The role/potential of transdisciplinary processes after the Paris 2016 agreement

Similar documents
Inter and Transdisciplinarity in Social Sciences. Approaches and lessons learned

Knowledge Brokerage for Sustainable Development

IPCC Working Group 3

United Nations Environment Programme 12 February 2019* Guidance note: Leadership Dialogues at fourth session of the UN Environment Assembly

A Platform for Environmental, Social

S&T roadmap and implementation strategy: Perspective from the DRR process

New Pathways to Social Change - Creating Impact through Social Innovation Research

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

ISGAN ANNEX 7 SMART GRIDS TRANSITIONS

Towards a Consumer-Driven Energy System

Roadmap of Cooperative Activities

A transition perspective on the Convention on Biological Diversity: Towards transformation?

Fourth Annual Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords: Collaborative problem solving; transdisciplinarity; multilevel innovation systems; food security; sustainable phosphorus management.

Key decisions adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety related to synthetic biology

Disasters and the continental shelf: Exploring new frontiers of risk

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCCC EXPERT GROUP ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FIVE YEARS OF WORK

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 2 of 9 September 13:00 hrs

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

Strategic Plan Approved by Council 7 June 2010

BOTSWANA INTERNET GOVERNANCE FORUM (IGF) DISCUSSION PAPER

Second Annual Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Technology Assessment. Global challenges and European prospects. Ortwin Renn June, 18, 2012 Copenhagen

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

The Method Toolbox of TA. PACITA Summer School 2014 Marie Louise Jørgensen, The Danish Board of Technology Foundation

Prof. Geraint Ellis. School of Planning, rand Civil Engineering Queen s University,

The future of research on safety and security in Germany - Results from an explorative Delphi study

DRAGON-STAR Plus Climate Change Expert Workshop

Science Integration Fellowship: California Ocean Science Trust & Humboldt State University

Outcomes and Implications of the Bali Climate Change Conference: A Few Personal Reflections

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs), Science Community and Society

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

Research strategy

Exploring elements for a transformative biodiversity agenda post-2020

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

DRAFT TEXT on. SBI 49 agenda item 14(a) Scope of and modalities for the periodic assessment referred to in paragraph 69 of decision 1/CP.

Development for a Finite Planet:

DRAFT TEXT on. SBI 49 agenda item 14(a) Scope of and modalities for the periodic assessment referred to in paragraph 69 of decision 1/CP.

Evolution of technology activities under the Convention

Expert Group Meeting on

The 26 th APEC Economic Leaders Meeting

Towards sustainable societies: the transformative vision, perspective and role of women. Diana Malpede

Risk governance and CCS: methodological approaches for integrating experts, stakeholders and the public

STRATEGIC ORIENTATION FOR THE FUTURE OF THE PMR:

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Framing Document World Centre for Sustainable Development RIO+ Layla Saad and Ana Toni*

Towards a World in Common Strategy. #WorldInCommon

Social license for marine renewables and stakeholder participation

Rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

The Role of Foresight in the Policy-Making Process

Summary Remarks By David A. Olive. WITSA Public Policy Chairman. November 3, 2009

Enabling ICT for. development

REDD+ Safeguards: How UN-REDD supports the development. María Sanz Sanchez, FAO & UN-REDD

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

Policy Evaluation as if sustainable development really mattered: Rethinking evaluation in light of Europe s 2050 Agenda

WIPO Development Agenda

Latin-American non-state actor dialogue on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement

The role of evidence in forest-related policy making: Power, politics and learning in sciencepolicy

The UN Technology Facilitation Mechanism (TFM):

Nature-Based Smart City Framework

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

APPENDIX 1: Cognitive maps of 38 innovative PE cases

The Impact of Foresight on policy-making - Drawing the landscape

Understanding Evaluating Shaping. Transdisciplinary Knowledge for a Sustainable Society

Distinguished Co-facilitators, Ambassadors, delegates and representatives from capitals,

Text Text. Cristian Matti 1,2, Irene Vivas 1,3, Julia Panny 1 and Blanca JuanAgullo 1. EIT Climate-KIC, 2 Utrecht University 3 Maastricht University

Smart Management for Smart Cities. How to induce strategy building and implementation

Report on the linkage modalities and the rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

Barriers to Research and Innovation for Solving Social Challenges

The work under the Environment under Review subprogramme focuses on strengthening the interface between science, policy and governance by bridging

Shuzo Nishioka Secretary General, LCS RNet Secretariat, IGES Side Event at AWGKP14 AWGLCA12 8 October 2010

Sustainability-Related Learning Outcomes Department/ Program

Table of Contents. Two Cultures of Ecology...0 RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE...3

The UNISDR Global Science & Technology Advisory Group for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction UNISDR

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Societal Challenge 4: Smart, Green and Integrated Transport

PART III: CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES

COURSE 2. Mechanical Engineering at MIT

Highways, ring road, expressways of tomorrow in the Greater Paris

University as a Platform for Social Experimentation towards Sustainability Innovation

FET Flagships in Horizon 2020

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

BLUE ECONOMY DISCOURSES

In-Country Shared Value Creation The Case of Ghana

TENTATIVE REFLECTIONS ON A FRAMEWORK FOR STI POLICY ROADMAPS FOR THE SDGS

Boundary Work for Collaborative Water Resources Management Conceptual and Empirical Insights from a South African Case Study

Elements in decision making / planning 4 Decision makers. QUESTIONS - stage A. A3.1. Who might be influenced - whose problem is it?

Interim Report on the Heiligendamm Process at the G8 Summit in Hokkaido Toyako 7 to 9 July 2008

Ms. Duduzile Nhlengethwa-Masina Chair of the Technology Executive Committee

2nd Call for Proposals

Universities and Sustainable Development Towards the Global Goals

November 18, 2011 MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK Updated August 2017

What is backcasting & why do we need it

Climate Change response measures, and negotiations update

The BGF-G7 Summit Report The AIWS 7-Layer Model to Build Next Generation Democracy

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

Programme. Social Economy. in Västra Götaland Adopted on 19 June 2012 by the regional board, Region Västra Götaland

Transcription:

The role of science in the context of the SDGs and climate Policy after Paris 8th Annual Meeting LCS-Rnet September 7, 2016 The role/potential of transdisciplinary processes after the Paris 2016 agreement Roland W. Scholz Faculty of Business Economics and Globalization, Danube University Krems (Austria) Fraunhofer Institute for Interface Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart (Germany) Prof. emeritus Dr. phil. habil. Dipl. Math., Chair of Natural and Social Science Interface, Dept. Environmental Systems Sciences, ETH Zürich (Switzerland) Adj. Prof. (PD), Department of Psychology, University of Zurich (Switzerland) Prof. Extraordinaire, Faculty of Economic and Management, University of Stellenbosch (South Africa)

Three inputs 1 1. What is (Mode 2) Transdisciplinarity (Td)? 2 2. Role(s) of science in Td processes (before and after COP21) 3 3. Two options for global Td processes after the Paris Agreement 2

1 Objectives of LCS-Rnet (http://lcs-rnet.org/about_lcsrnet/; retrieved Sept. 5, 2016) Promotion of information exchange and research cooperation that cover various issues relating to low carbon societies, Promotion of understanding about LCS through dialogues between researchers and various stakeholders including policymakers, businesses, citizens and others to share national and sub-national visions on low-carbon societies, and Contribution to international policy-making processes on climate change including G8 process by providing research outcomes and recommendations. 3

1 The use of sustainability as a regulative idea and the Differentiation of Tasks/and Roles for SDG Sustainability is conceived as a regulative idea of social order (Kant, 1781, Schneidewind et al. 1997). A minimum systemic definition of sustainability reads (Laws et al., 2004; based on interviews with 21 project leaders of the AGS MIT, ETH, Chalmers, University of Tokyo) Sustainable development is an ongoing inquiry For system limit management in the frame of inter- and intragenerational justice Facilitation of transdisciplinary processes Science-based resilience assessment Normative facilitation/justice (e.g., on the goal of climate mitigation) Professional facilitators Scientists Politicians and stakeholders Laws, D., Scholz, R. W., Shiroyama, H., Susskind, L., Suzuki, T., & Weber, O. (2004). Expert views on sustainability and technology implementation. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 11(3), 247-261. Kant, I. (1881). Immanuel Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Hartknoch. Schneidewind, 4 U., Feindt, P. H., Meister, H. P., Minsch, J., Schulz, T., & Tscheulin, J. (1997). Institutionelle Reformen für eine Politik der Nachhaltigkeit: Vom Was zum Wie in der Nachhaltigkeitsdebatte. GAIA, 6(3), 182-182.

1 Transdisciplinarity: a mode of science-practice collaboration Scholz & 5 Steiner, 2016

1 Transdisciplinarity Has become a third mode (methodology) of doing and utilizing science (in sustainable transitioning) Means going beyond sciences (not only beyond disciplines) and switching from doing science for to science with society Start from an ill-defined, complex, socially relevant problems Include(s) three types of processes i. a targeted interdisciplinary process ii. iii. a moderated processes of stakeholder discourse or mitigation a facilitated process of relating science and practice Follow(s) four functions 1. Capacity building (for scientists and practitioners) 2. Consensus building, primarily on what is the problem 3. (Analytic) Mediation, i.e., anticipatory management of losses and benefits of (sustainable) transitions/transformations 4. Political legitimation Transdisciplinarity in a nutshell Is based on mutual learning by relating and/or integrating different epistemics Dimensions of integration: (1) disciplines, (2) subsystems, (3) modes of thought, (4) interests/perpectives, and (5) cultures Asks for theory-practice discourses with equal rights when accepting the otherness (of roles and knowledge) of the other which can be best realized by co-leadership Provide socially robust orientations (not solutions) which are of interest for practice and sciences Is an important way for strategic sustainable planning 6

1 There are three main processes in a (Mode 2) transdisciplinary process on sustainable transitioning i. A targeted interdisciplinary process iii. A facilitated td-process relating 1. and 2. ii. A facilitated Multistakeholder discourse Scholz, R. W., & Steiner, G. (2015). The real type and the ideal type of transdisciplinary processes. Part I - theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 527-544.

Td-projects realize coleadership on all levels of the project The example of Global TraPs (global phosphorus management) Scholz, ETHZ Roy, IFDC Datta, UNEP Wellmer, BGR Ferroni, Syngenta Keyman, Keytrade Pandley, FAO Tirado, Greanpeace Key practitioners who participated 8

2 A much discussed issue In what way are scientists legitimized to political action? Science as a public good ( serving all values ) Science the principal agent of the great transition Some consider science to be a public good and differentiate between scientists and (democratically) legitimized stakeholders Differentiation of roles Differentiation between knowledge and values Others postulate SDGs serve as a new narrative that describes the necessary change processes; they offer a comprehensive framework for coordinating sustainable development efforts and strategies at regional, national and international levels, and for integrating them in a shared vision of a globally just and much less resource-intensive world society. (Schneidwind et. al, 2016, p. 124) 9

2 In what way are scientists legitimized to political action? Science as a public good ( serving all values ) Public knowledge institutions/ universities need a governmental mandate, also after COP21 Science the principal agent of the great transition 10

2 In the Zurich 2000 conception scientists are a public good Science as a public good ( serving all values ) Public knowledge institutions/ universities need a governmental mandate, also after COP21 Science the principal agent of the great transition 11

2 Where may be the role of transdisciplinary processes after COP21? There may be a shift of frontiers/tasks ONGOING INQUIRY: From search on who contributed how much to climate change to what contribution for mitigation should be given by whom RESILIENCE: What threats is a warming planet facing to who can theoretical provide what contribution JUSTICE: From intergenerational justice (how does temperature change) to intragenerational justice (who has to contribute how much) 12

2 What does COP 21 change? Various Articles define tasks for Td-processes A global social contract/quantitative goals (Art 2(a)) Request for national assessment for mitigation (Art 4.9) Regional economic organizations and (negotiation) processes among the parties are responsible for its emission level (Art 4.18) Intencitivize and facilitate participation... (Art 6(b)) The call for transdisciplinary processes is given in Art 7.5 Parties acknowledge that adaptation action should follow a country-driven, gender-responsive, participatory and fully transparent approach, taking into consideration vulnerable groups, communities and ecosystems, and should be based on and guided by the best available science and, as appropriate, traditional knowledge, knowledge of indigenous peoples and local knowledge systems, with a view to integrating adaptation into relevant socioeconomic and environmental policies and actions, where appropriate. 13

3 Two examples for prospective Global Transdisciplinary Processes for LCS 1. Crosscultural leaning about efficient and socially accepted CO2 emission reduction in different countries Reducing fossile energy life-cycle costs of housing (from construction via heating/airconditioning and behavior of users to destruction) a little cross -cost-benefit like 2. Critical industries strategic sustainability learning in global transdisciplinary processes (such as Global TraPs) Where is consensus what direction to move necessary Airplane producers and airlines (e.g., prerequisites of a hydrogene fuel cell future Car industry on infrastructure of electric and hydrogene fuel cell infrastructure/supply 14