Load-Frequency Control and Reserves Network Code. David Bunney JESG 19 March 2013

Similar documents
LFC/AGC Nordic and European perspective. Exchange of balancing services international workshop Jan 2011 Whitley Gjerde

ENTSO-E Draft Network Code on High Voltage Direct Current Connections and DCconnected

INCIDENTS CLASSIFICATION SCALE METHODOLOGY

Impact of Merit Order activation of automatic Frequency Restoration Reserves and harmonised Full Activation Times

Demonstration of PFR Improvement September ERCOT Operations Planning

OPERATIONAL RESERVE AD HOC TEAM REPORT

European Workgroup. 7th May 2015

SELECTING NATIONAL MW BOUNDARIES

INITIAL RfG FREQUENCY PARAMETER SELECTION. BASED ON DRAFT RfG VALUES. Requirement Range Suggested GB Value Comments

European Update. 5 th May 2016

European Update. 3 rd December 2015

FNN comments on NC HVDC submitted to ENTSO E

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Requirements for Generators European Network Code High Level Implementation Issues

ASX CHESS Replacement Project Webinar

IEEE Major Revision of Interconnection Standard

CHARACTERISTIC NUMBERS OF PRIMARY CONTROL IN THE ISOLATED ESTONIAN POWER SYSTEM

Max voltage in 400 kv Networks

Exploiting the digital dividend a European approach: overview of the study for the European Commission

Parameters related to frequency stability

Indication of Dynamic Model Validation Process

Network Code for HVDC Connections and DC-connected Power Park Modules Requirement Outlines

Commonwealth War Graves Commission. Burial and Cremation (Scotland) Bill

Recreation Facility Hours

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR STORAGE CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS

P5 Policy 5: Emergency Operations

FREQUENCY and VOLTAGE, ranges and durations

WORKING GROUP REPORT. Frequency and voltage operating range. Prepared by the Working Group for submission to the Grid Code Review Panel

Automatic connection/reconnection and admissible rate of change of active power

EASTERN AFRICA POWER POOL

Constant Terminal Voltage. Working Group 1 29 st January 2014

Parameters related to voltage issues

Form of the 2018 Electricity Ten Year Statement Consultation. UK electricity transmission

TABLE 1 COMPARISION OF ENTSO-E RfG TO GB GRID CODE

Indonesia s Preparation for WRC-19

Deleted: 9 4 anuary ... [1] Deleted: much more. Formatted ... [2] Formatted Table. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.06 cm

Fault Ride Through. Antony Johnson / Richard Ierna National Grid TNS Technical Policy

WSAT Online Tool for Assessment of Secure Level of Wind Generation on the System

Total Marks : 100 READ THE FOLLOWING DIRECTIONS CAREFULLY:

The EU Network Code on Requirements for Generators A Summary

Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)

Frequency response White paper

SYSTEM MONITORING FAULT RECORDING

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.64/Rev.2/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.64/Rev.2/Amend.2

TESTING GUIDANCE FOR PROVIDERS OF FIRM FREQUENCY RESPONSE BALANCING SERVICE

Real-time Monitoring of Power Oscillations and Modal Damping in the European ENTSO-E System

Phasor-based wide area monitoring in the South African power system

3-Terminal 500mA Positive Voltage Regulator

Wind Power Plants and future Power System Frequency Stability

Research and Innovation in Science and Technology Project (P121842)

G59 and G83 Protection Requirements

New ITS Project Proposed INOGATE Work Program for Sustainable Energy (Component C)

P5 Policy 5: Emergency Operations

VGB / EURELECTRIC s generators RfG Network Code: Needs, Feasibility, Alternative Solutions and Costs

Considerations and Recommendations for the Harmonisation of Under Frequency Loadshedding Schemes in Multi Zone Meshed Grids

TS79M00 Series 3-Terminal 500mA Negative Voltage Regulator

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH ESTIMATES OF MONTHLY GDP. Embargo until hours on 11 th January 2013

The Revised EU Block Exemption Regulation for Research and Development Agreements

Target Mchunu and Themba Khoza Eskom Transmission Division, System Operator Grid Code Management

Legal Aspects of Identity Management and Trust Services

Identification number : Jean-Louis MARTINAUD. 1, Place Samuel de Champlain PARIS LA DEFENSE Cedex. Address

UK High-Field NMR Funding and the UKRI Infrastructure Roadmap

Homogenisation of Maximum and Minimum Air Temperatures in Ireland. Mary Curley * and Seamus Walsh

SSE Offices, Glasgow and Teleconference

Site Name. Bird Dimensions Species Hen harrier = data input required length (m) 0.55 = model calculates value wing span (m) 1.

Preparation of requirements. Part I Notification principles and time schedule

Top View BAT54T BAT54AT BAT54CT BAT54ST

3-Termal 500mA Negative Voltage Regulator

Final ballot January BOT adoption February 2015

Overview and Version 3.1.0

N-Channel Power MOSFET 60V, 70A, 12mΩ

BAL Standard Project Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting Industry Webinar

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

Minutes Frequency Response Initiative Meeting

11/4/2013. NERC RS Meeting October 28, 2013 Sullivan s Island, SC. Troy Blalock SERC NERC RS Representative

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

Revision of the European Trade Mark system

ASD EUROSPACE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE (SRTC)

Transmission Availability Data System Phase II Final Report

RADIO SPECTRUM POLICY GROUP. Commission activities related to radio spectrum policy

Assessing the Feasibility of Wind Power Production for the University of Rhode Island s Bay Campus

Alternatives for Primary Frequency Control Contribution from Wind Power Plants Connected to VSC-HVDC Intertie

Work process proposal adaptation FTR. UG Belgian Grid 09/09/2013 Elia

N-Channel Power MOSFET 40V, 135A, 3.8mΩ

Step-Response Tests of a Unit at Atatürk Hydro Power Plant and Investigation of the Simple Representation of Unit Control System

Robert W. Cummings - NERC Director of System Analysis and Reliability Initiatives William Herbsleb - Chairman of Frequency Response Standard Drafting

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR NC HVDC REQUIREMENTS OF GENERAL APPLICATION

1

N-Channel Power MOSFET 100V, 81A, 10mΩ

Keeping it up to Speed Off-Nominal Frequency Operations. CETAC 2018 San Ramon

Spectrum for audio PMSE. Use of the 694 to 703 MHz band

RADIO SPECTRUM POLICY GROUP. Commission activities related to radio spectrum policy

Mandatory Frequency Response

PC-07- PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON DRAFT FRAMEWORK GUIDELINES ON INTEROPERABILITY RULES AND DATA EXCHANGE FOR THE EUROPEAN GAS TRANSMISSION NETWORKS

High Performance Engineering

N-Channel Power MOSFET 60V, 38A, 17mΩ

ISO Rules Part 500 Facilities Division 502 Technical Requirements Section Aggregated Generating Facilities Technical Requirements

TESTING GUIDANCE FOR PROVIDERS OF ENHANCED FREQUENCY RESPONSE BALANCING SERVICE

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

WFPS1 WIND FARM POWER STATION GRID CODE PROVISIONS

Transcription:

Load-Frequency Control and Reserves Network Code David Bunney JESG 19 March 2013

Agenda Overview and Timescales Stakeholder Engagement Overview of the Code More detailed discussion on Frequency Quality reporting & Normal Distribution methods 2

Background and purpose One of the Network Codes being developed under the System Operation Framework Guidelines Overview: The LFC&R Network Code considers the containment and restoration system frequency and appropriate dimensioning of reserves to achieve and maintain satisfactory frequency quality in terms of the frequency deviations from the nominal value and how often these deviations occur within a defined time period. The code seeks harmonisation where practical and achievable and standardisation of terminology. Where necessary parameters are defined on a per synchronous area basis 3

ENTSO-E LFC&R Timescale Commission Mandate Early Drafting Final Drafting Public Consultation Today Final Revision Submit Network Code to ACER Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 25 September 2 nd Workshop with DSO and Stakeholders 19/20 March GB public Workshop May Further ENTSO-E public Workshop 12 July 1st Workshop with DSO and Stakeholders 13 February 3 rd Workshop with DSO and Stakeholders 25 April 4 th Workshop with DSO and Stakeholders

Stakeholder Engagement Key dates and opportunities to engage in the process

ENTSO-E Stakeholder Engagement ENTSO-E Public Stakeholder Workshop 12/03/2013 took place in Brussels A further Public Workshop will be arranged towards the end of the drafting process All Responses to ENTSO-E by electronic comment via the consultation website. https://www.entsoe.eu/news-events/entso-e-consultations/ https://www.entsoe.eu/major-projects/network-codedevelopment/load-frequency-control-reserves/ 6

GB Stakeholder Engagement (Today) 19 th & 20 th March 2 day event (ELEXON Building) Presentation and discussion on the LFCR code and its impact on GB operations and industry. Please this does not replace the ENTSO-E consultation. Formal stakeholder comments are to be submitted directly to ENTSO-E.

Provisions of the Network Code Overview of the Code: Structure and Key concepts

LFC&R Framework Frequency Quality Control Structure Interaction with Other Codes OS OP&S Balancing CACM Grid Connections Frequency Containment Frequency Restoration Cross- border Exchange and Sharing Minimum Technical Requirements Replacement Data / Info Exchange 9

Chapter 2: Frequency Quality This section defines the specific operating criteria of each Synchronous Area with specific values (Table 1); Specific interaction between frequency quality, dimensioning incident and 3-categories of reserve are introduced; 10

Frequency Quality Parameters GB Synchronous Area Nominal Frequency Standard Frequency Range Maximum Instantaneous Frequency Deviation Maximum Steady-state Frequency Deviation Time to Recover Frequency Frequency Range Within Time To Recover Frequency Time To Restore Frequency Frequency Range Within Time To Restore Frequency 50 Hz ±200 mhz 800 mhz 500 mhz 1 minute ±500 mhz 10 minutes ±200 mhz Table 1: Frequency Quality Criteria 11

Frequency Quality General Terms 51 50.8 50.6 50.4 Time to Recover frequency Time to restore frequency Frequency (Hz) 50.2 50 49.8 49.6 49.4 49.2 49 Nominal frequency Frequency Maximum absolute frequency deviation Time Standard frequency deviation range Maximum quasi steady state frequency deviation

Response and reserve current and new terms Frequency (Hz) 52.0 50.5 50.2 50.0 49.8 49.5 49.2 49.0 48.8 47.0 Dynamic response Upper Statutory Limit 10 s 30 s 60 s FCR (Primary) Lower Statutory Limit Maximum Absolute Frequency Deviation Based on Dimensioning Incident Incident (i.e. Generation loss) Time to Recover frequency FRR Secondary (to 30 mins) Time 10 mins Frequency Range Within Time to Restore Frequency (Lower Limit) Frequency Range Within Time to Recover Frequency (Lower Limit) Time to Restore Frequency GB and new LFCR terms 30 mins Replacement Reserve (Tertiary) 13

Control Structure The classification of reserve category is determined according to activation time and the delivery time of the reserve. General principle of Reserve Activation 1. Frequency Containment Reserves (FCR), 2. Frequency Restoration Reserves (FRR), 3. Replacement Reserves (RR) The terminology is different to that presently in GB 14

Process Activation Structure Reserves / Frequency Frequency Containment Process FCR FRR Frequency Restoration Process RR manual FRR Reserve Replacement Process Time Time to Restore Frequency Frequency Containment Process Stabilization Frequency Restoration Process Regulate to Set-Point Value Reserve Replacement Process Restore FRR

Process Responsibility Structure - 1 Requirements are specified on a Synchronous Area basis e.g. GB, Continental Europe, Nordic Control hierarchy is present: Synchronous Area 1 or more Load Frequency Control Blocks 1 or more Load Frequency Control Areas 1 or more Monitoring Areas For GB there will be only be one responsible entity for all elements within the Control Hierarchy i.e. the NETSO = NGET 16

Process Responsibility Structure - 2 Synchronous Area Frequency Quality Target, FCR Dimensioning Control Block Frequency Restoration Quality Target & FRR/RR Dimensioning Control Area Frequency Restoration Control Error, Frequency Restoration and Replacement Processes Monitoring Area Online Monitoring of the Power Interchange In GB these are the system operator s responsibility 17

Reserves Categories - FCR Dimensioning (reserve holding) obligations on TSO remain largely unchanged; NG has sought to retain Minimum technical requirements unchanged e.g. full activation in 10s and sustainable for a further 20s; Geographic limitations to avoid concentrations of reserve providers in one part of the network. Within GB this is part of the normal TSO competency and hence no change. Pooling of providers permitted where the TSO considers it to have no security of supply implications Provision is subject to a prequalification process. Code applicable to all FCR providing units of any size(??); GB may exchange or share this service across HVDC links see later slide

FCR minimum technical parameters FCR Parameter FCR Value Minimum accuracy of frequency measurement 1 mhz Maximum insensitivity of the governor of the FCR Providing Units 15 mhz Full Activation Time of FCR 10s FCR Full Activation Deviation. ±500 mhz TSOs may set more onerous criteria within there synchronous areas; FCR is a broad category of reserve for containment and there may be a requirement for faster and more sensitive products; 19

Reserve Category - FRR TSO obligations are to ensure enough FRR is held to restore frequency for credible risk events (ie dimensioning incident) Those current GB reserve products whose full activation time is outside normal FRR full activation time may be considered to be in this category of reserve (specific product structure is for Balancing Code) The code sets out minimal technical requirements but permits TSOs to set requirements specific to their system. Full activation within 30seconds; TSOs have right to set per SA requirements; Code applicable to Reserve Providing Units of 1MW of bigger The code seeks to cover all synchronous areas with definitions for Automatic Generation Control as well as Manual activation. Prequalification Process is required Provisions exist for Sharing and Exchange of this service see later slides

Reserve Category - RR Termed Replacement Reserves these relate to all despatched instructions which may be used to maintain margins or replace depleted FCR/FRR. There is a prequalification process Provisions for GB to Exchange and/or Share this product exist see later slide

Reserve Exchange, Sharing and Netting Mechanisms exist within the code that will allow GB to share or exchange products with neighbouring systems Imbalance Netting permits TSOs to reduce unnecessary simultaneous activation of reserves in opposite directions Sharing common dimensioning and holding of reserves for use in more than one area already in place for GB-Ireland Exchange SO-SO / SO-BRP models of exchange are permitted these services exist e.g. GB FR There are provisions to allow an Affected TSO or Block to prevent exchanges/sharing occurring; There are provisions to limit exchanges/sharing by TSOs for security reasons;

LFCR supporting slides for JESG Concepts of frequency quality in LFCR network code Evaluation of the application of methods within the code

Common representation a Normal Distribution http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:normal_distribution_and_scales.gif/

The affect of averaging frequency values 1 sec / 1mHz measurements taken 1 minute average used to show up the fast moving errors in frequency around FCR utilisation; 10 minute (time to restore frequency duration) averaging used to show slower errors in FRR and RR Europe 1 second Little of error in this category A good measure of system dynamic stability and shows-up all range of details; 1 minute Begins to show errors in FCR A reasonable measure for highlighting GB excursions whilst filtering continuous dynamic frequency movement; 10 minute Shows inter-block errors and FCR/FRR issues GB Frequency Deviations not permitted to continue this long (different measurement approach required);

Overview of Articles 10 & 12 Overview of Frequency Quality Target Parameters Within the code Article 10(3) 1. Consider the number of minutes outside of the target error ranges determined ranges to be applied based on the 30% and 5% of historical frequency plot; 1. The Frequency Restoration Control Error Ranges values in Hz now used as the basis to report minutes outside these ranges; Within Article 12 1. Report on the Quarterly standard deviation of frequency information 2. Report on the 95% distribution based on the 10 minute averaged frequency data

Method explained for article 10 & 12 Number of Periods Frequency points in Hz (centred around 50Hz nominal frequency) Current text in Article 10 asks for Level 1 Frequency Restoration Control Error Range = 30% of minutes. The value read from the horizontal axis being a value in Hz Level 2 Frequency Restoration Control Error Range = 5% of minutes. The value read from the horizontal axis being a value in Hz 5% Example pictogram for illustration only It must be explained that the further these values are from Nominal Frequency the worse the average frequency control was for that period. Minute averaged values in 5 mhz bands 30% 50% It is important to note that these values in Hz do not relate to specific operational thresholds but are rather specific error reporting boundaries

Illustration of an alternative method under consideration for GB & Ireland Number of Periods Frequency points in Hz (centred around 50Hz nominal frequency) Proposed approach is to plot the number of seconds in each frequency band that occur in a period and then look at the % of minutes that lie outside the two given ranges. Standard Frequency Range (±200mHz) Frequency Range Within Time To Recover Frequency (±500mHz) Example pictogram for illustration only +500mHz Second by Second frequency plot in 5 mhz bands 50Hz +200mHz This method explicitly shows the time spent outside of operational and statutory limits (in current GB speak).

Article 12 : LFC Block Error Calculations The current text has an issue in Article 12, Clause 2(b) where for GB the 10 minute averaged data would always be zero. This is because the GB NETSO always takes action to both preserve the dimensioned requirement of FCR/FRR/RR and lastly will take emergency measures to restore frequency within the time to restore frequency. Only one exceptional event has within recent records lasted for more than 10 minutes loss of 2 generators in seconds in May 2008. The regulation of values between blocks is not required for GB and two options exist: 1.Propose a exemption or 2.Alternative quality parameters which work for smaller systems with dynamic redimensioning Once again GB is considering alternate methods. One possible alternative being a threshold based on reporting the number of minutes outside the ±500mHz threshold based on second-by-second data