National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Phone: 617-770-3000 Fax: 617-770-0700 www.nfpa.org MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Technical Committee on Fire Prevention Organization and Deployment Elena Carroll, Project Administrator DATE: December 20, 2016 SUBJECT: NFPA 1730 First Draft Technical Committee FINAL Ballot Results (A2018 Cycle) According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary affirmative votes to pass ballot. 31 Members Eligible to Vote 6 Members Not Returned (Bodnar, Chesser, Forster, Hormann, Jessop, Lynam) The attached report shows the number of affirmative, negative, and abstaining votes as well as the explanation of the vote for each revision. To pass ballot, each revision requires: (1) a simple majority of those eligible to vote and (2) an affirmative vote of 2 /3 of ballots returned. See Sections 3.3.4.3.(c) and 4.4.10.1 of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards.
1 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 1-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Section No. 4.3.4 ] 4.3.4 The MIS shall maintain provide a history means of services delivered and measuring performance outcomes as measured against goals and trends for each area established through the organizational statement. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 30 13:06:22 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The TC agrees in part with the submitter and modified text for clarification. The TC also considered PI 7 when making the revisions. Public Input No. 8-NFPA 1730-2016 [Section No. 4.3.4] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 23 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D.
2 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M. Cooper, Kwame Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Dawson, Jr., James R. I agree with the proposed change, however I believe it is incomplete. These systems should also capture process and impact measures identified in the CRR Plan as well as the outcome measures. Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree
3 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 8-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Section No. 4.9 ] 4.9 Authority Having Jurisdiction. The AHJ shall develop, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with this standard. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Chelsea Tuttle Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Sep 30 15:26:23 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Adding title to comply with MOS Response Message: Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M. Cooper, Kwame
4 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Dawson, Jr., James R. Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree
5 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 2-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Section No. 6.7 ] 6.7 Minimum Inspection Frequency. Existing occupancy fire prevention inspection and code enforcement inspection frequencies shall be not less than those specified in Table 6.7. Table 6.7 Minimum Inspection Frequency Occupancy Risk Classification High Moderate Low Critical infrastructure Frequency Annually Biennially Triennially Per AHJ 6.7.1 The AHJ shall perform a community risk assessment to establish minimum inspection frequencies. 6.7.2* In the absence of a community risk assessment, existing occupancy fire prevention inspection and code enforcement inspection frequencies shall be not less than those specified in Table 6.7.2. Table 6.7.2 Minimum Inspection Frequency High Moderate Low Critical infrastructure Occupancy Risk Classification Frequency Annually Biennially Triennially Per AHJ Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 30 13:18:28 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The minimum inspection frequencies provided by Table 6.7 are intended to be used in those instances when a Community Risk Assessment has not been performed. As currently written, the language establishes minimum frequencies that may be contrary to what is actually found to be necessary after performing a CRA. The additional language clarifies the intent of this section to provide a minimum in the absence of a CRA. Additionally, annex material from 6.7 is moved to 6.7.2 for clarity.
6 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Public Input No. 17-NFPA 1730-2016 [Section No. 6.7] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M. Cooper, Kwame Dawson, Jr., James R. Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D.
7 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree
8 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 3-NFPA 1730-2016 [ New Section after 9.11 ] 9.11.8 Wildfire Safety Educational Programs. 9.11.8.1 Educational programs for wildfire prevention and preparedness shall be developed based on the CRR plan developed in accordance with Chapter 5. 9.11.8.2 Educational programs under this chapter shall be developed for residents and visitors of communities within wildland urban interface areas. 9.11.8.3 Educational programs shall cover relevant topics, including, but not limited to, wildfire prevention, defensible space, home hardening, emergency planning, and evacuations. 9.11.8.4 Wildfire cause data shall be analyzed periodically and used to develop key educational messages for the public. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 30 13:21:57 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: The TC recognizes the need to include Wildfire Safety Educational Programs. Response Message: Public Input No. 4-NFPA 1730-2016 [New Section after 9.11] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Bodnar, Michael
9 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M. Cooper, Kwame Dawson, Jr., James R. Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree
10 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 7-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Sections A.3.3.1, A.3.3.3.1, A.3.3.3.2, A.3.3.3.3 ] A.3.3.1 Critical Infrastructure. Examples of critical infrastructures are could include water treatment plant, special structures, public safety buildings, and power plants. A.3.3.3.1 High-Risk Occupancy. Examples of high-risk occupancies are apartment could include multiple-family dwellings, high-rise buildings, hotels, dormitories, lodging and rooming, assembly, child care, detention, educational, and health care, and industrial. A.3.3.3.2 Low-Risk Occupancy. Examples of low-risk occupancies are could include storage, mercantile, and business. A.3.3.3.3 Moderate-Risk Occupancy. Examples of moderate-risk occupancies are could include ambulatory health care, and industrial occupancies that do not maintain, store, use, or handle hazardous materials in excess of exempt amounts. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 30 13:35:53 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: The TC believes that clarification of some of the examples. Response Message: Public Input No. 16-NFPA 1730-2016 [Section No. A.3.3.3.1] Public Input No. 15-NFPA 1730-2016 [Section No. A.3.3.3.3] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 22 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned
11 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cooper, Kwame Dawson, Jr., James R. Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Cockerill, Lisa M. Spelling error on A.3.3.3.1 'high-raise buildings' should read 'high buildings' or 'highrise buildings'. Pietzak, Gene J. Section A.3.3.3.1 High Risk Occupancies - Correct High Raise to read High Rise Negative with Comment Moore-Merrell, Lori L. This section should match the hazard levels of the NFPA handbook.
12 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 6-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Section No. A.5.3.3 ] A.5.3.3 The demographic profile describes the composition of the community s population using various categories such as age, gender, cultural backgrounds, language barriers, educational attainment, socioeconomic makeup, transient populations, and other considerations specific to a local community. The geographic profile describes the physical features of the community. Consider the nature and placement of features such as waterways, highways, canyons, railroads, wildland-urban interface, landforms, and bridges. The building stock profile describes the various occupancy classification types and number of buildings, including mixed occupancies, in the community to classify their hazard risk category. The fire profile describes the community s fire experience and trends and how the community s experience compares to statewide and national trends. Data on fire deaths, injuries, cause, and dollar loss are important components of a fire profile. State and national statistics can assist in providing data. The response profile describes the types of emergencies to which the organization responds. The hazard profile describes the natural, human-caused, and technological hazards. This also includes the organization s resources available for response and their performance. The economic profile describes the economic sectors affecting the community that are critical to its financial sustainability. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 30 13:30:49 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The TC recognizes that there is a need to consider a performance based on resource capacity. Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 23 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention
13 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Not Returned Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M. Cooper, Kwame Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree Negative with Comment Dawson, Jr., James R. This additional language should be part of the previous item, "response profile" as it is pointing out the response performance of the organization and not the types of hazards related to the community.
14 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 4-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Section No. A.8.5.2 ] A.8.5.2 At a minimum, the investigator should have and maintain an up-to-date basic knowledge of the following topics at a postsecondary education level as set forth in NFPA 1033: (1) Fire science (2) Fire chemistry (3) Thermodynamics (4) Thermometry (5) Fire dynamics (6) Explosion dynamics (7) Computer fire modeling (8) Fire investigation (9) Fire analysis (10) Fire investigation methodology (11) Fire investigation technology (12) Hazardous materials (13) Failure analysis and analytical tools (14) Fire protection systems (15) Evidence documentation, collection, and preservation (16) Electricity and electrical systems Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 30 13:26:13 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: A.8.5.2- Increase the number of topics the fire investigator needs to have an understanding of from 13 to 16 to reflect the number in the 2014 edition of 1033 (1033, 2014 edition 1.3.7) Public Input No. 5-NFPA 1730-2016 [Section No. A.8.5.2] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot
15 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M. Cooper, Kwame Dawson, Jr., James R. Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment
16 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree
17 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 5-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Section No. A.8.7.5.1 ] A.8.7.5.1 To be effective, fire and explosion investigation and analysis must be conducted in a systematic manner. The systematic approach recommended for fire investigation, as contained in NFPA 921, is that set forth in the scientific method, as follows: (1) Recognize the Need. First, it should be determined that a problem exists. In this case, a fire or explosion has occurred and the cause should be determined and listed so that future, similar incidents can be prevented. (2) Define the Problem. Having determined that a problem exists, the investigator or analyst should define the manner in which the problem can be solved. In this case, a proper origin and cause investigation should be conducted. This is done by an examination of the scene and by a combination of other data collection methods, such as the review of previously conducted investigations of the incident, the interviewing of witnesses or other knowledgeable persons, and the results of scientific testing. (3) Collect Data. Facts about the fire incident are collected by observation, experiment, or other direct data-gathering means. The data collected are called empirical data because they are based on observation or experience and are capable of being verified or are known to be true. (4) Analyze the Data (Inductive Reasoning). The scientific method requires that all data collected be analyzed. This is an essential step that must take place before the formation of the final hypothesis. The identification, gathering, and cataloging of data do not equate to data analysis. Analysis of the data is based on the knowledge, training, experience, and expertise of the individual doing the analysis. If the investigator lacks expertise to properly attribute meaning to a piece of data, then assistance should be sought. Understanding the meaning of the data will enable the investigator to form hypotheses based on the evidence rather than on speculation. (5) Develop a Hypothesis. Based upon the data analysis, the investigator produces a hypothesis or group of hypotheses. The hypothesis must be based solely on the empirical data that the investigator has collected. (6) Test the Hypothesis (Deductive Reasoning). To be valid, a hypothesis must be able to stand the test of careful and serious challenge. Testing of the hypothesis is done by the principle of deductive reasoning, in which the investigator compares his or her hypothesis to all the known facts as well as the body of scientific knowledge associated with the phenomena relevant to the specific incident. A hypothesis can be tested either physically, by conducting experiments, or analytically, by applying scientific principles in thought experiments. When relying on experiments or research of others, the investigator must ensure that the conditions and circumstances are sufficiently similar. When the investigator relies on previously conducted research, references to the research relied upon should be noted. If the hypothesis cannot be supported, it should be discarded and alternative hypotheses should be developed and tested. This can include the collection of new data or the re-analysis of existing data. The testing process needs to be continued until all feasible hypotheses have been tested and one is determined to be uniquely consistent with the facts and with the principles of science. If no hypothesis can withstand an examination by deductive reasoning, the issue should be considered undetermined. (7) Select Final Hypothesis. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City:
18 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 30 13:27:45 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The TC added 7th step to the scientific method, "(7) Select final hypothesis" to reflect the scientific method in NFPA 921. Public Input No. 6-NFPA 1730-2016 [Section No. A.8.7.5.1] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M. Cooper, Kwame Dawson, Jr., James R. Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G.
19 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree
20 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM First Revision No. 9-NFPA 1730-2016 [ Section No. C.1 ] C.1 Five-Step Process. This annex shows a sample of the five-step process outlined in A.4.7.1. It has been filled out using a fictitious FPO so the user can see how all the steps and activities are compiled into a single staffing exercise. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Chelsea Tuttle Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Sep 30 15:34:27 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Added title to comply with MOS Response Message: Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 31 Eligible Voters 6 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Bodnar, Michael Chesser, Gregory D. Forster, Connie Hormann, Randall Jessop, Jim Lynam, David D. Affirmative All Bowman, Jr., William F. Cockerill, Lisa M.
21 of 21 12/20/2016 1:43 PM Cooper, Kwame Dawson, Jr., James R. Farr, Ronald R. Gibson, IV, Hugh H. Jacobowitz, David King, Martin M. Knisely, Tim Lacey, Brett T. Larsen, Michael Minaker, Randy P. Munger, James G. Pennington, Colleen Pietzak, Gene J. Santelli, Guy J. Sawyer, Derrick Sawyers, Kellie J. Schofield, A. Lynn Shaw, Arthur Sunderhaus, Marcina J. Valdez, Anthony D. Willhite, Larry T. Yahnke, Morgana Affirmative with Comment Moore-Merrell, Lori L. agree