Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use

Similar documents
CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH. Notice to Industry Letters

Guidance for Industry

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Good

February 5, 2010 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Prescription Drug-Use-Related Software; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments (Docket No. FDA-2018-N-3017)

Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

CAMD Transition Sub Group FAQ IVDR Transitional provisions

SAUDI ARABIAN STANDARDS ORGANIZATION (SASO) TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE PART ONE: STANDARDIZATION AND RELATED ACTIVITIES GENERAL VOCABULARY

This document is a preview generated by EVS

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Connecting People, Science and Regulation

Recast de la législation européenne et impact sur l organisation hospitalière

American Nuclear Society

Preparing for the new Regulations for healthcare providers

PROPOSED DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force. Title: Medical Devices: Post Market Surveillance: Content of Field Safety Notices

TABLE OF CONTENTS DUPONT TYVEK MEDICAL PACKAGING TRANSITION PROJECT (MPTP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JUNE 2016 THE FINAL PHASE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

Final Document. Title: The GHTF Regulatory Model. Authoring Group: Ad Hoc GHTF SC Regulatory Model Working Group

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION QUALITY GUIDELINES

510 (k) Summary. Imp SFB7 Body Composition Analyzer

Ministry of Justice: Call for Evidence on EU Data Protection Proposals

AGREEMENT on UnifiedPrinciples and Rules of Technical Regulation in the Republic of Belarus, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation

CBD Request to WIPO on the Interrelation of Access to Genetic Resources and Disclosure Requirements

What We Heard Report Inspection Modernization: The Case for Change Consultation from June 1 to July 31, 2012

Submission of comments on Review of the Variations Guidelines (EC 1234/2008)

Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC

June Phase 3 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of Candu Energy Inc. Enhanced CANDU 6 Design

Fiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines

LOREM IPSUM XXX MEDICAL DEVICES NEWS OCTOBER 2012 SPECIAL POINTS OF INTEREST: XXX EDITORIAL

STATEMENT OF WORK Environmental Assessment for the Red Cliffs/Long Valley Land Exchange in Washington County, Utah

[Definitions of terms that are underlined are found at the end of this document.]

APPEAL TO BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS

Wireless Power Transfer Devices (Wireless Chargers)

SATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION REGULATIONS 2007 BR 94/2007

The Recast RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU

FDA REGULATION OF DIGITAL HEALTH

The BioBrick Public Agreement. DRAFT Version 1a. January For public distribution and comment

Privacy Policy SOP-031

(Non-legislative acts) DECISIONS

TITLE V. Excerpt from the July 19, 1995 "White Paper for Streamlined Development of Part 70 Permit Applications" that was issued by U.S. EPA.

FINAL DOCUMENT. Title: Medical Devices Post Market Surveillance: Content of Field Safety Notices. Endorsed by: The Global Harmonization Task Force

Prof. Steven S. Saliterman. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

4/8/2018. Prof. Steven S. Saliterman Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

SECTION SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

Wireless Power Transfer Devices (Wireless Chargers)

Environmental Protection Agency

In practice, the question is frequently raised of what legislation applies to clamping devices that are intended to be used on machines.

.2 Accompany all submissions with a transmittal letter, in duplicate, containing:.4 Specification Section number for each submittal

Section Meetings Section Material and Equipment. None Required

EFRAG s Draft letter to the European Commission regarding endorsement of Definition of Material (Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8)

Guide to the Requirements for Public Information and Disclosure GD-99.3

Ch. 813 INTERACTIVE GAMING ADVERTISEMENTS CHAPTER 813. INTERACTIVE GAMING ADVERTISEMENTS, PROMOTIONS AND TOURNAMENTS TEMPORARY REGULATIONS

UNION COUNTY VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOLS West Hall Addition Project Raritan Road, Scotch Plains, NJ

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C October 23, 2003

June 2014 For any information or queries relating to fundraising for headspace, please contact:

129 FERC 61,131 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Part 284. [Docket No. RM ]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for Review; Information

Clarification for 14 CFR Part Vibration Test

Information Technology Equipment (Including Digital Apparatus) Limits and Methods of Measurement

2008 Course Programs Schedule

Issues in Emerging Health Technologies Bulletin Process

1005 Longworth HOB 2111 Rayburn HOB Washington, D.C Washington, D.C

IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS: CAPITA EXOTICA

Public Information and Disclosure RD/GD-99.3

FEE Comments on EFRAG Draft Comment Letter on ESMA Consultation Paper Considerations of materiality in financial reporting

Combination Products Verification, Validation & Human Factors Sept. 12, 2017

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

June 2014 For any information or queries relating to fundraising for headspace, please contact:

DNVGL-CP-0338 Edition October 2015

CDRH PMA Critical to Quality (CtQ) Pilot

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) RFI NO: /WJG

Conformity assessment procedures for hip, knee and shoulder total joint replacements

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY Office of Planning Design and Construction Administration

Implementing Quality Systems

The following draft Agreement supplements, but does not replace, the MOU by and between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the California

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Assemblies according to the Pressure Equipment Directive - a consideration provided by the PED-AdCo Group 1 -

Air Monitoring Directive Chapter 9: Reporting

The Medical Device Regulation: Transitioning between old and new

CAR Part IX Regulations for srpas Manufacturers. Presented by RPAS TF Eng to Industry, Jan. 24, 2019

IEEE Session #14 Opening Plenary Presentation

Appeals Policy Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation th Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

POLICY

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Addendum 3 to RFP July 28, 2017

SECTION SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

IGEM/TD/101 Edition 2 Communication 1740 Adoption of pipe systems by a GT management of UIP activities

A stronger system to protect the health and safety of Canadians. Exploring the Future of the Food Regulatory Framework Under the Food and Drugs Act

MINIMUM ADVERTISED PRICE POLICY

H e l p I n g H e a l t h c a r e C a r e. U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) Product Specifications Overview

IR UK Interface Requirement 2095 High Duty Cycle Network Relay Points (NRPs)

TGA Discussion Paper 3D Printing Technology in the Medical Device Field Australian Regulatory Considerations

Type Approval JANUARY The electronic pdf version of this document found through is the officially binding version

NZFSA Policy on Food Safety Equivalence:

Public and Aboriginal Engagement Public Information and Disclosure REGDOC-3.2.1

Diana Gordick, Ph.D. 150 E Ponce de Leon, Suite 350 Decatur, GA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

Comments of Cisco Systems, Inc.

Operational Objectives Outcomes Indicators

Position Paper.

October 17, Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Policy. International Agreements. Aussi disponible en français

Transcription:

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use Document issued on: November 30, 2004 The draft of this document was issued on October 28, 2003. The information collection provisions in this guidance have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0553. This approval expires 10/31/2007. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number. For questions regarding this document contact Paula Silberberg, Office of Communication, Education and Radiation Programs, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 240-276- 3234; Terri Garvin, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Evaluation and Safety, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 240-276-1326; or Sheryl Kochman, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 301-827-6123. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

Public Comment Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Preface Written comments and suggestions may be submitted at any time for Agency consideration to the Division of Dockets Management, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, (HFA-305), Rockville, MD, 20852. Alternatively, electronic comments may be submitted to http://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. When submitting comments, please refer to Docket No. 2003D-0383. Comments may not be acted upon by the Agency until the document is next revised or updated. Additional Copies Additional copies are available from the Internet at: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/ GuidanceDocuments/UCM085404.htm or or http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/ GuidanceDocuments/UCM085679.pdf You may also send an e-mail request to dsmica@fda.hhs.gov to receive an electronic copy of the guidance or send a fax request to 301-847-8149 to receive a hard copy. Please use the document number (4444) to identify the guidance you are requesting. Or, you may contact: Office of Communication, Training, and Manufacturers Assistance, HFM-40 Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-1448 Phone: 800-835-4709 or 301-827-1800

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Background... 2 Legal Considerations... 3 FDA Recognizes Selected ISO 15223 and EN 980 Medical Device Symbols... 5 For In Vitro Diagnostic Devices... 7 For Professional Labels and Labeling... 7 Glossary of Terms...7 Educational Outreach... 8 Application of Guidance to Other Symbols... 8 Implementation... 9

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance. I. Introduction This document provides guidance on the use of selected symbols in place of text to convey some of the information required for in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs) intended for professional use by 21 CFR 809.10, FDA s labeling requirements for in vitro diagnostic devices, and 21 CFR parts 610 and 660, FDA s labeling requirements for biologics (including IVDs) that are licensed under the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. These recommendations apply to the use of symbols on the labels and in labeling only of IVDs intended for professional use, and not for over-the-counter or prescription home-use IVDs. This guidance does not address the use of unique and generally recognized symbols to identify the manufacturer of a device, as described in Section 502(u) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Note: The term symbols used throughout this guidance refers to the use of graphical symbols without equivalent accompanying text. This guidance is intended for both industry and FDA. FDA's guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency's current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required. 1

The Least Burdensome Approach The issues identified in this guidance document represent those that we believe should be addressed before your device can be marketed. In developing the guidance, we carefully considered the relevant statutory criteria for Agency decision-making. We also considered the burden that may be incurred in your attempt to follow the guidance and address the issues we have identified. We believe that we have considered the least burdensome approach to resolving the issues presented in the guidance document. If, however, you believe that there is a less burdensome way to address the issues, you should follow the procedures outlined in the A Suggested Approach to Resolving Least Burdensome Issues document. It is available on our Center web page at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/modact/leastburdensome.html. II. Background The market for in vitro diagnostic devices is international. European Union (EU) member countries have attempted to harmonize their national legislation governing IVDs through the European Union s Directive on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices, (Directive 98/79/EC) ( IVD Directive ). The EU s IVD Directive went into full effect on December 8, 2003. As of that date, IVD products marketed in the EU must comply with the IVD Directive and bear the CE mark (mark showing that the product is certified for sale in the European community) to indicate compliance. The EU s IVD Directive and FDA regulations in 21 CFR 809.10, 21 CFR part 610, and 21 CFR part 660 all require substantial information to appear on the IVD itself and/or in its labeling. The IVD Directive specifically allows each EU member state to require that such information appear in its national language, so that a single IVD could be required to bear labeling in multiple languages in order to be sold in the EU. As an alternative, the IVD Directive encourages that, in place of text, IVDs use symbols from harmonized standards to convey the required information. Given that the use of national languages may be required by individual member states and that most IVDs and their packaging are quite small, the IVD Directive s symbols provision represents an avenue through which manufacturers can achieve compliance in an international marketplace. Similarly, the use of symbols helps IVD manufacturers to create uniform labels and labeling for the United States and European Union (and any other countries that may permit use of symbols from these international standards), instead of needing designated labels for each marketplace. Because symbols take up less space than the text for which they may substitute, the use of symbols promotes less crowded and more legible IVD labels. An additional advantage is that there are likely to be fewer labeling errors when using a single label, rather than having one set of labels for use in the United States and another set for use in the European Union. Of course, it is essential that the symbol convey the substance of the deleted text and be widely understood. 2

III. Legal Considerations FDA regulations in 21 CFR 809.10 and 21 CFR parts 610 and 660 define information required to appear on the label and in labeling for IVDs marketed in the United States. These regulations specify the content of labels and labeling and the order in which this information should be presented. With a few exceptions, these regulations do not specify wording that manufacturers must use to meet these requirements. Under Section 502(c) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), a drug or device is misbranded If any word, statement, or other information required by or under authority of this Act to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices, in the labeling) and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use." The information required by 21 CFR 809.10 and 21 CFR parts 610 and 660 thus must also meet the requirements of Section 502(c) of the Act. For a symbol to be used to convey information required by the regulations, it must be a term that is... likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use. This guidance addresses specific symbols from two harmonized international standards that FDA believes can satisfy this requirement. Thus, in accordance with section 514(c) of the Act, FDA recognizes these specific symbols for use on the label and in the labeling of certain IVDs. (See Federal Register of April 28, 2003 (68 FR 22391); corrected with respect to the extent of recognition by October 28, 2003 (68 FR 61448). In this context, we narrowly define the ordinary user as the professional user of IVDs. The customary conditions of purchase and use are within the laboratory environment. Through the process for recognizing international consensus standards, under section 514(c) of the Act, FDA received acceptable evidence in the form of a user comprehension study conducted in the United States that indicates that this target audience can understand labels and labeling that use the 25 symbols identified here in place of equivalent text. Use of these symbols can also help to satisfy the conspicuousness requirement of section 502(c). As explained above, most IVD devices are small and have limited label space. By using symbols in place of some textual statements, manufacturers may enhance the legibility of labeling and thus improve the conspicuousness of required information. In the study submitted to FDA in support of recognition of these standard symbols, participants overwhelmingly favored the use of the tested symbols in place of the text equivalents. This guidance document recognizes that the symbols for which comprehension data have been presented to, and accepted by, the FDA through the consensus standards recognition process may be used as terms to communicate to professional users of IVDs information 3

required under 21 CFR 809.10 and 21 CFR parts 610 and 660. 1 Manufacturers remain responsible for adhering to the substantive requirements of these provisions, and to all other labeling requirements under the Act and regulations. As stated above, some provisions of 21 CFR 809.10 and 21 CFR part 660 do specify particular labeling language. As a matter of enforcement discretion, FDA does not intend to object to the use of: the symbol consisting of the letters IVD in a box in place of the statement For In Vitro Diagnostic Use required by 21 CFR 809.10(a)(4), 809.10(b)(5)(ii), 660.28(b)(13), and 660.55(b)(10) the symbol that represents For IVD Performance Evaluation only in place of the statement, For Investigational Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not been established. Because FDA equates this symbol with this statement, required by 21 CFR 809.10(c)(2)(ii), use of this symbol should be limited to those IVDs that are subject to that requirement. IVDs that may be subject to other labeling requirements regarding their investigational or research status, such as the requirements of 21 CFR 812.5(a), 809.10(c)(2)(i), or 312.6(a), must continue to bear the textual statements required by those provisions and should not bear this symbol. The symbol that represents Authorized representative in the European Community is not needed to fulfill the labeling requirements of 21 CFR 809.10 or 21 CFR parts 610 or 660, as U.S. regulations do not require this information to be provided. IVD manufacturers who wish to use this symbol on the label or labeling to be used in both the U.S. and European Union in order to fulfill European labeling requirements may do so as long as the use of this symbol does not violate other U.S. labeling requirements. For example, if the Authorized representative in the European Community symbol is used in a manner that interferes with the communication of information required by U.S. law, the device could be misbranded under section 502(c) of the Act. 1 21 CFR 801.15(c) says that a device is misbranded under section 502(c) of the Act unless: All words, statements, and other information required by or under authority of the act to appear on the label or labeling shall appear thereon in the English language: Provided, however, That in the case of articles distributed solely in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or in a Territory where the predominant language is one other than English, the predominant language may be substituted for English. Because, as explained above, FDA concludes that the symbols from international consensus standards recognized in this guidance document can be understood by relevant users in the United States and thus satisfy the underlying requirements of section 502(c), the Agency does not intend to interpret their use to violate 21 CFR 801.15(c). This interpretation is consistent with international harmonization. 4

IV. FDA Recognizes Selected ISO 15223 and EN 980 Medical Device Symbols In accordance with the consensus standards recognition process, established by section 514(c) of the Act, in the Federal Register of April 28, 2003 (68 FR 22391), FDA published a notice recognizing certain standards for use in premarket reviews including the two standards listed below concerning the use of symbols in labeling. In the Federal Register of October 28, 2003 (68 FR 61448), FDA published a notice correcting the April 28 th notice with respect to the extent of the recognition of the two standards. FDA recognizes 25 symbols for IVD devices for professional use from the following two international consensus standards: ISO 15223, Medical Devices Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labeling and information to be supplied EN 980, Graphical symbols for use in the labeling of medical devices The following chart displays the symbols with their definitions. 5

6

Validation data introduced in FDA s consensus standards recognition process satisfies FDA that professional users of IVDs, the intended audience for this labeling, will understand the 25 symbols identified above. Specifically, industry-sponsored studies conducted in the United States with professional laboratory test users from a variety of educational backgrounds demonstrated end-user comprehension of the symbols in context, with an accompanying glossary and other educational outreach. Sections V and VI of this guidance explain the limitations of this recognition, which flow from the validation data. V. For In Vitro Diagnostic Devices FDA recognizes use of these symbols only for the labels and labeling of in vitro diagnostic devices. Recognition supports FDA s efforts to harmonize its regulatory work with international standards-making bodies. Recognition is supported by the scope and results of the studies performed and submitted to FDA. FDA has not received reports of studies supporting use of any additional symbols on IVDs, nor supporting recognition of any symbols for use on other devices, for which ordinary users and conditions of purchase and use would differ from IVDs. VI. For Professional Labels and Labeling FDA recognizes these symbols only for use on the professional label and in the professional labeling of in vitro diagnostic devices. FDA does not recognize the symbols for use in the labels and labeling of over-the-counter or prescription home-use IVDs. Validation data introduced through FDA s consensus standards recognition process supported the use of symbols for IVD professional labels and labeling, not for consumer labeling. VII. Glossary of Terms FDA recommends that a glossary of terms accompany each IVD to define all of the symbols used on that device s labels and/or labeling. This glossary may also contain other symbols identified by FDA in its recognition of ISO 15223 and EN 980, whether or not used in labeling for the particular device. The glossary allows users to become familiar with the meaning of the symbols and also acts as a reference for users to look up any definitions they may not recall. In these respects, the glossary helps to satisfy the requirements of Section 502(c) of the Act by ensuring that IVD users, under customary conditions of use, have access to necessary reference materials, making it more likely that they can understand the symbols. Since users can keep the package insert readily accessible, FDA encourages the inclusion of the glossary in the package insert. The 7

glossary accompanying the IVD may be a separate labeling piece in the form of a separate sheet of paper or card while IVD labeling is being updated and revised, but FDA recommends that to ensure ease of access, the glossary of symbols ultimately appear as part of the package insert accompanying the IVD. VIII. Educational Outreach FDA recommends that manufacturers conduct an educational outreach effort for the intended audience to enhance the understanding of newly introduced symbols. The educational outreach should target the various professional users of IVDs (e.g., laboratory technologists, nurses, laboratory assistants, medical assistants). FDA recommends the following possible methods for education: print materials such as glossaries, wall charts, articles in the laboratory press information on industry web sites dear health care provider letters advertisements in professional journals training sessions The educational outreach should extend to all of those involved in the IVD distribution chain, such as wholesalers and distributors, who need to be aware of symbols relating to expiration date and storage requirements. Such educational programs also help satisfy the requirements of Section 502(c) of the Act by creating an environment in which IVD users are likely to understand the symbols used. FDA recommends that the manufacturers evaluate the educational outreach activities to determine if these activities are effective in educating IVD users to comprehend the meaning of the symbols. IX. Application of Guidance to Other Symbols CDRH will consider recognizing other symbols for use on the labels and in the labeling of IVDs through FDA s consensus standards recognition process. For additional information about this process, refer to the web page for FDA s Standards Program: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/stdsprog.html. 8

X. Implementation For IVDs intended for professional use for which FDA has approved an application for Premarket Approval (PMA), manufacturers may change the labeling to include FDA recognized symbols in place of equivalent text without approval of PMA supplements. Other changes to labeling may require new PMA submissions, in accordance with 21 CFR 814.39(b). PMA holders that implement this type of change should notify the Agency of the change in the next annual report to the PMA, in accordance with 21 CFR 814.84. Similarly, biologics license holders that implement this type of change should notify the Agency of the change, which the Agency will consider an editorial or similar minor change, in the next annual report to the Manufacturers Biologics License Application (BLA), in accordance with 21 CFR 601.12(f)(3)(A). Manufacturers may substitute recognized symbols in place of equivalent text on existing labels and labeling for IVDs intended for professional use that received Premarket Notification [510(k)] clearance without submitting a new 510(k). (For information on other labeling changes that may require submission of a new 510(k), please see 21 CFR 807.81(a)(3), and FDA s guidance document, Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device, available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/510kmod.pdf.) Manufacturers and importers should report to FDA any adverse events that arise from the use of symbols in labeling of IVDs intended for professional use, as required by 21 CFR part 803. Reporting forms and instructions are available at http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety.htm. 9