RemoveDebris Mission: Briefing to UNCOPUOS

Similar documents
Dr Jason Forshaw, PhD CEng Surrey Space Centre, UK Surrey Space Centre PM for RemoveDebris Mission

QB50. An international network of CubeSats. J. Muylaert. UNCOPUOS Technical and Scientific Committee 15 Feb 2013 Vienna, Austria

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Update Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

Nanosat Deorbit and Recovery System to Enable New Missions

Proximity Operations Nano-Satellite Flight Demonstration (PONSFD) Overview

Changing the economics of space. STRaND-1 & TDS-1. How the UK does Low Cost TechDemo Missions. Shaun Kenyon Mission Concepts, SSTL

Status of Active Debris Removal (ADR) developments at the Swiss Space Center

The Evolution of Nano-Satellite Proximity Operations In-Space Inspection Workshop 2017

Using COTs components to Reduce Space Mission Costs: Facts, Myths, Advantages & Pitfalls

QB50. An international network of CubeSats for scientific research and technology demonstration. J. Muylaert, C. Asma

Relative Cost and Performance Comparison of GEO Space Situational Awareness Architectures

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Vehicle Avionics and Design

TechDemoSat-1 & NovaSAR-S

debris manoeuvre by photon pressure

Galileo signal reflections used for monitoring waves and weather at sea

- KiboCUBE - Supporting space technology capacity building in developing countries

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Orbicraft Pro Complete CubeSat kit based on Raspberry-Pi

Space Debris Mitigation

Five Years Orbit Experience of a Small Satellite Hyperspectral Imaging Mission. Mike Cutter & Martin Sweeting. AIAA Utah, August 2007

From Single to Formation Flying CubeSats: An Update of the Delfi Programme

NanoRacks CubeSat Deployer (NRCSD) Interface Control Document

QB50 An international network of 50 CubeSats for multipoint,

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

AstroBus S, the high performance and competitive Small Satellites platform for Earth Observation

Electric Solar Wind Sail tether payloads onboard CubeSats

EXPERIENCE OF PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SPACE PROJECTS BY THE EXAMPLE OF QB50 PROJECT

CubeSat Standard Updates

CubeSat Navigation System and Software Design. Submitted for CIS-4722 Senior Project II Vermont Technical College Al Corkery

Free-flying Satellite Inspector

Small satellites deployment mission from. "Kibo" Engineer, Hiroki AKAGI

Beyond CubeSats: Operational, Responsive, Nanosatellite Missions. 9th annual CubeSat Developers Workshop

Space Debris Related Activities -Japanese Case-

Rocket Lab Rideshare CubeSat Launch in Maxwell

Maximizing the Outcome of the ISS and Kibo Innovative launch opportunity for Micro/Nano-satellite by using one and only function on Kibo/ISS

CubeSat Advisors: Mechanical: Dr. Robert Ash ECE: Dr. Dimitrie Popescu 435 Team Members: Kevin Scott- Team Lead Robert Kelly- Orbital modeling and

GomSpace Presentation to Hytek Workshop

The TEXAS Satellite Design Laboratory: An Overview of Our Current Projects FASTRAC, BEVO-2, & ARMADILLO

Tropnet: The First Large Small-Satellite Mission

End-to-End Simulation and Verification of Rendezvous and Docking/Berthing Systems using Robotics

Advanced Electrical Bus (ALBus) CubeSat Technology Demonstration Mission

2013 RockSat-C Preliminary Design Review

Cesar Arza INTA 2009 CUBESAT DEVELOPERS WORKSHOP 23RD APRIL 2008

GAMMa - A modular ascender concept for sample return missions

Small satellites Launch Opportunities. Small satellites Deployment from Kibo

Incorporating a Test Flight into the Standard Development Cycle

Space Station Cubesat Deployment Services. Space Station Cubesat Deployment Services

NovaSAR-S - Bringing Radar Capability to the Disaster Monitoring Constellation

CUBESATS: A COST-EFFICIENT WAY TO VALIDATE TECHNOLOGICAL BRICKS

A Systems Approach to Select a Deployment Scheme to Minimize Re-contact When Deploying Many Satellites During One Launch Mission

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

SPACE. (Some space topics are also listed under Mechatronic topics)

Acta Astronautica FINAL PAYLOAD TEST RESULTS FOR THE REMOVEDEBRIS ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL MISSION

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

Simulation Results of Alternative Methods for Formation Separation Control

Cubesats and the challenges of Docking

A Novel Approach for Controlled Deorbiting and Reentry of Small Spacecraft

MEMS in Space A New Technology Advancing from Flight Experiment to Proven COTS Product

In the summer of 2002, Sub-Orbital Technologies developed a low-altitude

Design and Evaluation of an Orbital Debris Remediation System

Design of a Remote-Cockpit for small Aerospace Vehicles

Rome, Changing of the Requirements and Astrofein s Business Models for Cubesat Deployer

QB50 Project Status and Ground Segment Thorsten Scholz (von Karman Institute, Belgium)

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW

GNSS Programme. Overview and Status in Europe

Presentation to CDW Niels Jernes Vej Aalborg E - Denmark - Phone:

The FAST, Affordable, Science and Technology Satellite (FASTSAT) Mission

CanX-2 and NTS Canada's Smallest Operational Satellites

OVERVIEW ON 2010 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE F.ALBY

An Evaluation of CubeSat Orbital Decay

Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines Update

CubeSat Launch and Deployment Accommodations

Open Source Design: Corvus-BC Spacecraft. Brian Cooper, Kyle Leveque 9 August 2015

Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout CubeSat Mission

An Information Session on Canadian Cubesat Project

Introduction to Galileo PRS

Joshua Laub Jake Tynis Lindsey Andrews

NetCubeSat and SDR Based Communication System for Climate Change Understanding

Relative Navigation, Timing & Data. Communications for CubeSat Clusters. Nestor Voronka, Tyrel Newton

A Technical Background of the ZACUBE-i Satellite Mission Series. Francois Visser

ELaNa Educational Launch of Nanosatellite Enhance Education through Space Flight

SSTL Contribution to NDU Spacepower Symposium. Dr. Stuart Eves 26 April 2007

Formation Flying Slide 2 ION Alberta Chapter > Calgary > 20 Dec 2012

Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):

SOME ASPECT AND PERSPECTIVES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL POLICY IN THE FIELD OF EXPLORATION AND PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE

Enabling Space Sensor Networks with PCBSat

Phoenix. A 3U CubeSat to Study Urban Heat Islands. Sarah Rogers - Project Manager NASA Space Grant Symposium April 14, 2018

(SDR) Based Communication Downlinks for CubeSats

Clean Space. A new cross-cutting initiative of ESA. The Clean Space Team 15/04/2013. ESA UNCLASSIFIED For Official Use

Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Space Systems Design and Test Laboratory

DLR s Optical Communications Program for 2018 and beyond. Dr. Sandro Scalise Institute of Communications and Navigation

EPS Bridge Low-Cost Satellite

TopSat: Brief to Ground Segment Coordination. Presenter Ian Pilling. By : W.A. Levett. Co author: E.J. Baxter.

Introduction. Satellite Research Centre (SaRC)

OPTEL-µ : Flight Design and Status of EQM Development

Uranus Exploration Challenges

A 1m Resolution Camera For Small Satellites

NanoRacks Customer Payloads on Orbital-ATK-9

A Technical Comparison of Three Low Earth Orbit Satellite Constellation Systems to Provide Global Broadband

Transcription:

Changing the economics of space RemoveDebris Mission: Briefing to UNCOPUOS 9 th Feb 2015 Chris Saunders Surrey Satellite Technology Limited Guildford, United Kingdom

RemoveDebris Mission RemoveDebris is an European Union (EU) Framework 7 (FP7) research project to develop and fly an in-orbit demonstrator mission that aims to de-risk and verify technologies needed for future Active Debris Removal (ADR) missions It is not an end-to-end demonstration of a full ADR mission It will demonstrate the use, on-orbit, of some of the key aspects of a real ADR mission Multi-partner consortium, with the Surrey Space Centre (Uni. Of Surrey) acting as project coordinator The project has a limited budget, which means that high pay-off scenarios have been traded carefully against their risk profile The consortium partners recognise the potential sensitivities surrounding ADR and its associated technologies This presentation aims to present the RemoveDebris mission to the community, to raise awareness, and to gather feedback on the proposed mission 2

Project Team Name Universityof Surrey Surrey Space Centre (SSC), UK Surrey Satellite TechnologyLtd (SSTL), UK AirbusDefenseand Space (AD&S), Germany, France, UK Innovative Solutions in Space BV(ISIS), Netherlands Suisse d'electronique et de Microtechnique SA -Recherche et Development(CSEM), Switzerland Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria), France Stellenbosch University Electronic System Laboratory (ESL), South Africa Project Role Project co-ordinator, CubeSat development and de-orbit technology development Satellite platform provider, satellite operations Mission and System Engineering, Net development,vision-based navigation development, harpoon development CubeSat deployers and subsystems LiDAR camera VBN algorithms CubeSat ADCS hardware and software 3

Mission Overview The mission has as its primary aim, the raising of Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), and gaining on-orbit experience with: A debris capture system based on a Net A debris capture system based on a Harpoon Visual Based Navigation (VBN) using Optical, Infrared and LIDAR cameras Deployable drag augmentation devices (Sails) The core concept behind the mission, is to use a small-satellite (~100kg) as a mothership, on which the payloads are carried, and from which CubeSats (~3kg) are released and used as pseudodebris targets Mission aims to launch Q2/3 2016 Currently in detailed design phase, with advanced bread-boarding and engineering model testing underway 4

Mission Overview The RemoveDebris mission obviously does not want to produce any excess debris in orbit from its activities The current mission baseline is therefore to fly the mission at low altitude (<400km) where orbital residence times for the different parts of the mission will be low (<3 years) Parts of the mission involving close proximity operations between the mothership and CubeSats have been designed to be passively safe (objects will naturally drift apart) The consortium is in discussions with several launch providers and no launch has been yet selected One potential option is the US company NanoRacks to obtain a launch from the International Space Station (ISS) Launch via airlock on the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) Carriage to the ISS via cargo re-supply flights (SpaceX or Orbital Sciences) 5

Mission Overview S/C commissioned and checked-out Experiments initiated in G/S visibility windows (payload data collected and downlinked in subsequent visibility windows) Continually decreasing altitude during mission Deployment into 400 km orbit ** or ** ejection from ISS (no operations until outside keepout zone) After all experiments, sail deployed on S/C leading to rapid re-entry and burn-up Launch directly into 400 km orbit ** or ** Launch as auxiliary payload to ISS SSTL 3.7m G/S in Guildford, UK (backup in Bordon, UK) TT&C and P/L data Any CubeSat targets released, quickly decay and burn-up after the experiments are finished 6

Payloads (Net & CubeSat) Purpose: Capture of a non-cooperative target (debris) via a thrown net Demonstrate net deployment, target capture and closure of net Airbus Defence and Space has tested a small net system in Bremen drop tower (Ø 1.5 m) and parabolic aircraft (Ø 1 m) Low probability of missing the target, as the Cubesat is ejected at low velocity (few cm/s) and the net is large (Ø ~5m) compared to the size of the target and the expected dispersions The net will not be connected to the mothership (no restraining tether) and no towing will be conducted (too complex and risky for the mission profile) 7

Payloads (Harpoon) The Harpoon is a small (~25cm long) barbed projectile, that is fired at ~20m/s towards a target The Harpoon punctures the outer layers of the target (e.g. Alu panels) and fish hook barbs deploy to lock the Harpoon into place which can then be towed via an attached tether Deployed via a cold gas generator and tear-pin mechanism For RemoveDebris the original objective of firing the Harpoon against a free flying CubeSat is no longer preferred ; it is envisaged to fire at a fixed target plate deployed on a boom from the Mothership Concerns over miss probability and secondary debris production with a CubeSat target (don t want to leave the Harpoon as its own orbiting object!) Still allows key demo of deployment mechanism and zero-g flight, whilst significantly reducing risk Target pate will have a Kevlar bag on its rear side to capture any secondary debris produced 8

Payloads (Visual Based Navigation) For the VBN experiment, a second CubeSat will be deployed as an observation target for the sensors VBN sensors will observe the CubeSat as it drifts away from the Mothership The VBN trajectory has not yet been confirmed, but it is likely a passively safe trajectory will be chosen for regulatory/safety reasons No attempt will be made to perform formation flying, rendezvous, target chasing, or any other close proximity operations By controlling the CubeSat ejection angle, the momentum transferred to/from the Mothership and CubeSat can be used to design trajectories which do not recontact after many orbits Differing ballistic coefficients cause the inter-satellite range to continually increase Verified by Monte Carlo simulation Still allows a good range of lighting/background conditions to be sensed 9

Safety is a Mission Priority The mission has been designed with as safe a concept-of-operations (CONOPS) as possible Altitude of mission will ensure rapid re-entry of all elements (Mothership and CubeSats) Risk of secondary debris production or collisions minimised (Harpoon fired against fixed plate is the preferred solution, no formation flying) Passively safe trajectories are currently envisaged Launch from ISS (if chosen) will bring its own set of safety requirements, especially given the number of mechanisms involved in the mission Electrical inhibits for power system Mechanical inhibits for deployers and payloads (e.g. mechanical safety barrier incorporated into the Harpoon deployer design) Delay (30mins) between ISS deployment and activation (outside of keep-out zone before any activity on the spacecraft) Safety requirements understood and being incorporated into final design The consortium is dedicated to producing a safe, yet ambitious mission, that will be one of the first key missions in demonstrating debris removal technologies 10

Changing the economics of space Thank You For more information on the RemoveDebris mission please contact: Jenny Harding, Consortium Project Manager, Surrey Space Centre: jenny.harding@surrey.ac.uk Surrey Satellite Technology Limited Tycho House 20 Stephenson Road Surrey Research Park Guildford, Surrey GU2 7YE, United Kingdom Tel: +44 1483 803803 Fax: +44 1483 803804 Web: www.sstl.co.uk Email: sstl@sstl.co.uk