Geopier Foundation Company, Inc.

Similar documents
VIBRATIONAL TESTING OF A FULL-SCALE PILE GROUP IN SOFT CLAY

GT4800 Ground Vibration Measurements near Impact Pile Driving

SKIN FRICTION OF PILES COATED WITH BITUMINOUS COATS Makarand G. Khare 1 and Shailesh R. Gandhi 2

transmit foundation loads

SImulation of MONopile installation - JIP SIMON

Helical Pier Frequently Asked Questions

Experimental Study on Pile Groups Settlement and Efficiency in Cohesionless Soil

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATION OF THE EXTENDED SUBTRACTION METHOD IN SASSI SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS

With time, the evolution of anchors have led to different designs More than one anchor type may be suitable for a particular purpose Thus there are

Foundation Specifications for 5.6-Meter Modular Earth Station Antennas

Foundation Specifications for 7.6-Meter Modular Earth Station Antennas

FB-PIER VALIDATION SET

Module 5 : Design of Deep Foundations. Lecture 20 : Introduction [ Section 20.1 : Introduction ]

Module 9 Lecture 35 to 40 DRILLED-SHAFT AND CAISSON FOUNDATIONS

Advanced Ground Investigation Techniques to Help Limit Risk or Examine Failure. Advanced Subsurface Investigations

CALIBRATION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM SASSI FOR VIBRATION TRANSMISSIBILITY ANALYSIS IN UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES USING FIELD MEASURED DATA

British Columbia Carpenter Apprenticeship Program

STABILITY. SECURITY. INTEGRITY.

Large Scale CalArc Pavers for Sand-Set Pedestrian Use Installations

Industrial vibration sensor selection: piezovelocity transducers

Overall vibration, severity levels and crest factor plus

Appendix B Drilling Methods

Module 7 : Design of Machine Foundations. Lecture 31 : Basics of soil dynamics [ Section 31.1: Introduction ]

INFLUENCE OF PILES ON LOAD- SETTLEMENT BEHAVIOUR OF RAFT FOUNDATION

Nondestructive Testing of Drilled Shaft Foundations

Propagation and attenuation characteristics of various ground vibrations

Industrial vibration sensor selection: Piezovelocity transducers

ABC and Innovative Bridge Construction for Minnesota Local Roads

Comparing Guided Auger Boring Techniques under Challenging Conditions

Texas Components - Data Sheet. The TX53G1 is an extremely rugged, low distortion, wide dynamic range sensor. suspending Fluid.

POSTPRINT UNITED STATES AIR FORCE RESEARCH ON AIRFIELD PAVEMENT REPAIRS USING PRECAST PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC) SLABS (BRIEFING SLIDES)

Paper Title: FIELD MONITORING OF FATIGUE CRACK ON HIGHWAY STEEL I- GIRDER BRIDGE

SEA SELF DRILLING, THREADED, HOLLOW BAR / GROUT-ABLE SOIL NAILS / ANCHORS

AGN 008 Vibration DESCRIPTION. Cummins Generator Technologies manufacture ac generators (alternators) to ensure compliance with BS 5000, Part 3.

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Flanged Dowel Box. Load Transfer System INDUSTRIAL SLAB ON GROUND

Linguistics 401 LECTURE #2. BASIC ACOUSTIC CONCEPTS (A review)

Results of Vibration Study for LCLS-II Construction in the Research Yard 1

Elastic Support of Machinery and Equipment

Foundations Subjected to Vibration Loads

Comparison of the Behavior for Free Standing Pile Group and Piles of Piled Raft

Vibration Calibrator

Double rotary drilling

USER S MANUAL. For the SVS-3 & SVS-3M. Vibration Shaker

Vibration Monitoring for University Of Louisville Belknap Campus Master Plan Seven Locations

Resonant Column (GDSRCA)

Finite Element Study of Using Concrete Tie Beams to Reduce Differential Settlement Between Footings

The DFI Institute is organized to serve as a primary means through which members of the Institute may participate in improvement of the planning,

Pile driving of large diameter monopiles: Current practice and challenges

Chapter 2 High Speed Machining

Foundation Specifications

ANALYSIS OF PILE-RAFT FOUNDATIONS NON- RESTED AND DIRECTLY RESTED ON SOIL

Numerical Analysis of Piled Raft Foundation using Fem with Interaction Effects

PD 3 Dowel Cradle. Load Transfer System Industrial Slab on Ground

DEEP FOUNDATIONS PILES

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

An Overview of Ground Motion and Vibration Studies

Do all accelerometers behave the same? Meggitt-Endevco, Anthony Chu

Synopsis. Civil Engineering Construction Chapter 3 TYPES OF FOUNDATIONS 7/22/2011. Deep Foundation. 1. Shallow foundations. 2.

High Vibration Analysis of Eddy Current Drum Coupled Motor to a Vertical Centrifugal Pump Solution Based on EMA, ODS and FEA By:

Response spectrum Time history Power Spectral Density, PSD

HOME STRENGTHENING GUIDE HOW TO ECONOMICALLY STRENGTHEN YOUR HOUSE AGAINST EARTHQUAKES AND HURRICANES

NALYSIS OF STABILIZING SLOPES USING VERTICAL PILES

Barrier. (a) State the conditions which must be met for an object to move with simple harmonic motion. (2)

IBIS range. GeoRadar Division. GeoRadar Division. Static and Dynamic Monitoring of Civil Engineering Structures by Microwave Interferometry

SUBSTATION SECURITY WALL INSTALLATION MANUAL

Sonic Pile Driving: The History and the Resurrection of Vibration Free Pile Driving

DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A BRIDGE ESTIMATED WITH NEW BOLT-TYPE SENSOR, AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Precast Concrete Pavement

Diamond Dowel. Load Transfer System INDUSTRIAL SLAB ON GROUND

Monitoring Rock Blasting for Tunnel Construction

StandingWaves_P2 [41 marks]

HORIZONTAL BORING GRUNDOMAT PNEUMATIC PIERCING TOOL DO IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME

Anchorage Port Modernization Program In air Noise and Ground borne Vibration Analysis Monitoring Report

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

Nonlinear Analysis of Pacoima Dam with Spatially Nonuniform Ground Motion

Block Foundation. From the 1950s through the 80s. Hydraulically driven. piers provide bearing. for a settling foundation

DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC ISOLATION SYSTEM IN VERTICAL DIRECTION

Module 6 : Design of Retaining Structures. Lecture 30 : Dewatering [ Section 30.1 : Introduction ]

B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422

Gable HomeshedsTM INSTALLATION BEFORE YOU START TOOLS REQUIRED GUIDE LARGE SPAN. Council Approval. Before Starting

Vibration Fundamentals Training System

4) Drive Mechanisms. Techno_Isel H830 Catalog

high, thin-walled buildings in glass and steel

Steel Plate in Oil Rig Blowout Preventer Valves

Vibration Meter Operation Manual REV. A DATE:

Kistler portable triaxial Force Plate

CHAPTER 11 TEST REVIEW -- MARKSCHEME

Aero Support Ltd, 70 Weydon Hill Road, Farnham, Surrey, GU9 8NY, U.K.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

Development of Random Vibration Profiles for Test Deployers to Simulate the Dynamic Environment in the Poly-Picosatellite Orbital Deployer

Pile Integrity Tester Model Comparison: PIT-X, PIT-XFV, PIT-QV and PIT-QFV April 2016

Design of Geophysical Surveys in Transportation

DYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF ORIFICE TYPE AEROSTATIC BEARING

Section 7. Pouring Concrete. Section 7: Pouring Concrete

The effect of underground cavities on design seismic ground motion

Transactions on the Built Environment vol 14, 1995 WIT Press, ISSN

A Technique for Improving the Yields of Fine Feature Prints

Evaluation Methodology on Vibration Serviceability of Bridge by using Non-Contact Vibration Measurement Method

VIBRATION ANALYSIS AND MODAL IDENTIFICATION OF A CIRCULAR CABLE-STAYED FOOTBRIDGE

Transcription:

Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. 800.371.7470 www.geopier.com 4_2006

g e o p i e r f o u n d a t i o n c o i n c t e c h n i c a l b u l l e t i n N o. 9 v i b r a t i o n a n d n o i s e l e v e l s Construction vibration and noise levels are important when considering the effect of construction activities on adjacent buildings, building additions and neighbors. This technical bulletin describes the results of vibration and noise monitoring performed adjacent to Geopier and Impact Rammed Aggregate Pier (RAP) activities. This information should be used when evaluating the feasibility of a RAP solution at a particular site. For sites with increased vibration and noise sensitivity, a site-specific monitoring program should be considered. 1. c o n s t r u c t i o n v i b r a t i o n s Many construction activities result in the transmission of vibrations across the construction site. Vibration levels depend on the types of construction activities as well as the soil conditions at the site. The effect of vibrations on adjacent buildings depends on the building s construction (wood, masonry, steel, concrete), building age, distance of the adjacent building from the source of vibration, duration of vibration, vibration frequency, vibration amplitude and soil conditions. In general, low frequency (long period) motions result in a greater likelihood of building damage compared to high frequency (short period) motions. This is because of the significant damping effect that occurs in soils subjected to high frequency (short period) motions. In contrast, soils subjected to low frequency (long period) motions may amplify the vibrations. In the United States, high frequency vibrations levels less than two in/sec at the building location are generally considered to be acceptable (Wiss 1981). These levels of vibrations are unlikely to lead to building damage. Vibration levels between 0.5 in/sec and 2 in/sec, are generally considered to be an annoyance but not structurally damaging. Vibration levels of less than 0.5 in/sec are often not noticeable.

2. r a m m e d a g g r e g a t e p i e r c o n s t r u c t i o n Rammed Aggregate Pier construction is described in detail in the Geopier Reference Manual (Fox and Cowell 1998). Geopier Rammed Aggregate Piers are constructed by drilling out a volume of compressible soil to create a cavity and then ramming select aggregate into the cavity in thin lifts using the patented beveled tamper. Impact Rammed Aggregate Piers are installed in caving soils through the use of a hollow mandrel driven to the design depth. Aggregate placed down the center of the hollow mandrel fills the cavity and is compacted in thin lifts as the mandrel is raised up and rammed down to achieve compaction. The ramming action during construction of Rammed Aggregate Piers causes the aggregate to compact vertically and to push laterally against the matrix soil, thereby increasing the horizontal stress in the matrix soil. Rammed Aggregate Pier construction results in a very dense aggregate pier with superior strength and stiffness. During installation, the hammers that produce the ramming action operate at ranges of 400 to 600 cycles per minute (7 to 10 cycles per second) for Geopier RAPs and 2,000 to 2,400 cycles per minute for Impact RAPs. These high frequency vibration levels are higher than most other construction activities resulting in a large amount of damping within the reinforced soils at the project site. Conversely, pile driving typically produces vibrations associated with low frequencies on the order of 60 cycles per minute (one cycle per second) and an associated period of one second. The RAP vibration levels are thus both lower in amplitude and higher in frequency than pile driving activities, resulting in lower vibrations measured at adjacent sites. 3. v i b r a t i o n m o n i t o r i n g Vibration monitoring has been performed at a number of Rammed Aggregate Pier project sites to evaluate the amplitude and frequency of vibrations as a function of distance from the energy source. The following table contains summaries of the collected data. The table includes a description of the soil conditions, installation technique, distance ranges from source, as well as the field vibration data for each of the project sites. p a g e t w o

Table 1. Vibration Monitoring Results* LOCATION MEMPHIS, TN SOIL DESCRIPTION MED. STIFF CLAY REINFORCE- MENT SOLUTION DISTANCE FROM SOURCE (ft) PEAK PARTICLE VELOCITY (ips) FREQUENCY (Hz) GEOPIER RAP 1.7-2.18-2.96 43-57 GEOPIER RAP 5-10.12 -.70 43-73 SOMERVILLE, MA SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA MINNEAPOLIS, MN MINNEAPOLIS, MN MED. DENSE GRANULAR FILL GEOPIER RAP 1.5-10.50 -.65 30-85 STIFF CLAY GEOPIER RAP 7-15.04 -.55 15-60 LOOSE SAND GEOPIER RAP 3-50.07 -.90 27-57 LOOSE SAND IMPACT RAP 3-20.56 -.99 21-47 MANALAPAN, NJ MED. DENSE SILTY SAND IMPACT RAP 30-100.02 -.48 21-47 IMPACT RAP 5-10.57-3.19 37-64 IMPACT RAP 25-50.10 -.62 34-73 *Monitoring results are also plotted in Figures 2 and 3. At one project site, the Baptist Memorial Hospital Addition in Memphis, Tennessee, Geopier RAPs were installed in close proximity to existing hospital facilities. An accelerometer was used at the site to measure both accelerations and peak particle velocities (PPV) during the installation of the Geopier elements. The accelerometer was positioned at distances ranging from 1.7 feet to 10 feet away from the Geopier RAPs as the tamper head elevation ranged from the ground surface to greater than 13 feet below grade. The subsurface conditions consisted of medium-stiff clay with groundwater below the bottoms of the piers. The results of the accelerometer testing are shown graphically in Figure 1. p a g e t h r e e

Figure 1. Peak Particle Velocity With Depth For Different Energy Source Distances Peak Particle Velocity (in/sec) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0 Depth Below Grade (ft) 2 4 6 8 10 12 Radial Distance From Source 1.7 ft 2 ft 5 ft 10 ft 14 16 4. d i s c u s s i o n o f v i b r a t i o n r e s u l t s The results of the vibration monitoring data (Figure 1) indicate that RAP construction vibration amplitudes decrease with increasing depth below the ground surface. The highest vibration amplitudes are observed when the tamper is at the ground surface. Table 1 and Figures 2 to 4 show the ranges of peak particle velocity with distance from the source. The data indicates that vibration amplitudes reduce with radial distance from the energy source. This rapid dissipation of vibration amplitudes is attributed to the high frequency (low period) vibrations resulting from the hammers used during RAP construction. For Geopier RAP elements, the peak particle velocities are generally less than two in/sec at distances of two feet from the installation location and less than 0.75 in/sec at distances of five feet from the installation location. For Impact RAP elements, the peak particle velocities are less than two in/sec at distances on the order of 10 to 15 feet from the pier installation location and less than 0.75 in/sec at distances of 20 to 25 feet from the installation location. The higher amplitudes observed for the Impact RAP installations are likely attributed to the displacement installation procedure and the densification of the granular soils during installation. Figure 4 shows a comparison of Geopier RAP vibration levels from the site in San Luis Obispo, California compared with other construction equipment. As indicated, the measured vibration levels are comparable to those induced by a jack hammer or a large bulldozer and are considerably lower than pile driving operations. p a g e f o u r

Figure 2. Peak Particle Velocities For Geopier RAPs With Distance From Energy Source 3.0 Peak Particle Velocity (in/sec) Peak Particle Velocity (in/sec) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1 10 100 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Distance from From Source Source (ft) (ft) Range of PPV - Memphis, TN Range of PPV - San Luis Obispo, CA Maximum PPV values - Minneapolis, MN Maximum PPV values - Somerville, MA Range of PPV - Manalapan, NJ Maximum PPV - Minneapolis, MN Figure 3. Peak Particle Velocities For Impact RAPs With Distance From Energy Source 0.5 0.0 1 10 100 Distance From Source (ft) p a g e f i v e

Figure 5. Peak Particle Velocity With Vibration Frequency (Fiegel 2005) Peak Velocity (mm/sec) (25 mm/sec = 1 in/sec) Although the data from Table 1 and Figures 1 through 5 may be used for most project sites, settlement- sensitive sites should include a site-specific monitoring program to evaluate vibration levels. 5. n o i s e l e v e l s Construction noise decibel levels were recorded during the installation of Geopier Rammed Aggregate Pier elements at the Baptist Memorial Hospital project. Using a decibel meter, the noise levels were recorded with increasing distance from the Geopier RAP installation. At each distance, readings were recorded for the noise level while the ramming assembly was positioned at both the top and the bottom of the cavity. The results of the measurements are summarized in Table 2 and shown in Figure 6. p a g e s e v e n

Table 2. Summary Of Noise Levels DISTANCE FROM RAMMING ASSEMBLY (ft) DECIBEL LEVEL WITH TAMPER AT TOP (db) DECIBEL LEVEL WITH TAMPER AT BOTTOM (db) 2 100 104 5 100 102 10 96 98 25 86 98 50 82 90 100 75 82 Figure 6. Range Of Geopier RAP Noise Levels With Distance From Source 120 Peak Velocity (mm/sec) (25 mm/sec = 1 in/sec) 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 Jack Hammer (94 db) Air Compressor (87 db) Pile Driver (107 db) 80 1 10 100 Distance from from Source Source (ft) (ft) p a g e e i g h t

The decibel level for the Geopier RAP installation process reduces significantly with distance from the ramming assembly. The decibel levels drop from approximately 100 db adjacent to the Geopier installation equipment to approximately 75 to 80 db at a distance of 50 to 100 feet. For comparison purposes, it should be noted that interpersonal communication is on the order of 60 db, heavy truck traffic is on the order of 85 db and pile driving operations are on the order of 105 db. 6. c o n c l u s i o n s Rammed Aggregate Pier installations induce high frequency (low period) vibrations during the construction process. Vibration levels for Geopier Rammed Aggregate Piers are typically within acceptable levels at distances between 2 and 5 feet from the installation location, while vibration levels for Impact Rammed Aggregate Piers are within tolerable levels at distances between 10 and 20 feet from installation locations. Noise levels for Rammed Aggregate Piers are consistent with construction-type activities. p a g e n i n e

a c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s The authors are indebted to Peterson Contractors, Inc. for providing vibration results and JGI/Eastern, Inc., French and Parrello Associates, and American Engineering Testing, Inc. for providing vibration monitoring services. r e f e r e n c e s Fiegel, G. (2005). Measurement of Vibration and Noise During the Installation of Rammed Aggregate Piers - Preliminary Data Report Draft, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. California Polytechnic State University. San Luis Obispo, CA. Fox, N.S. and Cowell, M.J. (1998). Geopier Foundation and Soil Reinforcement Manual, Geopier Foundation Company, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ. Wiss, J.F. (1981). Construction Vibrations: State-of-the-Art. ASCE Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 107 (GT2), pp. 167-181. a u t h o r s Brendan T. FitzPatrick, Director of Engineering / Development - North America, Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. Kord J. Wissmann, Ph.D., P.E., President / Chief Engineer, Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. 2006 Geopier Foundation Company, Inc.

n o r t h a m e r i c a a n d s o u t h a m e r i c a Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. Telephone: (540) 951.8076 or (800) 371.7470 Fax: (540) 951.8078 Email: info@geopier.com www.geopier.com e u r o p e a n d a s i a Geopier Global Corporation Telephone: (480) 998.3522 Fax: (480) 998.3542 Email: natfox@geopierglobal.com www.geopierglobal.com