Future DSN Capabilities

Similar documents
Future DSN Capabilities

Future Plans for the Deep Space Network (DSN)

Deep Space Network. Spectrum Management Issues. Presentation to the NRC Committee on Radio Frequencies [CORF] May 14, 2003 by

Space Communications Supporting NASA s Missions

Deep Space Communication The further you go, the harder it gets. D. Kanipe, Sept. 2013

RADIOMETRIC TRACKING. Space Navigation

RADIOMETRIC TRACKING. Space Navigation

A Feasibility Study of Techniques for Interplanetary Microspacecraft Communications

LLCD Accomplishments No Issues with Atmospheric Effects like Fading and Turbulence. Transmitting Data at 77 Mbps < 5 above the horizon

DEEP SPACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 131/7) a) that telecommunications between the Earth and stations in deep space have unique requirements;

Communications in Space: A Deep Subject

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

ECE 6390 Project : Communication system

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA Protection criteria for deep-space research

Deep Space Communication

MarCO: Ready for Launch Andrew Klesh, Joel Krajewski

Factors affecting the choice of frequency bands for space research service deep-space (space-to-earth) telecommunication links

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 210/7)

ARTEMIS: Low-Cost Ground Station Antenna Arrays for Microspacecraft Mission Support. G. James Wells Mark A. Sdao Robert E. Zee

Uranus Exploration Challenges

High Speed Data Downlink for NSF Space Weather CubeSats

Improving CubeSat Communications

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

Hawk Institute for Space Sciences. Firefly Comms Plan. November 30, 2009

(SDR) Based Communication Downlinks for CubeSats

Satellite System Engineering. -- Communication Telemetry/Tracking/Telecommand (TT&C)

Satellite Link Budget 6/10/5244-1

Wallops CubeSat-SmallSat Ground Stations and Frequency Standardization

VLBI and DDOR activities at ESOC

Lecturer Series ASTRONOMY. FH Astros. Telecommunication with Space Craft. Kurt Niel (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria)

LE/ESSE Payload Design

SPACOMM 2009 PANEL. Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites

EVLA System Commissioning Results

SATELLIT COMMUNICATION

DELTA-DIFFERENTIAL ONE WAY RANGING (DELTA-DOR) OPERATIONS

X-band CubeSat Communication System Demonstration

High Speed, Low Cost Telemetry Access from Space Development Update on Programmable Ultra Lightweight System Adaptable Radio (PULSAR)

A High-Speed Data Downlink for Wide-Bandwidth CubeSat Payloads

B ==================================== C

K/Ka Band for Space Operation Services, Pros and Cons. ITU International Satellite Symposium 2017 Ing. Hernan Sineiro

NASA Near Earth Network (NEN) Support for Lunar and L1/L2 CubeSats Scott Schaire April 2017

MOSAIC: Mars Orbiting Satellites for Advanced Interplanetary Communication

3-2 Communications System

SATELLITE SUBSYSTEMS. Networks and Communication Department. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

W-Band Satellite Transmission in the WAVE Mission

206, Rev. B Telemetry General Information

Use of the Deep Impact HRI Instrument to Observe Exoplanets Via Microlensing

5.3 The Physics of Rocket Propulsion Rockets for Space Practice Exercises References Exploring the Solar System and

Exploiting Link Dynamics in LEO-to-Ground Communications

Brief overview of NASA s Human Mars Campaign and some cool New Projects at KSC

Chapter 3 Solution to Problems

LESSONS LEARNED TELEMTRY REDUNDANCY AND COMMANDING OF CRITICAL FUNCTIONS

HUMAN FLIGHT TO LUNAR AND BEYOND RE- LEARNING OPERATIONS PARADIGMS

The Decade of Light: Innovations in Space Communications and Navigation Technologies

Technician Licensing Class

DICE Telemetry Overview and Current Status

Voyage to Mars Space Simulation

Analysis of Potential for Venus-Bound Cubesat Scientific Investigations

Space Communication and Navigation Testbed: Communications Technology for Exploration

JPL Does Cubesats. Tony Freeman* Manager, Innova1on Foundry. April 2013

I SARA 08/10/13. Pre-Decisional Information -- For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

Picture of Team. Bryce Walker. Charles Swenson. Alex Christensen. Jackson Pontsler. Erik Stromberg. Cody Palmer. Benjamin Maxfield.

Experiment of 348 Mbps downlink from 50-kg class satellite

Ka Band and Broadband Satellite service

1. Discuss in detail the Design Consideration of a Satellite Communication Systems. [16]

ECE 6390: Satellite Communications and Navigation Systems TEST 1 (Fall 2004)

KaBOOM- Ka Band Objects: Observation and Monitoring. Dr. Barry Geldzahler NASA Headquarters, Washington DC

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Radio Frequency Interference in Satellite Communications Systems

RADIO FREQUENCY AND MODULATION SYSTEMS PART 1: EARTH STATIONS AND SPACECRAFT

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Iris Transponder Communica1ons and Naviga1on from Deep Space

Expanding CubeSat Capabilities with a Low Cost Transceiver

Chapter 6 Solution to Problems

Design, Trade-Off and Advantages of a Reconfigurable Dual Reflector for Ku Band Applications

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

JPL Spectrum Management Process

MLCD: Overview of NASA s Mars Laser Communications Demonstration System

Clocks and Timing in the NASA Deep Space Network

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

Satellite Communications. Chapter 9

Satellite Communications. Chapter 9

Solar Observing Low-frequency Array for Radio Astronomy (SOLARA)

Relative Navigation, Timing & Data. Communications for CubeSat Clusters. Nestor Voronka, Tyrel Newton

DRONACHARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, GREATER NOIDA. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (EEC 021) QUESTION BANK

Chapter 2 Link and System Design

Recommendation ITU-R M (09/2015)

ANTENNA ELEMENTS INTEGRATED INTO THE PARACHUTES OF PLANETARY ENTRY PROBES

Earth Station and Flyaway

Lunar Exploration Communications Relay Microsatellite

Study of Future Architectures for ESA Deep Space Ground Station Antennas

Executive Summary. Astrium GmbH (Germany): Study lead RF systems and protocols. INSA (Spain): RF ground segment

Ranging and Optical Communication R&D for Deep Space Missions

SPREAD SPECTRUM CHANNEL MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT

Notice of coordination procedure required under spectrum access licences for the 2.6 GHz band

Channel Modeling ETIN10. Wireless Positioning

Annex B: HEO Satellite Mission

CNES Position Regarding the Use of the X- X and Ka- Bands for EESS

BENEFITS FOR DEPLOYABLE QUADRIFILAR HELICAL ANTENNA MODULES FOR SMALL SATELLITES

Transcription:

Future DSN Capabilities Barry Geldzahler Chief Scientist and DSN Program Executive NASA HQ: Space Communications and Navigation Division 202-358-0512 barry.geldzahler@nasa.gov 9/22/09 Geldzahler 1

Areas for Discussion Downlink data rates Uplink data rates Spectrum considerations Navigation 9/22/09 Geldzahler 2

Downlink Data Rates Currently limited to ~ 6 Mbps MRO: X-band, 100W s/c transmitter, 3m s/c antenna. 34m ground antenna Developing Universal Space Transponder, S, X, Ka-bands Ready for flight validation 3-5 years 150 Mbps DSN internal capability: Today, 25 Mbps ~FY12 100Mbps 9/22/09 Geldzahler 3

Downlink Data Rates: Improvement Factor in Returned Data Rate 1000 100 10 1 Technology 5m Deployable Spacecraft Antenna Factor of 2.8 over today High Power S/C Transmitter 200W Factor of 2 over today Advanced Coding & Compression Factor of 5 over today Ka-Band Deployment on all Assets Factor of 4 enabled by Next Gen DSN DSN Arraying ~2020 Factor of 7 over today DSN Arraying Today (3 34m Antennas) Factor of 3 Current Spacecraft and DSN (SC: 100W, X-band, 3m antenna, std coding DSN: 34m antenna) 9/22/09 Geldzahler 4

Downlink Data Rates: Back of the Envelope Mission Data Rate [Mbps] Frequency Ground Antenna Equivalent Aperture [m] s/c TX Power [W] s/c Antenna Diameter [m] MRO today 6 Ka 34 35 3 MRO- what might have been. I. MRO- what might have been. II. Next Gen Mars Mission Next Gen Mars Mission 24 Ka 70 35 3 120 Ka 70 180 3 330 Ka 70 180 5 1200 Ka 70 180 10 Note: All the technologies/capabilities exist today except for the 10m Ka band s/c antenna 9/22/09 Geldzahler 5

Downlink Data Rates: Detailed Chart 9/22/09 Geldzahler 6

Equivalent Data Rate from Jupiter 1.E+12 1.E+10 1.E+08 1.E+06 1.E+04 1.E+02 1.E+00 1.E-02 1.E-04 Pioneer IV Baseline (First Deep Space mission) Downlink Data Rates 3-W, 1.2-m S-Band Antenna (S/C) Reduced Transponder Noise (S/C) Past technology investment Mariner IV Maser (G) 10-W S-Band TWT (S/C) 64-m Antenna (G) Reduced Microwave Noise (G) 20-W S-Band TWT, Block Coding (G & S/C) Mariner 69 Reduced Ant Surf Tolerances (G) Improved Antenna (G) Interplexed, Improved Coding (G & S/C) 1.5-m S-/X-Band Antenna (S/C) X-Band Maser (G) Mariner 10 Concatenated Coding (7, 1/2) + R-S (G & S/C) 3.7-m X-/X-Band Antenna (S/C) Array: 64-m + 1 34-m (G) Reduced Microwave Noise (G) Video Data Compression (G & S/C) Voyager 70-m Antenna (G) You are here 1.E-06 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 DSN arrives in Code S 9/22/09 Geldzahler 7 Array: 70-m + 2 34-m (G) Galileo Improved Coding (15/1/6) (G & S/C) MRO DSN improvements have been made possible by technology investment Ka-Band Systems (G & S/C) Kepler 100W Ka-Band Transmitter (S/C) DSN Array - Phase 1 (G) DSN Array - Phase 2 (G) Future investment 1kW Ka-Band Xmtr (S/C) Adv Coding & Cmprsn (G & S/C) Decommissioning of 70m antennas 10.5m Space Antenna (S/C) Optical Comm

Uplink Data Rates Today 2 kbps routine Can do 125 kbps [tested with the Across The Universe uplink in Feb 09] Coming: UST h/w can handle 16-24 Mbps; link margin will moderate this DSN internally does not have the capability to transmit at such high rates [no reqt to date]s 9/22/09 Geldzahler 8

Spectrum Considerations: Need To Go To Ka Band Figure 1. Spectral Occupancy of Mars Missions in 2007 Time Frame (Data rates are as currently conceived by missions) 0-10 Relative PSD, db -20-30 8400 8405 8410 8415 8420 8425 8430 8435 8440 8445 8450 Frequency, MHz -Only Mars Express and Odyssey have been assigned a frequency channel -The center frequency (downlink) of the n th channel is given by 8400.06 + (n-3)*1.36 MHz Odyssey(220ksps, ch.8) Mars07Landerr (7.2 ksps) Mars07Rover (7.2 ksps) Mars Scout Orbiter(9 ksps) ME(586 ksps, ch.18) CNES07Orbiter(60 ksps) Telesat( 360 ksps) Mars05( 4.4Msps, filtered) 9/22/09 Geldzahler 9

Spectrum: Polarization Combining 9/22/09 Geldzahler 10

Navigation Emphasis on precision landing Enhances all deep space navigation operations Currently; promise 5 nrad (=1 mas) accuracy Usually deliver 2 nrad Phoenix test with VLBA: Result 0.3 nrad; will get to 0.1 nrad (=20 µas) 9/22/09 Geldzahler 11

Navigation: VLBA Overview 10 antennas, baselines from a few hundred to 8,000 km X-band (8.4 GHz) installed, X/Ka (8/33 GHz) possible Routine dynamic observing Astrometric accuracy 10-100 _as (tens of m at Mars) Demonstrated s/c capability w/ Cassini, Mars missions Current multi-s/c demos w/ Phoenix & Mars orbiters 9/22/09 Geldzahler 12

Navigation: VLBA Benefits for Spacecraft Nav. 1. Establish and maintain inertial reference frame 2. Build dense Ka band quasar catalog on ecliptic Critical for Ka band accuracy Requires substantial observing time Monitor quasars within ~1 degree of trajectory 3. Routine access to negative declinations 4. Navigation possible without stopping telemetry (due to short/long baseline mix) 5. Reduced risk from switching transmission modes on spacecraft 6. Low operations cost 9/22/09 Geldzahler 13

Navigation: Phoenix Odyssey Mars MRO Absolute nav precision: 2-5 nrad today DSN Level 1 s call for 0.1 nrad in 2020 Phoenix _ (orbiters Phoenix) = 0.3 nrad = 60 _as =50 m on approach; better accuracy in same field of view Field of View: 6 arcminutes 9/22/09 Geldzahler 14

Navigation: Cassini test DSN is also charged with determining and maintaining the planetary ephemeredes. Currently, there is no tie of the outer planets to the quasar reference frame. Rectifying using Cassini as a target source for VLBA observations begun in 2006 Results: accuracy, better than 10 µas for 3 of 6 epochs; 0.05 nrad = 2 orders of magnitude better than current capabilities This corresponds to 70m at Saturn 9/22/09 Geldzahler 15

Navigation: Future NASA, NSF, and USNO are entering into an agreement to use the VLBA on a routine basis for spacecraft navigation, the inertial reference frame, and Earth orientation parameters Start date: FY2011 9/22/09 Geldzahler 16

Summary Deep Space Navigation capabilities are improving dramatically Deep Space Downlink Rates are poised to increase modestly, ~10x, over the next decade COULD increase orders of magnitude more with infused technology Deep Space Uplink Rates likely to remain at 2 kbps for the decade COULD increase orders of magnitude 9/22/09 Geldzahler 17

Backup: Cassini Expt Data plot of the measured separation of Cassini - quasar J1112+0724, made with the VLBA at 8 GHz. The observations were made on Feb 9, 10, 11/09. Each obs was 6 hours long and a position was determined every two hours, three on each day. The Cassini-source separation varied from 2' to 5! so all were in-beam on all days. The solid line shows the linear fit of the separation on Feb 9 and 11. This is caused by a very small offset in the assu Cassini orbit. The slight offset of the positions on Feb 10 from the l are caused by the gravitational bending by Saturn of quasar when it passed 1.3! away. This is the effect we wanted to measure. The offset we measured agrees with GR. Einstein is always correct. The average slope implies a residual drift of Cassini o about 5 millimeters/sec from the orbit we were given. The scatter in the position offset when you remove th slope and the gravitational effects are about 0.008 mas = 60 meters at Saturn. 9/22/09 Geldzahler 18