FORT WORTH DISTRICT. SH 360 Corridor Noise Workshop Andy Kissig, P.E.

Similar documents
Appendix B: Noise Study

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

APPENDIX D Noise Analysis

Appendix D. Traffic Noise Analysis Report. I-94 St. Michael to Albertville Minnesota Department of Transportation

APPENDIX Q MSP 2020 Improvements EA Traffic Noise Proposed Roadway Improvements Memorandum

Traffic Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Technical Report for the North Meadows Extension to US 85 and Interstate 25

Study Description. November 29, Overpass Road Alternatives Public Workshop

Virginia Avenue Tunnel (VAT) Reconstruction Noise Analysis Approach

Noise Abatement Design Study Report Dulles Loop Project (Route 606 and Loudoun County Parkway) UPC 97529

Noise Study Report. Addendum. Interstate 10 Corridor Project. In the Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

Noise Impact Analysis. NW Bethany Boulevard Improvement Project NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. November Washington County.

Noise walls Some Noise Facts

FARM TO MARKET 1103 OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC MEETING. FM 1103 I-35 to Rodeo Dr

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 375 FRONTAGE ROADS RECONFIGURATION FROM FM 76 (NORTH LOOP DRIVE) TO ZARAGOZA PORT OF ENTRY CSJ: EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS

Theme, Guidelines and Selection Criteria for the 2019 Metropolitan Student Art Calendar Contest

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) APPENDIX K Parallel Barriers

ipad Nintendo 3DS Mini ipad

Effectiveness of Traffic Noise Barrier on I 471 in Campbell County, Kentucky (Interim Report)

Session 8 Traffic Noise Modeling: Best Practices for Modeling and Review of Models

APPENDIX M NOISE ANALYSIS

Environmental Noise Assessment Pa ia Relief Route Project Pa ia, Maui County, Hawaii

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

Q. Will prevailing winds and wind speeds be taken into account in the noise study?

PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY. Noise Study Report. SR 30 (US 98) From 17th Avenue To Baybridge Drive

SITE PLAN, SUBDIVISION & EXTERIOR DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS

Charlton/Oxford Route 20 Reconstruction Project

The Influence of Quieter Pavement & Absorptive Barriers on US 101 in Marin County

DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City of El Segundo. APPLICATION FOR AN AMPLIFIED SOUND OR NOISE PERMIT ESMC SECTION Amplified Sound/Noise Permit No:

Planning and Zoning Application & Checklist

City of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet

Oakland International Airport Master Plan Update

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM)

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) APPENDIX L Tunnel Openings

City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY

Public School Facilities Element

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

PUBLICATION 213. Think Safety First

PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT

MINUTES OF MEETING BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 1, :00 A.M.

Item 2. September 28, 2017

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

King Mill Lambert DRI# 2035 Henry County, Georgia

EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Wednesday, December 6, 2017

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics acoustical study for the City of St. Petersburg.

CITY OF PINE CITY SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES

I-20 East Texas Corridor Implementation Plan DALLAS DISTRICT Updated May Install cable barrier system in median

SITE PLAN APPLICATION

USING THE RAILWAY NOISE MODEL (RWNM) FOR DETAILED NOISE ANALYSES AT SOME INTERESTING RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

ON USING PERFECT SIGNAL PROGRESSION AS THE BASIS FOR ARTERIAL DESIGN: A NEW PERSPECTIVE

LA RAMBLA INTERNATIONAL POTTERY AND CERAMICS CONTESTS 7-15 AUGUST 2017 (EXHIBITION)

2.8 NOISE. Chapter IX 2. Comments and Responses CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Comment

CALGARY SOUTHEAST STONEY TRAIL Detailed Design 17th Avenue SE to Macleod Trail South (Hwy 2A) Calgary, Alberta

SOUTHWEST ANTHONY HENDAY DRIVE NOISE STUDY OPEN HOUSE WHAT WE HEARD REPORT ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION

Moorhead / Dilworth Fixed Route Expansion Study

CHAPTER 26 SITE PLAN REVIEW

# Insite RE Inc./ Verizon Wireless Special Use Permit Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Performance of Roadside Sound Barriers with Sound Absorbing Edges

MINUTES MALIBU PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 23, 2018 MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM 3:30 F.M.

Examen de Certificación B1 Examen Escrito. Información para candidatos. 1ª Parte: 2ª Parte: Destreza: Expresión escrita. Duración: 60 minutos

WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV

Problems with TNM 3.0

FREMONT COUNTY. APPLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE #2 USE DESIGNATION PLAN (Requires Subsequent Approval of ZC #2 Final Designation Plan) 1.

Increasing Pace of Utility Accommodations

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT OFFICE 3966 Archer Pkwy Cheyenne, WY Phone (307) Fax (307)

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS, ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION BASE SITES APPLICATION

GUIDELINES AND MINIMUM ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF PARKING MANAGEMENT PLANS (PMP) ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT (ACG)

CHAPTER 14: TRAFFIC SIGNAL STANDARDS Introduction and Goals Administration Standards Standard Attachments 14.

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY

Literature Reading math stories reinforces ideas. Look for these books at the library.

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN THE HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT

Exit 61 I-90 Interchange Modification Justification Study

INTENT An Administrative Site Plan is required for the following situations, excluding single-family detached development:

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

PROJECT NARRATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS

CONCEPT REVIEW GUIDELINES

CTA Blue Line Forest Park Branch Feasibility/Vision Study

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JANUARY 27, 2014 FEBRUARY 2, 2014)

San Antonio Wrong Way Driver Initiative

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

CITY OF LOVELAND VISUAL ARTS COMMISSION ACQUISITION POLICY

Dear Family, Literature Reading math stories reinforces ideas. Look for these books at the library.

TERRESTRIAL S Noise Barriers

Use Strategies and Properties to Add and Subtract

Last Name: First Name: M.I:

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF APRIL 29, 2013 MAY 05, 2013)

SECTION EDITION - REVISION 2. Large Guide

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JUNE 30, 2014 JULY 06, 2014)

Transcription:

Note: Only adjacent property owners may submit a ballot to vote on the proposed noise barrier. FORT WORTH DISTRICT SH 360 Corridor Noise Workshop Andy Kissig, P.E. November 10, 2016

What is the Purpose of this Workshop? Provide overview of Traffic Noise Analysis Present the potential noise barrier location, dimensions, and aesthetic elements 2

SH 360 Proposed Construction Project Environmental clearance received in February 2007 Reconstruct to four main lanes each direction at East Abram Street Widen to four main lanes each direction from Mitchell Street to Green Oaks Boulevard Existing frontage roads to remain Five proposed noise barriers 3

Traffic Noise Analysis FHWA regulation on highway traffic noise requires that we conduct noise studies when: Utilizing federal funds Adding capacity on existing highways TxDOT guidelines (FHWA approved) utilized to perform this analysis. The most current Traffic Noise Model is the software that models the existing and future roadway. The purpose of our noise study is to learn whether the SH 360 Project traffic noise will have an impact on nearby outdoor areas frequently used by people. 4

Highway Traffic Noise Produced from tires, engines, and mufflers of cars and trucks. Measured either by a sound meter or predicted by computer program. Depends on the number and speed of vehicles, the terrain, and the distance between the highway (source) and listener (receiver). Source >>>Propagation Path>>>Receiver 5

Traffic Noise Impacts Measured in decibels (db) Not all sound can be heard by the human ear. When sound levels are measured, sound meters adjust the high/low frequencies of traffic noise to match the way an average person hears it. This adjustment is called A-weighting (db(a)). Traffic noise levels are never constant due to the changing number, type and speed of vehicles. A single value is used to represent the average or equivalent sound level or Leq. FHWA has established Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) to determine possible traffic noise impacts on various activity areas. db(a) (Leq) 57 A 67 B Residential 67 C NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA (NAC) Activity Area Category Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public need and where preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose Active sport areas, amphitheaters, auditoriums, campgrounds, cemeteries, daycare centers, hospitals, libraries, medical facilities, parks, picnic areas, places of worship, playgrounds, public meeting rooms, public or nonprofit institutional structures, radio studios, recording studios, recreation areas, Section 4(f) sites, schools, television studios, trails, and trail crossings TxDOT decides that an impact occurs when predicted noise levels are: 1 db(a) below, equal to, or above the NAC criteria for a specific activity area OR More than 10 db(a) higher than the existing levels at any activity area. In either of the above condition, noise abatement must be considered. 6

What Does 67 db(a) Sound Like? Sources db(a) Rock Band 110 Leaf Blower 100 Food Blender 90 Police Whistle 80 Vacuum Cleaner 70 Conversation at 3-ft to 5-ft 60 Refrigerator 50 Library 40 67 db(a) 7

Our Noise Study Does What? Identifies land use and activity areas that may be impacted by highway traffic noise. Determines existing noise levels. Predicts noise levels 20 years in the future for No- Build and Build Alternatives. Examines and evaluates ways to reduce noise impacts (abatement measures). 8

Noise Abatement Consideration Noise abatement refers to the positive action taken to reduce the impact of noise from highway traffic on an activity area. Noise abatement on this project: Noise Barriers Noise Barriers evaluated to determine if they are feasible and reasonable. Photos taken from FHWA Keeping the Noise Down Guidebook 9

How Noise Barriers Work A Diffraction B C A + B > C = Longer Path Length 10

When Noise Barriers are MORE Effective 200 ft -5 Source Within TxDOT ROW Receiver -5 Source Within TxDOT ROW Receiver 11

Feasibility Requirements Can the noise barrier: Provide a minimum of 5 db(a) reduction in noise levels at the majority of impacted sites? Be constructed at the appropriate location? Would noise barrier: Create a safety issue? Restrict access for vehicular and pedestrian movement? Be inaccessible for maintenance? Impact utilities, drainage? Affect historic properties? -4-5 -4-5 -5-5 -5-7???????????????????????????????? Noise Barrier?????????????????????????????? 12

Reasonableness Requirements Cost/benefit analysis where total cost of noise barrier is $25,000 (or less) per benefitted receiver. Noise reduction design goal where at least one first row receiver (residence) achieves at least a 7 dba reduction in noise. -7 Cost for each Benefitted Receiver Opinion of the benefitted receiver(s) where the final decision to construct noise barrier or not is by a simple majority vote. 13

Reasonable and Feasible Cost for each Benefited Receiver -5-5 -7-5 -5-5 = Total Cost # Benefited??????????????????????????????????????????????????? Noise Barrier???????????????????????????????????????????????????? 144

Traffic Noise Analysis for Noise Barrier 2 Near your neighborhood, existing sound levels estimated to be 72-75 db(a) and year 2025 levels predicted as 75 76 db(a). A noise barrier including two segments for a total length of 3,500 feet and ranging in height from 6 to 14 feet is recommended to reduce levels by approximately 8 10 db(a). The noise barrier was determined to be reasonable and feasible for implementation based upon an analysis that considered all individual segments as one barrier. Through this type of analysis, all segments of the barrier would or would not be constructed through a majority vote, greater than 50%, by ballot of all adjacent property owners. 15

Proposed Noise Barrier 2 Location Map 16

Noise Barrier Aesthetics Roadway Side Residential Side *These are photographs of a similar aesthetic treatment on an existing noise barrier. Actual aesthetic treatment may vary. 17

Noise Barrier Aesthetics The aesthetic style was coordinated between TxDOT project engineers and the City of Arlington and City of Grand Prairie. TxDOT would maintain the noise barrier. 18

Ballot Deadline Ballots must be postmarked by: November 25, 2016 What Happens After November 25, 2016? Tally up the votes received. If approved by majority vote, the noise barrier would be planned for construction as part of the SH 360 Project expected to be awarded for construction in 2020. 19

Questions? For Questions or Concerns After This Workshop Please Contact: Andy Kissig, P.E. at 817-370-6599 http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/projects/studies/fort-worth/sh-360.html Note: Noise barrier ballot included on website is for adjacent property owners only. 20

Noise Barrier Ballot SH 360 from E. Abram Street to Green Oaks Boulevard Tarrant County, Texas CSJ: 2266-02-086 A Noise Workshop will be held on 11/10/2016 As part of the State Highway (SH) 360 widening project the proposes to construct a noise barrier (Noise Barrier 2), ranging in height from 6 to 14 feet, between the southbound main lanes and frontage road adjacent to your property. The existing frontage road would remain. The proposed noise barrier would not be constructed without the approval, by majority vote, of the adjacent property owners. 1. Property Owner Address City, State Zip Code 2. If the person listed in Item 1 is not the current property owner, please provide current property owner information here: Full Name (please print): Mailing Address: City, state, zip code: 3. Are you for or against the construction of the proposed noise barrier? Only one vote is allowed for each adjacent property to the proposed noise barrier. For Against COMMENTS /CONCERN: (Please Print) Signature (required): Telephone no.: Date: If possible, please bring your completed and signed ballot to the Noise Workshop. If you are not able to attend the Noise Workshop, please send your completed and signed ballot to: Brian Barth, P.E., TxDOT, 2501 S.W. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas, 76133. (Ballot must be postmarked no later than 11/25/2016) Adjacent property owners will be notified of the results of the vote for or against the proposed noise barrier after all ballots have been received and counted.

Balota de Votacion para la Barrera de Ruido SH 360 desde E. Abram Street hasta Green Oaks Boulevard Tarrant County, Texas CSJ: 2266-02-086 Un Taller de Ruido se realizara 11/10/2016 Como parte del proyecto de ampliación de la carretera del estado (SH) 360, el Departamento de Transporte de Texas propone construir una barrera de ruido (barrera de ruido 2), que varía en altura de 6 a 14 pies, entre las carretera principal hacia el sur y la carretera de servicio adyacente a su propiedad. La carretera de servicio existente se mantendría. La barrera de ruido propuesta no se construirá sin la aprobación, por mayoría de votos de los propietarios adyacentes. 1. Nombre Completo Direccion postal Ciudad, Estado, Codigo postal 2. Si la persona listada en el Articulo 1 no es el propietario actual, favor de proveer la informacion del dueňo actual aqui: Nombre Completo: Direccion postal: Ciudad, Estado, Codigo postal: 3. Esta usted a favor o en contra de la barrera de ruido en propuesta? Solo un voto es permitido por cada propiedad adyacente a la barrera de ruido en propuesta. A Favor En Contra COMMENTARIOS/PREOCUPACIONES: (Favor Use Letra Imprenta) Firma (obligatorio): Numero de telefonono.: Fecha: Si es posible, favor de traer su boleta completada y firmada a el taller de ruido. Si no es capaz de asistir al taller de ruido, por favor, envíe su bolete completada y firmada a: Brian Barth, P.E., TxDOT, 2501 S.W. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas, 76133. (Boleta se debe matasellar a no más tardar el 12/21/2016) Los dueños de las propiedades adyacentes serán notificados de los resultados de la votación a favor o contra de la barrera de ruido propuesta después que todas las boletas hayan sido recibidas y contadas.