Artifacts Tacit Artifacts What you cannot talk about Knowing more than you can say Defy expression and codification Have very far reaching influences May be the most insidious and powerful of the three Bound up in culture, values, and feelings (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 23 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 24 6

Key Terms and Concepts Activities Agent behavior comprises the action and decision making elements of knowledge flows Segmenting behaviors into activity areas simplifies analysis Each activity area is associated with different processes, tasks, and design implications Terms and Concepts Activities Activity Areas Transfer Creation Utilization Retention Source: General Knowledge Model, Newman and Conrad, 1999 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 25 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 26 Creation Creation Terms and Concepts Activities Knowledge Creation Transfer Utilization Retention Terms and Concepts Activities Knowledge Retention Transfer Utilization Retention Any activity that brings new knowledge into the system Development Discovery Capture Acquisition Etc. or knowledge to be usable it must be stored for some period of time Knowledge retention Preserves knowledge artifacts Maintains the viability of knowledge within the system Is imperfect (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 27 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 28 7

Creation Creation Terms and Concepts Activities Retention Activities Transfer Utilization Retention Terms and Concepts Activities Knowledge Transfer Transfer Utilization Retention People create stories, build machines, develop models, code software Organizations re-enforce and preserve culture Work procedures Unwritten rules Mores and values Computers store data Knowledge transfer moves knowledge from one agent to another rom knowledge developers to knowledge users rom one work group to another rom suppliers to vendors and vendors to customers (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 29 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 30 Creation Creation Terms and Concepts Activities Transfer Activities Transfer Utilization Retention Terms and Concepts Activities Knowledge Utilization Transfer Utilization Retention People tell stories Mentors teach Markets use pricing to communicate value Organizations transfer and promote people Instrumentation and control systems monitor events The various ways that knowledge is used to Enable actions Support decisions KU Events provide the rationales and value propositions that drive knowledge flows (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 31 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 32 8

Creation Terms and Concepts Activities Utilization Activities People trade stocks, buy cars, get married Airplanes fly Software systems execute algorithms Transfer Utilization Retention Module 2: KM Tool Characterization ramework Overview Cells divide Organizations create value Cultures squash radicals (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 33 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 34 KMTC Overview ramework Developed to Organize and classify KM tools based on their impacts on the various elements of Knowledge lows Assess the performance characteristics of other tools used in Knowledge systems Combat the conceptual clutter KMTC Overview What is The ramework A set of analytical principles that target the ways that tools interact with and impact Agents Artifacts Activities Associated worksheets that package key concepts and focus analysis (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 35 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 36 9

KMTC Overview irst-generation Rendering KMTC Overview Current Rendering Name Tool Practice Creation Technology Method Activity Phase Retention Utilization Transfer Activity Level Mid-Level High-Level Individual Decision or Action Agent Type Automated Artifact Type Implicit Explicit Organizational Agent Tacit ocus Artifact Process orm-based Includes analytical support elements ocus questions Low, medium, high impact rankings ields for rationale and descriptions Two versions Three-page worksheet One-page summary (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 37 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 38 KMTC Overview Analysis Principals Keep it simple OK to work in non-linear fashion Expect individuals to vary in their interpretations and analysis Only analyze to point of differentiation Articulate type of impact (result) Not mechanics driving impact (process) KMTC Overview Scenario Define an application scenario for the tool being characterized What is the organizational and/or business context? or what business problems or functions is the tool being considered? (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 39 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 40 10

KMTC Overview Tool Type The KMTC differentiates three kinds of tools Technology Method Practice Each type of tool has different characteristics and limitations KMTC Overview Tool Type Technologies Commonly associated with automated and mechanized agents Examples Hardware Software Associated data (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 41 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 42 KMTC Overview Tool Type Method Commonly associated with individuals, small groups, and specialized contextspecific rules Comprises specific, well-engineered ways of behaving ormula Procedure Protocol KMTC Overview Tool Type Practice Usually associated with organizational and social agents Involves application of broadly accepted theories and methods Characterized by well-defined heuristics (ways of thinking) (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 43 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 44 11

KMTC Overview Agent Impacts Who uses the tool and how? Who s behavior is affected through the application of the tool and how? Agent types Individual Agents (people) Automated Agents (machines) Organizational Agents (organized collections of various agent types) KMTC Overview Organizational Impacts How are the different levels of the organization affected by this tool? The KMTC differentiates three organizational levels High-level Mid-level Low-level (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 45 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 46 KMTC Overview Organization High-level Impacts Usually associated with Enterprise-wide initiatives Organization s mission Strategic goals and objectives Long-term impacts Organizational culture and values Policies KMTC Overview Organization Mid-level Impacts Usually associated with Individual business units or functions Tactical decisions Operations Programs Projects Procedures (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 47 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 48 12

KMTC Overview Organization Low-level Impacts Usually associated with Task-level functions Work packages Individual actions and decisions Point-to-point communications KMTC Overview Artifact Interactions What knowledge artifacts does the tool interact with? What artifacts are used by (inputs to) the tool? What artifacts are output from (or affected by) the tool? (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 49 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 50 KMTC Overview Artifact Interactions Artifact Types Explicit Artifacts Have form and substance Written, spoken, digital, etc. Implicit Artifacts Incomplete and context-dependent Could be made explicit Tacit Artifacts Know but can t say Can t make explicit KMTC Overview Behavioral Impacts What are the impacts of the tool in each activity area? Creation Retention Transfer Utilization (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 51 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 52 13

KMTC Overview ocus Which interactions does the tool target? Agent (the tool enables actions and decisions; modifies agent behaviors) Artifacts (the tool is optimized around creation, retention, or transfer of artifacts) Behavior (the tool improves process efficiency or integrates processes) Module 3: Practice Session (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 53 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 54 Practice Session List potential analysis topics Methods Practices Technologies Module 4: Advanced Usage orm teams and pick topics Perform analysis Report findings (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 55 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 56 14

KMTC Overview Organization Low-level Impacts Usually associated with Task-level functions Work packages Individual actions and decisions Point-to-point communications KMTC Overview Artifact Interactions What knowledge artifacts does the tool interact with? What artifacts are used by (inputs to) the tool? What artifacts are output from (or affected by) the tool? (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 49 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 50 KMTC Overview Artifact Interactions Artifact Types Explicit Artifacts Have form and substance Written, spoken, digital, etc. Implicit Artifacts Incomplete and context-dependent Could be made explicit Tacit Artifacts Know but can t say Can t make explicit KMTC Overview Behavioral Impacts What are the impacts of the tool in each activity area? Creation Retention Transfer Utilization (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 51 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 52 13

KMTC Overview ocus Which interactions does the tool target? Agent (the tool enables actions and decisions; modifies agent behaviors) Artifacts (the tool is optimized around creation, retention, or transfer of artifacts) Behavior (the tool improves process efficiency or integrates processes) Module 3: Practice Session (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 53 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 54 Practice Session List potential analysis topics Methods Practices Technologies Module 4: Advanced Usage orm teams and pick topics Perform analysis Report findings (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 55 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 56 14

Advanced Usage The KMTC is based on a more general conceptual framework which can be applied in a variety of ways Knowledge Engineering Gap Analysis Systems Development Marketing KM and IT Products Advanced Usage Knowledge Engineering The KMTC focuses on policy-level impacts Alternatively, tools can be analyzed based on their internal mechanics unctional deconstruction Sub-unit relationships Dependencies Such an approach is better suited to solving engineering and integration problems (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 57 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 58 Advanced Usage Gap Analysis Characterizing complex knowledge flows Clarifies distinctions between artifacts, agents, and behaviors Helps to illuminate both patterns and gaps Unarticulated elements Missing elements Knowledge gaps and breakdowns Advanced Usage Systems Development Mapping knowledge flows to automation opportunities Clarifies functional requirements Isolates integration points Validates the scope of development efforts Reduces instability of specifications Differentiates commercial tools (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 59 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 60 15

Advanced Usage Marketing KM and IT Products Tool vendors can use the characterization framework to Characterize customer demand Distinguish where both existing and new tools fit into the KM solution space Overcome re-labeling complaints Differentiate products and services in a well-grounded way Identify strategic opportunities for product evolution and increased customer value (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 61 Wrap -Up The value of a specific tool results as much (if not more) from how it is applied than from the tool s internal characteristics Better characterization of problem spaces and potential solutions Improves functionality Speeds results Increases the odds of organizational success (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 62 16

Advanced Usage The KMTC is based on a more general conceptual framework which can be applied in a variety of ways Knowledge Engineering Gap Analysis Systems Development Marketing KM and IT Products Advanced Usage Knowledge Engineering The KMTC focuses on policy-level impacts Alternatively, tools can be analyzed based on their internal mechanics unctional deconstruction Sub-unit relationships Dependencies Such an approach is better suited to solving engineering and integration problems (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 57 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 58 Advanced Usage Gap Analysis Characterizing complex knowledge flows Clarifies distinctions between artifacts, agents, and behaviors Helps to illuminate both patterns and gaps Unarticulated elements Missing elements Knowledge gaps and breakdowns Advanced Usage Systems Development Mapping knowledge flows to automation opportunities Clarifies functional requirements Isolates integration points Validates the scope of development efforts Reduces instability of specifications Differentiates commercial tools (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 59 (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 60 15

Advanced Usage Marketing KM and IT Products Tool vendors can use the characterization framework to Characterize customer demand Distinguish where both existing and new tools fit into the KM solution space Overcome re-labeling complaints Differentiate products and services in a well-grounded way Identify strategic opportunities for product evolution and increased customer value (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 61 Wrap -Up The value of a specific tool results as much (if not more) from how it is applied than from the tool s internal characteristics Better characterization of problem spaces and potential solutions Improves functionality Speeds results Increases the odds of organizational success (c) The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 62 16

KM Tool Characterization ramework Worksheet Tool Name Scenario What is the business and/or organizational context? or what business problems or functions is the tool being considered? Type of Tool What kind of tool is this? (Pick One) Technology Hardware, software, and associated data (automated, mechanized) Rationale Method Strict rules, formula, and algorithmic behavior (ways of behaving) Practice Characterized by well-defined heuristics (ways of thinking) Agent Impacts Who uses the tool and for what? Agent Type L M H Description Individual Agents People Automated Agents Hardware, software, and machines Organizational Agents Organized collections of agents Who s behavior is affected through the application of the tool and in what ways? Individual Agents People Automated Agents Hardware, software, and machines Organizational Agents Organized collections of agents The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 Page 1

KM Tool Characterization ramework Worksheet Tool Name Organizational Impacts How are the different levels of the organization affected by this tool? Organizational Level L M H Description High-level Enterprise-wide, strategic goals and objectives, long-term impacts Mid-level Individual business unit or function, program and project-level functions Low-level Task-level, work packages, individual decisions and actions Artifact Interactions What knowledge artifacts does the tool interact with? Inputs (used by) L M H Description and input specifications Explicit Written, spoken, digital, etc. Implicit Incomplete and context-dependent Tacit Know but can t say; can t make explicit Outputs (or affected by) Explicit Written, spoken, digital, etc. Description, output specifications, and transformations Implicit Incomplete and context-dependent Tacit Know but can t say; can t make explicit The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 Page 2

KM Tool Characterization ramework Worksheet Tool Name Organizational Impacts How are the different levels of the organization affected by this tool? Organizational Level L M H Description High-level Enterprise-wide, strategic goals and objectives, long-term impacts Mid-level Individual business unit or function, program and project-level functions Low-level Task-level, work packages, individual decisions and actions Artifact Interactions What knowledge artifacts does the tool interact with? Inputs (used by) L M H Description and input specifications Explicit Written, spoken, digital, etc. Implicit Incomplete and context-dependent Tacit Know but can t say; can t make explicit Outputs (or affected by) Explicit Written, spoken, digital, etc. Description, output specifications, and transformations Implicit Incomplete and context-dependent Tacit Know but can t say; can t make explicit The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 Page 2

KM Tool Characterization ramework Worksheet Tool Name Behavioral Impacts What are the impacts of the tool in each activity area? Activity Area L M H Description Creation Development, capture, acquisition Retention Storage, maintenance, availability Transfer Transport, translation, communication Utilization Enabling actions and decisions ocus Agents Tool enables actions and decisions; modifies agent behaviors Which set of interactions does the tool target? (Pick One) Rationale Artifacts Tool is optimized around creation, retention, or transfer of artifacts Behavior Tool improves process efficiency, integrates processes The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 Page 3

KM Tool Characterization ramework Worksheet Tool Name Behavioral Impacts What are the impacts of the tool in each activity area? Activity Area L M H Description Creation Development, capture, acquisition Retention Storage, maintenance, availability Transfer Transport, translation, communication Utilization Enabling actions and decisions ocus Agents Tool enables actions and decisions; modifies agent behaviors Which set of interactions does the tool target? (Pick One) Rationale Artifacts Tool is optimized around creation, retention, or transfer of artifacts Behavior Tool improves process efficiency, integrates processes The Knowledge Management orum, 2000 Page 3

KM Tool Characterization ramework Summary Tool Name Scenario What is the business context? or what business problem is the tool being considered? Type of Tool What kind of tool is this? Technology Method Practice Agent Impacts L M H Who uses the tool and how? Individual Agents Automated Agents Organizational Agents Who s behavior is affected through the use of the tool and how? Individual Agents Automated Agents Organizational Agents Organizational Impacts High-level Mid-level Low-level Artifact Interactions Explicit Implicit Tacit Explicit Implicit Tacit Behavioral Impacts Creation Retention Transfer Utilization ocus Agents Artifacts Behavior How are the different levels of the organization affected by this tool? What knowledge artifacts are used by (input to) the tool? What knowledge artifacts are output from (or affected by) the tool? What are the impacts of the tool in each activity area? Which set of interactions does the tool target? The Knowledge Management orum, 2000