QUEST Vision for Exploration of Space

Similar documents
Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

NASA Ground and Launch Systems Processing Technology Area Roadmap

Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy

estec PROSPECT Project Objectives & Requirements Document

ISHM Testbeds and Prototypes (ITP) Project

Constellation Systems Division

Global Exploration Strategy. Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

JOHNSON SPACE CENTER HOME OF HUMAN SPACE EXPLORATION

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

2009 ESMD Space Grant Faculty Project

NASA Mission Directorates

Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

The Lunar Split Mission: Concepts for Robotically Constructed Lunar Bases

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

NEO Science and Human Space Activity. Mark V. Sykes Director, Planetary Science Institute Chair, NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

KNOWLEDGE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL

Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

C. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

10/29/2018. Apollo Management Lessons for Moon-Mars Initiative. I Have Learned To Use The Word Impossible With The Greatest Caution.

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

The Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.

Enterprise ISEA of the Future a Technology Vision for Fleet Support

A TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TOWARDS MINERAL EXPLORATION FOR EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS IN SPACE

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

Autonomous Control for Unmanned

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

LLCD Accomplishments No Issues with Atmospheric Effects like Fading and Turbulence. Transmitting Data at 77 Mbps < 5 above the horizon

Automation & Robotics (A&R) for Space Applications in the German Space Program

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

U.S. Exploration EVA: Architecture and ConOps Overview. NASA-JSC EVA Office/J. Buffington

Human Exploration Systems and Mobility Capability Roadmap. Chris Culbert, NASA Chair Jeff Taylor, External Chair

A Unified Space Vision

The Promise and Realities of Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) in Space Betsy Cantwell, PhD

Canadian Activities in Intelligent Robotic Systems - An Overview

MSL Lessons Learned Study. Presentation to NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee April 29, 2013 Mark Saunders, Study Lead

NASA s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs. May 2, 2007

European Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Lunar Mission Operations Global Cooperation

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,

CPE/CSC 580: Intelligent Agents

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

Reaction to NASA Roadmap TA04 Robotics, Telerobotics, and Autonomous Systems (RTA)

UWB for Lunar Surface Tracking. Richard J. Barton ERC, Inc. NASA JSC

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Dan Dvorak and Lorraine Fesq Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Jonathan Wilmot NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Status of the European Robotic Arm Project and Other Activities of the Robotics Office of ESA's ISS Programme

The NASA and LVX System Partnership for Development of Light Communication Technologies

Workshop Summary. Presented to LEAG Annual Meeting, October 4, Kelly Snook, NASA Headquarters

NASA Research Areas of Interest Released by NASA HQ February 2014

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

Revolutionary Aerospace Systems Concepts - Planning for the Future of Technology Investments

NASA All-Hands Address on Support of the FY2011 Budget Proposal NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX April 28, 2010

BOX, Floor 5, Tower 3, Clements Inn, London WC2A 2AZ, United Kingdom

Ultra Reliability at NASA

Advanced Life Support

Design and Operation of Micro-Gravity Dynamics and Controls Laboratories

NOAA Satellite Observing System Architecture (NSOSA) Study Update

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

PLANLAB: A Planetary Environment Surface & Subsurface Emulator Facility

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

IAC-13-A THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: STRENGTHENING EXPLORATION THROUGH INCREASED HUMAN ROBOTIC PARTNERSHIP

2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment

Kennedy Space Center. Connecting Space Grant with Spaceport and Range Technology and Science Thrust Areas

An Overview of Space Robotics Activities at the Canadian Space Agency

FY 2004 Budget Request. February 3, 2003

Addressing International Lunar Surface Operations Click to edit Master title style

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Technical Memorandum# TM2

GSAW 2014 Session 11C Current and Future Ground Systems for CubeSats Working Group

APL s Reusable Flight Software Architecture and the Infusion of New Technology

Exploration Systems. Program Overview. July 15, 2004 Associate Administrator, Office of Exploration Systems Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.

Space Technology FY 2013

ITS Canada. Quarterly Webinar Series

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

ROCKS TO ROBOTS: Concepts for Initial Robotic Lunar Resource Development

Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program: A Brief History

Human Spaceflight Programmes and Possible Greek Participation

Expanding human activities beyond LEO

Transcription:

QUEST for Human Exploration of the Solar System GSAW99 NASA/JSC/Lynn R. Vernon 1

Why are we Here? Present a vision of the Ground and Space architecture to support the Human exploration of space. Develop Partners for future development Gather/Exchange Information about Lessons Learned Technology Information exchange 2

MCC QUEST Vision for Exploration of Space Earth Based Operations JPL JSC GSFC ISS KSC Ames MSFC Control Center Constellation ISS Planetary Based Operations MARS VEHICLE JPL EARTH JSC KSC GSFC Ames MSFC ROVER Planetary Constellation MARS GROUND BASE EXPERIMENT FACILITY FUEL PRODUCTION FACILITY PARTNERSHIP COST AUTONOMY OF MISSION VEHICLE GROUND OPERATIONS TEAM Operations Vehicle Based EARTH MARS Interstellar Constellation MOON JUPITER 3

The Vision for Exploration of Space Acknowledges Funding for the future will continue to be tighter and more competitive NASA s commitment to having human presence on Mars Research and Development must connect to Enterprise missions and goals The blurring of boundaries between robotics and human exploration Information Sharing is a MUST Requires all of NASA s expertise Information sharing between centers in support of each others programs Lessons learned from robotics missions applied to human presence 4

Forward the Vision for Exploration of Space Revolutionary progressive steps Earth based Uniting NASA through it s incredible Control Centers Planetary (Mars/Lunar) Increased information sharing required Collaboration is essential between robotics, Human and Mission to Planet Earth program s for mutual benefits Interstellar Where we all want to go in the future 5

98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 Shu tle ISS assembly complete Lunar Return increasing shuttle rate Mars Strategic Baseline 2005 ControlCenter Constellation Programs Supported: Shu tle, station,lunar return startup, increasing shu tle rate Functionality Needed: Integrated & Interactive space operations information sharing Vehicles through control centers operates as if on same network <system constellation> Enhanced system archive - virtual functionality checkpoints Automated end to end scheduling and configuration of vehicle to ground interfaces C&C automation Merge planning & cmd&cntl through collaborative mission management environment Ground manages plan,crew/vehicle execute Minimum ground intervention for execution Virtual reality C&C display and simulation Distributed Operations Distributed and integrated operations for science/payload operations, vehicle engineering support and non-critical operations Process improvements Integrated/Collaborative Flight Design, Productions, reconfiguration, planning & exec S trategic Bas eline 2010 Planetary Constellation Increased au tonomy ofplanetary Based Operations Programs Supported: shu tle, station,lunar return,mars Functionality Needed: In Situ C&C operations In Situ control center assets, Plng, cmd and cntl integrated at vehicle or constellation level Ground configures and manages tools and applications remotely Information returned for system and mission evaluation Robotics Open-distributed operations Data path from vehicle to ground users independent from control center Open-distributed control center, control center tracks activities and provides services to distributed Emersive Communications Virtual crew-family communication & emersive communications for crew ground operations planning Process/Operations System development through intelligent synthesis Automated test and verification Strategic Baseline 2015 Interstellar Constellation Increased au tonomy ofvehicle Based Operations Programs Supported: shu tle, station,lunar (multi-vehicle), Mars (multi-vehicle), Interstellar Functionality Needed Autonomous vehicle, C&C onboard Strategic planning on ground, tactical planning onvehicle. Vehicle plans and performs system maintenance, vehicle participates in planning Ground roles are mission objectives & priorities and vehicle engineering support Vehicle and ground system operate as team members, coordinate resources as required Process/Operations Verbal/conversational system interface Integrated training, verification and cmd system for S/W loads 6

What have we done? Developed and growing Partnerships: UCSD, Moorhouse, UHCL - Tech Transfer, NASA University Tech. & Research Development of Mars Operations Concept, NAVY Helo project, NASA Engineering New Technology cooperation Xylan, Veda Systems, STK, Heroix Robomon Initiated QUEST 7

What is QUEST? QUEST (Qualification and Utilization of Electronic System Technology) for Space Exploration initiative A civil servant lab environment where new technologies for command, control and planning can be tested and integrated prior to migration into the operational environment Develops Core Competencies in the civil servant work force for developing future architectures and evaluating CSOC proposed architectures (IOA) 8

What is QUEST? Allows for revolutionary advances in Space Exploration operations instead of evolutionary advance Back to NASA s Core Mission Global Systems Engineering instead of local Systems Engineering Not Business as Usual Can not live in an isolated world of not invented here Must explore policies to bridge the gap between research and operations 9

Challenge NASA Inter. and Intra. Agency development of partnerships and collaboration Universities Develop new technologies and systems engineering skills in support of future space operations Industry Assist/Lead in the development of new technologies and standards in partnership with NASA Other Agencies Develop partnerships and collaboration with NASA on Lessons Learned and common goals 10

Attachments Technologies to support the QUEST for Space Exploration 11

98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 Shu tle ISS assembly complete Lunar Return increasing shuttle rate Mars S trategic Bas eline 2005 ControlCenter Constellation Programs Supported: Shu tle, station,lunar return startup, increasing shu tle rate Technologies Needed: Information vs. Data sharing Enhanced network prioritization and routing of data vs.. information vs. command Increased Bandwidth communication Distributed, yet integrated information storing Enhanced connectivity and switching between Control Centers and vehicles Alternative security methods to allow constellation, while ensuring integrity of constellation Enhanced communication standards to allow vehicle to act like a node on the Control Center Constellation Data priority scheme to ensure RT execution data requirements are met S trategic Bas eline 2010 Planetary Constellation Increased au tonomy ofplanetary Bas ed Operations Programs Supported: shu tle, station,lunar return,mars Technologies Needed: Nanotechnology for computer systems Increased Stellar Bandwidth communication Distributed, yet integrated information storing Enhanced stellar connectivity and switching Alternative security methods to allow planetary constellation, while ensuring integrity of planetary constellation Enhanced communication standards to allow vehicle to act like a node on the Control Center Constellation Lightweight and portable telepresence equipment Power generation and storage Organic hardware systems Regenerative components (logical first-step: breedable memory) S trategic Bas eline 2015 Interstellar Constellation Increased au tonomy ofvehicle Bas ed Operations Programs Supported: shu tle, station,lunar (multi-vehicle), Mars (multi-vehicle), Interstellar Technologies Needed Quatum technology for computer systems Quantum pair technology for communication bioelectonics Increased interstellar Bandwidth communication Enhanced interstellar connectivity and switching Lightweight and portable telepresence equipment Conversational voice recognition by computer systems Alternative energy sources and types 12