Adaptive Optics Lectures

Similar documents
Adaptive Optics lectures

GMT Instruments and AO. GMT Science Meeting - March

SOAR ADAPTIVE MODULE (SAM): SEEING IMPROVEMENT WITH A UV LASER

SAM COMMISSIONING REPORT

Robo-AO: Robotic Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics on the Palomar 60 in Christoph Baranec (PI) & Nick Law (PS)

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope

Gemini 8m Telescopes Instrument Science Requirements. R. McGonegal Controls Group. January 27, 1996

Potential benefits of freeform optics for the ELT instruments. J. Kosmalski

AVOIDING TO TRADE SENSITIVITY FOR LINEARITY IN A REAL WORLD WFS

Segmented deformable mirrors for Ground layer Adaptive Optics

GROUND LAYER ADAPTIVE OPTICS AND ADVANCEMENTS IN LASER TOMOGRAPHY AT THE 6.5M MMT TELESCOPE

Modeling the multi-conjugate adaptive optics system of the E-ELT. Laura Schreiber Carmelo Arcidiacono Giovanni Bregoli

Wavefront sensor design for NGAO: Assumptions, Design Parameters and Technical Challenges Version 0.1

Puntino. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for optimizing telescopes. The software people for optics

MAORY E-ELT MCAO module project overview

ON-SKY GROUND-LAYER ADAPTIVE OPTICS RESULTS ON MAUNAKEA

What is the source of straylight in SST/CRISP data?

Robo-AO: The first autonomous laser guide star adaptive optics system for 1 to 3 meter telescopes

Design parameters Summary

Designing Adaptive Optics Systems

The MCAO module for the E-ELT.

MAORY ADAPTIVE OPTICS

GRAAL on-sky performance with the AOF

A prototype of the Laser Guide Stars wavefront sensor for the E-ELT multi-conjugate adaptive optics module

Adaptive Optics Overview (Astronomical)

OWL Phase A Review - Garching - 2 nd to 4 th Nov Adaptive Optics. (Presented by N. Hubin) European Southern Observatory

Raven a scientific and technical Multi-Object Adaptive Optics (MOAO) demonstrator

On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS

Science Detectors for E-ELT Instruments. Mark Casali

Lecture 08. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (6)

Ultralight Weight Optical Systems using Nano-Layered Synthesized Materials

SOAR Integral Field Spectrograph (SIFS): Call for Science Verification Proposals

Fratricide effect on ELTs

Wavefront Sensing In Other Disciplines. 15 February 2003 Jerry Nelson, UCSC Wavefront Congress

Optimization of coupling between Adaptive Optics and Single Mode Fibers ---

Southern African Large Telescope. Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph. Instrument Acceptance Testing Plan

Speckle Phase Sensing in Vortex Coronagraphy

Observational Astronomy

PYRAMID WAVEFRONT SENSOR PERFORMANCE WITH LASER GUIDE STARS

UV/Optical/IR Astronomy Part 2: Spectroscopy

Lecture 08. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (6)

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII Institute for Astronomy. f/31 High Angular Resolution Imaging Spectrograph HARIS USER MANUAL update June 10, 1997

Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory. CHIRON manual. A. Tokovinin Version 2. May 25, 2011 (manual.pdf)

Telescopes and their configurations. Quick review at the GO level

Effect of segmented telescope phasing errors on adaptive optics performance

Infrared detectors for wavefront sensing

CFHT and Subaru Wide Field Camera

Adaptive optics for laser-based manufacturing processes

MAORY for E-ELT. Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna) On behalf of the MAORY Consortium

Capabilities of SST* and CHROMIS

LUCI1/2 AO commissioning: status and prospects

1.6 Beam Wander vs. Image Jitter

Gemini MCAO Control System. Gemini Preprint #77

Laser Guide Star upgrade of Altair at Gemini North

Applications of Optics

Lecture 7: Wavefront Sensing Claire Max Astro 289C, UCSC February 2, 2016

Spatially Resolved Backscatter Ceilometer

Chapter 34 The Wave Nature of Light; Interference. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

MALA MATEEN. 1. Abstract

Adaptive Optics for LIGO

The Field Camera Unit for WSO/UV

LGS AO photon return simulations and laser requirements for the Gemini LGS AO program

Corner Rafts LSST Camera Workshop SLAC Sept 19, 2008

A Ground-based Sensor to Detect GEOs Without the Use of a Laser Guide-star

CHARA AO Calibration Process

Proposed Adaptive Optics system for Vainu Bappu Telescope

Experimental Physics. Experiment C & D: Pulsed Laser & Dye Laser. Course: FY12. Project: The Pulsed Laser. Done by: Wael Al-Assadi & Irvin Mangwiza

Properties of a Detector

The DECam System: Technical Characteristics

DESIGN NOTE: DIFFRACTION EFFECTS

DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AN ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEM FOR THE UH HOKU KE`A OBSERVATORY ABSTRACT

Lecture 21. Wind Lidar (3) Direct Detection Doppler Lidar

M1/M2 Ray Tracer. for High-Speed Mirror Metrology in the E-ELT. Ron Holzlöhner, 21 Sep 2016 European Southern Observatory (ESO)

Wide-field Adaptive Optics for MOSAIC

Binocular and Scope Performance 57. Diffraction Effects

Stereo SCIDAR: Profiling atmospheric optical turbulence with improved altitude resolution

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTIPLE BEAM LASER PROJECTOR AND DYNAMICALLY REFOCUSED WAVEFRONT SENSOR. Thomas Eugene Stalcup, Jr.

High Resolution Optical Spectroscopy in the ELT Era. Cynthia S. Froning University of Texas at Austin May 25, 2016

Ultra-stable flashlamp-pumped laser *

E-ELT Programme Science drivers

Vibration-compensated interferometer for measuring cryogenic mirrors

Calibration of AO Systems

SONG Stellar Observations Network Group. The prototype

The First Light of the Subaru Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System

Some Basic Concepts of Remote Sensing. Lecture 2 August 31, 2005

Exoplanet transit, eclipse, and phase curve observations with JWST NIRCam. Tom Greene & John Stansberry JWST NIRCam transit meeting March 12, 2014

Solar Optical Telescope (SOT)

Bruce Macintosh for the GPI team Presented at the Spirit of Lyot conference June 7, 2007

Study of self-interference incoherent digital holography for the application of retinal imaging

Improved Spectra with a Schmidt-Czerny-Turner Spectrograph

Non-adaptive Wavefront Control

Adaptive Optics with Adaptive Filtering and Control

Keck Observatory Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) Capability/Architecture Options

The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy

The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy

TriVista. Universal Raman Solution

Wavefront control for highcontrast

We describe the ESO and Durham methods, the current progress on the experimental subsystems, and the projected timescales for the experiments.

ECEN. Spectroscopy. Lab 8. copy. constituents HOMEWORK PR. Figure. 1. Layout of. of the

Transcription:

Adaptive Optics Lectures Andrei Tokovinin 3. SOAR Adaptive Module (SAM) SAM web pages: SOAR--> SAM http://www.ctio.noao.edu/new/telescopes/soar/instruments/sam/ Paper (2016, PASP, 128, 125003): http://www.ctio.noao.edu/~atokovin/papers/sam-pasp.pdf History: http://www.ctio.noao.edu/~atokovin/papers/sam_history.pdf 1

Plan Goals and concept evolution System overview Optics & Mechanics WFS, tip-tilt, laser system Performance on the sky Science use and operation 2

Goals of SOAR AO = SAM SOAR: narrow field, good resolution. But... 0.7? SOAR community interested in the visible, not IR. Tip-tilt is not sufficient, needs AO. Must work in the visible, on faint targets Competitors: HST, Gemini, etc. Solution = GLAO! Must be simple (facility instrument) 3

SOAR: the competition 4

The idea of GLAO F. Rigaut (2001): improve seeing by correcting only <1km, using tomography to separate the ground layer Gain: uniformity of correction in wide field Loss: spatial resolution! Performance is measured in FWHM, not in Strehl. Strongest turbulence is located near the ground and in the dome 5

DIMM MASS-DIMM: turbulence @ Cerro Pachon, 2005 MASS Calm nights with FA seeing <0.25 happen at every site! 6

Two options for GLAO tomography Several stars in a ring One low-altitude LGS 7

The gray zone 1.5 off-axis uncorrected High(isoplanatic) on-axis 20% 20% at at 10km 10km 80% 80% floating floating Gray (trouble) Ground(isoplanatic) 8

The difference between GLAO and AO OTF(f)= OTF0(f) exp[ -Dε(λf)/2] (Veran et al. 1997) Classical AO: Strehl, σ2 GLAO resolution: β ~ λ /r (SF=1 rad2) The SF only matters at baselines r < λ/β ~ 0.5m if β ~0.2 9

Development of the SAM concept LGS only (sky coverage!). Use single UV laser! NGS mode was foreseen, then dropped (speckle instead) Preserve F-ratio of SOAR (same instruments, e.g. SIFS) From small 35-mm DM to 50-mm bimorph DM Conservative approach (min. development) 10

SAM at a glance 11

SAM components DM Bimorph, 50mm pupil, 60 electrodes WFS S-H 10x10, CCD-39 pixel 0.41 Laser Tripled Nd:YAG 355nm, 10W, 10 khz LLT D=25cm, behind secondary, H=7km Gating KD*P Pockels cell, dh>150m Tip-tilt Two probes, fiber-linked APDs, R<18 FoV 3 x3 square, 3 arcsec/mm, f/16.5 CCD imager 12 4Kx4K, 0.045 pixels, 5 or 7 filters

Optics: the components 13

Optics: real 14

Mechanics Space Flexure Access ~300kg 15

Rayleigh LGS timing Range gate defines the spot elongation and flux 16

LGS WFS Two moving elements + Focus 17

Fast shutter: Pockels cell 2.4 kv KD2P 18

Real LGS spots The spot size is determined mostly by the local seeing Now the 2x2 binning is used: less noise, faster 19

Tip-tilt guiding LGS cannot measure tilts, need NGS Measure & correct tilt upstream (M3 and 1st focus) Two guide probes, quad-cell principle, fibers 20

The laser system Laser: 10W, 10kHz, 34ns pulse, 355nm tripled Nd:YAG Beam expander (~8x) & transport (laser-m4) Laser Launch Telescope (LLT), D=25cm 21

Laser Launch Telescope 22

Extra-focal images (June 2011) 23

Laser safety SAM is safe in normal operation Airplane-safe US Space Command: propagation windows Maintenance of laser system: qualified personnel only! 24

Laser safety for insects They like the UV light! Massive attack in March 2014. Protected LLT with thin-wire mesh It worked until... a smaller bug in October 2016 burned on M3! 25

Computers & Software Real-Time Computer +PXI RTSoft (4 loops) AOM computer AOM control LGS control Instrument control Laser propagation SAMI computer SAMI software 26

AO performance 27

SAM performance depends on FA seeing SAM needs flexible scheduling!!! 28

More plots... 29

SAM does improve the seeing! Typical FWM resolution: 0.6 in V, 0.5 in R, 0.4 in I. FWHM variation few percent over 3'x3' FoV 30

NGC 1232: SAM vs. SOI SAM SOI SAM project by A.Ardila (January 2014) 31

Correction uniformity 32

SAM in NGS mode (2009-2010) 33

Science projects Crowded fields: clusters (CMDs, variable stars) Lensed quasars Narrow-band imaging with filters Fabry-Perot imaging Binary-star surveys with LGS pre-compensation SAM helped to develop speckle interferometry at SOAR 34

SAM's instruments SAMI: 4Kx4K, pixels 45mas, FoV 3'. Filters: BVRI, griz, narrow-band, user-defined. SAMI+Fabry-Perot ( visitor mode supported by B.Quint) HRCam: speckle, res. 20mas, can be laser-assisted. SIFS: to be commissioned with SAM. SAMOS: multi-slit spectrograph, R~2000, FoV 3', uses DMD mirror technology. Visitor, ready in 2019? BTFI-2 (?) Fabry-Perot with EM CCD. 35

SAM operation Preparation: send target list to Space Command, define filters, backup in case of poor seeing or failure. Switch SAM on, do checklist. Point the target and acquire 1 or 2 guide stars. Close the M3 and mount loops (5-7 min). Acquire the laser, close the LLT and main AO loop (1 min). Take science data, keep an eye on SAM. Manage LCH interrupts. 36

S C 37