AERIAL SURVEY OF BIRDS AT MONO LAKE ON AUGUST 24, 1973

Similar documents
2008 San Francisco Bay Shorebird Census

DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SEA DUCKS AND DIVING DUCKS ON LAKE ST. CLAIR AND W. LAKE ERIE

Alvord Lake BCS number: 48-2

THE SHOREBIRDS OF MONTEZUMA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sauvie Island Wildlife Area BCS number: 47-28

Tualatin River NWR and Wapato Lake BCS number: 47-37

Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

POPULATION SIZE AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF CALIFORNIA GULLS AT MONO LAKE, CALIFORNIA, IN 1995, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE NEGIT ISLETS

2016 WATERFOWL BREEDING POPULATION SURVEY MINNESOTA

River s End Ranch BCS number: 48-21

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

44. MARINE WILDLIFE Introduction Results and Discussion. Marine Wildlife Cook Inlet

Warner Wetlands / Warner Valley BCS number: 48-31

2018 WATERFOWL BREEDING POPULATION SURVEY, MINNESOTA

May 25, 2005 Forum Meeting

Species: Birds (seabirds, shorebirds, waterfowl, raptors, passerines) and marine mammals

IBA Monitoring Guide

Summaries of Sub-regional Trends in Density Indices PROCEEDINGS 1

Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-16

Grassland Bird Survey Protocol Sauvie Island Wildlife Area

Fall 2001 Whooping Crane Migrational Survey Protocol Implementation Report

McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19

Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible

Upper Klamath National Wildlife Refuge Complex Upper Klamath Unit and Hank s Marsh Unit BCS Number: 48-29

A volunteer-based program for the study of international migrations of shorebirds in the Western Hemisphere

5.3 Developing Spatially-Explicit Models to Guide Conservation of Diving Ducks During Migration

Minnesota Loon Monitoring Program

AERIAL SURVEY OF EMPEROR GEESE AND OTHER WATERBIRDS SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA, FALL 2003

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

HERON AND EGRET MONITORING RESULTS AT WEST MARIN ISLAND: 2003 NESTING SEASON

Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-4

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

Fall Trumpeter Swan Survey of the High Plains Flock

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery

POPULATION SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION OF BLUE, GREY CROWNED AND WATTLED CRANE IN KWAZULU-NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA, DETERMINED BY AN AERIAL SURVEY DURING

Digital Aerial Baseline Surveys of Marine Wildlife

News from the Everglades A Weekly Update from Everglades Imagery

Teacher. Description By competing in math/science and physical activities, student will learn that shorebirds have incredible physical abilities.

Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve BCS Number: 47-14

BALD EAGLE NIGHT ROOST SURVEYS

Migration Math N79. Theme: Natural History. Author: Loris J. Chen Teacher, North Arlington Middle School. Subject Areas Science, Math

Tahkenitch Creek Estuary BCS number: 47-35

Paulina Marsh BCS number: 48-20

SHOREBIRDS! Brief Background. World Travelers 11/6/2016

Facts about the DuPont Nature Center at Mispillion Harbor Reserve

Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2017

OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION TO SHOREBIRDS MANAGEMENT FOR SHOREBIRDS TVA REGIONAL SHOREBIRD PROJECT ESTIMATING SHOREBIRD NUMBERS

Marine Mammal and Seabird Surveys

Chaumont Bay SLELO-PRISM Water Chestnut & Hydrilla Surveillance 2012

large group of moving shorebirds (or other organism).

BOHAI UPDATE #4 MAY 22 nd 2017

MIGRATORY SHOREBIRD POPULATIONS ON THE COPPER RIVER DELTA AND EASTERN PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA

YUKON DELTA ALASKA HELICOPTER/FIXED WING COMPARATIVE WATERFOWL BREEDING POPULATION SURVEY. Progress Report III

THE USE OF ACOUSTIC TRANSECTS TO DOCUMENT CHANGES IN BAT DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE. Eric R. Britzke & Carl Herzog

Wood Stork Nesting Population Survey Results 2016 and Radio-tracking Dice

Fall Trumpeter Swan Survey of the High Plains Flock

Malheur National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-18

Catalog of Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture GIS Data March 2009 Version 1

LOON FLOATING NEST PLATFORMS 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

1. Monitoring Breeding Colonial Waterbirds in the U.S. Great Lakes Francie Cuthbert, University of Minnesota

Bolsa Chica Birds Survey

Siuslaw River Estuary BCS number 47-32

Alberta Conservation Association 2011/12 Project Summary Report

A Rising Tide: Conserving Shorebirds and Shorebird Habitat within the Columbia River Estuary

Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2015

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Waterbird Migration, Breeding, and Habitat Use Study Plan Section 10.15

The Adirondack Tremolo

TERNS TRACKING. Sitting in a blind within a colony of over 5,000 common terns is

Objectives: 1. Assess the feasibility of using high spatial resolution image data for counting male Common Eiders.

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. January 3-6, 2018

Training Resources for Citizen Scientists: Estimating Shorebird Flock Sizes

Lesser Sandhill Cranes, Annual Summary Homer, Alaska, Summer By Kachemak Crane Watch

POPULAT A ION DYNAMICS

Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area BCS Number: 47-5

MIGRATION CYCLES (MODIFIED FOR ADEED)

the SLA and AIM Inc.

Figure 1. Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge Shorebird Survey Areas. (Adapted from Davis, 1982) THE KINGBIRD

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2014

Siletz Bay BCS number: 47-29

Humboldt Bay NWR BCS number: 86-4

Wildlife Inventory Plan Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Protocol #28. Version 1.2. Parameter: Populations

Erie County Van Trip. Pipe Creek Wildlife Area

The Role of Geology in Supporting Mono Lake s Ecosystem

Avinor Activities since last meeting, results from Risk analysis bird and wildlife control

"A Spectacle of Birds:

Autumnal migration of Eared Grebes (Podiceps nigricollis) through southwestern Wyoming: a key to assessing the size of the North American population

MICHIGAN NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY PHASE I FINAL REPORT

THE COMMON LOON. Population Status and Fall Migration in Minnesota MINNESOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION OCCASIONAL PAPERS: NUMBER 3

MLPA NCSR Baseline Seabird Nearshore Foraging and Feeding Flock Monitoring Protocol Point Blue Conservation Science

Wanaket Wildlife Area BCS number: 48-30

Memorandum. To: Heritage Wind, LLC. From: Justin Zoladz. Date: October 30, Re: 2017 Spring Migratory Raptor Survey Results

Smith River Mouth BCS number: 86-6

Atlantic. O n t h e. One of the best parts of fall is hearing the cacophony of honking,

Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project

How do you identify shorebirds?

Osprey Monitoring Guide

Protecting Beach-nesting Birds in Louisiana VOLUNTEER TRAINING

370 ACRES (304 Developable) Douglas Lake Newport, TN Huff Hollow $5,995,000

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2012

Transcription:

AERIAL SURVEY OF BIRDS AT MONO LAKE ON AUGUST 24, 1973 by Ronald M. Jurek Special Wildlife Investigations Wildlife Management Branch California Department of Fish and Game September 1973 Jurek, R.M. 1973. Aerial survey of birds at Mono Lake on August 24, 1973. Calif. Dep. of Fish and Game, Wildlife Management Branch, Special Wildlife Investigations report. Sacramento, CA. 4 pp. + map.

AERIAL SURVEY OF BIRDS AT MONO LAKE Introduction An aerial survey of birds at Mono Lake was conducted on August 24, 1973 at about the peak of the fall migration season. Purposes of the flight were as follows: 1) to determine if aerial surveys are practicable in counting water birds, particularly eared grebes and phalaropes, on Mono Lake; 2) to compare aerial counts with sample ground counts; and 3) to determine distribution of each species in relation to habitat types and regions of the lake. Methods The main species under consideration were California gulls, eared grebes, American avocets, northern phalaropes and Wilson s phalaropes. Killdeer, waterfowl and other species were counted only incidentally; no effort was made to seek out and survey these species in habitats around the lake. The aerial survey was preceded by sample counts from the shore on August 23. Water birds were censused at the Mono Marina shorebird census site (S5 26 l) and at the South Boat Ramp site (S5-26 3) (Figure 1). These stations are part of the California Shorebird Survey network of census sites. Because of the lowering water level of the lake, the South Boat Ramp site cannot be as accurately censused now as in previous years. Thus, only half the site was surveyed for this study. The Mono Marina site encompasses O.64 km (0.4 mile) of shoreline and 26.3 hectares (65 acres) of water. Offshore in shallow water are boulder and tufa tower outcroppings. The area censused at the South Boat Ramp site includes 0.4 km (0.25 mile) of shoreline and 14.2 hectares (35 acres) of water. Numerous tufa towers are exposed along the shoreline. Both counts were conducted by Morris P. Anderson and Ronald M. Jurek using binoculars and a 20x spotting scope. The aerial survey was flown in the Department s Cessna 185, piloted by Bob Powers. The observers, Anderson and Jurek, recorded counts on tape recorders. During the flight there was no wind and the sky was clear. The survey began at 0811 and ended at 0934. Shoreline counts from the air were conducted along the perimeter of the lake and around the islands (Figure 1). Included in counts were birds on the shore and on the water out to a distance of 0.4 km (1/4 mile) from shorelines. This part of the survey was flown at an altitude of 300 feet and at a distance of approximately 0.2 km (1/8 mile) from the shorelines. A special aerial count of grebes and gulls on open water was conducted at the west end of the lake (Figure 1). Included were birds on open water beyond 0.2 km (1/8 mile) from shorelines. Transect lines totaled l4.5 km (9 miles). Observers counted birds out to a distance of 0.2 km (1/8 mile) on each side of transect lines. Since voice counts failed to be registered on one recorder, the census width was 0.2 km (1/8 mile). Total coverage was 2.91 sq. km (720 acres).

Results and Discussion Calculations from aerial counts indicate that approximately one half million water birds were on Mono Lake the morning of the count. Most of these were eared grebes. Along shorelines, 42,800 birds were counted (Table 1). Count figures for gulls and avocets are probably quite accurate, but those for phalaropes are undoubtedly too low. Because grebes dived as the plane approached, they could not be counted. Only a partial count was obtained around Paoha Island since voice counts were not registered on one tape recorder. Fortunately most of the birds around the island were included in the counts on the operative recorder. Probably only a couple hundred birds (gulls and phalaropes) were missed. TABLE 1 Aerial Counts of Birds Along Shorelines of Mono Lake, August 24, 1973 Area 1 Approximate Length of Shoreline Kilometers Miles California gull Species American avocet Phalaropes Southwest shore (A-B) 12.1 7.5 4,152 20 935 South shore (B-C) 10.5 6.5 3,915 509 245 East shore (C-D) 9.7 6.0 2,943 665 200 North shore (D-E) 16.9 10.5 4,988 10 446 Northwest shore (E-A) 9.7 6.0 11,950 1,383 3,517 Exposed lake bed 3.2 2.0 830 1,443 244 Islets - - 265-1,825 Negit Island 4.0 2.5 247-759 Paoha Island 9.7 6.0 800 2-509 2 Total 75.8 47.0 30,090 4,030 8,680 1 Refer to Figure 1. 2 Partial census. On the open water transect, 3,961 eared grebes and 199 California gulls were counted. Many more grebes were excluded from this total since those feeding underwater could not be seen by observers. Densities of visible birds were 1,361 grebes per sq. km (3521 per square mile) and 68 gulls per sq. km (177 per square mile). Excluding portions of the lake within 0.2 km (1/8 mile) of shoreline, there are approximately 181 sq. km (70 square miles) of open water at Mono Lake. The estimated populations on open water are 246,470 grebes (surface count only) and 12,390 gulls. 2

To arrive at a total grebe population, the percentage of birds underwater at any moment must be known. At Mono Marina two hours before the aerial survey, approximately 40 percent of the grebes were feeding underwater at any given moment. Assuming that the grebes counted on the aerial survey represented only 60 percent of those actually in the transect area, the total population of eared grebes on the lake was approximately 411,000. Approximately 42,500 California gulls were present at Mono Lake on count day. Most of these, about 71 percent, were near shorelines. Juveniles were very rare along the south and west shores. They were more common on the east and north shores and were particularly numerous around the islands. American avocets occurred mainly where there were tufa towers. Of the 3,905 avocets counted, approximately 68 percent were found on the shore east of Black Point and around a fairly recently exposed portion of the lake bed west of Negit Island. Phalaropes were found chiefly in areas with tufa towers and around the islets northeast of Negit Island. Phalaropes were easily counted if they were flying or were swimming in open water. However, those among tufa towers or wading along shorelines were not accurately censused. The total count of 8,680 phalaropes may be less than half the actual figure. From the air, observers were able to distinguish species of phalaropes only when the birds were flying. All phalaropes identified to species in open water areas were northern phalaropes. Nearer shore, where both Wilson s and northern phalaropes occur, species identification was not possible. Most of the phalaropes sighted were near land in the west half of the lake. Of those counted, 90 percent were around the islands and along the lake shore from Hot Springs to the area northeast of North Crater. Tufa tower habitat east of Black Point and the islets northeast of Negit Island were the main concentration areas where 62 percent of all phalaropes were observed. Other species recorded included a flock of 100 ruddy ducks near the lake shore north of Negit Island. Killdeer were sighted in small numbers around the lake, but they were difficult to census. Eight species of water birds were recorded at the two shoreline census sites (Table 2). Only for grebes and gulls can aerial and ground population data be compared. No attempt is made to compare the two survey methods with respect to avocet and phalarope populations. Survey comparisons would not be meaningful because avocets are quite rare at the two south shore sites and phalaropes were not accurately censused from the air. Combining counts at both ground survey sites, density of grebes was 2,743 birds per sq. km (7,104 per square mile) of lake surface. This is about twice the density estimated from the air: 1,361 grebes per sq. km (3,521 per square mile). Again, these are figures only for the number of grebes visible on the surface at any given moment. Density of gulls at ground stations was 428 birds per km (685 per mile) of shoreline. This density is close to that determined by aerial counts along shorelines: 398 gulls per km (640 per mile). Ronald M. Jurek Assistant Wildlife Manager Biologist 3-

TABLE 2 Ground Counts of Birds at Mono Lake, August 23, 1973 Number of Birds Species Mono Marina (S5-26-1) 1 South Boat Ramp (S5-26-3) 2 Killdeer 2 2 Least sandpiper - 20 Western sandpiper 7 - America avocet 2 2 Wilson s phalarope 100 40 Northern phalarope 600 - California gull 95 350 Eared grebe 800 310 Total 1,606 724 1 Wind: 10 m.p.h., sky: clear, time: 1350-1435 2 Wind: 15 m.p.h., sky: clear, time: 1545-1605 -4-