Status and Plans for the 805 MHz Box Cavity MuCool RF Workshop III 07/07/09 Al Moretti

Similar documents
MuCool Test Area Experimental Program Summary

MHz NCRF R&D Program and Plans. R. Rimmer, A. Ladran, D. Li LBNL

TESLA RF POWER COUPLERS DEVELOPMENT AT DESY.

HIGH POWER COUPLER FOR THE TESLA TEST FACILITY

Frequency Tuning and RF Systems for the ATLAS Energy Upgrade. Gary P. Zinkann

RF STATUS OF SUPERCONDUCTING MODULE DEVELOPMENT SUITABLE FOR CW OPERATION: ELBE CRYOSTATS

3.9 GHz work at Fermilab

DEVELOPMENT OF A BETA 0.12, 88 MHZ, QUARTER WAVE RESONATOR AND ITS CRYOMODULE FOR THE SPIRAL2 PROJECT

HIGH POWER INPUT COUPLERS FOR THE STF BASELINE CAVITY SYSTEM AT KEK

Design and RF Measurements of an X-band Accelerating Structure for the Sparc Project

Study of RF Breakdown in Strong Magnetic Fields

MULTIPACTING IN THE CRAB CAVITY

REVIEW OF HIGH POWER CW COUPLERS FOR SC CAVITIES. S. Belomestnykh

The transition for the Elettra Input Power Coupler to the standard WR1800

International Technology Recommendation Panel. X-Band Linear Collider Path to the Future. RF System Overview. Chris Adolphsen

CAGE CAVITY: A LOW COST, HIGH PERFORMANCE SRF ACCELERATING STRUCTURE*

Progress in High Gradient Accelerator Research at MIT

Detailed Design Report

LOW BETA CAVITY DEVELOPMENT FOR AN ATLAS INTENSITY UPGRADE

Commissioning of the ALICE SRF Systems at Daresbury Laboratory Alan Wheelhouse, ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory ESLS RF 1 st 2 nd October 2008

Breakdown in Waveguides and Components

30 GHz rf components for CTF3 (and CLIC) next part. I. Syratchev

Completion of the first SSR1 cavity for PXIE

High Power Couplers for TTF - FEL

Design, Development and Testing of RF Window for C band 250 kw CW Power Klystron

Progresses on China ADS Superconducting Cavities

SRF Advances for ATLAS and Other β<1 Applications

The design of a radio frequency quadrupole LINAC for the RIB project at VECC Kolkata

780-8 Series Constant Impedance FM Combiners

5.5 SNS Superconducting Linac

RF power tests of LEP2 main couplers on a single cell superconducting cavity

Low-Level RF. S. Simrock, DESY. MAC mtg, May 05 Stefan Simrock DESY

Superconducting RF cavities activities for the MAX project

Couplers for Project X. S. Kazakov, T. Khabiboulline

A few results [2,3] obtained with the individual cavities inside their horizontal cryostats are summarized in Table I and a typical Q o

High Power S-Band RF Load for SLAC Linac. A. Krasnykh, F-J Decker, et al. SLAC 2014

Normal-Conducting Photoinjector for High Power CW FEL

Liquid Helium Heat Load Within the Cornell Mark II Cryostat

Processing and Testing of PKU 3-1/2 Cell Cavity at JLab

Cavity BPMs for the NLC

Third Harmonic Superconducting passive cavities in ELETTRA and SLS

Development of a 20-MeV Dielectric-Loaded Accelerator Test Facility

Current Industrial SRF Capabilities and Future Plans

Title: THE MECHANICAL DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF A RIDGE-LOADED WAVEGUIDE FOR AN RFQ

The BESSY Higher Order Mode Damped Cavity - Further Improvements -

Experience with 3.9 GHz cavity HOM couplers

CST MWS simulation of the SARAF RFQ 1.5 MeV/nucleon proton/deuteron accelerator

ERI FM Band Pass Filters

GA MICROWAVE WINDOW DEVELOPMENT

Lattice Design for PRISM-FFAG. A. Sato Osaka University for the PRISM working group

Experimental Plan for Testing the UNM Metamaterial Slow Wave Structure for High Power Microwave Generation

P. Koert, P. MacGibbon, R. Vieira, D. Terry, R.Leccacorvi, J. Doody, W. Beck. October 2008

Coupler Electromagnetic Design

COMPARISON OF BUFFERED CHEMICAL POLISHED AND ELECTROPOLISHED 3.9 GHz CAVITIES*

Behavior of the TTF2 RF Gun with long pulses and high repetition rates

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF STORES AND DRAWINGS.

NEW OPPORTUNITIES IN VACUUM ELECTRONICS USING PHOTONIC BAND GAP STRUCTURES

Normal-conducting high-gradient rf systems

Advances in CW Ion Linacs

QUARTER WAVE COAXIAL LINE CAVITY FOR NEW DELHI LINAC BOOSTER*

RF Design of Normal Conducting Deflecting Cavity

FAST RF KICKER DESIGN

ALICE SRF SYSTEM COMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE A. Wheelhouse ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory

ECRH on the Levitated Dipole Experiment

Superstructures; First Cold Test and Future Applications

The European Spallation Source. Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer ESS\Accelerator Division IVEC 2013

MICROWAVE MICROWAVE TRAINING BENCH COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS:

Maurizio Vretenar Linac4 Project Leader EuCARD-2 Coordinator

To produce more powerful and high-efficiency particle accelerator, efforts have

Main Injector Cavity Simulation and Optimization for Project X

ISG3 Injector Working Group (WG2) l/26/99. NLC Damping Ring RF Cavity development. R. A. Rimmer LBNL

Christopher Nantista ISG8 SLAC June 25, 2002

Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on RF Superconductivity, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan

Packaging of Cryogenic Components

Magnetron. Physical construction of a magnetron

A Design Study of a 100-MHz Thermionic RF Gun for the ANL XFEL-O Injector

MEASURES TO REDUCE THE IMPEDANCE OF PARASITIC RESONANT MODES IN THE DAΦNE VACUUM CHAMBER

Advance on High Power Couplers for SC Accelerators

EC 1402 Microwave Engineering

5.2.3 DecayChannelSolenoids BeamDynamics Induction Linac Approach

Current Status of cerl Injector Cryomodule

PROGRESS IN IFMIF HALF WAVE RESONATORS MANUFACTURING AND TEST PREPARATION

R.L. Geng, C. Crawford, H. Padamsee, A. Seaman LEPP, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853, USA

S. Ghosh On behalf of Linac, IFR, Cryogenics, RF and beam transport group members. Inter University Accelerator Centre New Delhi India

BESSY VSR: SRF challenges and developments for a variable pulse-length next generation light source

Resonator System for the BEST 70MeV Cyclotron

Status of the HOM Damped Cavity Project

1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, May 12-16, 1997 BNL

LEP Couplers..a Troubled Story of a Success. HPC2002, Jefferson Lab, October 30 th, 2002 R. Losito, CERN 1

Development Status of KSTAR LHCD System

SUPERCONDUCTING PROTOTYPE CAVITIES FOR THE SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCE (SNS) PROJECT *

CEBAF waveguide absorbers. R. Rimmer for JLab SRF Institute

Cavity development for TESLA

RF design studies of 1300 MHz CW buncher for European X-FEL. Shankar Lal PITZ DESY-Zeuthen

Size : Connection End : Min Temperature : Max Temperature : Materials : Cast iron body

Status Alcator C-Mod Engineering Systems. DoE Quarterly Review October 27, 2005

HIGH POWER PULSED TESTS OF A BETA=0.5 5-CELL 704 MHZ SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITY

LARGE SCALE TESTING OF SRF CAVITIES AND MODULES

XFEL Cryo System. Project X Collaboration Meeting, FNAL September 8-9, 2010 Bernd Petersen DESY MKS (XFEL WP10 & WP13) 1 st stage. Possible extension

Linear Particle Accelerator Control Performance

Transcription:

Status and Plans for the 805 MHz Box Cavity MuCool RF Workshop III 07/07/09 Al Moretti 7/6/2009 1

Outline : Description of the Box cavity Concept. Box Cavity Summary Plans. HFSS Models of orthogonal and Parallel cavities. Pictures of Box cavity machined parts. Peak electric Field contours. New and different RF Cavity Commissioning Proposal. Specifications. Qo, Resonant Impedance, Power requirements, peak surface fields. Status. Summary. 7/6/2009 2

Simplified View of Box Cavity for Field Orientation Studies Min ConFlat pickup ports (3) places DC magnetic field direction. Waveguide Flange Perpendicular Orientation and Coupling aperture 7/6/2009 RF Electric Field Direction Max in center 3

Box Cavity Summary Details: Rectangular box cavity is made of 101 OFE copper plates. Interior Parts and the aperture will be machined into parts with 32 μ inch finish. Then the sides will be screwed and foil hydrogen brazed together, First Braze Cycle; 2 cross Field cavities are being made and one Parallel cavity is being designed. The HFSS simulation coupling aperture will be machined in one of the end walls and the SS waveguide flange will be brazed in place as well as the pickup coupling SS tubes. The cavity and setup are being designed for 0 to 15 Degree rotation. This will come back to Fermilab and be finish machined for foil brazing of top and bottom plates; Water cooling channels will have been gun drilled into plates. Top and bottom plates we be electro polished. If required Coupling aperture will be trimmed after a RF cold test to determine Fo, Qo and near match coupling. Top and bottom plates; this then will be sealed and shipped back to Fermilab, Second Braze Cycle Another cold RF test will be made to determine Fo, Qo and coupling. Coupling aperture will be trimmed for near match condition if required. The rotating support fixture (upto 15 degrees) will be attached onto the current support frame. Vacuum system, drive waveguides, 2 RF cavity pick-ups and sapphire viewing window will be attached; after calibration testing will begin at 90 Degrees. 7/6/2009 4

Orthogonal E and H Cavity Coupled to the Waveguide Rectangular Coupling aperture with rounded edges Sapphire Viewing Port Original LBL Waveguide RF power Coupler section Coupling Cell Pickup Ports HFSS Model RF cavity and WG coupler 7/6/2009 5

Parallel E and H field Concept: Beginning design of the second of the parallel E and H field cavity for 15 Degree rotation with little required design changes. E Field pick-ups Optical View port However, Cavity design may need to be Change to be able to rotate upto 15 Degrees. 7/6/2009 6

First Braze Cycle Box Frame Rotation Pivot Axel Support Waveguide Flange 7/6/2009 7

Box Cavity Attached to Waveguide Showing Water fitings and Pickups. 7/6/2009 8

End View of The cavity in the Magnet 7/6/2009 9

Box cavity Frame Setup for Dimensional measurement with SS WG Flange sitting on top. 7/6/2009 10

Picture of the same on Its side Showing view of coupling Aperture and pickup Ports 7/6/2009 11

Orthogonal Cavity Electric Field Simulation Note 1: Ratio Eps/ Epa= 3.5 for orthogonal case. Peak Surface field on-axis Eps Note 2: Ratio Eps/ Epa= 2 for parallel case. Peak Surface Field on Aperture Epa 7/6/2009 12

Specifications The following are some of the specs for the square cavity: Tolerance of parts = ± 0.005" (Parts were machined to +/-.0015 inches) Inside finish = 30 u inches Average power = 5 kw with half the power dissipated equally on the Top and bottom plates the remainder almost equally on the 4 sides. Pick-up ports: Temperature: Three min-conflat vacuum feed-thru ports in the side opposite the coupling aperture, 2 with field pick-up loops and one with a Sapphire vacuum viewing window on a mini Con Flat flange. Max. temperature on inside surface of the un-cooled coupler aperture is +37.2 C at 5 kw with room temperature water circulating in the cooling tubes. The other max temperatures are at center of top and bottom plates is 38.1 C and 43.1 C on the long side plate. Rotation Angle: 90 + Δ12 Degrees, need to lower the center of cavity vertically 3.8 cm to achieve 15 Degrees. 7/6/2009 13

Schedule and Cost estimate Schedule Schedule Comments Detailed drawings completed ------- 1 week Procurement of materials Cu plates ------- 2 weeks Machining parts for first braze cycl & Clean ------- 3 weeks: At the machine shop, this week. First hydrogen braze cycle ------- 1 weeks To start July 7, 2009* First RF cold measurement ------- 1 week Machine parts second braze cycle & clean ------- 1 week Second braze cycle ------- 1 weeks Cold test and attach rotation structure ------- 2 week Installation in magnet with vacuum and RF ------- 1 week Total 13 weeks with high priority! Material copper plate ------- $2000 2 braze cycle ------- 4000 Machining of parts ------- 10000 Miscellaneous material and parts ------- 4000 Total = $ 20,000 x 2 = $40,000

Calculated Parameters of the cavity and cavity dimensions HFSS normalizes all parameters to 1 W of input power to the waveguide coupler and solves for the frequency, gradient, coupling factor, Qo (in cavity mode) etc. 1W produces a gradient of 25 kv/m by scaling: 25 MV/m would take 1 MW ideal. The Impedance across the center of the cavity is Imp =9.5 MΩ. This is the resistance across the center of the cavity given by Imp = (gap Voltage)²/1 W. This uses the peak voltage and is in agreement with SuperFish and most published accelerator designs. Qo = 27,400. Aperture Fields about a factor 4 lower than central max. field. 250 mm 276.50 mm 123.82 mm 7/6/2009 15

Status The machining of the parts for 2 orthogonal box have been completed. Parts are now being cleaned and assembled for shipment to brazing facility in Indiana. Shipping boxes have been fabricated and packing is in preparation. Jim Wilson will be present for all the brazing setup, brazing, leak checking and packing for return shipment. Began looking at the design of the parallel box cavity and its rotation possibility without major design changes other than the position and size of the coupling aperture. This cavity configuration only allows a peak Electric field reduce of about 2 for Eps/ Epa. We need to decide if this is OK to proceed with fabrication. Design of the supporting and rotating hardware is about 90 % complete. Need to design the waveguide transition pieces for the rotation angle or angles. Looking at straight pieces with proper angled CPR975 flanges. The fabrication is on schedule with high priority for the cavity to be operational in 12 to 13 weeks. 7/6/2009 16

MV New and Different RF Cavity Commissioning proposal I would like to RF commission ether the LBL cavity or the Box cavity or both starting with the 3 T high magnet field breakdown limit. Using the magnetic breakdown curve as our guide, RF commission say to 10 to 15 % above the curve, 16.5 to 17.25 MV/m without the magnetic field. After this turn-on the magnetic to 3 T and RF commission the cavity with the magnetic field to its limit. Reduce the magnetic field to say 2 T and rf commission again 10 to 15 % above the 2.75 T curve; increase the magnetic field to 2.75 T and RF commission with field upto its limit. This should be repeated until with trace out the whole curve down to say 0.25 T. In the past, we took the data by Increasing magnetic field in steps of 0.25 T upto 3 T. However in the past, we RF commissioned to 36 MV/m before RF commissioning with the magnetic field, starting out at 0.25 T. In this case, the reason we do not want to go to zero magnetic field is the charging and discharging time of the magnet are to long, hours. I especially want to do this for the orthogonal cavity. I am of the opinion now, that it does no good to RF commission the cavity or cavities without the magnetic to very high gradient. All this does create pits that interfere with the magnetic field commissioning results. If other agree at this point, we can not do very much without the 5 T magnet being operational. We could, however, RF commission the cavity at this low valve of 16.5 to 17.25 MV/m for the length of time it takes for the refrigerator to be operational. We have noted large improvements in breakdown limit of vacuum cavity in our linac with very very long running times. in the br 50 40 30 20 10 0 Gradient Limits with Magnetic Damaging Field Sparks 4040 37 36 3432.4 31.7 28.8 25.75 26.74 26.4 23.25 25.9 22.5 21.5 20.9 22 16.5 15 13.5 0 1 Magnetic 2 3 Field Tesla 4 5 7/6/2009 17

Summary The orthogonal cavities should be operational the end of August to early September. The parallel cavity is in the early design stage. We need to know if a Ratio Eps/ Epa= 2 for parallel case is OK to proceed with the design. Without a difficult Endfire design in may be impossible to do much better. I will continue to explore different aperture coupling design such as a dogbone design. We also need to discuss the priority of the next cavity to be tested. There are many options: 1.The LBL Pillbox cavity with Be windows all facing in; 2. The LBL Button cavity facing a Be curved window facing in, 3. The orthogonal Box cavity, 4. The parallel Box cavity, 5. The Muons Inc. High pressure cavity with Beam. 7/6/2009 18