Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

Similar documents
New Pathways to Social Change - Creating Impact through Social Innovation Research

Social innovation Research and Policy of the Future Results from the SI-DRIVE Project

Horizon 2020 and CAP towards 2020

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

The Role of Social Innovation in Poverty

COST FP9 Position Paper

Data users and data producers interaction: the Web-COSI project experience

Project overview Athens, 14 October 2016

Vienna Declaration: The most needed social innovations and related research topics

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Colombia s Social Innovation Policy 1 July 15 th -2014

Engaging Stakeholders

COUNTRY: Questionnaire. Contact person: Name: Position: Address:

The Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

FP9 s ambitious aims for societal impact call for a step change in interdisciplinarity and citizen engagement.

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

"Social Innovation: A European Commission perspective and recent activities "

SI-DRIVE POLICY DECLARATION: SOCIAL INNOVATION ON THE RISE CHALLENGES FOR A FUTURE INNOVATION POLICY

2nd Call for Proposals

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

DELIVERABLE SEPE Exploitation Plan

Addressing current needs and challenges in social innovation (and businesses)

Refining foresight approaches to crisis, inertia and transition

Belgian Position Paper

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Research strategy

Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities. Preservation for reuse of high quality data

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Societal Challenge 4: Smart, Green and Integrated Transport

CERN-PH-ADO-MN For Internal Discussion. ATTRACT Initiative. Markus Nordberg Marzio Nessi

Social Innovation 2015: Pathways to Social Change Vienna, November 18 th, Maria Schwarz-Woelzl (ZSI) & Wolfgang Haider (ZSI)

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Report. RRI National Workshop Germany. Karlsruhe, Feb 17, 2017

Social innovation ecosystems in Latin America

Added Value of Networking Case Study INOV: encouraging innovation in rural Portugal. Portugal

How to identify and prioritise research issues?

European Union - New Zealand SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COOPERATION ROADMAP Research and Innovation Priorities

Mainstreaming PE in Horizon 2020: perspectives and ambitions

Rethinking the role of SSH: reflective and generative perspective. Social innovation : what have we learnt, what else do we need to know and why?

The Social Sciences in Horizon 2020: Societal Challenge 6 - Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies

Capturing the impacts of Liverpool 08 Evaluating European Capital of Culture

THESIS PRESENTATION. Gabriele Goebel-Heise 5617A011-4

Introduction to HSE ISSEK

Impacts of the circular economy transition in Europe CIRCULAR IMPACTS Final Conference Summary

SERBIA. National Development Plan. November

No. prev. doc.: 9108/10 RECH 148 SOC 296 Subject: Social Dimension of the European Research Area - Adoption of Council conclusions

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

GENEVA COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to 30, 2010

Research and Innovation Strategy for the Smart Specialisation of Catalonia. Brussels March 20th, 2014

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

Social Innovation Research and Policy of the Future Towards a Comprehensive Innovation Policy

GUIDELINES SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH MATTERS. ON HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY DESIGN, AND IMPLEMENT, MISSION-ORIENTED RESEARCH PROGRAMMES

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

ClusterNanoRoad

RIS3-MCAT Platform: Monitoring smart specialization through open data

Reaction of the European Alliance for Culture and the Arts to the European Commission s proposal for the EU future budget

Social Innovation & Social Experimentation: European strategic perspectives. Seminar of the project leaders of the PROGRESS grants

Customising Foresight

Use of forecasting for education & training: Experience from other countries

SMART CITIES Presentation

Universities and Sustainable Development Towards the Global Goals

Smart Management for Smart Cities. How to induce strategy building and implementation

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

BOOSTING INNOVATION 1

Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Frequently Asked Questions

Enabling ICT for. development

BUILDING CAPACITIES: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEARNING AND SME SKILLS

Industrial Innovation: Managing the Ecosystem

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

Outcomes of the 2018 OECD Ministerial Conference on SMEs & the way forward

Strategy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NATIONAL DOCUMENTATION CENTRE NHRF

Programme Curriculum for Master Programme in Economic History

6/14/2017. Engineering Future Cities The Value of Extreme Scenario Methodologies

Public Consultation: Horizon 2020 "Science with and for Society" - Work Programme Questionnaire

From FP7 towards Horizon 2020 Workshop on " Research performance measurement and the impact of innovation in Europe" IPERF, Luxembourg, 31/10/2013

GreenEcoNet Annual Conference

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

Il programma di lavoro SSH 2013

UNFPA/WCARO Census: 2010 to 2020

SIC Summer School on Social Innovation Ecosystems Budapest, September 2018 In collaboration with:

Media Literacy Policy

HORIZON Peter van der Hijden. ACA Seminar What s new in Brussels Policies and Programme 20 th January Research & Innovation.

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

An exploration of the future Latin America and Caribbean (ALC) and European Union (UE) bi-regional cooperation in science, technology and innovation

WIPO Development Agenda

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

Werner Wobbe. Employed at the European Commission, Directorate General Research and Innovation

DRAFT. February 21, Prepared for the Implementing Best Practices (IBP) in Reproductive Health Initiative by:

OECD Innovation Strategy: Key Findings

High Level Seminar on the Creative Economy and Copyright as Pathways to Sustainable Development. UN-ESCAP/ WIPO, Bangkok December 6, 2017

Development UNESCO s Perspective

Welcome to the future of energy

Forsight and forward looking activities Exploring new European Perspectives Vienna 14-15th June 2010

Research Development Request - Profile Template. European Commission

Summary Remarks By David A. Olive. WITSA Public Policy Chairman. November 3, 2009

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

RegionArts - overview, methodology and outputs

INNOSERV. An FP7 project on innovative social services

Europe as a Global Actor. International Dimension of Horizon 2020 and Research Opportunities with Third Countries

Transcription:

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping Social Innovation2015: Pathways to Social change Vienna, November 18-19, 2015 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt/Antonius Schröder This project has received funding from the European Union s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 612870.

The tracks of international research on innovation demonstrate that the technology-oriented paradigm shaped by the industrial society does not cover the broad range of innovations indispensable in the transition from an industrial to a knowledge and services-based society: Such fundamental societal changes require the inclusion of social innovations in a paradigm shift of the innovation system. Vienna Declaration: The most relevant topics in social innovation research Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 2

Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 3

Although social innovations pop up in many areas and policies and in many disguises, and social innovation is researched from a number of theoretical and methodological angles, the conditions under which social innovations develop, flourish and sustain and finally lead to societal change are not yet fully understood both in political and academic circles. Jenson/Harrisson Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 4

Mission: Extending knowledge about Social Innovation as a driver of social change Integrating theories and research methodologies to advance understanding of SI leading to a comprehensive new paradigm of innovation. Undertaking European and global mapping of SI, thereby addressing different social, economic, cultural, historical and religious contexts in eight major world regions. Ensuring relevance for policy makers and practitioners through indepth analyses and case studies in seven policy fields, with cross European and world region comparisons, foresight and policy round tables. This project has received funding from the European Union s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 612870. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 5

International SI-DRIVE Consortium Members SI-DRIVE involves 14 partners from 12 EU Member States, 11 partners from other parts of the world, and 13 high level advisory board members: all in all 30 countries. blue: red: green: EU research partner non-eu research partner Advisory Board Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 6

SI-DRIVE Approach builds on: a) comprehensive working definition of social innovation; b) clearer insight into the need for a theory of social innovation; c) better appreciation of the relationship between social change, social innovation and political intervention; d) clarification of how social innovation progresses including the lifecycle from idea to impact; e) cross-sector cooperation; f) identification of key dimensions of SI; and g) elaborating a process of cyclic improvement of theory and methodology. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 7

Building blocks towards a Theory of Social Innovation Social Entrepreneurship, Social Economy, Local and Regional Development, Design Thinking, (History of Social Innovation) Relationship between social innovation and social change Innovation Systems, Transition research, STS, Business Innovation Social Theory Theories of Social Change, Practice Theory, Development Theories Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 8

Guiding Questions What is the relevance of the theoretical approaches discussed? What have we learned in relationship to: a theoretical sound and comprehensive concept of social innovation and; the relationship to (transformative) social change; most appropriate conditions for introducing, implementing, diffusing and establishing social innovations? 9

Variety of approaches and conceptions At the same time we find a lot of conceptual differences in the theoretical fields, not only with regard to the concept and understanding of (social) innovation but also regarding: the role of technologies, the main actors and drivers, the relationship to social change, the governance and framework conditions, and the significance of power and conflict. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 10

New Innovation Paradigm New practices, methods, processes and regulations Key elements of social innovation theory Opening of the innovation process to society by co-creation, user involvement, empowerment of citizens, and cross-sector collaboration Objectives New demands, social needs and societal challenges, social value creation Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 11

Social innovation is seen as Social Innovation Working Definition a new combination or figuration of practices in areas of social action, prompted by certain actors or constellations of actors with the goal of better coping with needs and problems than is possible by use of existing practices. An innovation is therefore social to the extent that it varies social action, and is socially accepted and diffused in society. Depending on circumstances of social change, interests, policies and power, social ideas as well as successfully implemented SI may be transformed and ultimately institutionalised as regular social practice or made routine. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 12

Five Key Dimensions of Social Innovation Analytical concept: social practice Analyse the ambivalence of SI Potential Scope Impact Functions, roles and new concepts Process Dynamics Capacity building, empowerment & conflict Mechanisms of diffusion: Imitation, social learning, relationship to social change Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 13

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Baseline Mapping Activities The first empirical phase (baseline mapping; general scan of social innovation practices) is consisting of five elements: 1. Regional reports 2. Policy field reports 3. Global Mapping (Database of 1.000+ SI cases) 4. Social Innovation Database Screening 5. Additional: Explorative Policy and Foresight Workshops Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 14

Objectives: Launching a global synopsis and landscape of the state of the art of SI with 1.000+ cases from all the world Setting up a database for analysis based on the recent theoretical state of the art Enabling a first SI typology Global Mapping Giving the ground for a selection of 70 cases for in-depth analysis Field work: Done by all 25 partners of SI-DRIVE, assisted by the advisory board members, as experts of regional and national SI activities Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 15

Data status: 04-11-2015 N = 1011 N/A = 10 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 16

Ranking: Policy Fields the initiative is addressing 211 188 206 165 162 165 131 143 141 123 144 Rank 1 Rank 2 93 96 98 Rank 3 55 70 63 78 49 14 12 23 7 24 Education Employment Environment Energy Supply Transport and Mobility Health and Social Care Poverty reduction and sustainable development Other Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 17

Increasing importance and undeveloped potential The Policy reports revealed the strong need for social innovation in the seven policy fields. But at the same time policy field related documents of public authorities such as the European Commission, the United Nations, the OECD, the World Bank, etc. often do not refer to social innovations (exceptions are Horizon 2020 documents as well as publications of other DGs such as DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion and DG Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs). Source: Compiling report This project has received funding from the European Union s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 612870. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 18

Increasing importance and undeveloped potential Thus, a broad spectrum of social innovations is present in the policy fields. All policy field reports, in addition, notify an unclear understanding of the concept of social innovation, report on social innovations in their policy fields even if they are not called social innovations and call for further social innovations to respond to the societal challenges the world is facing. Source: Compiling report This project has received funding from the European Union s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 612870. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 19

Sectors actively involved in the policy fields Policy Field Public Private Civil Societies/ Sectors Sectors NPO/NGO Education 155 146 155 Health & Social Care 126 97 121 Employment 107 112 104 Poverty 103 99 140 Transport & Mobility 97 83 70 Environment 59 82 82 Energy Supply 50 57 53 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 20

Initiatives: Type of Partners Private company Public Body NPO NGO Foundation Private or public University Social enterprise Ministry Network Individual Private or public Non-university research institute Informal group Public-private Partnership Social Partnership Institution 67 57 47 31 15 15 122 115 132 201 321 388 556 617 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 21

Ecosystems of Social Innovation Development of new Alliances / Cross-sector Fertilization Civil Society University/ Science / Research Social Innovation Policy Economy Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 22

Societal Level Addressed by the Initiative Policy Field Social Demand Societal Challenge Systemic Change Education 153 100 97 Employment 88 74 24 Environment 55 67 41 Energy Supply 44 58 14 Transport & Mobility Health & Social Care 68 59 25 134 96 48 Poverty 130 103 49 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 23

Geographical Transfer of the Solution 353 239 219 196 143 28 No geographical transfer Local Territory National Territory Regional Territory International Territory Other Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 24

Initiatives: Types of Scaling Increasing target group reach 601 Extending the network of partners 424 Organisational growth 349 Through institutionalisation 148 Through imitation Through multiplicators 117 108 Through differentiation Scaling to other policy areas 52 65 Through franchise Through accreditation Other 25 18 33 No scaling 97 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 25

Initiatives: Type of Support Idea development 421 Funding 388 Specific knowledge 173 Infrastructure Dissemination Personell 102 99 115 Technology 66 Lobbying 31 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 26

Main Barriers Funding 301 Lack of personnel Knowledge Gaps Legal Restrictions 95 103 102 Missing political support 81 Absence of Participants 72 Lack of institutional access 60 Lack of Media Coverage 44 Competitors Political opposition 35 33 No barriers No identified Barriers 230 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 27

Iterative Process: Two Empirical Phases Based on and Feeding Theory Methodology Policy Development Policy Policy Policy Theory Global Mapping Theory Case studies Theory Methodology Methodology Methodology Phase 1 Phase 2 Final Results Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 28

Next Steps Comparative analysis (Mapping 1) Key dimensions of SI: First comparative across sectors and countries (April 2016) The purpose of this second stage analysis is: to explore key issues that are pertinent to the support/success or detriment/failure of the cases; to start exploring possible trends and drivers that will shape the future of social innovation in the respective areas. In addition, this cross-cutting thematic analysis will enable the identification of key policy issues of citizen empowerment, access to finance, scaling-up models, skills and training, social entrepreneurship and collective creation and diffusion. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 29

Two main empirical phases Mapping 1 - baseline mapping of social innovation (state of the art reports, report of regional strategies, selection of 1.000 and more cases for a SI database) Step in between: Selection of 300 most important cases based on five key dimensions of SI and associated KPIs as a basis for the selection of the 70 in-depth cases. Mapping 2 (case studies) - typology of social innovation/ (using mixed method research protocol consisting of detailed interviews, extensive status check, follow up surveys, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis QCA, 70 cases. 1000+ cases (mapping 1) 300 cases (pre-selection 70 cases (case studies) SI-DRIVE General Assembly (3) 20th of November 2015 PAGE 30

Five Key Dimensions of Social Innovation Analytical concept: social practice Analyse the ambivalence of SI Potential Scope Impact Functions, roles and new concepts Capacity building, empowerment & conflict Process Dynamics Mechanisms of diffusion: Imitation, social learning, relationship to social change Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 31

Systemic view on Social Innovation To understand the modes of governance of social innovation, a focus should be on networks and their actor constellations, modes of cooperation and communication channels. To develop an integrated understanding of the role of various actors in social innovation, a broader concept is needed that appreciates social entrepreneurship but also takes account of other actor types. To establish a systemic view upon social innovation. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 32

Key question Many variations of social behaviour have an volatile character. They do not lead to permanent changes in culture, technology and social organisation (Burns et al. 1995, 350). Why do ten of hundred different at the same time conceived innovations diffuse ( ) while ninety are passed into oblivion? (Tarde 2003: 163) 33

This workshop/working group will bring together three world-leading research initiatives that are currently engaged in active research on developing new theory on social innovation and transformative social change. The central purpose of this collaborative theory workshop is: i) to develop a better theoretical understanding of the concept of social innovation and its relationship to (transformative) social change; ii) to forge productive new working relations between our parallel research processes; and iii) to identify specific opportunities for future networking activities and research collaborations. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 34

Social innovation requires also appropriate social innovation policies. Social Innovation Policies Many social inventions are hindered by traditional approaches in public policies. If Europe wants to tackle the challenges policy makers need to understand how to involve and make use of the participation of citizens to serve the public good. Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 35

Cross-Cutting-Themes the projects are addressing Empowerment 594 Human Resources, Knowledge 512 Social Entrepreneurship, Social Economy, Social 398 ICT & Social Media Gender, Equality, Diversity 321 318 Governance Demographic Change 164 180 Migration 104 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 36

Social Innovation moves to the mainstream Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 37

Establishment of a Global Community for Social Innovation Research Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 38

Intellectual and moral progress is not a matter of getting nearer to an antecedent goal, but of surpassing the past. On the pragmatist view, I m putting forward what we call increased Knowledge should not be thought as increased access to the Real, but as increased ability to do things to take part in practises that make possible fuller and richer human lives. Richard Rorty, 2007, 108 Surpassing the past Prof. Dr. Jürgen Howaldt PAGE 39