Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-16

Similar documents
Upper Klamath National Wildlife Refuge Complex Upper Klamath Unit and Hank s Marsh Unit BCS Number: 48-29

Warner Wetlands / Warner Valley BCS number: 48-31

Malheur National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-18

McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19

Tualatin River NWR and Wapato Lake BCS number: 47-37

River s End Ranch BCS number: 48-21

Wanaket Wildlife Area BCS number: 48-30

Smith River Mouth BCS number: 86-6

Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3

Tahkenitch Creek Estuary BCS number: 47-35

Alvord Lake BCS number: 48-2

Killin Wetland (Cedar Canyon Marsh) BCS number: 47-15

Mud Slough Wetland Reserve BCS number: 47-19

Fernhill Wetlands BCS number: 47-13

Humboldt Bay NWR BCS number: 86-4

Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-4

Paulina Marsh BCS number: 48-20

Sauvie Island Wildlife Area BCS number: 47-28

Siletz Bay BCS number: 47-29

Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve BCS Number: 47-14

Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area BCS Number: 47-5

Smith and Bybee Wetlands Natural Area BCS number 47-33

Siuslaw River Estuary BCS number 47-32

Coos Bay BCS number: 47-8

2011 Wood River Wetland Yellow Rail (Coturnicops neveboracensis noveboracensis) Survey Report

Davis Lake BCS number: 48-9

Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-3

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Thunder Bay AOC,

Catalog of Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture GIS Data March 2009 Version 1

Implementing the pilot Federal Marshbird Monitoring Program in Wisconsin

American Bittern Minnesota Conservation Summary

Wood Stork Nesting Population Survey Results 2016 and Radio-tracking Dice

Title Marsh Bird Habitat Restoration and Management on Private and Public land in Arkansas Mississippi Alluvial Valley

National Audubon Society. Coastal Bird Conservation Program

Black-crowned Night-heron Minnesota Conservation Summary

Marsh Monitoring Program - Contact and Route Information

OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION TO SHOREBIRDS MANAGEMENT FOR SHOREBIRDS TVA REGIONAL SHOREBIRD PROJECT ESTIMATING SHOREBIRD NUMBERS

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Bay of Quinte AOC,

ASSESSING HABITAT QUALITY FOR PRIORITY WILDLIFE SPECIES IN COLORADO WETLANDS

Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory

Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the St. Lawrence River (Canada and USA) AOC,

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Past, Present, Future. Andy Bishop RWBJV Coordinator February 9 th 2016

PREDICTING AND MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE: IMPACTS ON GREAT BASIN WETLANDS, SHOREBIRDS, AND THEIR PREY

A Rising Tide: Conserving Shorebirds and Shorebird Habitat within the Columbia River Estuary

Matagorda Island Marsh Restoration An Adaptive Management Approach by Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program

Wings N Wetlands Bird List

AERIAL SURVEY OF BIRDS AT MONO LAKE ON AUGUST 24, 1973

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery

Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture. Waterbird Habitat Conservation Strategy

Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Wetlands Program 2016 Grant Awards

Restoration of Emergent Wetlands on Steve N. Wilson Raft Creek Bottoms WMA in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Ecoregion

FWP Northwest Montana Terrestrial Climate Change Species Monitoring and Conservation Plan January 2010

Collaborative resource management on public lands: the future of conservation?

Lake St. Clair Coastal Wetlands in 2050: Modelling Wetland Community Responses to Climate Change Water Level Scenarios

MINNESOTA NAWCA PROJECTS

2008 San Francisco Bay Shorebird Census

Mannington Meadows Important Bird Area (IBA) Conservation and Management Plan

Project Summary. Predicting waterbird nest distributions on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of Alaska

Current Monitoring and Management of Tricolored Blackbirds 1

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

MIGRATION CYCLES (MODIFIED FOR ADEED)

Managing wetlands and rice to improve habitat for shorebirds and other waterbirds

Birds! Are they canaries in a Cowichan Coal Mine? David Aldcroft Cowichan Watershed Board VIU Speaker Series January 2015

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

WISCONSIN NAWCA PROJECTS

Tiered Species Habitats (Terrestrial and Aquatic)

Deepwater Horizon NRDAR Caribbean nesting bird RFP September 15, 2016

TERR 7 MIGRATORY WATERFOWL

The Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program: 18 years of surveying birds and frogs as indicators of ecosystem health

Cat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L ENRTF Work Plan (Main Document)

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan

Avian Point-Count/Callback Survey Protocol (revised May 2015) Summary of the Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols

Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting February 17, 2011 Wildlife Habitat Management Considerations

History and status of the Franklin's Gull on Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon

Habitat Use by Wildlife in Agricultural and Ranching Areas in the Pantanal and Everglades. Dr. Júlio Cesar de Souza and Dr. Elise V.

Erie County Van Trip. Pipe Creek Wildlife Area

Cutler Reservoir Amalga Barrens: an IBA of Global Significance for White-faced Ibis

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Durham Region of Lake Ontario from 1995 through 2002.

TEXAS NAWCA PROJECTS

The North American Wetlands Conservation Act: Working for Maine

2016 WATERFOWL BREEDING POPULATION SURVEY MINNESOTA

IBA Monitoring Guide

NORTH DAKOTA NAWCA PROJECTS

Shorebird Migration in Nebraska: Stopover Habitat Decisions in a Vanishing Landscape. Caitlyn Gillespie and Joseph J. Fontaine

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

2018 WATERFOWL BREEDING POPULATION SURVEY, MINNESOTA

Blue-winged Teal. Blue-winged Teal Minnesota Conservation Summary

May 25, 2005 Forum Meeting

Chesapeake Bay adaptation Designing marshes for David Curson, National Audubon Society Erik Meyers, The Conservation Fund

CALIFORNIA NAWCA PROJECTS

31 Figure 5 continued.

Riparian Conservation Project Monitoring and Avian Habitat in Colorado

MONITORING DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE OF WETLAND BIRDS. Chris Healey President, BirdLife East Gippsland

203 Species of Birds observed 1770 Checklists entered by UBB (Updated 7/3/17 H.Murphy) 21 Birding Stations (4 on Fish Lake Pontoon Boats)

THE USE OF ACOUSTIC TRANSECTS TO DOCUMENT CHANGES IN BAT DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE. Eric R. Britzke & Carl Herzog

CHAPTER. Coastal Birds CONTENTS. Introduction Coastal Birds Action Plan. 108 cbbep.org

Progress on Marsh Bird Monitoring in Prairie Canada. Kiel Drake, Bird Studies Canada

Transcription:

Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-16 Site description author(s) Carol Damberg, Klamath Marsh NWR Refuge Manager Kate Halstead, Field Technician, KBO Primary contact for this site Carol Damberg, Klamath Marsh NWR Refuge Manager. Phone: (541) 783-3380. Email: Carol_Damberg@fws.gov Site location (UTM) Datum: NAD 83, Zone: 10, Easting: 608512, Northing: 4755010 General description Boundaries and ownership Boundaries: Boundaries are fairly well marked in most areas by signs and fencing. A majority of the 40,960 currently owned by the Refuge is wetland habitat (30,000 acres +). The Refuge is bordered on the east by U.S. Forest Lands (Winema- Fremont Forest) and along the west by private and corporate lands. Ownership: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service owns 40,960 acres in fee title of the proposed 49,583 acquisition boundary area. Private in-holdings within the Refuge are held by a variety of landowners. Please work through the Refuge Manager to obtain permission to conduct surveys on private lands. See Figures 1 and 2 for general and detailed ownership and boundary maps. Water levels Water is provided to the marsh via three primary routes groundwater re-charge from precipitation; Williamson River & Big Springs surface flows (occasional contributions from other smaller tributaries); and direct precipitation. Historically, much of the bulrush marsh that is observed today was a lake. Changes in climate, water use in the Upper Williamson River watershed, and in land use practices have transformed the marsh from an open water habitat to a mono-culture of bulrush and cattail. The Refuge Marsh is the wettest during the spring and early summer when it receives significant contributions of water from groundwater and surface flows (like the Williamson River and Big Springs). The majority of the marsh will dry out by mid to late fall, depending on summer rain patterns. The Williamson River is diverted into a variety of cannels and ditches shortly after it enters the Refuge. The Refuge uses the existing Description updated 4/29/2010 1

cannel and ditch system to create wetlands and to move water to various portions of the Marsh. The cannels allow the Refuge to provide some fall wetlands in irrigated areas. The Refuge wetlands provide good spring and summer breeding and migration habitat, but very little fall migration habitat due to lack of water. Tim Mayer, hydrologist United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Portland, OR office has written a paper regarding the hydrology of the Klamath Marsh that is available upon request. Focal species use and timing Focal Guild/Species Wintering Breeding Migration Secretive Marsh Birds* Absent Present Present Colonial Nesting Waterbirds Absent Present Present Ground-based Aquatic Birds Absent Present Present Migrating Shorebirds Absent Unknown Present American White Pelican Absent Unknown Present Possible Barrow s Goldeneye Absent Absent Unknown Black-necked Stilt Absent Unknown Present Bufflehead Absent Unknown Present Dusky Canada Goose Absent Absent Absent Franklin s Gull Absent Absent Absent Greater Sandhill Crane Absent Present Present Long-billed Curlew Absent Absent Unknown Snowy Egret Absent Absent Unknown Red-Necked Grebe Absent Absent Absent Upland Sandpiper Absent Absent Absent Western Snowy Plover Absent Absent Absent Yellow Rail Absent Present Present *The focal species for Oregon s aquatic secretive marsh bird monitoring are PBGR, LEBI, AMBI, VIRA, SORA, YERA. Description updated 4/29/2010 2

Location of Type 1 and 2 habitat within the site Guild Type 1 Habitat Type 2 Habitat Secretive Marsh Birds Wet sedge and grassland meadows; Emergent wetlands with bulrush, cattail, and sedge vegetation. (Wocus Bays, Private Lands, Irrigated wetlands, Northern Marsh areas) Unknown Ground-based Aquatic Birds Wet sedge and grassland Unknown meadows; Emergent marsh; Upland grasslands. (Wocus Bays, Private Lands, Irrigated wetlands, Northern Marsh areas) Migrating Shorebirds Short emergent sedge Unknown meadows, shallow open water areas (Wocus Bays), Mud flats in fall (Wocus Bays) and barrow ditches along Silver Lake Rd and Military Crossing Road. Colonial Nesters Emergent Marsh with sedges, cattails, and bulrush interspersed with open water (Wocus Bays, Private Lands, Irrigated wetlands, Northern Marsh areas) Unknown *See Figures 3 and 4 for USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (2008) layer in Google Earth (2008). Access to Type 1 and 2 habitat and visibility/audibility of birds Road access into the middle or central portions of the marsh does not exist for several large wetland areas. Access via administrative refuge roads is good in the areas that have irrigated wetlands. Road access around the periphery of the Refuge is good via USFS two-tracked roads that are not maintained and require a 4 wheel drive vehicle or ATV. Access on all roads may be impossible during early spring or late fall due to snow or extremely wet conditions. Road noise along Silver Lake Rd can be distracting at times if trying to conduct a survey along this road. Entering the central portions of the marsh during spring and summer can only be accomplished via a tracked vehicle like a Marsh Master (one is owned by the Refuge). Walking is generally not feasible due to the density of the bulrush and depth of water during the spring and summer. Boating is possible in Wocus Bay and Little Wocus Bay areas in spring and summer. Description updated 4/29/2010 3

See Figures 4 and 5 for road maps of the area. Past and current surveys Aerial waterfowl surveys spring and fall (data held at Klamath Basin Refuge Complex office Tule Lake, CA contact USFWS Biologist Dave Mauser) Spring Sandhill Crane survey conducted in late May or early June: Ground survey via vehicles or ATV s completed by Refuge staff. Data available from Klamath Marsh NWR. Waterfowl breeding pairs aerial survey completed by Klamath Basin Refuge Complex Office in spring (contact Dave Mauser) Goose breeding pair survey aerial survey completed by Klamath Basin Refuge Complex Office in spring (contact Dave Mauser) Yellow Rail surveys historically completed by Ken Popper of The Nature Conservancy (TNC) since 1991. Staring in 2007 the USFWS has started to complete surveys. Surveys conducted on foot in June at night using call playback technique. Data available from Klamath Marsh NWR. Bald eagle nest surveys completed by volunteers at Klamath Marsh NWR. Ground surveys using vehicles, binoculars, and spotting scopes. Data available from Klamath Marsh NWR. In 2008, Klamath Bird Observatory (KBO) surveyed for six focal secretive marsh bird species (Pied-billed Grebe, American Bittern, Least Bittern, Yellow Rail, Sora, and Virginia Rail) during peak breeding season (May and June). Klamath Marsh was visited three times by KBO with 10 survey stations completed during each visit. Pied-billed Grebes were found in abundance, and several American Bittern, Yellow Rail, Sora, and Virginia Rail were detected. KBO conducted Black Tern surveys at Klamath Marsh during the breeding season from 1997 to 2004. KBO conducted point count surveys for 2 years in various habitats contact Klamath Bird Observatory at kbo@klamathbird.org Sandhill Crane nesting survey completed in early 1990 s. Results in Klamath Marsh Refuge Files. Description updated 4/29/2010 4

Conservation issues Water availability and water adjudication in the Klamath Basin. The future allocation of water could be a major factor in the future viability of the Marsh. Introduced noxious weeds are a problem, which could become more serious. Potential future development of lands not acquired. Lack of vegetation management via fire and/or haying and grazing the Marsh continues to fill in with dense stands of bulrush and the amount of open water habitat continues to diminish. Conservation measures taken, in progress, or proposed Chemical, mechanical, and biological control of noxious weeds Continued use of prescribe fire and haying programs with hopes of resurrecting future grazing programs. Purchase of lands within acquisition boundary and continued pursuit of conservation easements on private lands within and outside acquisition boundary Continued work with Williamson River Basin Working Group to improve water regime for wildlife both on the refuge and on private lands. Description updated 4/29/2010 5

Potential survey methods a. Description: a. Nest searches for grebes and other waterbirds nesting in the emergent vegetation in small colonies. A Marsh Master or canoe may be necessary for access. b. Colony counts for nesting ibis, gulls, and terns. Aerial surveys will likely be necessary to determine location and size of any colonies in the area. c. Area searches for migrating shorebirds, gulls, and terns from observation points near Type 1 habitat. e. Systematic sampling, probably including the use of playback calls, for secretive marshbirds from the road and from a canoe within Wocus Bay(s). f. Census for terns and ibis during aerial waterfowl counts with verification via ground surveys. g. Ground foot transects through sedge and emergent marshes for secretive marsh birds using tape playback. b. Selection Bias: a. Evaluate water level conditions in habitats surveyed as this can change in an area from year to year and determine utilization of species from year to year. b. Evaluate vegetation management that has occurred in areas historically and in the present prescribe burns, haying, grazing, etc. c. Measurement error and bias: Manning and Hartley (2006) suggest that it should be determined whether a groundbased waterbird survey would be beneficial. Potential Pilot Studies Design a study to evaluate the positive and negative impacts of vegetation management such as fire, haying and grazing on yellow rail, sandhill crane, and other secretive marsh birds. This would need to be conducted via observational day surveys for species like cranes and call play back techniques (AM or PM) for secretive marsh birds. Monitoring of water depths and changes in vegetative conditions from year to year during surveys would be vital. I would be beneficial to complete a general comprehensive survey of the various wetland habitats to determine what species are breeding and/or migrating through the areas. This survey may be conducted via point counts or transects in areas accessible via foot. Some surveys may need canoe or kayak in the Wocus Bay areas. This survey should attempt to determine if we have pockets of colonial nesting species (black terns, grebes, etc.) Also, completing pre and post Williamson River and Wetland restoration surveys of select guild species to determine the impacts of the future restoration of the Williamson River and associated wetlands on wetland and riparian bird species would be beneficial. Description updated 4/29/2010 6

Literature cited Google Earth version 4.3. 2008. Image: Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon. Accessed October 10, 2008. Google Map. 2009. Map of Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon. http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=42.925697,-121.66832&z=11&t=h&hl=en. Accessed March 24, 2009. Manning, Ann and Laura Hartley. March 2006. Important sites for aquatic birds in Eastern Oregon. Version 2.0. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2008. National Wetlands Inventory website. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/. Accessed October 10, 2008. Description updated 4/29/2010 7

Figure 1: General ownership map of Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. Description updated 4/29/2010 8

Figure 2: Detailed ownership map of Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. Description updated 4/29/2010 9

Figure 3: USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (2008) layer of the upper portion of Klamath Marsh NWR in Google Earth (2008). Description updated 4/29/2010 10

Figure 4: USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (2008) layer of the lower portion of Klamath Marsh NWR in Google Earth (2008). Description updated 4/29/2010 11

Figure 5: Klamath Marsh NWR road map. Description updated 4/29/2010 12

Figure 6: Google Map (2009) of Klamath Marsh NWR. Description updated 4/29/2010 13