ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
CubeSat Design Specification

Hands-on Education for the Space Engineers of tomorrow. Annual Report 2004

IAC-04-P.5.B.07 CUBESAT TECHNICAL ASPECTS

Attitude Determination and Control Specifications

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Update Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

GEM Student Tutorial: Cubesats. Alex Crew

From the Delfi-C3 nano-satellite towards the Delfi-n3Xt nano-satellite

From Single to Formation Flying CubeSats: An Update of the Delfi Programme

CubeSat: Developing a Standard Bus for Picosatellites

In the summer of 2002, Sub-Orbital Technologies developed a low-altitude

Poly Picosatellite Orbital Deployer Mk. III Rev. E User Guide

CubeSats: From Launch to Deployment Necessity for a standard.

Strategies for Successful CubeSat Development. Jordi Puig-Suari Aerospace Engineering Department Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo CEDAR Workshop July, 2009

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

Revision C June 5, Author: Ryan Connolly

Rome, Changing of the Requirements and Astrofein s Business Models for Cubesat Deployer

10 August 2005 Utah State University Logan, UT

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Vehicle Avionics and Design

Nanosat Deorbit and Recovery System to Enable New Missions

7 Annual CubeSat Developers Workshop Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, April UniCubeSat

Chapter 2 Satellite Configuration Design

6U SUPERNOVA TM Structure Kit Owner s Manual

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

The NaoSat nanosatellite platform for in-flight radiation testing. Jose A Carrasco CEO EMXYS Spain

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND STABILIZATION OF A CUBESAT

6U CubeSat Design Specification Revision 1.0

UKube-1 Platform Design. Craig Clark

Phone: , Fax: , Germany

GEM - Generic Engineering Model Overview

QB50 - BeEagleSat Inner - Outer Design Details and ADCS Testing - Integration

Open Source Design: Corvus-BC Spacecraft. Brian Cooper, Kyle Leveque 9 August 2015

Hermes CubeSat: Testing the Viability of High Speed Communications on a Picosatellite

KUTESat. Pathfinder. Presented by: Marco Villa KUTESat Project Manager. Kansas Universities Technology Evaluation Satellite

ARMADILLO: Subsystem Booklet

Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Space Systems Design and Test Laboratory

UCISAT-1. Current Completed Model. Former Manufactured Prototype

NanoRacks CubeSat Deployer (NRCSD) Interface Control Document

SPD 1004 QM Vibration Testing

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

CAHIER DES CLAUSES TECHNIQUES PARTICULIÈRES PUMA N Objet du marché : SUPPLY OF CUBESAT COMPONENTS FOURNITURE DE COMPOSANTS CUBESAT

Advanced Electrical Bus (ALBus) CubeSat Technology Demonstration Mission

CUBESAT P-Pod Deployer Requirements

New techniques for Radiation testing of CubeSats

SABRE-I: An End-to-End Hands-On CubeSat Experience for the Educate Utilizing CubeSat Experience Program

CanX-2 and NTS Canada's Smallest Operational Satellites

Beyond CubeSats: Operational, Responsive, Nanosatellite Missions. 9th annual CubeSat Developers Workshop

Cover. DLR-ESA Workshop on ARTES-11. SGEO: Implementation of of Artes-11. Dr. Andreas Winkler

SURREY GSA CATALOG. Surrey Satellite Technology US LLC 8310 South Valley Highway, 3rd Floor, Englewood, CO

A CubeSat-Based Optical Communication Network for Low Earth Orbit

Datasheet VHF antenna and release system for GomSpace 6U structure

SIMBA Sun Earth Imbalance mission. Tjorven Delabie, KU Leuven

Universal CubeSat Platform Design Technique

Computer Aided Approach on Optimizing Solar Array Circuitry on CubeSats

The Nemo Bus: A Third Generation Nanosatellite Bus for Earth Monitoring and Observation

Moog CSA Engineering CubeSat Payload Accommodations and Propulsive Adapters. 11 th Annual CubeSat Developer s Workshop 25 April 2014

Outernet: Development of a 1U Platform to Enable Low Cost Global Data Provision

Space Radiation & Charging Cube Satellite (SPARCCS) Project

The Future for CubeSats Present and Coming Launch Opportunities 18th Annual AIAA / USU Conference on Small Satellites CubeSat Workshop

PicoSat Mission Examples and Design Suggestions. Department of Electrical Engineering National Cheng Kung University

Student Satellites, Implementation Models & Approaches in Sudan

SMART COMMUNICATION SATELLITE (SCS) PROJECT OVERVIEW. Jin JIN Space Center, Tsinghua University 2015/8/10

NCUBE: The first Norwegian Student Satellite. Presenters on the AAIA/USU SmallSat: Åge-Raymond Riise Eystein Sæther

CubeSat Test Pod User s Guide Revision IV June, 2005

Improving Receive Sensitivity of the CPX Bus

HYDROS Development of a CubeSat Water Electrolysis Propulsion System

Orbicraft Pro Complete CubeSat kit based on Raspberry-Pi

ESPA Satellite Dispenser

CubeSat De-Orbit Project

Design of an Electrical Power Subsystem Using the CubeSat Stackable

Method for CubeSat Thermal-Vacuum testing specification

Satellite Engineering BEST Course. CubeSats at ULg

HEMERA Constellation of passive SAR-based micro-satellites for a Master/Slave configuration

Enabling Space Sensor Networks with PCBSat

LV-POD Executive Summary Report

Summary. ESPA 6U Mount (SUM) overview SUM qualification status Future SUM enhancements Moog CSA adapters and ESPA family

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

t: e: w: Mokslininkų str. 2A, LT Vilnius, Lithuania

First Results From the GPS Compact Total Electron Content Sensor (CTECS) on the PSSCT-2 Nanosat

Proximity Operations Nano-Satellite Flight Demonstration (PONSFD) Overview

Launch Service 101: Managing a 101 CubeSat Launch Manifest on PSLV-C37

Italian Space Agency perspective on Small Satellites

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

IABG Space Centre We give you space on earth SPACE

Developing the Miniature Tether Electrodynamics Experiment Completion of Key Milestones and Future Work

KySat1 Mission Review

(U) A Path Forward for Small Satellite Ground Architecture

The Evolution of Nano-Satellite Proximity Operations In-Space Inspection Workshop 2017

ncube Spacecraft Specification Document

Quantum Tech demos on CubeSat nanosatellites. Robert Bedington Satellite team leader Alex Ling Group 1

RAX: The Radio Aurora explorer

Conceptual Structural Design

Pico-Satellite Training Kit HEPTA-Sat: Hands-on Practices for Space Engineering

NanoCom ANT430. Datasheet 70 cm band Omnidirectional UHF CubeSat antenna

Research Activities on Small Satellite in HIT

The Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE) On-Orbit Performance

COTS ADAPTABLE MODULE FOR ATTITUDE DETERMINATION IN CUBESATS

NetCubeSat and SDR Based Communication System for Climate Change Understanding

Recent Advances in the CubeSat Kit Family

High-Power Solar Arrays for NanoSats

Transcription:

COMPASS-1 PICOSATELLITE: STRUCTURES & MECHANISMS Marco Hammer, Robert Klotz, Ali Aydinlioglu Astronautical Department University of Applied Sciences Aachen Hohenstaufenallee 6, 52064 Aachen, Germany Phone: +49 241 6009-1542, Fax: +49 241 6009-1542 marco_hammer@web.de, robert_klotz@hotmail.com, ali_aydinlioglu@yahoo.de ABSTRACT The experiences from the design and development of the spacecraft structure will be addressed in this paper. Basically, the structure must provide housing for the payload and the subsystems. A satellite structure normally appears to be subdivided in a primary structure that carries the spacecraft major loads and a secondary structure that supports wire bundles, propellant lines, non-structural doors and brackets for the components. Because the structure of a picosatellite had to be designed, it seemed advantageous to only consider one general structure. Yet the most important issues when designing a picosatellite structure is to constrain the mass to a minimum. To do so, the material thickness choice is a compromise between the necessary stability on the one hand and a feasible mass reduction on the other. Therefore dedicated aerospace aluminum was used as raw material for the body frame of the spacecraft. Before that, first estimations based on calculations were done and then, a software-based static and dynamic analyses. Those proofed that the chosen material was really suitable. The paper will present the results of the analyses. The model of the spacecraft and its mechanisms will be presented at the conference to give the audience an idea about the functionality of this system. The author wants to share his experience with others, in particular those that want to build their own CubeSats. INTRODUCTION COMPASS-1 is the name of the first picosatellite being developed at the Aachen University of Applied Sciences in Germany [1]. Since the projects initiation in September 2003 it is being managed and carried out by students of different engineering departments, with a majority being undergraduate students from the Astronautical Department. The team has about ten members with an increasing number of new participants. The project focuses on a number of goals. Mainly the students will gain essential practical experience in realizing a research and development project from start to end. Moreover, an adequate infrastructure shall be created that enables more space engineering activities to take place at our university in the future. And definitively not least, a fully functional picosatellite is going to be built and finally launched into orbit! The satellite is being built according to the CubeSat specification documents [2] published by Stanford and Calpoly University, which define a cubical structure with 10cm edges and a mass of not more than 1kg. Powered by solar cells, such a satellite will have an average of 1.5W for operation. Attempting to develop a spacecraft within the stringent constraints mentioned above becomes reasonable when considering the satellite being stored inside a container (P-POD) for simultaneous launch with other CubeSats, which in turn helps decreasing launch costs significantly. The launch date of COMPASS-1 is scheduled for mid/end of 2006. The final development and qualification testing is scheduled for spring 2006.

OVERVIEW Structure & Mechanism System Overview Important key element of the structure design was the philosophy of modularity. Thus the COMPASS- 1 structure was designed to be completely modular. In essence, it is a stand-alone frame structure which is covered with an alloy panel on each side. It provides mounting aids for PCBs and other parts. It can be disassembled and re-assembled quickly. Another advantage of the modular design is that the center of mass can be better positioned within the cube. In addition it facilitates the replacement of parts during test phase. The integrated mechanisms of the satellite follows the aspect to fulfill reliably its function under space conditions. Panel Design The panels are designed multifunctional around the main body. The outer surface is in use for the solar cells, which are special glued directly on the panel. The panels also granted all holding possibilities for the sun sensors, magnetorquer, GPS Antenna; Communication antenna release mechanism; remove before flight pin, data access port and last but not least the solar connecting board. All panels are completely laser cut and black anodised. Structure Hardware Components The different designs aspects of the hardware components are shown in the following. When designing the structure all relevant sketches and parts are in compliance with the Calpoly Cubesat Standards. Frames & Beams The focus has been on the frames. The frames are the most important parts of the structure. They take up all mechanical loads during launch and are used during the deployment out of the P-Pod. In addition they built up the platform for all integrated subsystem parts. The Kill-Switch mechanics and the Separation Spring mechanism are integrated into the frame. The four beams connected with the two frames build up the main body. Battery Box Fig. 2: Side Panels The Lithium Polymer Batteries are COTS 1 and thus constructed for terrestrial operation. To prevent the bloat up of the batteries caused by the vacuum in space, it is required to protect it inside a container, which takes up all pressure loads. The box is designed in consideration of the loads; therefore it combines a high stiffness and a low mass. Fig. 1: Main Body Fig. 3: Battery Box The parts of the main body are CNC-milled out of 6061-T6 aluminum blocks and are anodised. 1 COTS = commercial off-the-self

Coil Holder The coil holder allows an easy integration of the magnetorquer on the side panels. These are designed to fix the coils into a defined position; whereas the edges of the magnetorquer are in addition fixed with special glue. Mechanisms Normally you have to avoid mechanisms and complex systems. Every mechanism enables new sources of errors. Because of service and security reasons, on the CubeSat, a few mechanisms are needed. Additionally the entire Structure is connected to power ground. STR RbF -Pin GPS Board Holder Fig. 4: Coil holder Kill Switch (1) Kill Switch (2) The GPS Board holder allows an easy integration of the GPS receiver on the ADCS PCB. The main design issue provides enough surface area for electronic components on the main ADCS PCB under the GPS. The GPS system is a Phoenix receiver board which is software modified by the DLR [3] Kill- Switches The Kill-Switches are for keep the system powered off during the launch. We use a simple spring mechanism which is integrated in the frame, combined with a micro switch. In detail the micro switch is a D2F-D1L micro switch from OMRON, which is recommended and tested in space by a Japanese Cubesat group. GND Fig. 5: GPS Board Holder Camera Holder The Camera Holder is designed to fix and align the Camera Module to the Structure. In addition it provides holding possibility for an adapter PCB to relieve the sensitive capton cable of the camera. It is also, like near all other parts, milled out of aluminium. Fig. 7:Kill- Switch We have one mechanic and one micro switch in each frame; so our Kill-Switch mechanism is fully redundant. Antenna Release Fig. 6: Camera Holder We use an enfoldable antenna system with one monopole and two dipole antennas. During the launch, in the deployer the antenna system is packed and fixed with a nylon wire. In order not to interfere with the other satellites. When the satellite leaves the deployer, after a short time the nylon wire will be melt by an heating coil. And the antenna can unfold. To protect the batteries, a micro switch is integrated in the mechanism, to cut off the

current from the heating coils when the nylon wire is melt. Data Access Port To assure access to housekeeping data or for software modifications and updates during phase of integration, while in the P-Pod, we use an Data Access Port. Chosen is a simple 8 pole mini DIN socket. Type 738359-V3 Fig. 11: Data Access Port Simulation & Testing Fig. 8: Antenna release mechanism Seperation Springs The Separation Springs are screwed in into the frames. They separates the different Cubesats in the the deployer during launch and take up vibrations. We chose the spring plunger Model No# 84985A45 from Mc Master Carr Inc. which are recommended and tested by Stanford University. The dynamic analysis and simulation of the CubeSat structure is to verify the structural integrity and localize weak points in the structure at an early design stage to prevent major modifications later. The structure of the satellite must assure integrity during the whole life cycle. Especially the high loads acting during the launch must be considered. A software-based analysis and simulation with appropriate programs is able to compute stress values under static load and behavior of the structure under dynamic loads. These computed values have to be in accordance with the material properties and the launcher requirements. The next step is going to the tests with real hardware. Static & Dynamic Analyses with CATIA A simulation based on the CATIA V5 software was able to calculate the first modal frequencies of the parts and the assembled structure, and maximal deflection and stresses under static loads. Fig. 9: Spring plunger Remove-Before-Flight Pin In our case it is not really a Pin to pull out but a slide switch with a very high self holding capability. It also can handle all current peaks and a mean current of 3A. Chosen is the miniature slide switch 25136NLDH from APEM. Fig. 12: Load simulation All analyses are made with CATIA V5R13. Fig. 10: Remove-Before-Flight Pin

Vibration Tests on Shaker Up to now, we carried out some shaker tests with the Side Panel solar cell assembly and the main frame. Diverse launcher scenarios, natural frequency and damping tests were simulated. Especial focuses are made on High and Low Level Qualification Profile tests from the DNEPR launcher. Ruck [g²/hz] 0,06 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,01 DNEPR High Level Qualification Profil [Time = 35 Seconds] 120,00 100,00 80,00 60,00 40,00 20,00 Beschleunigung [m/s²] More vibration tests, in particular with the full integrated engineering model will be conducted in order to provide results of qualification testing for possible launch provides. SUMMARY The model of the spacecraft and its mechanisms will be presented at the conference to give the audience an idea about the functionality of this system. The author wants to share his experience with others, in particular those that want to build their own CubeSats. 0 0,00 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Frequenz [Hz] LOWER FREQ HIGHER FREQ LOWER FREQ ACCEL LOWER FREQ ACCEL REFERENCES [1] The Compass-1 Picosatellite Project at the FH Aachen. www.raumfahrt.fh-aachen.de [2] Calpoly and Stanford University. (2003). CUBESAT Design Specifications Document, Revision VIII. http://cubesat.calpoly.edu/ [3] DLR Homepage www.weblab.dlr.de/rbrt/ Fig. 13: Vibration Test Stand