Barcelona, January 2011 Workshop on optimization of Radiation Protection of Medical Staff

Similar documents
Active Personal Dosemeters: EURADOS activities and application in interventional radiology. Filip Vanhavere

First EURADOS intercomparison exercise of eye lens dosemeters for medical applications

ORAMED S MEASUREMENT AND SIMULATION CAMPAIGN FOR EXREMITY AND EYE LENS DOSES OF MEDICAL STAFF INVOLVED IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY AND CARDIOLOGY

Ideas for type tests of electronic dosemeters in pulsed fields

- Nuclear Radiation Sensor - Detects Beta and Gamma Radiation and X-Rays

Monitoring the eye lens

RaySafe Xi. Specifications

Radiation Protection Instruments PTB-A 23.2

Unfors EDD-30 Radiation Protection in Fluoroscopy

Telescopic Survey Meter

Development of Personal Dosimeter Using Electronic Dose Conversion Method

I. PERFORMANCE OF X-RAY PRODUCTION COMPONENTS FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Introduction of a Single Chip TLD System for Patient Dosimetry

Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents

Inovision Model 451P Pressurized µr Ion Chamber Survey Meter

Determination of the tube voltage from clinic mammographic system using two types of detectors

SPECIFICATION. Kilovoltage X-ray calibration system for protection and diagnostic level dosimetry. Prepared by

Recommendations to harmonize European early warning dosimetry network systems

Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a 0.1 mm Cu Filter into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp

Joint ICTP/IAEA Advanced School on Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology and its Clinical Implementation May 2009

Preliminary studies of a new monitor ionization chamber

Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia

Less effort. More insight.

Title: A COMPARISON OF Cs-137 AND X-RAY SOURCES AS CALIBRATION REFERENCES FOR THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER CHIPS

Measurement and data analysis concepts combined with data assimilation techniques for source term reconstruction and dose assessment

A STUDY OF THE RESPONSE OF DEPLETED TYPE p-mosfets TO PHOTON AND ELECTRON DOSE

Technical aspects on DAP calibration and CT calibration

X-RAY IMAGING EE 472 F2017. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

RaySafe X2. Effortless measurements of X-ray

Radiation dose to physicians eye lens during interventional radiology

RADIOACTIVITY INDICATOR RADIASCAN-501(701) OPERATIONS MANUAL

WRIST GAMMA INDICATOR РМ1208M OPERATING MANUAL

Calibration of KAP meters

Technical Description and Operator s Manual. Survey Meter SM 5 D. Sensortechnik und Elektronik Pockau GmbH. Siedlungsstraße 5-7 D Pockau

X-rays. X-rays are produced when electrons are accelerated and collide with a target. X-rays are sometimes characterized by the generating voltage

Update on NIST X-Ray Air-Kerma Standards and Calibrations

- Water resistant. - Large size.

Application Note. ipix A Gamma imager to support various applications. Introduction. An easy to carry and deploy instrument

NEUTRON MONITOR 2222A. Users Manual

Estimation of signal transfer property for wireless digital detector in different measurement schemes

MKS-05 TERRA DOSIMETER-RADIOMETER. Operating manual

Response characteristics of a tandem ionization chamber in standard X-ray beams

Dosepix Detector as kvp-meter in Radiology and Mammography: First steps

Highlights of Poster Session I: SiPMs

HISTORY. CT Physics with an Emphasis on Application in Thoracic and Cardiac Imaging SUNDAY. Shawn D. Teague, MD

Teletector 6112M Operating Manual for Models 6112M and 6112M/H

A comparison of two methods for the determination of freein-air geometric efficiency in MDCT

Scientific Production Company Doza DOSIMETER/RADIOMETER DKS-96. User Manual TE RE

Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality

MEDE3500 Mini-project (Day1)

Improved Imaging Plate Dosimetry for X-rays in Interventional Radiology

I. Introduction.

Quality control of Gamma Camera. By Dr/ Ibrahim Elsayed Saad 242 NMT

Physics Laboratory Scattering of Photons from Electrons: Compton Scattering

Quality assurance: a comparison study of radiographic exposure for neonatal chest radiographs at 4 academic hospitals

Chromatic X-Ray imaging with a fine pitch CdTe sensor coupled to a large area photon counting pixel ASIC

Photons interaction with matter

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION JINST_128P_1010 v2

Received 3 December 2016; revised 17 May 2017; editorial decision 21 June 2017; accepted 4 July 2017

Fully Automatic X-ray meter kvp, dose, rate, HVL and time Extremely easy to use. Unfors ThinX RAD for Radiographic Quality Control

SUBCHAPTER 14. THERAPEUTIC INSTALLATIONS

NEMA XR X-ray Equipment for Interventional Procedures User Quality Control Mode

Measurements of MeV Photon Flashes in Petawatt Laser Experiments

Radiation Detection Instrumentation

Ch. 223 VETERINARY MEDICINE CHAPTER 223. VETERINARY MEDICINE GENERAL PROVISIONS X-RAYS RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL. Authority

The SIRAD irradiation facility at the INFN - Legnaro National Laboratory

Linear electron accelerators for radiation processing MIKHAIL DEMSKY, CORAD LTD, ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA (

Application of CMOS sensors in radiation detection

GAFCHROMIC HD-810 Radiochromic Dosimetry Film Configuration, Specifications and Performance Data

Calculation of Remanent Dose Rate Maps in the LHC Beam Dump Caverns

Technical data GammaTRACER

Teaching Digital Radiography and Fluoroscopic Radiation Protection

EURAMET project 1177 : Comparison protocol ( ) Comparison protocol for the calibration of KAP meters in terms of air kerma area product

LLNL Results from CALIBAN-PROSPERO Nuclear Accident Dosimetry Experiments in September 2014

NM Module Section 2 6 th Edition Christian, Ch. 3

Cylindrical Ion Chambers Victoreen Model 550 Series

GammALERT SPECTRAL SYSTEM

Partial Replication of Storms/Scanlan Glow Discharge Radiation

Military Performance Specifications

The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology

By: Georgia Institute of Technology

MC SIMULATION OF SCATTER INTENSITIES IN A CONE-BEAM CT SYSTEM EMPLOYING A 450 kv X-RAY TUBE

Colibri : Hand-Held Health Physics Communication ALARA* Platform

APPENDIX K UNF RADIATION GENERATING DEVICE SAFETY PROCEDURES

Performance evaluation of a photon counting detector for high energy NDT applications

Derivation of total filtration thickness for diagnostic x-ray source assembly

Effect of pressure, temperature and humidity in air on photon fluence and air kerma values at low photon energies

New Detectors for X-Ray Metal Thickness Measuring

MaxRay Handheld X-ray Systems Operator Training Exam

SRS MapCHECK. SRS Patient QA, No Film. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools

New Dose Limits for the Lens of the Eye Implications and Implementation Industrial Radiography

Disclosures. Outline 7/31/2017. Current Implementation Status of IEC Standard : Exposure Index (EI) for Digital Radiography

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Features and Weaknesses of Phantoms for CR/DR System Testing

SYLLABUS. 1. Identification of Subject:

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them?

Pinhole collimator design for nuclear survey system

DETERMINATION OF INHERENT AND ADDITIONAL FILTRATION IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH RADIATION QUALITIES ACCORDING TO IEC 61267

QUALITY CONTROL TESTS IN SOME DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY UNITS IN BANGLADESH

The Use of a Novel Radiation Detector on Quantifying PET/Nuclear Medicine. Occupational and Non-occupational Doses and Calibration of MOSFET Radiation

Transcription:

USE OF ACTIVE PERSONAL DOSEMETERS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY/CARDIOLOGY: TESTS WITH CONTINUOUS AND PULSED FIELDS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS ORAMED PROJECT I. Clairand 1, J-M. Bordy 2, E. Carinou 3, J. Daures 2, J. Debroas 1, M. Denozière 2, L. Donadille 1, M. Ginjaume 4, C. Itié 1, C. Koukorava 3, S. Krim 5, A-L. Lebacq 5, P. Martin 6, L. Struelens 5, M. Sans-Mercé 7 and F. Vanhavere 5 1 Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), France 2 CEA-LIST Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (CEA LNHB), France 3 Greek Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), Greece 4 Institute of Energy Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Spain 5 Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Belgium 6 MGP Intruments (MGPi), France 7 Institute of Radiation Physics (IRA), University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Switzerland Barcelona, 20-22 January 2011 Workshop on optimization of Radiation Protection of Medical Staff

One of the ORAMED work packages deals with the optimization of the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional radiology/cardiology (IR/IC) CONTEXT OBJECTIVES study the behavior of selected APDs in pulsed X-ray beams: tests in laboratory conditions with continuous and pulsed X-ray beams tests using an X-ray facility in a hospital environment and in different European hospitals worn by interventionalists during routine practice provide proposals for improvement of active personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology/cardiology provide practical guidelines related to the choice and the use of APDs in interventional radiology/cardiology this presentation Struelens et al. Martin et al. Daures et al. 2/38

CONTEXT The work consisted in: making a selection of APDs deemed suitable for application in interventional radiology defining, by measurements under laboratory conditions, the dose equivalent, the dose equivalent rate, the energy and the angular response of selected commercial APDs, with continuous X-ray beams. studying, by measurements under laboratory conditions, the effect of dose equivalent rate, pulse frequency and pulse width on the APD response, with pulsed X-ray beams. 3/38

INTRODUCTION GENERAL PROBLEMATIC Interventional radiology/cardiology procedures can lead to relatively high doses to medical staff who is mostly exposed to radiation scattered by the patient. For the adequate dosimetry of these scattered photons, APDs must be able to respond to: low-energy photons (20-100 kev) pulsed radiation with relatively high instantaneous dose equivalent rates. Very few APD devices can detect low energy radiation fields. None of them are specially designed for working in pulsed radiation fields. 4/38

TYPICAL FIELD PARAMETERS ENCOUNTERED IN IR/IC Parameter Range High voltage 60-120 kvp Intensity 5-1000 ma Inherent Al equivalent filtration 4.5 mm Additional Cu filtration 0.2 0.9 mm Pulse duration 1-20 ms Pulse frequency 1 30 s -1 Dose equivalent rate 2 to 360 Sv.h -1 in the direct beam (table) Dose equivalent rate 5.10-3 to 10 Sv.h -1 in the scattered beam (operator above the lead apron) Energy range of scattered spectra 20 kev 100 kev 5/38

SELECTION OF APDs Eight APDs were selected for the study: MGPi DMC2000XB Siemens EPD Mk2.3 Dosilab EDM III Polimaster PM1621A Rados DIS-100 Unfors EDD 30 Atomtex AT3509C Philips DoseAware 6/38

SELECTION OF APDs APD characteristics given by the manufacturer in the technical notice APD Energy range Dose equivalent rate range Dose equivalent range Detector type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DMC 2000XB MGPi EPD Mk2.3 Thermo EDM III Dosilab PM1621A Polimaster DIS-100 Rados EDD 30 Unfors AT3509C Atomtex Min Max Min Max Min Max 20 kev 6 MeV 0.1 µsv.h -1 10 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 10 Sv Silicon diode 17 kev 6 MeV 1 µsv.h -1 4 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 16 Sv Silicon diode 20 kev 6 MeV 0.5 µsv.h -1 1 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 1 Sv Silicon diode 10 kev 20 MeV 0.01 µsv.h -1 2 Sv.h -1 0.01 µsv 9.99 Sv Geiger Muller tube 15 kev 9 MeV 1 µsv.h -1 40 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 50 msv Specific detector interventional radiology energy range 0.03 msv.h -1 2 Sv.h -1 1 nsv 9999 Sv Silicon diode 15 kev 10 MeV 0.1 µsv.h -1 5 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 10 Sv Silicon diode 7/38

SELECTION OF APDs APD characteristics given by the manufacturer in the technical notice APD Energy range Dose equivalent rate range Dose equivalent range Detector type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DMC 2000XB MGPi EPD Mk2.3 Thermo EDM III Dosilab PM1621A Polimaster DIS-100 Rados EDD 30 Unfors AT3509C Atomtex DoseAware Philips Min Max Min Max Min Max 20 kev 6 MeV 0.1 µsv.h -1 10 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 10 Sv Silicon diode 17 kev 6 MeV 1 µsv.h -1 4 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 16 Sv Silicon diode 20 kev 6 MeV 0.5 µsv.h -1 1 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 1 Sv Silicon diode 10 kev 20 MeV 0.01 µsv.h -1 2 Sv.h -1 0.01 µsv 9.99 Sv Geiger Muller tube 15 kev 9 MeV 1 µsv.h -1 40 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 50 msv Specific detector interventional radiology energy range 0.03 msv.h -1 2 Sv.h -1 1 nsv 9999 Sv Silicon diode 15 kev 10 MeV 0.1 µsv.h -1 5 Sv.h -1 1 µsv 10 Sv Silicon diode 33 kev 118 kev 10 µsv.h -1 50 msv.h -1 1 µsv 10 Sv Silicon diode 8/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH CONTINUOUS X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS Calibration laboratories (SCK CEN, Belgium and IRSN, France) Dose equivalent response : S-Co, N-150 for DoseAware Dose equivalent rate response from 0 to 10 Sv.h -1 : S-Co for all APDs, H-100 for EDD30, N-150 for DoseAware Energy response: N-15, N-20, N-25, N-30, N-40, N-60, N-80, N-100, N-120, S-Cs and S-Co, from N-30 to S-Cs for DoseAware Angular response at +/- 60 : N-25, N-30, N-40 and N-60, + N-80 for DoseAware Three measurements per APD were made. Two dosemeters of each type were tested, except for the EDD30 of which we had only one unit. IEC 61526 standard (2010 07) International Electrotechnical Commission. Radiation protection instrumentation. measurement of personal dose equivalent Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) for X, gamma, neutron and beta radiation: direct reading personal dose equivalent and/or dose equivalent rate dosemeters (2010 07) IEC 61526 Geneva: IEC 9/38

DOSE EQUIVALENT RESPONSE ThedoseequivalentresponseoftestedAPDsis linear in the dose equivalent range of interest. 10/38

Tests made with: S-Co (N-150 for DoseAware) DOSE EQUIVALENT RATE RESPONSE Most APDs can stand high dose equivalent rates up to 10 Sv.h -1,except: PM1621A for which the response is diverging rapidly from 1 Sv.h -1 EDD30 which saturates for dose equivalent rates above 2 Sv.h -1 DoseAware which saturates for dose equivalent rates above 4 Sv.h -1 11/38

ENERGY RESPONSE (12) (16) (20) (24) (33) (48) (65) (83) (100) (667) (1250) The energy response is within the interval [0.71 1.67] as required in the IEC 61526 standard from 137 Cs energy down to 24 kev for all APDs except EDD30 and DoseAware. For these two APDs, these results are consistent with characteristics given by the manufacturers. 12/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE MGPi DMC2000XB 13/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE Siemens EPD Mk2.3 14/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE Dosilab EDM III 15/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE Polimaster PM1621A 16/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE Rados DIS-100 17/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE Unfors EDD 30 18/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE Atomtex AT3509C 19/38

ANGULAR RESPONSE Philips DoseAware 20/38

CONCLUSIONS ON TESTS PERFORMED WITH CONTINUOUS X-RAY BEAMS All APDs have a linear response with the dose equivalent and most of them have a satisfactory response at low energies from 24 kev. Most APDs can stand high dose equivalent rates up to 10 Sv.h -1,except: PM1621A for which the response is diverging rapidly from 1 Sv.h -1 EDD30 which saturates for dose equivalent rates above 2 Sv.h -1 DoseAware which saturates for dose equivalent rates above 4 Sv.h -1 All APDs have a satisfactory angular response from the energy of N-30 (except AT3509C: satisfactory angular response only from N-80) 21/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS French standard laboratory for ionizing radiation (CEA LIST - LNE LNHB, France) Commercially available X-ray generator: GEHC PHASIX 80 (used in large number of radiology services) High Voltage: 70 kvp, Total filtration: 4.5 mm Al + 0.2 mm Cu, Half Value Layer: 5.17 mm Al. Denozière et al. (poster) In pulsed mode, the APD response was studied in laboratory conditions, corresponding to the operational conditions, in function of the variation of: the dose equivalent rate the pulse frequency the pulse width 22/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS APD response with dose equivalent rate variation (in multi-pulsed mode): - Pulse duration: 20 ms (it was not possible to perform tests for lower pulse durations for technical reasons), - Pulse frequency: 10 pulses per second (pps) - Dose equivalent rate variation: from 100 msv.h -1 to 50 Sv.h -1 (up to 1.8 Sv.h -1 for DoseAware) APD response with pulse frequency variation (in multi-pulsed mode): - Dose equivalent rate: 1.8 Sv.h -1 and 6.8 Sv.h -1 (908 msv.h -1 and 1,8 Sv.h -1 for DoseAware) - Pulse duration: 20 ms, - Pulse frequency variation: 1 pps, 10 pps and 20 pps (1 pps and 10 pps for DoseAware) APD response with pulse width variation (in single pulsed mode): - Pulse width variation: 20, 50, 100 and 1000 ms at 1.8 Sv.h -1 (DoseAware not tested in this configuration) 23/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF DOSE EQUIVALENT RATE For most APDs the response decreases when the dose equivalent rate increases. For dose equivalent rates < 2 Sv.h -1 the responses are, in general, close to 1 and fall down for higher dose equivalent rates, except for DIS-100 that stands relatively high dose equivalent rates. 24/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY 1.400 MGPi DMC2000XB 1.200 1.000 10 pps 20 pps 1 pps 0.800 R 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 mean dose rate per pulse (Sv/h) 25/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY Siemens 1.200 EPD Mk2.3 1.000 10 pps 20 pps 1 pps 0.800 R 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 mean dose rate per pulse (Sv/h) 26/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS Dosilab 2.000 EDM III 1.800 1.600 EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY 10 pps 20 pps 1 pps 1.400 1.200 R 1.000 0.800 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 mean dose rate per pulse (Sv/h) 27/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS Polimaster PM1621A EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY NO SIGNAL IN PULSED MODE 28/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY Rados DIS-100 10 pps 20 pps 1 pps 29/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY Unfors 1.400 EDD 30 1.200 1.000 R 0.800 0.600 0.400 0.200 10 pps 20 pps 1 pps 0.000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 mean dose rate per pulse (Sv/h) 30/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS 1.200 Atomtex AT3509C1.100 1.000 0.900 EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY 10 pps 20 pps 1 pps 0.800 0.700 R 0.600 0.500 0.400 0.300 0.200 0.100 0.000 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 mean dose rate per pulse (Sv/h) 31/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF DOSE EQ. RATE AND PULSE FREQUENCY Philips DoseAware 32/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF DOSE EQUIVALENT RATE Threshold in terms of dose equivalent rate (Sv.h -1 ) for which the maximum APD response is divided by a factor 2. APD Dose equivalent rate (Sv.h -1 ) for APD response divided by 2 DMC 2000XB EPD MK2.3 EDM III 5 7 20 PM1621A DIS-100 EDD 30 AT3509C NO SIGNAL Response within +/- 30% for all dose equivalent rates up to 55 Sv.h -1 Dose Aware 10 3.5 0.8 33/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF PULSE FREQUENCY Percentage of variation on the APD response from 1 to 20 pps APD DMC 2000XB EPD MK2.3 EDM III PM1621A DIS-100 EDD 30 AT3509C DoseAware Variation on the APD response % 25-30 30-40 <10 NO SIGNAL 30 10 (1.8 Sv.h -1 ) saturation from 2 Sv.h -1 30: 10-20 pps; No signal at 1 pps <10 (between 1 and 10 pps) 34/38

TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS EFFECT OF PULSE WIDTH When the pulse width is larger than 1 s: the responses in pulsed and in continuous radiation field are similar. No significant effect of pulse width on the response for 20, 50, 100 and 1000 ms at 1.8 Sv.h -1 was observed. 35/38

CONCLUSIONS ON TESTS PERFORMED WITH PULSED X-RAY BEAMS IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS PM1621A, equipped with a Geiger-Muller tube, does not give any signal in pulsed mode. The other APDs provide a response in pulsed mode. DMC 2000XB, EPD Mk2.3, EDMIII, EDD30, AT3509C and DoseAware contain all a silicon detector, the differences of their response is likely to be due to the time response of the electronics. The DIS has a hybrid technology between silicon and ionization chamber which presents correct results. 36/38

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ON TESTS PERFORMED IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS (1/2) The tests performed with continuous X-ray beams showed that all tested APDs have a satisfactory response at low energies typical of IR/IC. Most APDs provide a correct response for dose equivalent rates up to 10 Sv.h -1. However, the dose equivalent rates in the direct beam can be much higher than those tested here. So these tests cannot guarantee that the APDs will correctly measure the high dose equivalent rates in the direct beam. The study in pulsed mode showed that, except PM1621A, all APDs provide a reading. Limitations of some APDs are mostly due to high dose equivalent rates rather than to pulse frequency. 37/38

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ON TESTS PERFORMED IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS (2/2) This study highlights the limitations of APDs in IR/IC and the need of improving the APDs technology as to fulfil all needs in the IR field. Nevertheless, it is also shown that, with adequate correction factors, most of the tested APDs could be used as operational dosemeters provided that they are not exposed to the direct beam. tests in hospitals proposals for improvements of APDs practical guidelines related to the choice and the use of APDs in IR/IC Struelens et al. Martin et al. Daures et al. 38/38