erosita mirror calibration:

Similar documents
SIMBOL-X. Peter Lechner MPI-HLL Project Review Schloss Ringberg, science background. mission. telescope.

The predicted performance of the ACS coronagraph

The Asteroid Finder Focal Plane

SOAR Integral Field Spectrograph (SIFS): Call for Science Verification Proposals

Inverted-COR: Inverted-Occultation Coronagraph for Solar Orbiter

Observational Astronomy

MONS Field Monitor. System Definition Phase. Design Report

ECEN. Spectroscopy. Lab 8. copy. constituents HOMEWORK PR. Figure. 1. Layout of. of the

Wide Field Imager for Athena

Spatially Resolved Backscatter Ceilometer

BEAM HALO OBSERVATION BY CORONAGRAPH

Reflectors vs. Refractors

MPE's views on SDDs as focal plane detectors for SFA

The Wide Field Imager

An integral eld spectrograph for the 4-m European Solar Telescope

3.0 Alignment Equipment and Diagnostic Tools:

Supplementary Materials

Laser Beam Analysis Using Image Processing

Optical Components for Laser Applications. Günter Toesko - Laserseminar BLZ im Dezember

, PMOD-WRC IDEAS+ WP TD3370 Status Pandonia updates Some EPIC info

!!! DELIVERABLE!D60.2!

Supplementary Figure S1. Schematic representation of different functionalities that could be

CaSSIS. Colour and Stereo Surface Imaging System. L. Gambicorti & CaSSIS team

Patents of eye tracking system- a survey

Light gathering Power: Magnification with eyepiece:

CHARA Collaboration Review New York 2007 CHARA Telescope Alignment

Reference and User Manual May, 2015 revision - 3

Wide X-ray Field of View

Opto Engineering S.r.l.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Department. 2.71/2.710 Final Exam. May 21, Duration: 3 hours (9 am-12 noon)

a simple optical imager

EE119 Introduction to Optical Engineering Fall 2009 Final Exam. Name:

Classical Optical Solutions

BAFFLES DESIGN OF THE PROBA-V WIDE FOV TMA

APPLICATIONS FOR TELECENTRIC LIGHTING

X-ray generation by femtosecond laser pulses and its application to soft X-ray imaging microscope

Physics 3340 Spring Fourier Optics

MERIS US Workshop. Instrument Overview. Steven Delwart

ADVANCED OPTICS LAB -ECEN Basic Skills Lab

DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AN ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEM FOR THE UH HOKU KE`A OBSERVATORY ABSTRACT

NANO 703-Notes. Chapter 9-The Instrument

AgilOptics mirrors increase coupling efficiency into a 4 µm diameter fiber by 750%.

OPAL Optical Profiling of the Atmospheric Limb

Optical Design. Instrument concept Foreoptics and slit viewer Spectrograph Alignment plan 3/29/13

Practical work no. 3: Confocal Live Cell Microscopy

Experiment 1: Fraunhofer Diffraction of Light by a Single Slit

HRMA Ghost Image Properties

Puntino. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for optimizing telescopes. The software people for optics

A Pin-Hole Projection System: Status

NIRCam optical calibration sources

Upgrade of the ultra-small-angle scattering (USAXS) beamline BW4

Olivier Thizy François Cochard

The performance of the CHEOPS On-Ground calibration system

This experiment is under development and thus we appreciate any and all comments as we design an interesting and achievable set of goals.

Why is There a Black Dot when Defocus = 1λ?

Case Study: Custom CCD for X-ray Free Electron Laser Experiment

PHY385H1F Introductory Optics. Practicals Session 7 Studying for Test 2

Optical Coherence: Recreation of the Experiment of Thompson and Wolf

Design and test of a high-contrast imaging coronagraph based on two. 50-step transmission filters

Simulations of the STIS CCD Clear Imaging Mode PSF

ANALYTICAL MICRO X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETER

GPI INSTRUMENT PAGES

Laser Telemetric System (Metrology)

Performance Comparison of Spectrometers Featuring On-Axis and Off-Axis Grating Rotation

ADVANCED OPTICS LAB -ECEN 5606

COST Short Term Scientific Missions Report 24 July 2014

MIRI The Mid-Infrared Instrument for the JWST. ESO, Garching 13 th April 2010 Alistair Glasse (MIRI Instrument Scientist)

Laser Speckle Reducer LSR-3000 Series

LISA AIV/T. N. Dinu Jaeger ARTEMIS. [joint work with APC and CNES]

Solar Optical Telescope (SOT)

Calibration considerations for a reduced-timeline optimized approach for VNIR earthorbiting

AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference 2007 Paper No. SSC07-VIII-2

Instructions for the Experiment

Nano Beam Position Monitor

Supplementary Information for. Surface Waves. Angelo Angelini, Elsie Barakat, Peter Munzert, Luca Boarino, Natascia De Leo,

Chapter 3. Introduction to Zemax. 3.1 Introduction. 3.2 Zemax

12.4 Alignment and Manufacturing Tolerances for Segmented Telescopes

TIRCAM2 (TIFR Near Infrared Imaging Camera - 3.6m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT)

Instrument Characteristics

UltraGraph Optics Design

Coronal and heliospheric imaging instrumentation development at RAL Space

STRAYLIGHT TESTS FOR THE HELIOSPHERIC IMAGERS OF STEREO

Phys 531 Lecture 9 30 September 2004 Ray Optics II. + 1 s i. = 1 f

Acquisition. Some slides from: Yung-Yu Chuang (DigiVfx) Jan Neumann, Pat Hanrahan, Alexei Efros

Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Lightning Imager (LI) instrument on-ground and in-flight calibration

Just How Good Are Flats? John Menke May 2005

Why and How? Daniel Gitler Dept. of Physiology Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Microscopy course, Michmoret Dec 2005

Point Spread Function. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Confocal Aperture. Optical aberrations. Alternative Scanning Microscopy

Supplementary Figure 1

ECEN 4606, UNDERGRADUATE OPTICS LAB

Detectors for AXIS. Eric D. Miller Catherine Grant (MIT)

Devices & Services Company

PHYS 3153 Methods of Experimental Physics II O2. Applications of Interferometry

SpectraPro 2150 Monochromators and Spectrographs

Opti 415/515. Introduction to Optical Systems. Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn

Computer Generated Holograms for Optical Testing

RENISHAW RAMAN MICROSCOPE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Bringing Answers to the Surface

J.A. Casey and J.H. Irby. M.I.T. Plasma Fusion Center

FRAUNHOFER AND FRESNEL DIFFRACTION IN ONE DIMENSION

Transcription:

erosita mirror calibration: First measurements and future concept PANTER instrument chamber set-up for XMM mirror calibration: 12 m length, 3.5 m diameter: 8m to focal plane instrumentation now: f = 1.6 m; cameras = PSPC, EPIC-pn, TRoPIC IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 1

erosita product tree of telescope FM telescope = 7 modules with 54 shells each + 7 cameras telescope infrastructure optical bench cover and mechanism thermal control system baffle mirror system mirrors structure cameras camera housing CCD module electronics box electronics and software IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 2

erosita optics at PANTER: test objects telescope = 7 modules with 54 shells each + 7 cameras single shell 44/3 (ABRIXAS mandrel),... single shell 46/1, 46/2, 46/8 (ABRIXAS mandrel) single shell 27/4 (MLT mandrel),... single shell 1 (MLT mandrel): to be installed tomorrow single shell 2 (Zeiss mandrel): to be installed tomorrow DM (QM): shells 1 + 27 FM1 FM2,..., FM7 (incl. cameras) end-to-end test IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 3

erosita optics at PANTER: test subjects (on-axis) delivery, visual inspection, installation optical alignment (laser) X-ray alignment (Burkert test) point spread function (HEW, W90) at various energies: large-scale (PSPC, e.g. scattering, micro-roughness) small-scale (TRoPIC): pixel scan : 20 20 (3.75 µm step) raster over 1 pixel to avoid split bias re-shift coordinates and merge exposures sub-pixel resolution via split event statistics single reflections: parabola entrance (mounting at spider), hyperbola entrance (close to mid-plane) out-of-focus rings (position, width, pseudo-hartmann test) effective area at various energies (full illumination, Glücksrad ) gold edge, off-axis behaviour, contamination control,... IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 4

erosita: mechanical interface (GSE) Mounted onto rotate-tilt-stage for X-ray alignment and dedicated off-axis exposures IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 5

Set-up at PANTER Shell and finger spider before mounting of entrance aperture In the back: PSPC (right), TRoPIC (middle), EPIC-pn (partially covered) IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 6

Tube exit In the back: exit of 123 m tube, with various aperture stops Distance source - mirror midplane: 130 m: maximum (full) divergence angle 9.5 IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 7

ero-27/4: alignment (PSPC) out-of-focus off-axis single reflections (hyperbola, parabola) IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 8

ero-27/4: alignment (PSPC): on-axis (combined image) combined image: symmetric IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 9

ero-27/4: out-of-focus (PSPC): on-axis 16 fingers of spider, zoomed image IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 10

ero-27/4 PSF: TRoPIC: HEW = 25 (22.5) arcsec (Al-K) IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 11

ero-46/8 PSF: TRoPIC: HEW = 17 (14.7) arcsec (Al-K) IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 12

ero-46/8: towards sub-pixel resolution randomize events within split area (i.e. where doubles, tripels etc. are generated) instead of within full pixel (like in XMM-SAS), this improves spatial resolution: HEW 17 arcsec 14.7 arcsec IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 13

ero-46/2: single reflections (PSPC) outer ring: hyperbola close to mid-plane inner ring: parabola close to entrance at higher energies: outer ring disappears due to large incidence angles IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 14

ero-46/8: single reflections (TRoPIC mosaic) single reflection rings, out-of-time events, pile-up in PSF core IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 15

Out-of-focus rings: position and width IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 16

Out-of-focus ring geometry: position and width Shell mid-plane radius exit radius distance ring center ring width # r m [mm] r u [mm] s [mm] r c [mm] w [mm] 46 47.202 43.870 40 1.180 0.028 125 3.686 0.088 175 5.161 0.124 200 5.898 0.141 250 7.373 0.177 400 11.796 0.283 27 81.943 76.160 40 2.048 0.049 144.02 7.373 0.177 250 12.799 0.307 1 174.184 161.906 40 4.353 0.105 67.75 7.373 0.177 250 27.208 0.655 focal plane instrumentation at PANTER: along optical axis: ±250 mm highest spatial resolution: TRoPIC: FOV 19.2 mm squared out-of-focus rings allow spatial location of features IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 17

ero-46/2: out-of-focus rings + single reflections (PSPC) intrafocal: parabola and hyperbola single reflections, double-reflection ring extrafocal: hyperbola and parabola and single reflections, double-reflection ring cross-sections of double-reflection ring, if sufficient spatial resolution: IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 18

ero-46/2: out-of-focus rings (TRoPIC): data + theory IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 19

ero-46/2: -250, +200, -40, +40, -20, +20 mm out-of-focus mirrored rings from intra-focal to extra-focal IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 20

ero-46/2: Pseudo-Hartmann test: in-focus prediction 0.2 2d positions: 2mm intrafocal 0.2 2d positions: 1mm intrafocal 0.2 2d positions: focus 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0 0-0.05-0.05-0.05-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.15-0.15-0.15-0.2-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.2 2d positions: 0.5mm extrafocal -0.2-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.2 2d positions: 1mm extrafocal -0.2-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.2 2d positions: 2mm extrafocal 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0 0-0.05-0.05-0.05-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.15-0.15-0.15-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 interpolation of -250mm intrafocal and +200mm extrafocal images to focus position: -2mm, -1mm intrafocal, 0mm, +0.5mm, +1mm, +2mm extrafocal IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 21

ero-27/4: effective areas IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 22

erosita: effective areas via Glücksrad put open mirror aperture parallel to incident beam any aperture from 0 to 45 (2 sectors) sum of sectors gives parallel beam effective area IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 23

erosita flight models FM1: according to schedule will be delivered prior to first camera FM FM1: calibrate extensively with TRoPIC FM1: mount X-ray baffle FM1: double crystal monochromator for gold edge (2.1 3 kev) FM1: calibrate afterwards with corresponding camera FM1 focal length, determine effects of camera pile-up, stray-light,... FM2,..., FM7 (incl. cameras) end-to-end test: only 1 3 modules in beam IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 24

erosita in-orbit calibration with cosmic sources: comments bright sources may saturate telemetry ( disk quota ) (1 event per readout-cycle per camera): these limits depend on other payload and calibration agreements standard sources: N132D, Mkn421, PKS2155, 1E0102, Crab, Vela: XMM: 40-10000 cts/s background in LEO: fluorescent O-K line (532 ev) from scattered solar X-rays IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 25

erosita in-orbit calibration with cosmic sources: strategy? observe source only with one (or more) camera active at the same time, and use other cameras with closed filter position give more (all?) telemetry to erosita during calibration observations split telemetry for S-X-G cross-calibration observations calibration observations in survey mode surveys could be interrupted for pointed calibration observations (every 6 months for e.g. 2 days, dependent on target visibility) IACHEC 2008, Schloss Ringberg, 18-21 May 2008 26