E-Field Uniformity Test Volume In Gtem Cell Based On Labview

Similar documents
A GTEM BEST PRACTICE GUIDE APPLYING IEC TO THE USE OF GTEM CELLS

A Complete Simulation of a Radiated Emission Test according to IEC

Electromagnetic Compatibility ( EMC )

Measurement Good Practice Guide

Immunity Test System RIS 3000 / RIS 6000 acc. to IEC/EN

GTEM cells. Emissions and immunity testing in a single, shielded environment

Large E Field Generators in Semi-anechoic Chambers for Full Vehicle Immunity Testing

INVESTIGATION OF THE LONGITUDINAL FIELD COMPONENT INSIDE THE GTEM 1750

Practical Considerations for Radiated Immunities Measurement using ETS-Lindgren EMC Probes

Measurements of Antenna Parameters in GTEM Cell

GTEM For emission and immunity testing according to IEC/EN Introduction

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

FISCHER CUSTOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Localization and Identifying EMC interference Sources of a Microwave Transmission Module

REVERBERATION CHAMBER FOR EMI TESTING

Characterization of medical devices electromagnetic immunity to environmental RF fields.

GTEM! Test Cells Enabling Your Success

Road vehicles Component test methods for electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy. Part 3:

EMC Seminar Series All about EMC Testing and Measurement Seminar 1

GTEM For emission and immunity testing according to IEC/EN Introduction

Transient calibration of electric field sensors

Fully Anechoic Room Validation Measurements to CENELEC pren

Harmonizing the ANSI-C12.1(2008) EMC Tests. Harmonizing the ANSI-C12.1(2008) EMC Tests

ELEC4604. RF Electronics. Experiment 2

Double-Ridged Waveguide Horn

OPEN TEM CELLS FOR EMC PRE-COMPLIANCE TESTING

pel.com Microwave & RF, March 23 rd, 2016.

EMC ANECHOIC CHAMBERS 5-METER CHAMBERS

INSTRUCTION MANUAL TRI-PLATE LINE MODEL EM-7310

Test and Measurement for EMC

Performance Analysis of Different Ultra Wideband Planar Monopole Antennas as EMI sensors

SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR CALCULABLE ANTENNA FACTOR OF THE DIRECT-FEED BICONICAL ANTENNA

TEST REPORT... 1 CONTENT...

Specification for Radiated susceptibility Test

Laird Attn: Bill Steinike W66 N220 Commerce Ct. Cedarburg, WI Report Constructed by: Zach Wilson, EMC Technician Signature: Date: June 21, 2017

Overview of EMC Regulations and Testing. Prof. Tzong-Lin Wu Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University

GTEM Radiated Emissions Correlation Testing and FDTD Modeling

Semi Anechoic Chamber (SAC)

Characterization of Integrated Circuits Electromagnetic Emission with IEC

OPEN TEM CELLS FOR EMC PRE-COMPLIANCE TESTING

Future In Radiated Immunity Testing

EMC/EMI MEASURING INSTRUMENTS & ACCESSORIES SHORT-FORM CATALOG 2011

EMC Antenna Parameters and Their Relationships

Course Introduction Purpose Objectives Content Learning Time

Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy

Calibration and Validation for Automotive EMC

AMPLIFIER RESEARCH... APPLICATION NOTE: 23

EMC/EMI MEASURING INSTRUMENTS & ACCESSORIES SHORT-FORM CATALOG 2009

EMC TEST REPORT for LEDELS LIGHTING CO., LTD. LED module Model No. : LL-F12T4815X6B

Physically and Electrically Large Antennas for Antenna Pattern Measurements and Radar Cross Section Measurements in the Upper VHF and UHF bands

Characterization of a Photonics E-Field Sensor as a Near-Field Probe

Mhow (MP) PIN c/o 56 APO RFI : PROCUREMENT OF FAST TRANSIENT RESPONSE ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE (EMP) SIMULATOR

AMPLIFIER RESEARCH... APPLICATION NOTE: 19

GTEMCELL GTEM For emissions and immunity testing

Selecting the right antenna for the

CHAPTER 6 EMI EMC MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS FOR TRACKED VEHICLES (MIL APPLICATION)

Verifying Simulation Results with Measurements. Scott Piper General Motors

An Introduction to EMC Testing (what can be done with scopes) Vincent Lascoste EMC Product Manager - RSF

Failing EMC testing? > 50% of products fail EMC testing first time around

SHIELDING EFFECTIVENESS OF ANISOTROPIC MATERIALS: HOW TO MEASURE?

Research Article Isotropic Broadband E-Field Probe

Analysis of a PCB-Chassis System Including Different Sizes of Multiple Planes Based on SPICE

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

AMPLIFIER RESEARCH... APPLICATION NOTE: 20

Measurement Environment Influence Compensation to Reproduce Anechoic Chamber Measurements with Near Field Scanning

How will the third edition of IEC affect your test facility?

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Preliminary Design and Development of Open Field Antenna Test Site

EMC standards. Presented by: Karim Loukil & Kaïs Siala

Alternative Radiated Emission Test Methods Progress Achieved in IND60 Project

Testing for Radiated Emission by Electronic Devices

EFFECT OF SHIELDING ON CABLE RF INGRESS MEASUREMENTS LARRY COHEN

Advanced Test Equipment Rentals ATEC (2832) CNE III Comparison Noise Emitter

Saturation of Active Loop Antennas

Internal Model of X2Y Chip Technology

Correlation Between Measured and Simulated Parameters of a Proposed Transfer Standard

A Comparison of the Microwave Oven and Reverberation Chamber

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

EMC TEST REPORT for : DONGGUAN EVER DEVELOPMENT ELECTRONIC CO., Electronic calculator Model No.: KF15758

Rationale for RC Testing. Vignesh Rajamani, PhD. Research Engineer Oklahoma State University

EMC Test Facility Sale

Physical Test Setup for Impulse Noise Testing

EMC TEST REPORT For MPP SOLAR INC Inverter/ Charger Model Number : PIP 4048HS

MICROWAVE MICROWAVE TRAINING BENCH COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS:

Numerical Study of Stirring Effects in a Mode-Stirred Reverberation Chamber by using the Finite Difference Time Domain Simulation

Product Description. Theory of operation

YRS01 York Reference Source

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 1 August 2013

Bill Ham Martin Ogbuokiri. This clause specifies the electrical performance requirements for shielded and unshielded cables.

A New TEM Horn Antenna Designing Based on Plexiglass Antenna Cap

The Important Points for Determining the Requirements of EMC Chambers

Alternative Coupling Method for Immunity Testing of Power Grid Protection Equipment

EMC TEST REPORT. for. Coliy Technology Co.,Ltd. Fluxgate Gaussmeter

Advanced Compliance Solutions, Inc FAU Blvd, Suite 310 Boca Raton, Florida (561)

The NASA High Intensity Radiated Fields Laboratory. Reuben A. Williams. NASA Langley Research Center M/S 130 Hampton, Virginia

System description 4. SERVICES ONSITE INSTALLATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE MAINTENANCE... 7

Dependence of Antenna Cross-polarization Performance on Waveguide-to-Coaxial Adapter Design

Understanding the Unintended Antenna Behavior of a Product

ALMA MEMO #360 Design of Sideband Separation SIS Mixer for 3 mm Band

EN 55015: 2013 Clause Pass. EN 55015: 2013 Clause Pass. EN 55015: 2013 Clause Pass

Transcription:

www.ijecs.in International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science ISSN:2319-7242 Volume 4 Issue 4 April 215, Page No. 11646-1165 E-Field Uniformity Test Volume In Gtem Cell Based On Labview Dominic S. Nyitamen Electrical Electronic Engineering Department, NDA, Kaduna Nigeria dsnyitamen@nda.edu.ng Abstract The standard IEC 61-4-2 is used to carry out field uniformity in GTEM 547 using Labview as the controlling software. For reliable and reproducibility of measurements in the GTEM, determine the field distribution to ensure the field uniformity for the performance of emissions and immunity tests is a requirement. In this work the determination of electric field distribution which is a lengthy process is carried out employing the Labview software for automatic capturing and storage at each point of measurement all the needed parameters in the frequency range of interest. The selected working volume chosen showed the primary field within 6dB required by the standard as well as 6dB cross coupling separation. The GTEM working volume was prepared for total radiated power test for GSM9 phone. Keywords GTEM, Labview, E-probe, emissions, susceptibility, septum, propagation. I. INTRODUCTION The gigahertz transverse electromagnetic mode, GTEM, has gained acceptance as a major EMC test environment for radiated and susceptibility measurements. Its ease of operation is an advantage. It s near zero interference, low cost and small size compared to anechoic room and the reverberation chamber is another attraction. The volume of the GTEM has broadband characteristics, usually with usable frequency range from DC to several GHz [1-3]. The electric and magnetic field distribution of the GTEM is well defined. The field strength distribution is a function of the input power, the particular location in the direction and the height of the septum corresponding to the location. The focus of this work is the study of electric field distribution in an unloaded GTEM cell, which contributes to the general understanding of radiated immunity test in electromagnetic compatibility. A uniform electric field distribution is required so that the device under test will be evenly illuminated by the electromagnetic field. A vertical plane transverse to the direction of propagation is selected and tested for field uniformity. The non uniformity may be caused by the following factors [4]: The field distribution caused by the geometry of the intersections and the increase of the septum s height along the z-axis The appearance of higher modes other than the TEM mode at certain frequencies that have the electric or magnetic field directed in the direction of propagation The amplitude ripples caused by standing wave due to an improper termination especially at the higher frequencies. For reliable and reproducibility of measurements in the GTEM, it is important to first determine the field distribution and to ensure the field uniformity for the performance of emissions and immunity tests. This process is lengthy and not easy for small cells[short papers] as several points needs to be measured within the GTEM volume over the entire frequency range as required in the IEC16-4-2 standard. In this work the determination of Electric field distribution which is lengthy is carried out employing the Labview software for automatic capturing and storage for each position in the frequency range. With the Labview, the field sensor (with outputs in x-,y-,zcomponents) are captured while simultaneously recording the input power with the power meter, and the frequency which is varied from the signal generator in the range of interest for each test position in the GTEM cell.. THE GTEM CELL Electrically, the GTEM is an extension of a 5-ohm transmission line. The transmission line s outer conductor flares and expands into a pyramidal form, becoming the GTEM s outer walls and RF shield. The center conductor transforms into a thin, wide conductive plate, becoming the GTEM s septum. Current is terminated by a 5 ohm broadband resistive network between the septum and the GTEM s backwall. Fields are terminated by RF absorber at the backwall [5]. The attraction in GTEM includes a constant characteristic impedance of 5 ohms throughout its length and field uniformity within the working volume. The characteristic impedance is based on the geometrical dimensions. To avoid reflections that may cause higher order modes, the characteristic impedance must be maintained along the length of the cell [6,7] Fig. 1. GTEM in components[5] The mode of propagation of the electromagnetic wave in the GTEM is TEM with the electric field given as [7]: Where, E = V in h = P inz o h Dominic S. Nyitamen, IJECS Volume 4 Issue 4 April, 215 Page No.11646-1165 Page 11646

V in = input voltage P in = input power h = height of the septum plate above the bottom ground plane at the point of measurement Zo = the characteristic impedance of the GTEM cell. TEM waves will propagate around the septum of the GTEM cell when high frequency signals are input. The waves propagating along the septum are characterised by electric and magnetic fields that are transverse to the direction of propagation. The phase velocity of the TEM mode for propagation in free space and TEM waveguides is always equal to the speed of light. ELECTRIC FIELD STRENGTH The strength of the electric field is proportional to the applied voltage and the distance between the flat inner conductor (septum) and the outer conductor. Figure 2 shows the typical field strength pattern at the cross section of testing volume. The nominal field strength in the working volume refers to the field strength at the center of testing volume approximately the fraction of the voltage and the distance between inner conductor and bottom outer wall. Amplifier Directional Coupler Signal Generator Fig 3 Measurement Setup sensor meter Labview Software meter Figure 6 shows the grid size used for the uniform area as required by IEC 61-4-2. For a.5 m by.5 m area an extra central point would have to be added to a 4-point grid..5 3 2 Fibre-optic cable 5.5m Fig. 2 Field distribution in GTEM [5] MEASUREMENTS Measurement setup is shown in fig 3. The equipment involved in the process include: GTEM cell (547 model), Signal Generator 56 series Amplifier, meter E4419 EPM series/power sensor, 3dB Directional Coupler, Field probe- RAdisense (The probe is an active device, which detects the electric field levels and converts the data to a digital form, which is sent to the receiver through fiber optic link), IEEE488 (USB-GIPB), Desktop computer with NI Labview software. 4 1 Fig. 4 Layout and selection of measurement points CONSTANT FORWARD POWER METHOD BS 61-4-2 [8] The standard suggests grid sizes for a test volume to be applied depending on the size of the GTEM. The procedure for carrying out the calibration is known as the constant forward power method and is as follows: a) position the isotropic electric field strength sensor at one of the points in the grid; b) apply a forward power to the TEM waveguide input port so that the electric field strength of the primary field component is in the range 3 V/m to 1 V/m, through the frequency range, in frequency steps specified and record all the forward power, primary and secondary components field strength readings; c) with the same forward power, measure and record the primary and secondary field strengths at the remaining grid points; d) taking all grid points into consideration, delete a maximum of 25 % (4 of 16, 2 of 9, 1 of 5) of those grid points with the greatest deviation from the mean value of the primary field component, expressed in V/m; e) the primary field component magnitude of the remaining points shall lie within a range of 6 db. The level of the secondary field components shall not exceed 6 db of the primary field component at each of these points; f) of the remaining points, take the location with the lowest primary field component as the reference (this ensures the +6dB requirement is met); g) from knowledge of the forward power and the field strength, the necessary forward power for the required testfield strength can be calculated (for example, if at a given point 81 W gives 9 V/m, then 9 W is needed for 3 V/m). This shall be recorded. Dominic S. Nyitamen, IJECS Volume 4 Issue 4 April, 215 Page No.11646-1165 Page 11647

db db dbv/m Depending on the size of the uniform area it is calibrated at least with a number of measurement points. A field is considered uniform if the following requirements are fulfilled: a) the magnitude of the primary electric field component over the defined area is within + 6dB of the nominal primary field component, over at least 75 % of the measured points; b) the magnitudes of both secondary (unintended) electric field components are at least 6 db less than the primary component, over at least 75 % of the measured points. The 75 % of points fulfilling the first requirement does not need to be identical with the 75 % of points fulfilling the second requirement. At different frequencies, different measured points may be within the tolerance. The tolerance has been expressed as +6dB to ensure that the field strength does not fall below nominal. The 6 db tolerance is considered to be the minimum achievable in practical test facilities. The three components of electric field (vertical and and the ) are captured by the Labview interface. The accuracy in measurement of the electric field is affected by the secondary (unwanted) fields. It is therefore required to find the region for the working volume where the primary (vertical) component dominates with greater cross polarisation isolation. In this work, the cross polarisation isolation is estimated. The maximum electric field difference between the secondary fields and primary field in 4 out of 5 positions of measurement are obtained. RESULTS and DISCUSSION The field uniformity test was performed for five (5) points with the grids 5mm x 5mm at the septum height of 78mmin the GTEM 547. Of the 5 points used, at each frequency 1-point with the highest diversity was discarded which gives the 75% tolerance [9]. The maximum difference in the vertical E field for the remaining 4-points is shown in Fig. 5. The result shows that for the working volume selected, the GTEM is well within the 6dB tolerance over the entire frequency range of 8MHz to 1GHz. The volume was chosen for radiation test for a GSM 9 phone and could serve effectively for small portable devices operating within this range. The cross-polar coupling test to ensure the secondary component are lower than the primary (vertical) field by 6dB was also carried out. The and the fields are plotted relative to the primary field in Fig.6. This is repeated relative to the resultant electric field in Fig.7 Additionally, the cross coupling separation is shown in Fig.8(a-e). For all the 5-points in the working volume. It can be seen clearly in all the plots the separation is well in excess of 6dB. 5 4 3 2 1.E+ 5.E+2 1.E+3 1.5E+3 Fig.5 Maximum difference for 4 f 5 poits, with reference to the primary field 4 2.E+ 5.E+2 1.E+3 1.5E+3-2 -4-6 A B C A &B = and fields relative to primary field. C= primary field Fig.6 Primary field and the relative secondary fields 4 2.E+ 2.E+2 4.E+2 6.E+2 8.E+2 1.E+3 1.2E+3-2 -4-6 A B A &B = and fields relative to resultant field. C= resultant field Fig.7 Resultant field and the relative secondary fields Dominic S. Nyitamen, IJECS Volume 4 Issue 4 April, 215 Page No.11646-1165 Page 11648

Frequency [MHZ].E+ 2.E+2 4.E+2 6.E+2 8.E+2 1.E+3 1.2E+ -2-4.E+ 2.E+2 4.E+2 6.E+2 8.E+2 1.E+3 1.2E+3-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-6 Fig.8a Position 1 Fig.8e Position 5.E+ 2.E+2 4.E+2 6.E+2 8.E+2 1.E+3 1.2E+ -1-2 -3-4 -5-6 Fig.8b Position 2.E+ 2.E+2 4.E+2 6.E+2 8.E+2 1. -1 Fig.9 Labview front panel -2-3 -4-5 -6 Fig.8c position 3 separation.e+ -1 2.E+2 4.E+2 6.E+2 8.E+2 1.E+3-2 -3-4 Fig.1 Block of Labview code -5-6 Fig.8d position 4 CONCLUSION The electric field distribution in an empty (unloaded) GTEM cell provides insight into other reasons for lack of homogeneity in field distribution. If there is a considerable electric field in the transverse and direction it will then mean part of the energy of TEM is lost in these directions. This is also an indication that higher modes are present. Choice of the working volume is a critical factor in having repeatability and reproducibility in GTEM cells. As can be seen from the plots of the primary and secondary fields, there is sufficient separation to allow for both radiated and susceptibility measurements as required by IEC 61-4-2 standard. Dominic S. Nyitamen, IJECS Volume 4 Issue 4 April, 215 Page No.11646-1165 Page 11649

ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his deep appreciation to the George Green Institute of Electromagnetic Research (GGIEMR) for the facilities used and the TETFUND/NDA, Kaduna for sponsorship. REFERENCES [1] Hansen, P. Wilson, D. Konigstein, H. Schaer, A broadband alternative EMC test chamber based on a TEM-cell anechoic-chamber hybrid concept, Proceedings of the 1989 Int. Symp. on EMC, Nagoya, Japan, September 1989, p. 133-137. [2] John Osburn, New Test Cell Offers Both Susceptibility And Radiated and Emission Capabilities, R. F. Design, August 199, pp.39-41. [3] E. L. Bronaugh, J.D.M. Osburn, Radiated emissions test performance of the GHz TEM cell, IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1991, 12-16 Aug.1991, Page(s): 1-7. [4] Kai Haake and Jan Luiken ter Haseborg Precise investigation of field homogeneity inside a GTEM cell 28 IEEE [5] The GTEM concept. GTEM test cells ETS.Lindgren-An ESCO Technologies Company Texas, USA www.etslindgren.com [6] Azian Ubin and Mohd Jenu Characterization of electric field in a GTEM cell RF and Microwave conference, Subang, Selanggor, Malaysia IEEE 24 [7] Pande, D.C and Bhatt, P.K. Characterization of gigahertz transverse electromagnetic cell (GTEM cell), in proceedings of the International Conference on electromagnetic Interference and Compatibility, 1999. [8] IEC 61-4-2 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques. Section 2: emission and Immunity Testing in Transverse Electromagnetic (TEM) waveguides. International electrotechnical commission, Geneva, Switzerland, Draft 2CD 61-4-2, 21. [9] A. Nothofer and M.J. Alexander, D. Bozec, L. McCormack and A.C. Marvin, A good practice guide-the use of GTEM cells for EMC measurements applying IEC 61-4-2. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK, www.npl.co.uk Dominic S. Nyitamen, IJECS Volume 4 Issue 4 April, 215 Page No.11646-1165 Page 1165