The Engineer of 2020 Project A high-risk, high-pay-off approach for the future of U.S. engineering education

Similar documents
Engineer of 2020: A high-risk, high-pay-off approach

Engineer of The National Academy of Engineering s. A high-risk, high-pay-off approach for the future of engineering education

Leading the way through. Innovation. Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology

Leading the way through. Innovation. Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology. GE Energy Sales Executives January 28, 2005

Innovation Economy. Creating the. Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology

Innovation. Key to Strengthening U.S. Competitiveness. Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology

WAKE Engineering. Let Your Assumptions Be Challenged

INTEL INNOVATION GENERATION

REMARKS BY G. WAYNE CLOUGH President, Georgia Institute of Technology. The Moles 2005 Awards Dinner January 26, 2005

THE NUMBERS OPENING SEPTEMBER BE PART OF IT

Transportation Education in the New Millennium

McCormick Excellence at all Levels

Vice Chancellor s introduction

Science with Arctic Attitude

Europe as a Global Actor. International Dimension of Horizon 2020 and Research Opportunities with Third Countries

Rising to the Innovation Challenge

The Relevance Question: The Professionalization of Political Science and the Waxing and Waning of Security Studies

President Barack Obama The White House Washington, DC June 19, Dear Mr. President,

Enriching Students Smart Grid Experience Using Programmable Devices

2016 Executive Summary Canada

Educational Imperatives of the NAE Grand Challenges for the 21 st C: An Interactive Discussion

The Riga Declaration on e-skills A call to action on digital skills and job creation in Europe

Prof. Daniel Roos ESD 10

Service Science: A Key Driver of 21st Century Prosperity

ADVANCING KNOWLEDGE. FOR CANADA S FUTURE Enabling excellence, building partnerships, connecting research to canadians SSHRC S STRATEGIC PLAN TO 2020

G20 Initiative #eskills4girls

National Innovation Initiative: Vision and Structure

TAB V. VISION 2030: Distinction, Access and Excellence

by Jeffrey Fong, NIST, May 15, 2009

COUNTRY: Questionnaire. Contact person: Name: Position: Address:

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Five-Year Strategic Plan: Improving Lives. Transforming Louisiana. Changing the World.

The Biological and Medical Sciences Research Infrastructures on the ESFRI Roadmap

Address by Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO on the occasion of International Conference on Engineering, Science and Technology, ICEST 2014

SMART PLACES WHAT. WHY. HOW.

MOSTI-APCTT Fourth Industrial Revolution Conference 2018

Technology Leadership Course Descriptions

Building global engagement in research Sources of funding for enabling international research collaborations

the EU framework programme for research and innovation

Start your adventure here.

The Hague Summer School

TOWARD THE NEXT EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROGRAMME

Preparing for STEM majors

CRC and CFI Strategic Research Plan: Summary

A Research and Innovation Agenda for a global Europe: Priorities and Opportunities for the 9 th Framework Programme

The New Delhi Communiqué

Public Consultation: Horizon 2020 "Science with and for Society" - Work Programme Questionnaire

Trieste, Italy, 10 May 2007

Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 November 2016 (OR. en)

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

The IET Strategic Framework. Working to engineer a better world

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING OPERATIONS RESEARCH

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Research Strategy of Tampere University Community

The Second Industry Conference on fourth Industrial revolution Pedro Alexandre da Costa Sousa. Tehran 27 th -28 th February 2017

Students Using Nanotechnology to Solve the World s Greatest Challenges. Dr Edward Davis Dr Virginia Davis Dr Joni Lakin

New and Emerging Issues Interface to Science Policy

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Scenario Development Process

The Hague Summer School

Strategic Plan

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Advances in the Engineering Education

Fujitsu, SMU, and A*STAR collaborate on traffic management technologies with the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore

1.INTRODUCTION: Scientific and Technological Revolutions and Global Industry 1890s- 2010s

Strategic Plan Public engagement with research

Strategic Plan Approved by Council 7 June 2010

The Grand Challenges for Engineering & The Grand Challenges Scholars Program

POSITION PAPER. GREEN PAPER From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding

Tricia Berry Director, UT Austin Women in Engineering Program Director, Texas Girls Collaborative Project txgcp.org

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

Ibero-American Engineer Profile

A Roadmap For Building Indigenous Digital Excellence: Looking To 2030

Baccalaureate Program of Sustainable System Engineering Objectives and Curriculum Development

Engineering for a Changing World. The Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. World Summit on Sustainable Development. Address by Mr Koïchiro Matsuura

List of selected reports from the National Academies Press related to the meeting topic.

G7 SCIENCE MINISTERS COMMUNIQUÉ

Why Foresight: Staying Alert to Future Opportunities MARSHA RHEA, CAE, PRESIDENT, SIGNATURE I, LLC

Victor O. Matthews (Ph.D)

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Societal Challenge 4: Smart, Green and Integrated Transport

Higher Education for Science, Technology and Innovation. Accelerating Africa s Aspirations. Communique. Kigali, Rwanda.

Hands on tech. Hearts on change. Minds on justice. DIVISION OF SOCIAL SCIENCES. THE EVERETT PROGRAM for Technology and Social Change

Shaping New Student Identity as Creatives in the 21st Century Global Economy

Fourth Annual Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Stanford CS Commencement Alex Aiken 6/17/18

Academic Program IIT Rajasthan

Assessing the Implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe SME DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF GEORGIA

Science for Global Development: The Role of Networks of Science Academies. Michael Clegg Co-Chair Inter American Network of Academies of Science

Achieving. A Roadmap. Profession. for the. Prepared by the ASCE Task Committee to Achieve the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025

JTC1 Smart Ci,es workshop. Welcome!

COURSE 2. Mechanical Engineering at MIT

AC : WHAT IS CURRICULA 2015?

Seoul Initiative on the 4 th Industrial Revolution

Horizon the new EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation

NAE Grand Challenges

National approach to artificial intelligence

DIGITAL FINLAND FRAMEWORK FRAMEWORK FOR TURNING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TO SOLUTIONS TO GRAND CHALLENGES

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

Expert Group Meeting on Exponential Technological Change, Automation, and Their Policy Implications for Sustainable Development

Presentation on Strategic Value of Global Standards to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative

Transcription:

The Engineer of 2020 Project A high-risk, high-pay-off approach for the future of U.S. engineering education -National Academy of Engineering- Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology The American Society for Engineering Education June 13, 2005

The premise Past: Engineering and engineering education were reactive, responding to change. Today: Rapid change signals that it is time to reverse the paradigm. Premise: If we anticipate the future and are proactive about changing engineering and engineering education, we can shape a significant, dynamic role for our profession.

The process Phase I: Imagining the future and the challenges it will present to engineering: Woods Hole Workshop. Phase II: Considering how engineering education should prepare for that future: Washington DC Summit. National Academy of Engineering

Steering Committees Phase I Wayne Clough, Chair, Ga Tech Alice Agogino, UC Berkeley George Campbell, Cooper Union James Chavez, Sandia Labs David Craig, Reliant Energy Jose Cruz, Ohio State Peggy Girshman, NPR Daniel Hastings, MIT Michael Heller, UC San Diego Deborah Johnson, U Virginia Alan Kay, H-P Tarek Khalil, U Miami Robert Lucky, Telcordia Technologies John Mulvey, Princeton Sharon Nunes, IBM Sue Rosser, Georgia Tech Ernest Smerdon, U Arizona Phase II Wayne Clough, Chair, Ga Tech Alice Agogino, UC Berkeley Mark Dean, IBM Deborah Grubbe, DuPont Randy Hinrichs, Microsoft Sherra Kerns, Olin College Alfred Moye, H-P Diana Natalicio, UT at El Paso Siman Ostrach, Case West Res Ernest Smerdon, U Arizona Karan Watson, Texas A&M David Wisler, GE Aircraft Engines

Context for engineering Breakthroughs in technology Demographics Challenges Economic/societal forces

Sustainable Technology Breakthroughs Microelectronics/ telecommunications Nanotechnology Biotechnology/ nanomedicine Logistics Photonics/optics Manufacturing

Demographics 8 billion people; a 25% increase since 2000. Balance tipped toward urbanization. Youth bulge in underdeveloped nations while developed nations age. If the world condensed to 100 people: 56 in Asia 16 in Africa 7 in Eastern Europe/Russia 4 in the United States

Challenges Fresh water shortages Aging infrastructure Energy demands Global warming New diseases Security

Economic/societal forces High speed communications / Internet Removal of trade barriers Terrorist attacks; wars in Iraq, Afghanistan Emergence of technologybased economies in other nations Sustained investment in higher education in countries like China, India

Social, global and professional context of engineering practice Population is more diverse. Social, cultural, political forces will shape and affect the success of technological innovation. Consumers will demand higher quality, customization. Growing imperative for environmental sustainability. Increasing focus on managing risk and assessment with view to security, privacy, and safety.

Scenario-based planning Facilitated by Peter Schwartz, author of The Art of the Long View Scenarios considered: The Next Scientific Revolution The Biotechnology Revolution in a Societal Context The Natural World Interrupts the Technology Global Conflict/Globalization

Aspirations for the Engineer of 2020 Engineering s image Public that understands and appreciates the impact of engineering on socio-cultural systems. Public that recognizes engineering s ability to address the world s complex and changing challenges. Engineers will be well grounded in the humanities, social sciences, and economics as well as science and mathematics.

Aspirations for the Engineer of 2020 Engineering without boundaries Embrace potentialities offered by creativity, innovation, and cross-disciplinary fertilization. Broaden influence on public policy and the administration of government, nonprofits, and industry. Recruit, nurture and welcome underrepresented groups to engineering.

Aspirations for the Engineer of 2020 Engineering a sustainable society Lead the way toward wise, informed, economical, and sustainable development. Assist in the creating of an ethical balance in standard of living for developing and developed countries alike.

Aspirations for the Engineer of 2020 Educating the engineer of 2020 Reconstitute engineering curricula and related educational programs to prepare today s engineering students for the careers of the future. Create a well-rounded education that prepares students for positions of leadership and a creative and productive life.

Attributes of the engineer of 2020 Strong analytical skills Practical ingenuity, creativity; innovator Good communication skills Business, management skills High ethical standards, professionalism Dynamic/agile/resilient/flexible Lifelong learner Able to put problems in their socio-technical and operational context Adaptive leader

To succeed Attract best and brightest with a forward-looking educational experience Phase II. Educate them to be ready: To implement new technology. To focus on innovation. To understand global trends.

Thoughts from the Phase II summit Some needs have not changed: A sound grounding in science The learning experience of great lectures Studio experiences with open-ended problem solving Other things have really changed: Access to IT creates challenge of coupling deep learning with instant gratification Means and ends of using computers to bring the world to campus and enrich learning Design tools and sophisticated instruments that enable students to experience the excitement of engineering Charles Vest

Thoughts from the Phase II summit Begin the curriculum with grand challenges. Integrate more directly with the sciences. Provide multiple entry points to the curriculum. Build working interdisciplinary partnerships. Give students self-confidence early on. Stop tinkering around the edges and shake things up. Gretchen Kalonji

Thoughts from the Phase II summit Research/co-op experience with real problems Experience with real-world tools and teams Encourage and recognize diversity Social, ethical aspects of engineering What students need to learn instead of what we want to teach Creative and practical thinking Arden Bement

Highlights from Phase II summit Break out of the present mold Education, not just curriculum Career, not just jobs Multiple models, not just one Leadership, not just teamwork More coordination with industry Cross-disciplinary emphasis

More highlights from Phase II summit Emphasis on innovation Systems approach Larger context for engineering and technology Non-engineering career tracks Global perspective Market forces, macroeconomics Sense of urgency

Related Initiatives National Innovation Initiative Frontiers of Engineering Survey

National Innovation Initiative Brought together 400 of the nation s best minds to develop a national innovation agenda. National summit, December 2004 30 recommendations in 3 broad areas: Talent, the human dimension of innovation Investment, the financial dimension of innovation Infrastructure, the enabling framework of innovation Now proceeding with implementation phase. Excellent context for new economic and global realities (www.compete.org)

Frontiers of Engineering survey Frontiers of Engineering participants: Selected as future leaders in engineering. Ages 30-45 (will still be active in 2020). 61 respondents from academia, 44 from industry Have worked in field for over 10 years. Involved in cutting-edge engineering topics. Intent: assess how well their education prepared them for issues they will face in practice in 2020.

Frontiers of Engineering Current undergraduate engineering education is sufficiently flexible to adequately meet the needs of 21 st century engineers. 50 % responses 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Industry Academia

Concluding remarks We may have only one chance to achieve our aspirations; that time may be now. The momentum generated by the Engineer of 2020 Project should be used to advantage. Strategically engage those outside of engineering who are needed to help in our cause. Success is tied to innovation and marketing. Think as engineer/scientist, not specialty name here engineer. The future of engineering in the U.S. lies in the balance; engineering education needs to lead the charge to a time of new energy and opportunity.