UWB Antennas & Measurements. Gabriela Quintero MICS UWB Network Meeting 11/12/2007

Similar documents
Measurement of Digital Transmission Systems Operating under Section March 23, 2005

The Measurement and Characterisation of Ultra Wide-Band (UWB) Intentionally Radiated Signals

The Value of Pre-Selection in EMC Testing. Scott Niemiec Application Engineer

APPENDIX A TEST PLOTS. (Model: 15Z970)

Japan PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF OF THE WORKING DOCUMENT TOWARDS A PDNR ITU-R SM.[UWB.MES] MEASUREMENT INITIALIZATION FOR RMS PSD

Differential and Single Ended Elliptical Antennas for GHz Ultra Wideband Communication

Power limits fulfilment and MUI reduction based on pulse shaping in UWB networks

Ultra Wide Band Signal Simulations Using FDTD Method

UWB Channel Modeling

AN4949 Application note

EENG473 Mobile Communications Module 3 : Week # (12) Mobile Radio Propagation: Small-Scale Path Loss

AN4378 Application note

An Ultra Wideband Local Positioning System for Highly Complex Indoor Environments

Written Exam Channel Modeling for Wireless Communications - ETIN10

GET10B Radar Measurement Basics- Spectrum Analysis of Pulsed Signals. Copyright 2001 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Keysight Technologies Pulsed Antenna Measurements Using PNA Network Analyzers

Pulsed VNA Measurements:

Utilizzo del Time Domain per misure EMI

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Lecture 7/8: UWB Channel. Kommunikations

Pulsed S-Parameter Measurements using the ZVA network Analyzer

Channel. Muhammad Ali Jinnah University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan. Multi-Path Fading. Dr. Noor M Khan EE, MAJU

Ultra Wide Band Communications

Application of pulse compression technique to generate IEEE a-compliant UWB IR pulse with increased energy per bit

RFID Chipless Tag Based On Multiple Phase Shifters

ECE 440L. Experiment 1: Signals and Noise (1 week)

EITN85, FREDRIK TUFVESSON, JOHAN KÅREDAL ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Why do we need UWB channel models?

Narrow- and wideband channels

Multi-Path Fading Channel

UWB Emission Measurements

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1340 *,**

Channel Modeling ETI 085

TETRA Tx Test Solution

6. 6dB &26dB Bandwidth Test

The Radio Channel. COS 463: Wireless Networks Lecture 14 Kyle Jamieson. [Parts adapted from I. Darwazeh, A. Goldsmith, T. Rappaport, P.

FCC Part 90 Certification Application. FCC Form 731. For The. Guardian UHF RADIO MODEM FCC ID: NP

On the Plane Wave Assumption in Indoor Channel Modelling

Final Examination. 22 April 2013, 9:30 12:00. Examiner: Prof. Sean V. Hum. All non-programmable electronic calculators are allowed.

What s New With Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) First R&O + More to Come TCB Workshop April 9, 2014 Aole Wilkins

Ultra Wideband Indoor Radio Channel Measurements

EE 529 Remote Sensing Techniques. Radar

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Understanding Probability of Intercept for Intermittent Signals

7. Transmitter Radiated Spurious Emissions and Conducted Spurious Emission

Mobile Radio Propagation Channel Models

UWB Double-Directional Channel Sounding

EMC Evaluation at Green Bank: Emissions and Shield Effectiveness

Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division

Narrow Pulse Measurements on Vector Network Analyzers

Overview. Measurement of Ultra-Wideband Wireless Channels

Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division

Revision of Wireless Channel

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM Measurement techniques of ultra-wideband transmissions

ADDENDUM TO ITRON, INC. TEST REPORT FC FOR THE AUTOMATED METER READING SYSTEM, FC 200 FCC PART 101 PARTIAL TESTING DATE OF ISSUE: MAY 22, 2007

Method of measuring the maximum frequency deviation of FM broadcast emissions at monitoring stations

FCC and ETSI Requirements for Short-Range UHF ASK- Modulated Transmitters

Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band GHz for intelligent transport systems applications

UNIDEN AMERICA CORPORATION 4700 AMON CARTER BLVD. FORT WORTH TEXAS UNITED STATES

Lecture 10 Performance of Communication System: Bit Error Rate (BER) EE4900/EE6720 Digital Communications

NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION AGENCY

Elham Torabi Supervisor: Dr. Robert Schober

2310 to 2390 MHz, 3m distance MCS8 (MIMO) to 2500 MHz Restricted band MCS8 (MIMO)

Time-modulated arrays for smart WPT

Preliminary RFI Survey for IIP

Chapter 4 Radio Communication Basics

Lab Assignment 1 Spectrum Analyzers

4-2 Power Measurement Emitted by UWB System in Time Domain

Experimental Evaluation Scheme of UWB Antenna Performance

As the responsible EMC Engineer, I hereby declare that the equipment tested as specified in this report conforms to the requirements indicated.

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Understanding New Pulse-analysis Techniques

ER55 EMI TEST RECEIVER Family of automatic test receivers for measurement of electromagnetic interference from 9kHz to 1GHz

STUDIO TO TRANSMITTER LINKING SYSTEM

Antenna Engineering Lecture 3: Basic Antenna Parameters

Application Note: Testing for FCC Pre-Compliance with LoRaWAN Modules

REPORT ON Radio testing of the VERTEX STANDARD VX-2100-G6-45 / VX-2200-G6-45 In accordance with ANSI/TIA/EIA-603, RSS-119. Report number TA000506

Version TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION. HCTR1208FR50 August 29, 2012 First Approval Report

9. MAXIMUM CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY

ERC Recommendation 54-01

5. Average Power Spectral Density

MAKING TRANSIENT ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

AN5029 Application note

Narrow- and wideband channels

Ranging detection algorithm for indoor UWB channels and research activities relating to a UWB-RFID localization system

Ultra-Wideband DesignGuide

TSEK02: Radio Electronics Lecture 6: Propagation and Noise. Ted Johansson, EKS, ISY

Ultra Wideband Radio Propagation Measurement, Characterization and Modeling

Narrow Band Interference (NBI) Mitigation Technique for TH-PPM UWB Systems in IEEE a Channel Using Wavelet Packet Transform

Signals. Periodic vs. Aperiodic. Signals

FCC Test Report. : RV340W Dual WAN Wireless-AC VPN Router. Standard : 47 CFR FCC Part : 2400 MHz MHz

FCC PART 80 & 90 TEST REPORT

Ultrawideband Radiation and Propagation

Emission of mm-wave and THz Scanners

Implementation Challenges of UWB Systems

Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division

An Introduction to Antennas

UWB Double-Directional Channel Sounding

Measurement Procedure & Test Equipment Used

Agilent ESA-L Series Spectrum Analyzers

5. Maximum Conducted Output Power

Transcription:

UWB Antennas & Measurements Gabriela Quintero MICS UWB Network Meeting 11/12/27

Outline UWB Antenna Analysis Frequency Domain Time Domain Measurement Techniques Peak and Average Power Measurements Spectrum Analyzer Settings Fourier Series Fourier Transform UWB Measurements

Outline UWB Antenna Analysis Frequency Domain Time Domain Measurement Techniques Peak and Average Power Measurements Spectrum Analyzer Settings Fourier Series Fourier Transform UWB Measurements

UWB Antennas Impulse radio UWB pulse (3.1 1.6 GHz) MICS pulse (4 4.5 GHz) Time and frequency domain Analysis Still with basic antenna architectures Monopole Vivaldi

Time and Frequency Domain Two different softwares used to characterize the antennas Ansoft HFSS FD Frequency Sweep at all frequencies Parameters in FD (S11, Gain, E-field, etc.) CST Microwave Studio TD Select the pulse BW Parameters in FD (S11, Gain, etc.) E-field in TD

Frequency Domain Tx Rx Transfer Function - S 21 Relates the output voltage with the input jωr voltage c V ( ω) = H( ω) V ( ω) e r Can be derived from the Friis Transmission Equation t 2 1 1 λ (, ) (, ) ˆ ˆ cdt cdr t r t θt φ 2 t r θr φr ρt ρr P ( )( ) r 2 2 = e e Γ Γ Pt 4π R D D And obtain V ( ) ( 2 1 ) r ω λ = ecdt S11 Et ( ω, θt, φt ) V ( ω) 4πR t

Frequency Domain Tx Rx HFSS Simulation S11 E-field Matlab Transfer Function Rx Pulse TD IFFT Rx Pulse PSD Pulse PSD

Monopole System Tx Rx -5 Return Loss S11 Simulated Measured 1.9 Normalized Magnitude Simulated Measured -5 Phase [radians].8-1 -1.7-15 Magnitude [db] -15-2.6.5.4-2 -25 TF S21-3 -25.3-35 HFSS NWA -3-35 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Frequency [GHz].2.1 5 1 15 2 Frequency [GHz] -4-45 -5 5 1 15 2 Frequency [GHz] 2 Power Spectral Density 1 Input Vs. Output pulse (normalized) Rx + Tx Pulse PSD Gaussian Pulse [db] -2-4 -6-8 -1-12 2 4 6 8 1 12 Frequency [GHz] Input Simulated Measured Gaussian Pulse.5 -.5-1 1.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Time [ns] Input Simulated Measured Rx + Tx Pulse 2.8 MICS Pulse, [db] -2-4 -6-8 -1 MICS Pulse.6.4.2 -.2 -.4 -.6 -.8-12 2 4 6 8 1 12 Frequency [GHz] -1-1 1 2 3 4 Time [ns]

Vivaldi System Tx Rx -5 Return Loss S11 Simulated Measured 1.9 Normalized Magnitude Simulated Measured -5 Phase [radians].8-1 -1.7-15 Magnitude [db] -15-2.6.5.4-2 -25 TF S21-3 -25.3-35 HFSS NWA -3-35 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Frequency [GHz].2.1 5 1 15 2 Frequency [GHz] -4-45 -5 5 1 15 2 Frequency [GHz] 2 Power Spectral Density 1 Input Vs. Output pulse (normalized) Rx + Tx Pulse PSD Gaussian Pulse, [db] -2-4 -6-8 -1-12 2 4 6 8 1 12 Frequency [GHz] Input Simulated Measured Gaussian Pulse.5 -.5-1.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Time [ns] Input Simulated Measured Rx + Tx Pulse 1 2.8 MICS Pulse, [db] -2-4 -6-8 -1 MICS Pulse.6.4.2 -.2 -.4 -.6 -.8-12 2 4 6 8 1 12 Frequency [GHz] -1-1 1 2 3 4 Time [ns]

CST: Monopole Antenna E-plane H-plane 4.25 GHz 6.85 GHz

CST: Vivaldi Antenna E-plane H-plane 4.25 GHz 6.85 GHz

Time Domain Monopole Vivaldi 1 UWB Pulse 1 UWB Pulse.5 Input Pulse E-field at 8.5 Input Pulse E-field at 8 -.5 -.5-1.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5-1.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 1 MICS Pulse 1 MICS Pulse.5.5 -.5 -.5-1 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16-1 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16

Time Domain Fidelity Factor Measures the faithfulness with which a device reproduces the time shape of the input signal. f(t) = Input signal at antenna terminals r(t) = Radiated E-field in time domain The signals are normalized to have unit energy r( t) and f() t rˆ( t) = r( t) 2 dt 1/ 2 fˆ( t ) f() t = 1/2 2 dt

Time Domain The fidelity parameter, F, is determined by the peak of the cross-correlation function of the signals F = max fˆ ( t) rˆ ( t+ τ ) dt τ

Time Domain Input signal CST Simulation Fidelity Factor E-field (t,θ, φ)

Time Domain Monopole Fidelity Factor Vivaldi Fidelity Factor 3-3 UWB Pulse MICS Pulse 3-3 UWB Pulse MICS Pulse 6-6 6-6 9 1.9.8.7-9 9 1.9.8.7-9 12-12 12-12 15-15 15-15 ±18 ±18

Outline UWB Antenna Analysis Frequency Domain Time Domain Measurement Techniques Peak and Average Power Measurements Spectrum Analyzer Settings Fourier Series Fourier Transform UWB Measurements

MEASUREMENTS Average Power Peak Power E = P avg P Pτ eff τ = T eff = P avg T

MEASUREMENTS

Spectrum Analyzer RBW VBW Scan Time

Spectrum Analyzer Line Spectrum Pulse Spectrum 1 B> or B>PRF T A pulse repetition rate equal to the resolution bandwidth is the demarcation line between a true Fourier-series spectrum, where each line is a response representing the energy contained in that harmonic, and a pulse or Fouriertransform response. Agilent Spectrum Analyzers Series. Application note 15-2 pp. 32

Line Spectrum

Line Spectrum All individual frequency components are resolved. Line spacing is 1kHZ = PRF Spacing of sidelobe minima is 1kHz = The amplitude of each line will not change when RBW is changed, as long as RBW<.3PRF 1 τ eff

Line Spectrum Pulse Desensitization Only valid for Fourier line spectrum. τ eff αl[ db] = 2log1 = 2log1 T Pavg [ db] = 1log 1( τ eff PRF) P peak ( τeff PRF )

Pulse Spectrum It s a combination of time and frequency display. The lines that form the envelope are pulse lines in time domain. Each line is displayed when a pulse occurs. Frequency domain display of the spectrum envelope. The amplitude of the envelope increase linearly as RBW increases. (As long as RBW <.2/ τ eff ).

Pulse Spectrum -3dBm CW carrier modulated by a pulse train with a PRF of 1Hz, τ eff = 1µs and RBW = 1kHz =.1/ τ eff

Pulse Spectrum In Figure 23, we lost the linear relationship between bandwidth and display amplitude RBW >.2/ τ eff. The resolution of the sidelobes is lost to a great extent. In Figure 24 RBW = 1/ τ eff, we get a display with an amplitude practically equal to the peak amplitude of the pulsed signal.

Pulse Spectrum Pulse desensitization correction factor α [ db] = 2log1( τ K RBW ) K p = B imp RBW K = 1.617 for Agilnet ESA Series 856x or 859x eff

Average Power FCC Definition The average limit is 5 uv/m, as measured at 3 meters with a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth (RBW). Equivalent to an EIRP of -41.25 dbm/mhz EIRP [dbm/mhz] -4-45 -5-55 -6-65 -7-75 FCC Indoor Spectral Mask -8 2 4 6 8 1 12 Frequency [GHz]

Average Measurements If 1 khz > VBW >1 Hz Video averaging should be used in conjunction with peak hold. If NO dithering or PPM Line spectrum setting (VBW RBW) RBW <.3 PRF Average level = highest line in the emission line spectrum

Average Measurements If dithering or PPM True pulse spectrum settings A pulse desensitization correction factor would be added to the measurement to obtain a peak level. The average is calculated using the duty cycle factor in db P P avg peak ( τ PRF ) [ db] = 1log 1 eff

Peak Measurements pp. 174

Peak Measurements Peak level when measured over a bandwidth of 5 MHz 5MHz widest victim receiver that is likely to be encountered. Peak measurements based on a 5 MHz (resolution) bandwidth may not be feasible. The widest available RBW that can be employed for peak measurements is 3 MHz.

Peak Measurements

Peak Measurements Peak emission level of dbm/5 MHz = 58mV/m at 3 meters is adopted. Equivalent to: A peak EIRP of -24.44 dbm/3 MHz Peak field strength of 3.46 mv/m at 3 meters with a 3 MHz RBW.

Rules of Thumb P avg No dithering or PPM P avg Dithering or PPM Peak Interference Power Line Spectrum RBW<.3PRF Pulse Spectrum.1 1.5 PRF < RBW < τ eff 1 scan time[s/div] PRF[Hz]

QUESTIONS?