Reinventing Technology Assessment

Similar documents
Reinventing Technology Assessment

Reinventing Technology Assessment

Technology Assessment and Public Participation: From TA to pta

The Emergence of Distributed Technology

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

Forsight and forward looking activities Exploring new European Perspectives Vienna 14-15th June 2010

The Method Toolbox of TA. PACITA Summer School 2014 Marie Louise Jørgensen, The Danish Board of Technology Foundation

EP Interest Group Mental Health, Brussels 22/09/11 Tinne Vandensande King Baudouin Foundation

Interoperable systems that are trusted and secure

Evaluation in Democracy Public Hearing at the European Parliament

EEA and LLTK* and Citizen Science. *LLTK: Lay, Local, Traditional knowledge

The Impact of Foresight on policy-making - Drawing the landscape

Doing Cross-European Technology Assessment

CIMULACT. Engaging all of Europe in shaping a desirable and sustainable future.

APPENDIX 1: Cognitive maps of 38 innovative PE cases

Society Science Society Science

Public Consultation: Horizon 2020 "Science with and for Society" - Work Programme Questionnaire

Towards a Magna Carta for Data

National approach to artificial intelligence

Report on the Results of. Questionnaire 1

IEEE Internet Initiative

Foresight Impact on Policy making and Lessons for New Member States and Candidate Countries Insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process

SDSN Northern Europe WCERE Fishery Policy: Succesful Right-based System? Pre-Conference Report

Research strategy

GUIDELINES SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH MATTERS. ON HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY DESIGN, AND IMPLEMENT, MISSION-ORIENTED RESEARCH PROGRAMMES

Perspectives of Scientists on technology and the SDGs 61 scientists 3 tasks 20 countries 45 disciplines. 97 scientists 58 briefs

Old problems, new directions and upcoming requirements in participatory technology assessment

Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) Action Plans on Societal Challenges

INTEL INNOVATION GENERATION

WP6 Genomics Organizing the societal debate on the use of genomic information in healthcare

Health Impact Assessment (HIA) & Transportation

Outline. IPTS and the Information Society Unit IPTS Research Agenda on ICT for Governance

Horizon Scanning. Why & how to launch it in Lithuania? Prof. Dr. Rafael Popper

Toward Institutionalizing Participatory Technology Assessment in Japan

Responsible Research and Innovation in H Science with and for Society work progamme in

WORK PROGRAMME 2007 CAPACITIES PART 5 SCIENCE IN SOCIETY. (European Commission C(2007)563 of )

Professor Richard Hindmarsh School of Environment and Science; and Griffith Centre for Governance and Public Policy, Griffith University, Brisbane

The participatory strategy

LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH

Training TA Professionals

Technology Assessment The State of / at Play

Technology Assessment in the Technology Mechanism: Suggestions on the Way Forward

Public Understanding of Science vs. Public Understanding of Research

Harnessing Science and Technology for our Future :

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Extended Abstract. PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº /CA

)XWXUH FKDOOHQJHV IRU WKH WRXULVP VHFWRU

Multi-level third space for systemic urban research and innovation

14:40-15:10 Gene Editing in New Zealand: Building Social Acceptance of Emerging Opportunities

Multi-Economy Foresight Activities of the APEC CTF

Call for contributions

Common Features and National Differences - preliminary findings -

Science Integration Fellowship: California Ocean Science Trust & Humboldt State University

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

2nd Call for Proposals

Refining foresight approaches to crisis, inertia and transition

Effective Societal engagement in Horizon 2020

POLICY SIMULATION AND E-GOVERNANCE

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Smart Management for Smart Cities. How to induce strategy building and implementation

Strategic Plan Public engagement with research

Current state of the debate regarding the role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Research and Innovation in the EU 1

A manifesto for global sustainable health. Sustainable Health Symposium Cambridge, UK 25th July 2017

Innovation Policy For Transformative change An Overview

Convergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA

Remote, Connected and Savvy! June 2017

Great Cities Initiative

Barbara Herr Harthorn

Societal engagement in Horizon 2020

Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies. UW Biological Futures Colloquium Series David H. Guston

WHY ACCOUNTANCY & SOCIAL DESIGN

Eva Carnestedt och Birgitta Boman

ACP/84/047/02 Final Cape Town, 28 July 2002 PAHD Dept. CAPE TOWN DECLARATION ON RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Embracing the human and social dimension of technology and innovation

WFEO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENGINEERING FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY (WFEO-CEIT) STRATEGIC PLAN ( )

COST FP9 Position Paper

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Technology Executive Committee

FOR RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH COUNCIL IMPACT REPORT

COMMUNICATION SCIENCE MASTER S PROGRAMME

Introduction to Foresight

Exploring emerging ICT-enabled governance models in European cities

RACE TO THE TOP: Integrating Foresight, Evaluation, and Survey Methods

New Themes for Analysing Neo- Carbon Society 2050

The main recommendations for the Common Strategic Framework (CSF) reflect the position paper of the Austrian Council

Non-ferrous metals manufacturing industry: vision for the future and actions needed

ECC ALL ABOUT OUR ORGANISATION The Electronic Communications Committee

Social Innovation 2015: Pathways to Social Change Vienna, November 18 th, Maria Schwarz-Woelzl (ZSI) & Wolfgang Haider (ZSI)

Summary Remarks By David A. Olive. WITSA Public Policy Chairman. November 3, 2009

IEEE-SA Overview. Don Wright IEEE Standards Association Treasurer. CCSA/IEEE-SA Internet of Things Workshop 5 June 2012 Beijing, China

We believe that... technological innovation and new uses of data can help solve big societal problems and improve lives.

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on the evaluation of Europeana and the way forward. {SWD(2018) 398 final}

Framework Programme 7

An introduction to the concept of Science Shops and to the Science Shop at The Technical University of Denmark

TECHNOLOGY WITH A HUMAN TOUCH

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL OF ACADEMIES OF APPLIED SCIENCES, TECHNOLOGIES AND ENGINEERING

The World Economic Forum Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

WhyisForesight Important for Europe?

Transcription:

Reinventing Technology Assessment A 21 st Century Model Richard Sclove, Ph.D. Richard@Sclove.org

The Challenge Science and technology transform our world. Often the ramifications are not understood until they are well-entrenched. Photos: Arnold Paul, courtesy of Wig Zamore, http://www.cc.nih.gov/centerio/images/8662_large.jpg, http:// www.tx.nrcs.usda.gov/news/lonestarlink/archives/09/biofarm.html

We style ourselves as living in a Technological Society and an Information Age Photos: Arnold Paul, courtesy of Wig Zamore, http://www.cc.nih.gov/centerio/images/8662_large.jpg, http:// www.tx.nrcs.usda.gov/news/lonestarlink/archives/09/biofarm.html

We style ourselves as living in a Technological Society and an Information Age Yet we lack the information we need to make informed decisions about technology. Photos: Arnold Paul, courtesy of Wig Zamore, http://www.cc.nih.gov/centerio/images/8662_large.jpg, http:// www.tx.nrcs.usda.gov/news/lonestarlink/archives/09/biofarm.html

Technology Assessment (TA) Enhances societal understanding of the broad implications of science and technology, and improves decision-making.

Technology Assessment (TA) 1972: U.S. opens Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1995: U.S. Congress shuts down the OTA Meanwhile: 18 TA agencies now operate in Europe Since 1995: Repeated attempts to re-open U.S. OTA have failed 2008: Congress asks Government Accountability Office (GAO) to establish a permanent TA capability.

Technology Assessment (TA) 1972: U.S. opens Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1995: U.S. Congress shuts down the OTA Meanwhile: 18 TA agencies now operate in Europe Since 1995: Repeated attempts to re-open U.S. OTA have failed 2008: Congress asks Government Accountability Office (GAO) to establish a permanent TA capability. For now GAO anticipates producing studies at less than 1/10th the OTA s annual rate.

Technology Assessment (TA) has the potential to alter and improve societal outcomes In Europe, TA has contributed to: Taking steps to adapt to global warming Developing strategies to produce green technologies Nuanced genetic technology choices (accelerating new pharmaceuticals, while going slow on gene-modified foods) Implementing REACH program that economically regulates all manufactured chemicals

New Opportunities & Developments New TA practices in Europe, including participatory technology assessment (pta), which involves citizens Collaboration between universities and TA agencies in developing new TA concepts & methods The Internet makes TA and pta possible on a more transparent, decentralized, agile, collaborative, and costeffective basis. Transnational collaboration in TA is expanding. TA and pta are increasingly influential around the world.

The need and opportunities for TA are expanding. But the U.S. is lagging. Photos: Arnold Paul, courtesy of Wig Zamore, http://www.cc.nih.gov/centerio/images/8662_large.jpg, http:// www.tx.nrcs.usda.gov/news/lonestarlink/archives/09/biofarm.html

Beyond OTA-style expert analysis, what s also needed is TA that Gives a voice to everyday laypeople, who are otherwise omitted in politics of science and technology Lets decision-makers know constituents informed views Stimulates broad societal discussion Allows innovators to anticipate public reactions and to alter innovation to reduce costly controversy Deepens social and ethical analysis of technology, informing and enriching expert TA pta and expert TA complement one another in critical ways.

An Influential pta Method: Danish Consensus Conferences Panel of diverse lay participants Two-weekends of background education Expert & stakeholder public testimony, Lay panel deliberation Lay panel writes report, delivers press conference in Danish Parliament Building

An Influential pta Method: Danish Consensus Conferences Panel of diverse lay participants Two-weekends of background education Expert & stakeholder public testimony, Lay panel deliberation Lay panel writes report, delivers press conference in Danish Parliament Building Sample pta adaptations in the US: Boston Consensus Conference on Biomonitoring (2006) National Citizens Technology Forum on Nanotech & Human Enhancement (2008) World Wide Views on Global Warming (2009) UMass-Lowell Scenario Workshop on Urban Ecology & Democracy (2002)

Boston Consensus Conference on Biomonitoring

Boston Consensus Conference on Biomonitoring I think this panel has shown to some degree of surprise to the scientific community that the public can really understand the issues, and this panel has moved biomonitoring forward. - Professor Thomas Burke, Chairman of the National Research Council Committee on Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Toxicants

World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWViews) WWViews at Boston Museum of Science Ambassadors of Sweden, Uganda, China, Chile and India discuss WWViews results, Danish Parliament, Nov. 19, 2009

Cost of Expert TA, Large-Scale pta, and other Large-Scale Deliberative Processes Location + Scope Project or Method Characteristics Year Est. Total Cost (2009 dollars) OTA Expert TA Study Expert analysts; expert + knowledgeable stakeholder advisors 1980-1 995 $0.7 1.4 million U.S. TA National Citizens Technology Forum on Nanotechnology & Human Enhancement (NCTF) 74 US laypeople at 6 sites across the USA, meet for 6 days face-to-face (f2f) + 9 twohour online sessions 2008 $0.5 million National Consensus Conference 24 U.S. laypeople travel 3 times to one site for f2f meetings, totaling 8 days. Note: substituting online for some or all f2f would reduce cost below range shown. est. $0.4 0.8 million

Cost of Expert TA, Large-Scale pta, and other Large-Scale Deliberative Processes Location + Scope Project or Method Characteristics Year Est. Total Cost (2009 dollars) OTA Expert TA Study Expert analysts; expert + knowledgeable stakeholder advisors 1980-1 995 $0.7 1.4 million U.S. TA National Citizens Technology Forum on Nanotechnology & Human Enhancement (NCTF) 74 US laypeople at 6 sites across the USA, meet for 6 days face-to-face (f2f) + 9 twohour online sessions 2008 $0.5 million National Consensus Conference 24 U.S. laypeople travel 3 times to one site for f2f meetings, totaling 8 days. Note: substituting online for some or all f2f would reduce cost below range shown. est. $0.4 0.8 million European pta A typical national Consensus Conference in Europe 16 laypeople from one large nation, 1 language, meet 3 times at one site, totaling 8 days $0.3 million

Cost of Expert TA, Large-Scale pta, and other Large-Scale Deliberative Processes Location + Scope Project or Method Characteristics Year Est. Total Cost (2009 dollars) OTA Expert TA Study Expert analysts; expert + knowledgeable stakeholder advisors 1980-1 995 $0.7 1.4 million U.S. TA National Citizens Technology Forum on Nanotechnology & Human Enhancement (NCTF) 74 US laypeople at 6 sites across the USA, meet for 6 days face-to-face (f2f) + 9 twohour online sessions 2008 $0.5 million National Consensus Conference 24 U.S. laypeople travel 3 times to one site for f2f meetings, totaling 8 days. Note: substituting online for some or all f2f would reduce cost below range shown. est. $0.4 0.8 million European pta A typical national Consensus Conference in Europe 16 laypeople from one large nation, 1 language, meet 3 times at one site, totaling 8 days $0.3 million Transnational pta World Wide Views on Global Warming ~4,000 citizens from 38 nations on 6 continents deliberate f2f at 44 sites for 1 day, very many languages 2009 $3.5 million

Cost of Expert TA, Large-Scale pta, and other Large-Scale Deliberative Processes Location + Scope Project or Method Characteristics Year Est. Total Cost (2009 dollars) OTA Expert TA Study Expert analysts; expert + knowledgeable stakeholder advisors 1980-1 995 $0.7 1.4 million U.S. TA National Citizens Technology Forum on Nanotechnology & Human Enhancement (NCTF) 74 US laypeople at 6 sites across the USA, meet for 6 days face-to-face (f2f) + 9 twohour online sessions 2008 $0.5 million National Consensus Conference 24 U.S. laypeople travel 3 times to one site for f2f meetings, totaling 8 days. Note: substituting online for some or all f2f would reduce cost below range shown. est. $0.4 0.8 million European pta A typical national Consensus Conference in Europe 16 laypeople from one large nation, 1 language, meet 3 times at one site, totaling 8 days $0.3 million Transnational pta World Wide Views on Global Warming ~4,000 citizens from 38 nations on 6 continents deliberate f2f at 44 sites for 1 day, very many languages 2009 $3.5 million Large, High-End Non-TA, Citizen Deliberations CaliforniaSpeaks AmericaSpeaks 21 st Century Town Meeting U.S. Deliberative Poll (Fishkin) 3,500 citizens at 8 California sites for 1 day, face-to-face + satellite-linked 2007 $4.4 million 200-600 people, f2f at one site for several days. Note: in future, online may lower cost. Europewide Deliberative Poll ~350 citizens from 27 EU nations deliberate in Brussels for 3 days; 21 languages 6 to 7 figures 2007 & 2009 $2.2 3.6 million

Cost of Expert TA, Large-Scale pta, and other Large-Scale Deliberative Processes Location + Scope Project or Method Characteristics Year Est. Total Cost (2009 dollars) OTA Expert TA Study Expert analysts; expert + knowledgeable stakeholder advisors 1980-1 995 $0.7 1.4 million U.S. TA National Citizens Technology Forum on Nanotechnology & Human Enhancement (NCTF) 74 US laypeople at 6 sites across the USA, meet for 6 days face-to-face (f2f) + 9 twohour online sessions 2008 $0.5 million National Consensus Conference 24 U.S. laypeople travel 3 times to one site for f2f meetings, totaling 8 days. Note: substituting online for some or all f2f would reduce cost below range shown. est. $0.4 0.8 million European pta A typical national Consensus Conference in Europe 16 laypeople from one large nation, 1 language, meet 3 times at one site, totaling 8 days $0.3 million Transnational pta World Wide Views on Global Warming ~4,000 citizens from 38 nations on 6 continents deliberate f2f at 44 sites for 1 day, very many languages 2009 $3.5 million Large, High-End Non-TA, Citizen Deliberations CaliforniaSpeaks AmericaSpeaks 21 st Century Town Meeting U.S. Deliberative Poll (Fishkin) 3,500 citizens at 8 California sites for 1 day, face-to-face + satellite-linked 2007 $4.4 million 200-600 people, f2f at one site for several days. Note: in future, online may lower cost. Europewide Deliberative Poll ~350 citizens from 27 EU nations deliberate in Brussels for 3 days; 21 languages 6 to 7 figures 2007 & 2009 $2.2 3.6 million

We need a 21 st Century TA Model Participation + Expertise 21 st Century Structure: distributed, agile, collaborative Institutionally non-partisan while inviting and integrating diverse value perspectives Integrated into government policy-making, into wider societal deliberation, and into technological R&D, dissemination & management Continuously innovative in concepts and practices

A TA capability within Congress is valuable but not sufficient. A TA capability outside Congress can more effectively: Conduct and demonstrate pta Innovate in TA and pta methods Conduct TA and pta on behalf of other clients/agencies, etc. Stimulate societal discussion and advance public education Flexibly collaborate in transnational TA and pta projects

An Institutional Network Model Nonpartisan Policy Research Organizations Science Museums Universities

An Institutional Network Model Nonpartisan Policy Research Organizations Policy relevance Interface with policymakers Broad dissemination Science Museums Universities Direct public interface Trusted public educators Innovation in citizen-friendly pedagogy Innovation in TA concepts & methods Research, analysis and evaluation Training researchers & practitioners

ECAST = Expert & Citizen Assessment of Science & Technology network

ECAST = Expert & Citizen Assessment of Science & Technology network

ECAST = Expert & Citizen Assessment of Science & Technology network ECAST will expand to encompass institutions across the nation.

Founding partners: Woodrow Wilson Center (Washington, DC) Arizona State University Boston Museum of Science ScienceCheerleader The Loka Institute

Founding partners: Woodrow Wilson Center (Washington, DC) Arizona State University Boston Museum of Science ScienceCheerleader The Loka Institute As other institutions learn about ECAST, they are expressing support and interest.

Establishing a 21st century TA capability in the U.S.

Establishing a 21st century TA capability in the U.S. an essential tool to help society make timely, informed decisions about technologies and their broad repercussions

Establishing a 21st century TA capability in the U.S. an essential tool to help society make timely, informed decisions about technologies and their broad repercussions The time is ripe! Courtesy Shadow Robot Company, Ltd.

The time is ripe! Courtesy Shadow Robot Company, Ltd.

Visit www.ecastnetwork.org for: E-mail updates about ECAST Richard Sclove s Reinventing TA report A video of today s discussion (available after May 7, 2010) Contact presenter: Richard@Sclove.org The time is ripe! Courtesy Shadow Robot Company, Ltd.