Advancing the Use of the Digital System Model Taxonomy

Similar documents
Models, Simulations, and Digital Engineering in Systems Engineering Restructure (Defense Acquisition University CLE011)

OSD Engineering Enterprise: Digital Engineering Initiatives

Digital Engineering. Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments OUSD(R&E)/Systems Engineering

Digital Engineering (DE) and Computational Research and Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments (CREATE)

Digital Engineering and Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS)

Digital Engineering. Phoenix Integration Conference Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments.

An Element of Digital Engineering Practice in Systems Acquisition

Digital Engineering Support to Mission Engineering

A Case Study to Examine Technical Data Relationships to the System Model Concept

Engineering Autonomy

The Drive for Innovation in Systems Engineering

DoD Engineering and Better Buying Power 3.0

DIGITAL ENGINEERING STRATEGY

Open Systems Architecture in DoD Acquisition: Opportunities and Challenges

RAPID FIELDING A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Engineered Resilient Systems NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 29, 2014

DoD Research and Engineering

DoD Modeling and Simulation Support to Acquisition

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 4 Systems Engineering Update: Overview Briefing

Challenges and Innovations in Digital Systems Engineering

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

AIR FORCE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT CENTER

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

A Systems Engineering Perspective on Innovation

DOD Technology Innovation & Transition

Strategic Guidance. Quest for agility, innovation, and affordability. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

Autonomy Test & Evaluation Verification & Validation (ATEVV) Challenge Area

Digital System Models: An Investigation of the Non-Technical Challenges and Research Needs

Future of New Capabilities

Department of Defense Independent Research & Development (IR&D) and the Defense Innovation Marketplace

Achieving the Systems Engineering Vision 2025

Engineered Resilient Systems DoD Science and Technology Priority

Update on R&M Engineering Activities: Rebuilding Military Readiness

Long-Term Strategy for DoD Trusted and Assured Microelectronics Needs

DoD Joint Federated Assurance Center (JFAC) Industry Outreach

The Role of the Communities of Interest (COIs) March 25, Dr. John Stubstad Director, Space & Sensor Systems, OASD (Research & Engineering)

The Role of CREATE TM -AV in Realization of the Digital Thread

Technology Transition Assessment in an Acquisition Risk Management Context

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS)

Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) requires the intelligence community. Threat Support Improvement. for DoD Acquisition Programs

Office of Naval Research Naval Science and Technology Exposition

Sparking a New Economy. Canada s Advanced Manufacturing Supercluster

DoDI and WSARA* Impacts on Early Systems Engineering

Policy Perspective: The Current and Proposed Security Framework

Are Rapid Fielding and Good Systems Engineering Mutually Exclusive?

Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO) Overview

Impact of Technology on Future Defense. F. L. Fernandez

DoD Information Enterprise Strategic Plan and Roadmap

DoD Electronics Priorities

Challenges and Opportunities in the Changing Science & Technology Landscape

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

Voluntary Education Program Readiness (Force Education & Training)

Trusted Microelectronic Investment Strategy

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

Software-Intensive Systems Producibility

Management of Toxic Materials in DoD: The Emerging Contaminants Program

A Review Of Technical Performance and Technology Maturity Approaches for Improved Developmental Test and Evaluation Assessment

Basic Research at the Department of Defense. University of Florida

Human Systems Integration (HSI) and DevOps

NASA Office of the Chief Technologist

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

Established via Executive Order in Help craft the future vision of learning science and tech

WSARA Impacts on Early Acquisition

Reducing Manufacturing Risk Manufacturing Readiness Levels

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT. Outcomes and Enablers

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #3: Improving the Integration and Synchronization of Science and Technology)

Frameworks for Assessing IT Systems Engineering Acquisition Issues and Proposed Approaches in Support of Public Law 111

Systems Engineering Initiatives for Verification, Validation and Accreditation of DoD Models and Simulations

SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS: IT S NOT JUST ABOUT THE ALGORITHMS

Model Based Systems Engineering

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE S: Microelectronics Technology Development and Support (DMEA) FY 2013 OCO

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

Future Technology Drivers and Creating Innovative Technology Cooperation

Preserving Technological Superiority

WFEO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENGINEERING FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY (WFEO-CEIT) STRATEGIC PLAN ( )

Ms. Lisa Sanders Director

Defense Innovation Day Unmanned Systems

Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities

Technology Roadmapping. Lesson 3

SERC Technical Plan: 2016 Update

Rapid Fielding A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Lesson 17: Science and Technology in the Acquisition Process

Our Corporate Strategy Digital

HARNESSING TECHNOLOGY

2017 AIR FORCE CORROSION CONFERENCE Corrosion Policy, Oversight, & Processes

Innovative Weapon Technology Solutions for the Current & Future Fight

Open Architecture Summit 2017 Industry Panel: Getting Everyone On Board

A New Way to Start Acquisition Programs

Dr. Cynthia Dion-Schwartz Acting Associate Director, SW and Embedded Systems, Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E)

OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET)

Commodity Management in the Department of Defense

Foundations Required for Novel Compute (FRANC) BAA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated: October 24, 2017

Proposed Curriculum Master of Science in Systems Engineering for The MITRE Corporation

Understanding DARPA - How to be Successful - Peter J. Delfyett CREOL, The College of Optics and Photonics

Trends in the Defense Industrial Base. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy

Developing S&T Strategy. Lesson 1

Advances in Hypersonic Test & Evaluation. Dr. Ed Kraft Associate Executive Director for Research Space Institute at Tullahoma

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs) In an S&T Environment

Transcription:

Advancing the Use of the Digital System Model Taxonomy Mrs. Philomena Phil Zimmerman Deputy Director, Engineering Tools & Environments Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering (ODASD(SE)) 19th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Springfield, VA October 26, 2016 Oct 26, 2016 Page-1

Background Background Steady erosion of advanced technical superiority, capability and capacity Growth in system complexity and unacceptable risks Cost overruns, reduced buying power and delayed deliveries of capability to the warfighter Better Buying Power 3.0 Dominant capabilities through innovation, technical excellence & quality Improve efficiency, productivity and military capabilities SECDEF Third Offset Strategy Extend US competitive technological and operational advantage Focus on becoming more efficient in development and fielding of new capabilities Accelerate timelines and out-innovate our adversaries Engineering Enterprise must address new threats to our national security and strengthen the technological superiority of our military Oct 26, 2016 Page-2

Digital Engineering Overview Current State Linear acquisition process that lacks agility and resiliency Our workforce uses stove-piped infrastructure, environments, and data sources in isolation to support various activities throughout the life-cycle Communication, collaboration, and decisions are through static disconnected documents and subject to interpretation Current practices can t keep pace with innovation and technology advancements Future State Digital Engineering ecosystem moves the engineering discipline towards an integrated model-based approach that leverages advancements in digital and technological innovation o way the Department of Defense innovates and operates Transforms the way the Department of Defense innovates and operates Oct 26, 2016 Page-3

Digital Engineering Strategic Goals 1 Develop and maintain a culture and workforce that adopts and supports Digital Engineering across the lifecycle 1. Culture 2 Formalize development and use of models for providing an enduring authoritative source of truth 3 4 5 Foster the integration of models and data sources across functional disciplines to inform enterprise and program decision making Establish supporting infrastructure & environments to perform engineering activities, collaborate, &communicate across stakeholders Leverage advanced tools, computing power, and advanced capabilities to improve system capabilities, automate workflow processes (as applicable) and generate digital artifacts and deliverables using models DIGITAL ENGINEERING ECOSYSTEM 1. Workforce Oct 26, 2016 Page-4

Leveraging Multiple Activities to Advance Digital Engineering Within DoD Infusion in Policy & Guidance http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/pg/guidance.html DoD Initiatives Other Partnerships DoDI 5000.02, Enclosure 3, Section 9: Modeling and Simulation Digital Engineering Working Group DoD Digital Engineering Working Group (DEWG) USAF Own the Technical Baseline Defense Acquisition Guidebook Chapter 4 DoD Digital Engineering Fundamentals DSM Taxonomy: Defining categories of data across acquisition Additive Manufacturing NDIA: Essential Elements of the System Model SERC: Model Centric Collaborative Environment Engineered Resilient Systems: Adapting to changing requirements Inter-Agency Working Group Defense Acquisition University HPCMP CREATE: Physics Based Modeling NASA: Sounding Rocket Program Advancing the state of practice for Digital Engineering within DoD Oct 26, 2016 Page-5

Current Taxonomy DSM Objectives Update existing DAG Chapter 4 (now DAG Chapter 3) taxonomy Provide stakeholders a structure for the types of data that should be considered across the life cycle. Used as a basis to drive the community towards a Digital Engineering Key Changes Takes a data perspective vs. document perspective Includes hardware, software, management, cost and schedule information as part of system information o DFARS does not include these as a part of the technical data definition Includes Technical, Program, Financial, Schedule, and WBS as part of Management Info Includes Validation with Verification as part of Definition Info Incorporates the WBS to align with CAPE efforts Incorporates the Integrated Product Support Elements to align with L&MR efforts Defines the next (4 th ) level of the taxonomy Oct 26, 2016 Page-6

Proposed DSM Taxonomy System Info Red Boxes: Changes to existing taxonomy Definition Info Management Info Product Support Info Schedule WBS Financial Technical Requirements Design Mfg Verification & Validation Lifecycle Sustainment Management Technical Management Infrastructure Management The Digital System Model Taxonomy expands on level 4 of the data taxonomy in Chapter 3 of the Defense Acquisition Guidebook Oct 26, 2016 Page-7

Proposed DSM Taxonomy Oct 26, 2016 Page-8

Transition to Digital Engineering Oct 26, 2016 Page-9

DSM Intended Use Defines the broad categories DSM Taxonomy Provides the program s DE ecosystem DE Ecosystem Requirements Manufacturing Provides multiple views to support decisions Document Views Architecture Test Design Data Views Sustainment Configuration Management Identifies the data and data rights Contracting Model Views Other Views Digital System Model provides the broad categories that should be considered across the lifecycle Oct 26, 2016 Page-10

Weapon System Example Oct 26, 2016 Page-11

Next Steps Develop Digital System Model Use Cases Transition Taxonomy to a model-based software tool Provide a mechanism to define taxonomy and provide visualizations from the same source of data Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Special Issue Develop a special issue paper with three focus areas: Digital Engineering, Engineered Resilient Systems and Modular Open Systems Approach. Includes OSD, Services, and Systems Engineering Research perspectives February 2017 Publication Digital Engineering Strategy Instantiate strategic goals, objectives, and recommendations to realize the DoD Digital Engineering Vision Digital Engineering Training (CLE 011) Oct 26, 2016 Page-12

For Additional Information Philomena Zimmerman Deputy Director, Engineering Tools & Environments Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 571-372-6695 philomena.m.zimmerman.civ@mail.mil Additional Contributors: Tracee Walker Gilbert, Ph.D. Frank Salvatore Tyesia Pompey Alexander, Ph.D. Allen Wong Oct 26, 2016 Page-13

Systems Engineering: Critical to Defense Acquisition Defense Innovation Marketplace http://www.defenseinnovationmarketplace.mil DASD, Systems Engineering http://www.acq.osd.mil/se Oct 26, 2016 Page-14