Private Equity Antitrust Inquiry. Richard M. Steuer

Similar documents
Do Private Equity Club Deals Violate the Anti Collusive Bidding Prohibitions of Bankruptcy Code Section 363(n)

Do Mid-Cap Private Equity Funds Have an Advantage in Today s Markets?

JASON HUSGEN. St. Louis, MO office:

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K

David Chu. Matters. Proskauer.com. Partner. Hong Kong

Pharma - Biotech Collaborations: Optimizing Success, Minimizing Risk and Maintaining Alignment

Client s Statement of Rights & Responsibilities*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. H Defendants.

B U R F O R D QUARTERLY

Paul T. Friedman MANAGING PARTNER, EUROPE EDUCATION BAR ADMISSIONS CLERKSHIPS PRACTICES

Small Business Investment Companies

Robert J. Cleary. Proskauer.com. Partner. New York

Stacey Slaughter Partner or

EDUCATION. Our Clients

MR. SCOTT A. BARNES, CPA, CFF, CGMA

Attorney Business Plan. Sample 3

FTC Approves Nielsen-Arbitron Transaction with Licensing and Divestiture Remedies

Standard-Essential Patents

François G. Laugier's Representative Experience

RJR Nabisco Case Prepared by Robert M. Bushman

R. Cameron Garrison. Managing Partner

6 TH CHINA INVESTMENT CONFERENCE

8(A) CONTRACTING, MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ PROGRAM, & JOINT VENTURES. March 9, 2010 William T. Welch

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

Michael T. Gass Practice Group Leader

Christopher D. Lonn. Member. Overview

Trademarks. Fortune 500 companies and organizations of all sizes trust Lathrop Gage to help establish, guard, maintain and enforce trademarks.

Nasir, Dao PKM Abdul Partner PwC Legal (Vietnam) Co., Ltd

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ROYAL PARK INVESTMENTS SA/NV, Plaintiff, vs. Index No /2012 (Ramos, J.

Identifying and Managing Joint Inventions

ALAN G. HEVESI, : Defendant. : DEPUTY CHIEF INVESTIGATOR GREGORY J. STASIUK of the Office of

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

Shafeeqa W. Giarratani

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1082 Filed05/08/15 Page1 of 5

Hamilton Loeb. Washington, D.C. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education. Partner, Litigation Department

Protecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond

For more information and analysis, please see the factsheet that follows.

4 th Quarter Earnings Conference Call

K&M ARCHITECTURAL WINDOW PRODUCTS, COUNTY OF NEW YORK. AVENUE CONDOMINIUM, on its own behalf and on AVENUE CONDOMINIUM,

Jamie A. Levitt PARTNER EDUCATION BAR ADMISSIONS CLERKSHIPS PRACTICES

Alternatives to Ex Ante Disclosure

Changes to the IPO Process

Building a Sophisticated Litigation Practice Outside the Big Firm

New York Bar admission (or eligibility to obtain admission promptly) is required.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 265 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3

Denis Brock Partner. Experience

Retail is becoming more and more. Finding the best protection for retail spaces 3D DESIGNS

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Stern School of Business

The JOBS Act for Portfolio Companies

FIRM POLICY PRO BONO POLICY. All Attorneys and Paralegals WHO THIS APPLIES TO: Business Operations CATEGORY: Allegra Rich CONTACT:

Case 1:11-cr JSR Document 155 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 5:15-cv EJD Document Filed 12/17/18 Page 1 of 6

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP STROOCK. Infrastructure. This document may be attorney advertising.

James T. (Tim) Shearin Member

GLOBAL RISK AND INVESTIGATIONS JAPAN CAPABILITY STATEMENT

Master Class : Excellence in Private Equity & Deal Structuring

MBIA Ins. Corp. v Credit Suisse Secs (USA) LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 32025(U) July 31, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2009

Multi-Million Dollar Pre-Trial Settlement Achieved for Wrongfully Terminated Commissioned Sales Representative Under Indiana Law

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE AND CONSENT LETTERS

FFIFF 2018 Shoot Your Short SCREENPLAY COMPETITION RULES

CONSTRUCTION LAW FIRM HIRING OF LAWYERS AND NON-LAWYERS: RISKS AND REWARDS

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:01-cv SAS

Allison L. Goico Partner

Michael R. McAlevey, Chief Corporate and Securities Counsel, General Electric Co.

Winston & Strawn LLP 312/

UNIVERSITIES AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PATENT ATTORNEYS TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS

Much Ado About Nothing? The Antitrust Implications of Private Equity Club Deals

Larry R. Laycock. Education. Practice Focus. Attorney at Law Shareholder

Latin America. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP pillsburylaw.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

INQUESTS A FACTSHEET FOR FAMILIES

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 264 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3

Rocco E. Testani, Partner

led by Sony Corporation of America and its equity partners Providence Equity

Nathan M. Berman. Partner. Nathan M. Berman maintains a broad litigation practice, representing clients in Florida and throughout the country.

DELAWARE CASE LAW UPDATE

VIRTU FINANCIAL, INC.

Sapna W. Palla. New York:

Jones Day MCLE University

Andrew Michael Diamond

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/23/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 288 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/23/2017

Model Pro Bono Policy for Large Firms

RESUME. John Highbarger

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2015

COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Modern Corporate Legal and Business Ethics: Backdating, Pretexting and Other Lapses

smb Doc 5802 Filed 02/19/19 Entered 02/19/19 15:05:04 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Pro-Bono Ethics for the In-House Lawyer

Karimah J. Lamar. Focus Areas. Overview. 501 West Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA main: (619) fax: (619)

S17Y1593. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. MEYERS. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the Review

PRESENTATION ON PRIVATE EQUITY 16 th January, 2017 at the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, EIRC

Partner Litigation, Energy B.A., University of Alabama J.D., University of Alabama

Partner. Stanford Law Review, Notes

Joint Ventures: Avoiding Antitrust Liability After JV is Established Lessons Learned from Twombly, Dagher, Copperweld and Starr

KKR & Co. L.P. Morgan Stanley Financials Conference: June 13, 2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Transcription:

Private Equity Antitrust Inquiry Richard M. Steuer

Questions How real is the risk? How do you continue doing deals? What s next? What do you need to know? 1

Initial Reports October 10 press reports: New York field office, Justice Department Antitrust Division letters to: Kohlberg Kravis Roberts Carlyle Group Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Silver Lake Partners Subsequent letter to: Merrill Lynch 2

Seeking general information on voluntary basis, regarding business practices and deals since 2003 3

Private Class Action November 15 Private antitrust class action (S.D.N.Y.) on behalf of former shareholders of companies sold to private equity funds at below market rates 4

Companies Listed Univision HCA Harrah s Linens n Things Jacuzzi, Metals USA Sourcecorp Michaels Stores OSI Restaurant Systems Warner Chilcott Burlington Coat Factory Sungard Data Systems Freescale Semiconductor CarrAmerica Realty La Quinta Wyndham Extended Stay America Meristar Hospitality HealthMarkets, Inc. Boca Resorts Prime Hospitality Kinder Morgan Open Solutions Toshiba Ceramics P&I Personal & Informatik Breed Technologies Masonite International Yankee Candle Kerzner International Education Management Corp. Serena Software Pacific Edge Software Neiman-Marcus Group Aleris International Petco Intergraph Lenovo Group Aramark West Corp. Somera Communications Sintex Industries Vaibhav Gems 5

Defendants Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Silver Lake Partners Blackstone Group Bain Capital Thomas H. Lee Partners Texas Pacific Group Madison Dearborn Partners Apollo Management Providence Equity Partners Merrill Lynch Warburg Pincus 6

Plaintiffs Counsel Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz 7

Justice Department Inquiry Suspected conduct resembles bidders for art, antiques and used machinery prosecuted years ago To understand where government coming from, helpful to understand those prosecutions 8

Auction Cases Bidders formed auction pools One bid; others sat out or made dummy bids Afterwards, private auction among themselves Difference in price divided among pool members 9

Auction Cases Distinguishing feature: Secrecy Otherwise, seller could consent or not, but not misled 10

Bidding Pools Not all bidding pools unlawful Legitimate reasons to form pools: Need for funds Need for expertise Need to spread risk 11

Bidding Pools Justice Department endorsed formation of joint venture pools years ago Pools formed for legitimate reasons and not secret are not anticompetitive 12

Justice Department Inquiry Reportedly, government interested in whether, after funds form pools (or clubs ), other funds forebear from forming competing pools on understanding that they will enjoy similar treatment when forming pools of their own in future deals Also, government may be interested in whether funds not originally included in pool are invited to participate after pool succeeds in buying company 13

Private Class Action Private suit alleges that in going private transactions 1) Once a firm or group signed a definitive agreement others could not submit competing bids 2) Funds formed clubs to submit only a single bid 3) Losers were given a piece of the deal after company taken private; and 4) Funds shared information to limit bids and depress prices 14

Antitrust Applicability Threshold issue: Whether antitrust laws apply or the SEC has exclusive jurisdiction. 15

Credit Suisse v. Billing Last June, Supreme Count asked views of Solicitor General in case involving claimed antitrust liability for IPO underwriters Second Circuit had ruled antitrust liability possible Solicitor General filed brief November 9th, urging Supreme Court to examine scope of antitrust immunity 16

Exposure? Felony: Fines of up to $100 million or more For individuals, fines of up to $1 million plus up to ten years in jail Private class actions: Automatic treble damages plus attorneys fees Joint and several liability No right of contribution 17

Real Trouble? Consortiums not secret Capital and expertise needed to make these bids Value of spreading risks Existence of many sources of capital = difficult to show pools unreasonably anticompetitive 18

Plus Without evidence of actual agreements, difficult to prove collusion Potential bidders not obligated to bid or form competing groups Parallel decisions by similarly-situated businesses facing same economic circumstances do not prove conspiracy 19

What s Next? So far, government inquiry on least formal basis: Voluntary request letters, not civil investigative demands or subpoenas Private action brand new: How much activity likely before government makes next move? 20

Impact on Health of Private Equity Funds? Government inquiry: Prophylactic effect Attention Sensitizing Private action: Expensive to litigate Settlement value even if no merit? 21

How to Protect Yourself? Business as usual? Consortiums? Post-acquisition arrangements? Quid pro quo? Communication? 22

Remember: Competition, competition, competition 23