When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

Similar documents
NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

Outpost Optimizing Science & Exploration Working Group (OSEWG) - Lunar Surface Science Scenarios

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

Space Technology FY 2013

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

Constellation Systems Division

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Focus Session on Commercial Crew

GAO NASA. Agency Has Taken Steps Toward Making Sound Investment Decisions for Ares I but Still Faces Challenging Knowledge Gaps

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

NASA Mission Directorates

The Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.

Chapter 6. Technology Development Options

Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

2009 ESMD Space Grant Faculty Project

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

WHAT WILL AMERICA DO IN SPACE NOW?

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

Taking Exploration Beyond LEO. Larry Price Orion Deputy Program Manager October 2009

Exploration Systems. Program Overview. July 15, 2004 Associate Administrator, Office of Exploration Systems Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

Human Spaceflight: Past, Present, and Future (if any) James Flaten MN Space Grant Consortium Univ. of MN Minneapolis

CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS

GPS Modernization and Program Update

Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011

Robotics in Space. Ian Taylor MP. Co-Chair, UK Parliamentary Space Committee VIIIth European Interparliamentary Space Conference

High Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

John P. Holdren, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy

Where are the Agencies Human Space Flight (HFR) Programs Heading? USA (NASA) System Description Goal Remarks * Space Launch System (SLS) Program

Preliminary Report Regarding NASA s Space Launch System and Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle

Emerging LEO Economy. Carissa Christensen April 26, 2016

2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment

National Space Exploration Campaign Report. Pursuant to Section 432(b) of the NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2017 (P.L.

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway

STATEMENT OF TIM HUGHES SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FOR GLOBAL BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA

NASA s Changing Human Spaceflight Exploration Plans

Summary of Results of a NASA-funded Study on: An Evolvable Lunar Architecture Leveraging Commercial Partnerships

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):

From ISS to Human Space Exploration: TAS-I contribution and perspectives

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

U.S. Space Exploration in the Next 20 NASA Space Sciences Policy

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

New Methods for Architecture Selection and Conceptual Design:

10/29/2018. Apollo Management Lessons for Moon-Mars Initiative. I Have Learned To Use The Word Impossible With The Greatest Caution.

A SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

NASA and Earth Science Enterprise Overview

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

CYGNSS Mission Update

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

PACE Science Definition Team Kickoff Meeting. Paula Bontempi, Betsy Edwards, Eric Ianson, Hal Maring, Woody

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

Engineering Design Challenge: Spacecraft Structures

Feasibility Analysis for a Manned Mars Free-Return Mission in 2018

Model-based Systems Engineering Mission Formulation and Implementation

Miguel A. Aguirre. Introduction to Space. Systems. Design and Synthesis. ) Springer

Design for Affordability in Complex Systems and Programs Using Tradespace-based Affordability Analysis

Space Exploration. Summary. Contents. Rob Waring. Level 3-1. Before Reading Think Ahead During Reading Comprehension... 5

Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme

Space and Missile Systems Center

Incorporating a Test Flight into the Standard Development Cycle

Intermediate Systems Acquisition Course. Lesson 2.2 Selecting the Best Technical Alternative. Selecting the Best Technical Alternative

Chapter 2 Planning Space Campaigns and Missions

NASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team Cis-Lunar Analysis. M. Lupisella 1, M. R. Bobskill 2

The Future of Space Exploration in the USA. Jakob Silberberg

NES: Problem Solving: Transportation and Space Reuse and Recycle

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

SpaceX launches a top-secret spy satellite for NASA

Pterodactyl: Integrated Control Design for Precision Targeting of Deployable Entry Vehicles

Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program: A Brief History

GAMMa - A modular ascender concept for sample return missions

National Aerospace Initiative

European Manned Space Projects and related Technology Development. Dipl.Ing. Jürgen Herholz Mars Society Deutschland Board Member marssociety.

On July 8th, 2011, STS 135, the final space shuttle mission, launched from the

NOAA Satellite and Information Service

Planetary Protection Subcommittee Mars Brief May 1, 2012 Doug McCuistion Director, Mars Exploration Program

Commission for Moon, Mars and Beyond

Transcription:

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009 Daniel L. Dumbacher,, Director Christopher E. Singer, Deputy Director Engineering Directorate Marshall Space Flight Center

Agenda Evolving from Saturn, to Shuttle, to Ares Expanding Frontiers for 50 Years and Counting Harnessing Risk Management Techniques and Tools Applying Human Space Flight Testing Philosophy Learning Lessons from the 1990s: Delta-Clipper Experimental Advanced Demonstrator Learning Lessons from the 1990s: X-33 Single-Stage-to-Orbit Flight Demonstrator Transitioning from Shuttle to Ares: Hard-Won Lessons Reducing Shuttle Risk: HD Cameras Visualize ET Foam Loss Reducing Shuttle Risk: Main Engine Cutoff (ECO) Sensor Reducing Technical Risk for Ares I Crew and Ares V Cargo Launch Vehicles Systems Engineering Throughout the Project Lifecycle Testing for Knowledge versus Testing for Success Ares I Project Milestones Ares I-X Development Flight Test: Breaking the Systems Engineering Model Generating and Analyzing Data to Reduce Risk: Main Propulsion Test and Integrated Ground Vibration Test Adopting Other Risk Reduction Methods: Project Lifecycle Management Engineering Knowledge Management System Conclusion: Reducing the Risk Inherent in the Human Exploration of Space 3/2/2009 5-397081 2

Evolving from Saturn, to Shuttle, to Ares 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Space Shuttle Operations through 2010 Complete International Space Station by Honoring International Partner Commitments Moon Landing by 2020 Expedition to Mars Ares I-X Test Flight 2009 Ares I Rocket First flight in 2015 Ares V Rocket First Flight in 2020 Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Orion Crew Vehicle Development Altair Lunar Lander Development Ares I Rocket & V Rocket Development Partnerships with Emerging Commercial Space Sector Carry out Science Missions to Learn about our Planet, Solar System and Universe Advance U.S. Technological Leadership in Aeronautics through Research Provide Critical Capabilities to Support NASA's Missions 3/2/2009 5-397081 3

Expanding Frontiers for 50 Years and Counting 122 m (400 ft) Overall Vehicle Height, m (ft) 91 m (300 ft) 61 m (200 ft) 30 m (100 ft) 0 Saturn V Command/Service Module Lunar Lander S-IVB (One J-2 engine) S-II (Five J-2 engines) S-IC (Five F-1 engines) Space Shuttle External Tank Two four-segment Reusable Solid Rocket Booster (RSRB) Orbiter Three Main Engines Ares I Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle Upper Stage (One J-2X engine) One 5-Segment Reusable Solid Rocket Booster (RSRB) Ares V Altair Lunar Lander 1967 1972 1981 Present First Flight 2015 First Flight 2020 Earth Departure Stage (EDS) (One J-2X engine) Two 5.5-Segment Reusable Solid Rocket Booster (RSRBs) Core Stage (Six RS-68 Engines) Height: 110.9 m (364 ft) Payload Capability: 44.9 metric tons (99,000 lbs) to TLI 118.8 metric tons (262,000 lbs) to LEO Height: 56.1 m (184.2 ft) Payload Capability: 25.0 mt (55,000 lbs) to LEO Height: 99.1 m (325 ft) Payload Capability: 25.5 mt (56,200 lbs) to LEO Height: 116.2 m (381.1 ft) Payload Capability: 187.7 mt (413,800 lbs) to LEO 71.1 mt (156,700 lbs) to TLI with Ares I 62.8 mt (138,500 lbs) direct to TLI 3/2/2009 5-397081 4

Harnessing Risk Management Techniques and Tools L I K E L I H O O D 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 CONSEQUENCE Likelihood Plus Consequence Equals Risk Level 3/2/2009 5-397081 5

Applying Human Space Flight Testing Philosophy Considering the Crew Drives Levels of Analyses 3/2/2009 5-397081 6

Learning Lessons from the 1990s: Delta-Clipper Experimental Advanced Demonstrator Defining Hardware Limits through Technology Development Flight Testing 3/2/2009 5-397081 7

Learning Lessons from the 1990s: X-33 Single-Stage-to-Orbit Flight Demonstrator Pushing the Limits of Technology 3/2/2009 5-397081 8

Transitioning from Shuttle to Ares: Hard-Won Lessons The great liability of the engineer compared to men of other professions is that his works are out in the open where all can see them. His acts, step by step, are in hard substance. He cannot bury his mistakes in the grave like the doctors. He cannot argue them into thin air or blame the judge like the lawyers. He cannot, like the architects, cover his failures with trees and vines. He cannot, like the politicians, screen his short-comings by blaming his opponents and hope the people will forget. The engineer simply cannot deny he did it. If his works do not work, he is damned. Herbert Hoover U.S. Mining Engineer & Politician (1874 1964) Applying 30 Years of Lessons Lived 3/2/2009 5-397081 9

Reducing Shuttle Risk: HD Cameras Visualize ET Foam Loss Regularly Scrubbing Requirements to Reflect Reality 3/2/2009 5-397081 10

Reducing Shuttle Risk: Low-level Main Engine Cutoff (ECO) Sensor Solving Potentially Critical Anomalies 3/2/2009 5-397081 11

Reducing Technical Risk for Ares I Crew and Ares V Cargo Launch Vehicles In House Upper Stage Design and Vehicle Stack Integration Designing for Life-Cycle Considerations: Safety, Reliability, Affordability 3/2/2009 5-397081 12

Systems Engineering Throughout the Project Lifecycle Testing Philosophy Drives Failures 3/2/2009 5-397081 13 13

Testing for Knowledge Versus Testing for Success Pre-Phase A Phase A Phase B Phase C Phase D Phase E 9 8 7 6 TRL 5 4 3 2 1 Development Program 1 Basic Principles 2 Application Formulated 3 Proof of Concept (Analytical Test) SRR SDR PDR CDR 4 Component Test (Lab Environ) 6 Prototype Flight Demo (Oper Environ) 5 Prototype Test (Rel Environ) Ares I-Y Component/Syst em Ares I-X Test (Rel Environ) 7 9 Mission 8 Operatio ns Orion II System Qual Tests/Develo p Flight Orion I Technology Readiness Levels Drive Testing Objectives 3/2/2009 5-397081 14

Ares I Project Milestones Ares I Project Milestones Name FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Ares I Flight Dates Ares 1-X July Ares 1-Y Or-1 Sep Mar Or-2 Sep IOC Or-3 Mar Or-4 Sep FOC Upper Stage SDR PDR CDR DCR HW Delivery 1yr 9mo Build Time Prior to Delivery Oct Aug Dec GVT ISTA Ares I-Y CF HF I Or-1 Apr Or-2 Or-3 Or-4 Or-5 Jan Feb Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Flight & Integration Test CDR Ares I-X HW to KSC Ares 1-X IVGVT Mar Oct FS Empty Dec FS Inert Apr U/S HW Jan Orion HW Mar IGVT Testing Complete Jun Analysis Complete May System-Level Tests Inform Major Engineering Milestones & Validate Readiness 3/2/2009 5-397081 15

Ares I-X Development Flight Test: Breaking the Systems Engineering Model Validates Modeling and Simulation, and Tests Operations Concepts 3/2/2009 5-397081 16

Generating & Analyzing Data to Reduce Risk: Main Propulsion Test & Integrated Vehicle Ground Vibration Test Testing the Edges and Margins on the Ground Verifies Design Performance & Validates Computer Models 3/2/2009 5-397081 17

Project Lifecycle Management Model: Reducing Undefined, but Known, Risks Manufacturing Engineering Product Engineering People Manufacturing Information Platform Concept Engineering Technology Processes Operation s Requirements Decommissioning Designing with the End in Mind 3/2/2009 5-397081 18

Engineering Knowledge Management System Broad Range of Data Resources/Types Across the Enterprise 3/2/2009 5-397081 19

Conclusion: Reducing the Risk Inherent in the Human Exploration of Space Engineering is a great profession. There is the satisfaction of watching a figment of the imagination emerge through the aid of science to a plan on paper. Then it moves to realization in stone or metal or energy. Then it brings homes to men or women. Then it elevates the standard of living and adds to the comforts of life. This is the engineer's high privilege. Herbert Hoover U.S. Mining Engineer & Politician (1874 1964) One Good Failure Is Worth a Thousand Successes 3/2/2009 5-397081 20