Revision of the Public Law Outline

Similar documents
Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1 st Floor 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. MV/288 Mark Vaessen.

Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution

MEASURES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF CIF COMMITTEES. CTF-SCF/TFC.11/7/Rev.1 January 27, 2014

Intimate Communications Hub Interface Specification Report to Secretary of State

GSA SUMMARY REPORT OF EQUALITY CONSIDERATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EQUALITY IMPACT. PGT Ethics Policy. New: Existing/Reviewed: Revised/Updated:

8th Floor, 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)

IAASB Main Agenda (March, 2015) Auditing Disclosures Issues and Task Force Recommendations

CMP298. Updating the Statement of Works process to facilitate aggregated assessment of relevant and collectively relevant embedded generation.

Justice Select Committee: Inquiry on EU Data Protection Framework Proposals

8th Floor, 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)

8th Floor, 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)

Exposure Draft Definition of Material. Issues Paper - Towards a Draft Comment Letter

Safety related product corrective action

Herefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

Application Procedure

Ministry of Justice: Call for Evidence on EU Data Protection Proposals

Research Specification: understanding consumer experience of first tier complaints

South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy

Proposed International Standard on Auditing 315 (Revised) Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement

Making Materiality Judgements

RadioCentre s response to the BBC Trust review of the BBC s national radio stations in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales

Accountable Officer Report

(EC) ), 11(8) 347/ /2009, (EC)

Impact on audit quality. 1 November 2018

Australian Standard. Design review AS IEC IEC 61160, Ed.2 (2005) AS IEC

Submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Intellectual Property Arrangements

New approach for lighting Regulations

1.1.1 Apologies were received from Nick Atkinson, Vaughan C. Matthews, David Foley and Peter Christian.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN ANCI AND THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS

TechAmerica Europe comments for DAPIX on Pseudonymous Data and Profiling as per 19/12/2013 paper on Specific Issues of Chapters I-IV

Clinical Commissioning Groups: Basic decision making around delegation

THE GRID CODE OC7.5 INTEGRAL EQUIPMENT TESTS GUIDANCE NOTES

THE GRID CODE OC7.5 INTEGRAL EQUIPMENT TESTS

A stronger system to protect the health and safety of Canadians. Exploring the Future of the Food Regulatory Framework Under the Food and Drugs Act

Continuing Healthcare Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

Shell Trading Gas and Power Company General Manager Regulatory Affairs, December 2, 2002 to Present

World Trade Organization Panel Proceedings

Consequential BSC changes resulting from the Smart Programme

AGREEMENT on UnifiedPrinciples and Rules of Technical Regulation in the Republic of Belarus, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation

The Cremation (Scotland) Regulations Consultation. Introduction. The regulations

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE REPORT BY THE MUSEUMS THINK TANK

Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom

CCG Assurance Framework. England

Statement on variation of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz Wireless Telegraphy Act licences

ESEA Flexibility. Guidance for Renewal Process. November 13, 2014

Appointment of External Auditors

Establishing the Greater Manchester Association of Clinical Commissioning groups. Summary slides

NHS HMR CCG and NHS England Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee 2015/16

Mde Françoise Flores, Chair EFRAG 35 Square de Meeûs B-1000 Brussels Belgium January Dear Mde.

Standard and guidance for the creation, compilation, transfer and deposition of archaeological archives

By RE: June 2015 Exposure Draft, Nordic Federation Standard for Audits of Small Entities (SASE)

Making It Your Own A PUBLIC ART POLICY AND PLANNING TEMPLATE. Arts North West Creative Opportunities 2012

Re: Examination Guideline: Patentability of Inventions involving Computer Programs

Office for Nuclear Regulation

Item 4.2 of the Draft Provisional Agenda COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

Collaboration Agreement

Minutes from the Health and Well-Being Board Financial Planning Group Tuesday 15 December North London Business Park, F13 1pm 3pm

AMTA Submission addressing the draft Terms of Reference of the Convergence Review 2011

NATS Swanwick. Interface Agreement. Owners: General Manager Swanwick. General Manager XXX

The European Securitisation Regulation: The Countdown Continues... Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Content and Format of the STS Notification

FEE Comments on EFRAG Draft Comment Letter on ESMA Consultation Paper Considerations of materiality in financial reporting

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy. NHS South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG)

UK Shared Business Services Ltd

Guidance on design of work programmes for minerals prospecting, exploration and mining permits

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

PILI Corporate Pro Bono Roundtable

Route Planning & Cable Route Surveys

EFRAG s Draft letter to the European Commission regarding endorsement of Definition of Material (Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8)

NHS South Kent Coast. Clinical Commissioning Group. Complaints, Comments and Compliments Policy

Merton Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution. [29 May] 2012

IAASB Main Agenda (May 2006) Page Materiality and Misstatements

Melbourne IT Audit & Risk Management Committee Charter

Interpret technical drawing

Commonwealth War Graves Commission. Burial and Cremation (Scotland) Bill

Government Policy Statement on Gas Governance

Learning Lessons Abroad on Funding Research and Innovation. 29 April 2016

Strategic Transport Forum 7 th December 2018

RADIO SPECTRUM POLICY GROUP. Opinion on Spectrum Aspects of Intelligent Transport Systems

BLM S LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES STEP-BY-STEP

Reflections on progress made at the fifth part of the second session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action

. Faye Goldman. July Contents

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Patient and Community Engagement Indicator (Compliance with statutory guidance on patient and public participation in commissioning health and care)

KKR Credit Advisors (Ireland) Unlimited Company PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Doing, supporting and using public health research. The Public Health England strategy for research, development and innovation

GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION ON THE OBJECTIVES OF THE NATIONAL INFORMATION SOCIETY POLICY FOR

Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office

I hope you will find these comments constructive and helpful.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC Comments of the National Association of Broadcasters

What does the revision of the OECD Privacy Guidelines mean for businesses?

IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT NON-NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL CO-OPERATION

AusBiotech response to Paper 1: Amending inventive step requirements for Australian patents (August 2017)

NCRIS Capability 5.7: Population Health and Clinical Data Linkage

Re: JICPA Comments on the PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034

INQUESTS A FACTSHEET FOR FAMILIES

Directions in Auditing & Assurance: Challenges and Opportunities Clarified ISAs

Controlling Changes Lessons Learned from Waste Management Facilities 8

The following draft Agreement supplements, but does not replace, the MOU by and between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the California

SATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION REGULATIONS 2007 BR 94/2007

Transcription:

Revision of the Public Law Outline Issue The President of the Family Division and the Ministry of Justice have been working together (and in conjunction with other family justice agencies) to revise the Practice Direction Guide to Case Management in Public Law Proceedings. This Practice Direction is more commonly known as the Public Law Outline, (the PLO). Our aim is for revisions to the PLO to come into force on 6 April 2010. The purpose of this note is to brief you about these changes and their impact and for you to share this information with relevant colleagues in your organisation. Background The Review of the Child Care Proceedings System in England and Wales, was issued jointly by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (now Ministry of Justice), the Department for Education and Skills (now Department for Children Schools and Families) and the Welsh Assembly Government, in May 2006. The Care Review made a number of recommendations to improve the system for children and families subject to care proceedings. It encouraged early intervention to find resolutions before cases reach court, and identified ways to improve the quality of local authority applications. It also recognised there were benefits in simplifying the court process and improving case management procedures. The PLO was a key reform arising from the Care Review. The Public Law Outline 1 April 2008 The PLO was issued jointly by the President of the Family Division and the Ministry of Justice, on 1 April 2008, and applies to all care and supervision proceedings. As far as practicable, it is to be applied to all other family public law proceedings. The PLO introduced a simpler, more streamlined process designed to minimise unnecessary delay, with greater emphasis on case management and advocacy preparation. Importantly, the timetable in each case would be focused around the needs of the individual child involved. It shifted the balance from the emphasis on a specific target time for completion of cases, to a more flexible requirement for cases to proceed at a speed appropriate to meet the needs of the individual child, known as Timetable for the Child. Reasons for change A commitment was made to revisit the PLO, a year after it had been in operation. This was intended not as a wholesale revision, or dilution of the PLO principles, but rather a fine-tuning exercise to make necessary changes and improvements to address any specific areas of operational concern.

We commissioned some research to help our understanding of how the PLO was operating. The report, An early process evaluation of the Public Law Outline in family Courts (Brophy et al, July 2009), showed that overall, when implemented appropriately to the needs of the case, the PLO provides a clear structure for care and supervision cases. However, it also found that there was inconsistency in compliance with the PLO requirements, and that the PLO paperwork was seen as unwieldy and in need of streamlining. The research was used to help inform the key areas to be addressed when revising the PLO. Work to revise the PLO has been led by the judiciary, and the key areas of focus were agreed following input from an inter-agency group comprising: the Ministry of Justice, Association of Directors for Children s Services, Cafcass, CAFACSS CYMRU, and the Welsh Assembly Government. In addition, an inter-agency Care Proceedings Implementation Steering Group (ISG) was tasked with reviewing the current PLO documentary requirements and recommending improvements. What is not changing The overall framework of the original PLO has not been affected by the changes. There are still the same four stages. The same timescales also apply to the each stage as before. PLO stages 1-4, timescales and hearings 1. Issue (on day 1 and by day 3) to ensure compliance with the pre-proceedings checklist and give initial case management directions and First Appointment (by day 6) to allocate the case to the appropriate tier of court and give initial case management directions. 2. Advocates' Meeting (no later than 2 days before the Case Management Conference) to prepare the draft Case Management Order and the CMC (no later than day 45) to identify issues that need resolving, confirm timetable for the child and give full case management directions. 3. Advocates' Meeting (between 2 & 7 days before the Issues Resolution Hearing) to prepare or update the draft Case Management Order and the IRH (between 16 & 25 weeks) to resolve and narrow issues that need resolving and identify any remaining issues. 4. Hearing set in accordance with the Timetable for the Child to determine any remaining issues. Each of the hearings should still take place within the same timescales as above, and in accordance with the Timetable for the Child on which there is now a greater emphasis. Applications for Emergency Protection Orders EPOs will continue to be outside the scope of the PLO. The Practice Direction explicitly states that consideration should be given to applying the PLO to all public law proceedings and it will therefore be a decision to be taken by the court about how and when it is appropriate for the PLO to apply when an application commences by way of an EPO. Key changes and benefits It was agreed, that revision of the PLO should be focused on three key areas:

reducing the burden of documentary requirements at issue clarifying the Timetable for the Child principle improving the PLO forms The revised PLO will streamline the documentary requirements on issue. It also provides further guidance on the principle relating to the Timetable for the Child, and how this needs to work with the overall framework of the PLO and the timescales of the various stages within it. In addition, the overly cumbersome original PLO forms have also been streamlined and simplified. Pre-proceedings checklist Some important changes have been made to the Pre-proceedings stage of the PLO this makes a distinction between the checklist documents required at Issue, and other documents to be disclosed by the First Appointment or as directed by the court. This change is in response to the feedback received that the original documentary requirements were considered to be overly burdensome and have been streamlined as a result. Such a large volume of documentation was also not considered to be essential for the courts to have at the issue stage. New application form C110 To inform the development of the new application form for care and supervision orders, we carried out a targeted two week consultation on the draft version, during January 2010. There was a high level of interest in the C110 consultation, generating 51 responses. Overall, the comments were very positive and welcomed the introduction of a bespoke application form. The new form C110 contains an Annex with a list of the 6 documents that need to be filed with the application at the time of issue. This requirement is in accordance with the revised PLO: Social Work Chronology Initial Social Work Statement Initial and Core Assessments Letters before Proceedings Schedule of Proposed Findings Care Plan By introducing the Form C110, there will no longer be a requirement to use the existing prescribed application forms C1 and C13 to apply for a care or supervision order. It will also not be necessary to use a series of forms recommended for use under the PLO Practice Direction - which results in an overall reduction in forms. Note: The C1 form will continue to exist, but will no longer be used for care and supervision applications and therefore some minor changes have been made to the heading of the C1 form to make this clear. Some consequential rule amendments are being made to cater for these minor changes to the C1 form Streamlining documentation A series of forms were introduced with the PLO. Currently, the forms PLO1, 2 and 3 are annexed to the PLO. The revised PLO will not annex any forms. The changes are:

PLO1 Pre-proceedings checklist this form will be obsolete as the relevant information has been incorporated into the new C110 application form. PLO2 Local Authority Case Summary the current form will be made obsolete. A Local Authority Case Summary will still be required, although no longer on a particular form. The information needed in will be specified in the revised PLO. PLO3 Draft Case Management Order this form will become obsolete, and the content for this order is set out in the revised PLO. PLO4 Allocation Record and Timetable for the Child(ren) this form will be obsolete as the relevant information at issue stage, is incorporated into the C110. PLO5 Standard Directions Form on Issue this form will become obsolete, and the content for these directions is set out in the revised PLO. PLO6 Standard Directions Forms at First Appointment this form will become obsolete, and the content for these directions is set out in the revised PLO. The changes mean that the documentary requirements have been reduced substantially and that overall the new form are more appropriately tailored for use with the requirements of the revised PLO and more flexible and user-friendly. These are Form C110 a new application form for care and supervision orders No longer a need to use the prescribed forms C1 and C13 Also no longer a need to use the original PLO forms PLO1, PLO2, PLO3, PLO4, PLO5 and PLO6. The revised PLO will set out the information that should be included in the: Standard Directions on Issue Standard Directions at First Appointment Case Management Order Accessing the new forms Prior to April 2010 - the new form C110 and the amended form C1 will be available on the HMCS website at: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/index.htm Courts will need to direct court users to the HMCS forms website for the new forms. Old forms From the 6 April 2010 the existing C1, C13, PLO1, PLO2 PLO3, PLO4, PLO5 and PLO6 will become obsolete. Courts need to ensure that they no longer accept these forms. Rules When the PLO was issued in April 2008, it was as a free-standing Practice Direction and is not supported by court rules. Therefore, revision of the PLO would not ordinarily require any

amendment to the rules. However, this opportunity to revise the PLO, is also being used to introduce a new application form to align with the PLO requirements. The rule amendments make provision for the use of a new application form for care and supervision orders, Form C110. In addition, the rules will provide that only those of the documents which are specified in the Annex to the Form C110 as are available should be filed at issue. The aim is to ensure that proceedings aimed at protecting children are not delayed by reason of a missing document. The new application form supports the revision to the PLO - for example, by referring to the documents set out in the Annex to the form C110 - and when the court should give directions relating to any missing Annex documents. In addition, there will be a new rule, which makes express reference to the court setting the timetable for the proceedings for a care or a supervision order in accordance with the Timetable for the Child defined in the rule. The revisions to the PLO support this rule by giving greater emphasis to the Timetable for the Child. The key feature of the Timetable for the Child, is that it is a timetable which takes into account dates of the significant steps in the life of the child who is the subject of the proceedings and is appropriate for that child Transitional arrangements The changes to the PLO will not apply retrospectively. The revisions to the PLO will apply to applications issued from 6 April 2010. However, the court may direct in any individual case that the revised PLO will apply in whole or in part. Training During March 2010 there will be a series of regional conferences across the country, which are about reducing delay in care proceedings. These events will cover the new system wide target for care cases, and also cover the changes to the PLO. These are inter-agency events, open to all those involved in the care proceedings system. The details appear on the Ministry of Justice website for those wishing to attend: http://www.justice.gov.uk/latest-updates/announcement260210b.htm Also during March, as the revision of the PLO is being finalised, we are sharing information and briefing about the changes ahead of them coming into force. Conclusion Our aim is for the revised PLO Practice Direction, new prescribed application Form C110, revised application Form C1, and the necessary rule amendments, all to come into force on 6 April 2010. Publication Prior to coming into force, the revised PLO Practice Direction will be issued electronically, on the HMCS website at: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/479.htm The changes mean: This is NOT a wholesale revision of the PLO Overall, the framework of the PLO is not changing The principles of the PLO remain intact

Processes have been streamlined and simplified There is no change to: Our commitment to avoid unnecessary delay The four stages of the PLO The Hearing types of the PLO Emphasis on robust case management Enhanced advocacy preparation Use of case management tools Focus on individual needs of the Child the Timetable for the Child