Twinning cases selected Deliverable D3.2 INNO-Partnering Forum

Similar documents
TECHNOLOGY WITH A HUMAN TOUCH

Korean scientific cooperation network with the European Research Area KORANET. Korean scientific cooperation network with the European Research Area

UEAPME Think Small Test

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

EUROPEAN MANUFACTURING SURVEY EMS

Nurturing Talent Reinforcing the Interaction between Research, Innovation and Education

EU Ecolabel EMAS Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) State-of-play and evaluations

Mutual Learning Programme

Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Actions

Robotics: from FP7 to Horizon Libor Král, Head of Unit Unit A2 - Robotics DG Communication Networks, Content and Technology European Commission

Needs searching solutions

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

HORIZON Wissenschaft mit und für die Gesellschaft. Mag. Daniel Spichtinger DG RTD B6 Ethik und Gleichstellung

Final Report. MAASiFiE. Report Nr 1.2 May 2017

Institute for Energy. ENIQ 2020 Roadmap. ENIQ report No 43

Common Features and National Differences - preliminary findings -

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

"Working Groups for Harmonisation and Alignment in Brain Imaging Methods for Neurodegeneration" Final version

EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, outcomes and uptake

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

DTP Capitalisation Strategy

Innovation in Horizon 2020:

MedLab. Mediterranean Living Lab for Territorial Innovation. Nicos Komninos, URENIO Research CENTRAL LAB Kick-off, Ptuj, Slovenia 30 May 2011

ESASTAP Strengthening Technology, Research and Innovation Cooperation between Europe and South Africa

OBSTACLES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PECS INDUSTRY TO PARTICIPATE IN ESA PROGRAMMES SPACE4SME PROJECT. Prague April 25, 2008

PUBLISHABLE FINAL ACTIVITY REPORT

GZ.:BMWF-8.105/5-II/1/2010

Strategic Plan for CREE Oslo Centre for Research on Environmentally friendly Energy

Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs

ENVIROS, s.r.o. Madrid, 1 st of December 2015

On Practical Innovation Policy Learning. Per M. Koch Head of the Science Policy Project

Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) Raw Materials update. Peter Moser, Alfred Maier & Katrin Brugger, Montanuniversität Leoben

Consultation on Long Term sustainability of Research Infrastructures

Chair: Dorothea Sturn (Austria)

MINERVA: IMPROVING THE PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL CULTURAL HERITAGE IN EUROPE. Rossella Caffo - Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali, Italia

The TTO circle workshop on "Technology Transfer in Nanotechnology"

EUROPEAN GNSS APPLICATIONS IN H2020

AAL2BUSINESS Towards successful commercialization of AAL solutions

nuclear science and technology

eafip Workshop fo Public Procurers in th Security Secto 9 th June 2016 in Riga Latvi Astrid De Nev Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneursh

JRA1:Genomics Observatories GOs in ASSEMPLE Plus Association of European Marine Biological Laboratories Expanded

1. Introduction. defining and producing new materials with advanced properties, or optimizing industrial processes.

Foresight Impact on Policy making and Lessons for New Member States and Candidate Countries Insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process

BUILDING CAPACITIES: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEARNING AND SME SKILLS

SME support under HORIZON 2020

Michael Stampfer, Dr. iur. Curriculum Vitae; 2018

Christina Miller Director, UK Research Office

North Sea Interreg IVb Lead Beneficiary Conference Bremen October 2010

International Collaboration Tools for Industrial Development

XXVII MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE - COMMUNIQUE MADRID, 30 JUNE 2017

summary General overview Project organisation Objectives Technical Solution Pilots CIP-ICT-PSP Long Lasting Memories

Finn Børlum Kristensen, MD, PhD Director, EUnetHTA Secretariat Danish Health and Medicines Authority (EUnetHTA Coordinator) Copenhagen, Denmark

International comparison of education systems: a European model? Paris, November 2008

OBN BioTuesday: Sources of Public Non-Dilutable Funding & Export Support to UK R&D Companies

PPP InfoDay Brussels, July 2012

New era for Eureka - relations with ETPs

Application and adaptation of mature geological disposal concepts to less advanced programmes

The ETV pilot programme: State of play, standardisation issues

Assessment of Smart Machines and Manufacturing Competence Centre (SMACC) Scientific Advisory Board Site Visit April 2018.

Stakeholders Acting Together On the ethical impact assessment of Research and Innovation

ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS COMMISSION PRAMONĖ 4.0 OF 2017

Europe how to become No. 1!

Mutual Learning Programme Database of National Labour Market Practices. Step-by-Step Guide

DoReMi-MELODI Training and Education Forum Introduction and background

Brief presentation of the results Ioana ISPAS ERA NET COFUND Expert Group

IP support and IP strategy development in the Austrian innovation system plus a brief look at Switzerland and Ireland

A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

Science & Technology Cooperation Workshop

Public forum on mobility and transportation

Use of forecasting for education & training: Experience from other countries

Mr. Wolfgang Metzen was trained as a mechanical

LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX LFM

Research DG. European Commission. Sharing Visions. Towards a European Area for Foresight

ASSESSMENT OF DYNAMICS OF THE INDEX OF THE OF THE INNOVATION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT OF LATVIA

WEBINAR ON AAL CALL 2018

3. How to prepare a successful proposal?

Case Study The ABC of IP strategy for a small R&D company

STRUCTURE OF THE H2020 PROPOSAL, TYPES OF ACTIONS, TLR. Summer School for Young Researchers, September 2017, Odessa

SETTING FOOD SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR HORIZON EUROPE. Marta Hugas EFSA Chief Scientist

Chapter 1 The Innovative Bakery Dialogue

THE DIGITALISATION CHALLENGES IN LITHUANIAN ENGINEERING INDUSTRY. Darius Lasionis LINPRA Director November 30, 2018 Latvia

Government Soft Landings (GSL) An Overview 29 th October 2013

Framework Programme 7 and SMEs. Amaury NEVE European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs

SUPPORT SCHEMES FOR ARTISTIC INTERVENTIONS IN EUROPE a mapping and policy recommendations

The shift towards Demand-Side innovation policy at regional level. René Wintjes (MERIT, Maastricht University) 5 April 2012 Tirana

Robotics in Horizon 2020 IMPACT and Technology Readiness Levels

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS FINAL REPORT AND ANSWERS TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Deliverable D6.3 DeMStack

Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA)

Science2Society Boosting innovation efficiency across Europe

Pre commercial procurement for egovernment and other online services EU project PROGR EAST

DAB+ Digital Radio. Global update. Vasant Venkatramani, WorldDAB IFTV Broadcast Istanbul, November 2018

ERA-Net Smart Grids Plus

The meeting was chaired by Mr. Sándor ERDŐ, representative of the Hungarian Presidency of the EU.

aws: Business Promotion Bank of the Republic of Austria

SECTEUR Ascertaining user needs

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME SEC GA No

EU Support for SME Innovation: The SME Instrument

SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAINS. Making the relationship between TRADE, SOCIAL and ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES more effective and mutually beneficial

Transcription:

Document ID: IPF 11-022 VINNOVA Dnr: 2009-04589 Twinning cases selected Deliverable D3.2 INNO-Partnering Forum

PAGE 2

Description of the deliverable This is a formal delivery D3.2 within WP3 of the INNO-Partnering Forum (IPF) project. This is deliverable describes the process for selection of twinning cases and the actual selection of the cases. Stockholm 2012-01-30 Cecilia Johansson Project Coordinator INNO-Partnering Forum Dissemination level: The following dissemination level is set for this report/deliverable in accordance with the contract and discussions with the Commission services: PU= Public. PAGE 3

Document ID: IPF 11-022 VINNOVA Dno: 2009-04589 Twinning Cases Selected Deliverable D3.2 Twinning cases selected

This report was prepared by: Wolfgang R. Knapp FFG - Austrian Research Promotion Agency Sensengasse 1 A-1090 Wien AUSTRIA Phone: +43 5 7755 7013 e-mail: wolfgang.knapp@ffg.at Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the author and the Peer Review Team. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion or position of the European Commission and in no way commit the involved organisations. PAGE 2

Twinning Concept Deliverable D3.2 Twinning cases selected TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Overview of the process... 4 2 Pilot Twinning Case... 4 3 Selection of other 5 twinning cases... 5 4 What happens after Twinning?... 5 PAGE 3

1 Overview of the process The developed twinning concept was verified in 3 pilot twinning cases a joint design exercise on the Innovation Procurement (SBIR). VINNOVA, FFG and Tekes have started designing a scheme on SBIR using the expertise and the best practices of NL Agency and TSB. The results of the pilot were summarised in the PCP-Design Options Paper. Next step was an Open Call on PCP started in January 2011. The offer for interested agencies were in-depth analysis of the two peer reviewed PCP programmes (SBIR/SBRI), the design options for PCP measures (Design Options Paper) as well as individual coaching for agencies with serious intentions to implement a PCP measure in their respective country. The call ended in March 2010. 5 agencies were selected. 2 Pilot Twinning Case The objective of the pilot twinning was to test the Twinning concept described in Report D3.1 and at the same time refine and improve the Twinning concept based on practical experience. Besides this objective, the pilot will also addressed real needs at the participating agencies thereby contributing to their internal plans to develop an SME measure. The Pilot Twinning Case (PTW) is a full-fledged Twinning case. To test the Twinning model before offering it to a broader public (see below), we limit the participation to the IPF partners only. Three partner agencies expressed their interest to participate in the PTW: VINNOVA (Sweden), FFG (Austria) and TEKES (Finland). We selected SBIR/SBRI for the pilot Twinning case (PTW) since it fulfils the two objectives above. That is, FFG, Tekes and VINNOVA are all planning for developing precommercial procurement schemes. Since none of the agencies have this kind of measures in their portfolios the PTW was a joint design exercise: Joint design of an SBIR-Programme by VINNOVA, FFG and TEKES using GP from NL Agency and TSB. The evaluation was performed by an expert panel using design documentation and an interactive workshop consisting of the panel and pilot representatives from the pilot partners (FFG, VINNOVA and TEKES) the outcome of the evaluation is recommendation for improving the Twinning concept and the process of reviewing Twinning results. PAGE 4

The two main results of the Pilot Twinning Case were: a) the concrete learnings of the non-experienced agencies and b) the PCP Design Option Paper (written by both sides, the learning and experienced agencies). D.3.2. Test twinning case selected there was done by end of 2010. 3 Selection of other 5 twinning cases So the next step as Open Call on PCP was started in January 2011. The offer for interested agencies were in-depth analysis of the two peer reviewed PCP programmes (SBIR/SBRI), the design options for PCP measures (Design Options Paper) as well as individual coaching for agencies with serious intentions to implement a PCP measure in their respective country. The call ended in March 2010. After that an Open Call for Twinning was started in January 2011. Agencies across Europe were invited to apply for twinning activities on pre-commercial procurement. This call was closed in March 2011. 5 agencies were shortlisted. An initial workshop with the potential candidates was held in May 2011 in Vienna. Five organisations / agencies from France (OSEO), Italy (Ministry), Spain (CDTI), Slovenia (TIA) and Czech Republic (TACR) were selected June 2011. From the beginning of October the concrete twinning exercises will start. 4 What happens after Twinning? Analyses of the twinning results and an ex-post evaluation will finalize the twinning activities. Planning and methodology for these activities will be decided in the IPF Management Team. PAGE 5