Advanced Ground Investigation Techniques to Help Limit Risk or Examine Failure. Advanced Subsurface Investigations

Similar documents
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) By Dr. Eng. Zubair Ahmed

7. Consider the following common offset gather collected with GPR.

Electromagnetic Induction

Ground Penetrating Radar

Ground Penetrating Radar (day 1) EOSC Slide 1

Report. Mearns Consulting LLC. Former Gas Station 237 E. Las Tunas Drive San Gabriel, California Project # E

GPR SURVEY METHOD. Ground probing radar

Geophysical Survey Rock Hill Bleachery TBA Site Rock Hill, South Carolina EP-W EPA, START 3, Region 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Signature

SURVEYING THE UNDERGROUND

The use of high frequency transducers, MHz, allowing the resolution to target a few cm thick in the first half meter suspect.

GPR Data Acquisition and Interpretation

Using GPR Technique Assessment for Study the Sub-Grade of Asphalt and Concrete Conditions

Advances in NDE Technology WHATS NEW?

Radar Methods General Overview

An acousto-electromagnetic sensor for locating land mines

Statement of Qualifications

3D UTILITY MAPPING USING ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED ANTENNA ARRAY. Egil S. Eide and Jens F. Hjelmstad

RADAR INSPECTION OF CONCRETE, BRICK AND MASONRY STRUCTURES

Investigation of Bridge Decks Utilizing Ground Penetrating Radar

Case Studies and Innovative Uses of GPR for Pavement Engineering Applications

Surface Deployed / Ground Sensors

Advanced Utility Locating Technologies (R01B)

GPR SYSTEM USER GUIDE AND TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE

Exploration Beyond Expectation. Geo-Carte Radar Technology Pvt. Ltd.

Tri-band ground penetrating radar for subsurface structural condition assessments and utility mapping

1. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/ Title and Subtitle PILOT IMPLEMENTATION OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT THICKNESS GPR

November 13, Hindu Temple, LTD Arbor Street Omaha, Nebraska Attn: Subject:

Archaeo-Geophysical Associates, LLC

L O C A T O R G P R. Introducing the. Radarteam. Ground Probing Radar/Antenna system with Rugged PC and Cart ü

European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.3 ISSN: (Print) e - ISSN

THE BEST GPR DATA QUALITY AT THE BEST PRICE! GROUND PENETRATING RADAR ZOND-12e G R O U N D P E N E T R A T I N G R A D A R S

Detection of Obscured Targets

SURVEYING THE UNDERGROUND

Nondestructive Testing of Drilled Shaft Foundations

REBAR DETECTION USING GPR: AN EMERGING NON DESTRUCTIVE QC APPROACH

GeoRadar Division. GPR for Archeology and Cultural Heritage. GeoRadar Division. GPR Configuration for Archeology and Cultural Heritage Application

SEEING THE UNKNOWN - The Use of GPR in Civil Engineering

COBRA CBD UNPARALLELED QUALITY GPR DATA WITHOUT BLIND SPOTS

GPR based Detection of Structurally Weak Zones of Road Pavement

L A N D R A Y P R O D U C T 1 BREAKTHROUGH PERFORMANCE BY GROUND PENETRATING RADAR

Identifying shallow subsurface stratigraphy and voids using dispersive characteristics of electromagnetic and surface waves

Module 6 : Design of Retaining Structures. Lecture 30 : Dewatering [ Section 30.1 : Introduction ]

ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS: SENSOR SELECTION AND SITE SUITABILITY

VIBRATIONAL TESTING OF A FULL-SCALE PILE GROUP IN SOFT CLAY

EKKO_Project is the all-inclusive software SUBSURFACE VIEWS. EKKO_Project V4 Released. In this issue GPR INNOVATIONS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE

SEA SELF DRILLING, THREADED, HOLLOW BAR / GROUT-ABLE SOIL NAILS / ANCHORS

Appendix I Geophysical Survey

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Seismic Reflection Method

GPR Part II: Effects of conductivity. Surveying geometries. Noise in GPR data. Summary notes with essential equations. Some Case histories

Ground Penetrating Radar

Pitfalls in GPR Data Interpretation: Differentiating Stratigraphy and Buried Objects from Periodic Antenna and Target Effects

A Report on the Ground Penetrating Radar Survey 205 Little Plains Road Southampton, NY

GPR Investigation: Post Tension Cable Mapping

ScienceDirect. A comparison of dielectric constants of various asphalts calculated from time intervals and amplitudes

GPR ANTENNA ARRAY FOR THE INSPECTION OF RAILWAY BALLAST

FUGRO GROUP BUILDING AND INFRASTRUCTURE. TACKLING your complex challenges. UNDERSTANDING your operational objectives

Applied Geophysics Nov 2 and 4

A. Dewatering observation wells are part of dewatering allowance.

Recording seismic reflections using rigidly interconnected geophones

PRINCIPLE OF SEISMIC SURVEY

In search of a Historic Grave: GPR Investigation near the Yellowstone Lake Store: 7/15/2010

Geopier Foundation Company, Inc.

ESTIMATION OF REBAR DIAMETER IN CONCRETE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR

Experiment on Artificial Frozen Soil Boundary GPR Detection During Cross-passage Construction in Tunnels

B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422

SECTION DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

SIR, UtilityScan and RADAN are registered trademarks of Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc.

Precast Concrete. Installation Guide V GR-WI-599. Page 1

Propagation and attenuation characteristics of various ground vibrations

P Forsmark site investigation. RAMAC and BIPS logging in borehole HFM11 and HFM12

SIMULATION OF GPR SCENARIOS USING FDTD

Visual inspection and ground penetrating radar investigation of the historical Pulaski County Poor Farm Cemetery

Chirp Sonar and Electrical Resistivity Imaging survey for integrity of concrete lining in a Hydel Channel

Understanding Seismic Amplitudes

Geology 228/378 Environmental Geophysics Lecture 10. Electromagnetic Methods (EM) I And frequency EM (FEM)

CAVE DETECTION USING SEISMIC METHODS AT MADISON BLUE SPRING STATE PARK, MADISON COUNTY, FLORIDA

John J. Bowders Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA

SECTION DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

Increasing the Probability of Detection and Evaluation of Buried Metallic Objects by Data Fusion GPR- Low Frequency Electromagnetic Sensor Array

STORM M ANHOLE FOR 42" PIPE AND SM ALLER JOB NO. SHEET NO. DATE MARCH 2015 OF MIN OF 3 CRSES MAX OF 5 CRSES 30"MAX 3 OR 3.5 PRECAST ECCENTIC CONC

Laboratory measurement of fragmented ore bulk density using ground penetrating radar

Surface wave analysis for P- and S-wave velocity models

Determine the Thickness of Pavement Layers Variety Using GPR Technique in Some Sites at University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq

Module 5 : Design of Deep Foundations. Lecture 20 : Introduction [ Section 20.1 : Introduction ]

HIGH FREQUENCY MASW FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF PAVEMENTS ACCELEROMETER APPROACH. Abstract

Design of Geophysical Surveys in Transportation

Chapter 4 Results. 4.1 Pattern recognition algorithm performance

RECONSTRUCTION OF BURIED OBJECTS BY IMPLEMENTATION OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR TECHNIQUE: EXAMPLE ON ROMAN TOMB IN BRESTOVIK (SERBIA)

Active Radio Frequency Sensing for Soil Moisture Retrieval

Test Pitting Guide. Contents: What is a test pit? Why do we use test pitting in archaeology? How do we do it? Big Heritage

Ground Penetrating Radar: Impulse and Stepped Frequency

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CONDUIT SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS. Notification of Completed Conduit Sections

Using ground penetrating radar to quantify changes in the fracture pattern associated with a simulated rockburst experiment

Experimental investigation of the acousto-electromagnetic sensor for locating land mines

a step change in Ground Penetrating Radar technology Guido Manacorda Engineering Manager

Block Foundation. From the 1950s through the 80s. Hydraulically driven. piers provide bearing. for a settling foundation

GCM mapping Vildbjerg - HydroGeophysics Group - Aarhus University

Limit Equilibrium including Shear Capacity for Launched Soil Nails. Matthew Birchmier, P.E.

transmit foundation loads

Transcription:

Advanced Ground Investigation Techniques to Help Limit Risk or Examine Failure

Overview Introduction What is geophysics? Why use it? Common Methods Seismic Ground Radar Electrical Case Studies Conclusion

Introduction What is Geophysics? A Section of Earth Sciences that Employs the Principles of Physics Large scale The Universe Small Scale Your sites!

Why use it? Imaging subsurface Geotechnical information Cover large areas rapidly / cost effectively

Imaging of Subsurface Features Layer profiles Bedrock delineation Overburden calculations / volume Location of buried objects Location of geo-hazards

Determination of Geotechnical Parameters Profiling of bedrock depth and material hardness for rippability, tunnelling and piling hardness. Assessment of layer stiffness, elastic moduli, liquefaction potential. In-situ electrical properties for earthing design soil layer resistivity.

Common Methods Seismic MASW Refraction Ground Radar / Geo Radar / GPR Electrical methods EM Conductivity Resistivity

MASW Multi channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) 1. Reasonably new technique (6 7 yrs old) 2. Gaining recognition and acceptance as a Geotechnical tool 3. Can be collected as a continuous method 4. Provides information of layers and layer stiffness as 1d or 2d Vs profiles 5. Can use to calculate Poisson ratio and densities of layers 6. Is only good for investigation to approximately 30m

Time to learn something!!

1d Vs profiles

2d Vs profiles

CPT correlation using MASW

example from Pilbara Rail line Culvert Failure

Ground Penetrating Radar What is it? A shallow geophysical investigation method some 40yrs old. Is as it sounds! Radio waves or EM energy of specific frequencies are pulsed into the ground 1000 s of times per second. The energy transmits through the ground and is reflected back to a receiver on the surface when there is a change in the electrical properties of the material eg: soil to metal or plastic pipe.

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Impulse Radar (GPR) GPR Trace GPR Antenna Energy -1 0 1 Ground surface Tx Rx Time

Depth and resolution of subsurface targets is frequency dependant. Lower the frequency the better the penetration but the larger the target has to be to observe a reflection from and vis versa. GPR is a continuous scanning method where as the antenna travels over the ground surface scans are recorded at set intervals of between 10mm to 500mm depending on what subsurface information is being sought. Data is digitally recorded at a minimum 16 bit resolution, very large files often result from individual profiles. Targets are identified by virtue of their shape, amplitude and phase as recorded reflections. Depth to targets is calculated from the time taken for the energy to travel too, and be reflected back from the target. This time is multiplied by the velocity of propagation of the radio energy through the material between antenna and target and divided by two to give a distance below the antenna.

Darwin East Arm Wharf

Issues! Sheet pile structure with back fill local sands Failure of surface pavement Voids occurring around buried infrastructure Possible lack of compaction of material during construction 250m section to investigate Used Ground Radar and MASW

Ground Radar Profiles

Results

MASW profiling

MASW Profile

Conclusions There is a defined low compaction layer directly under the pavement and it is this that is moving around and appears in some locations to be extending deeper under the structure. This suggests a possible issue with material loss below the water line (tide range here is 7m) and movement through the compacted back fill behind the steel sheet piles. Alternatively, the back fill material may not have achieved compaction during the construction and has since settled and created voiding that has allowed further movement.

Sid Enfield Drive Reinforced Earth wall supporting major road Concrete interlocking panels containing compacted sand backfill supporting road pavement, Sand leaking from behind panels How big are possible voids?

Vertical GPR Profile Noticeable increase in amplitude and return reflections increased voiding

Results

Conclusions The sand movement is occurring within the first 400mm behind the concrete panels and is not effecting the competency of the reinforced earth straps. The sand / fill material deeper in the structure is still compacted and supporting the pavement above. The issue appears to be legacy from construction where inadequate compaction was achieved right up against the rear face of the panels. Over time vibration from the heavy traffic above has loosed the sand which is finding its way out through perished joints.

Dam Site Spillway, Qld

Issues

Construction

Local Geology

Investigation with Ground Radar Area of spillway was 125m x 80m = 10,000m 2 Slopes 1 in 10 and 1in 2 Temperature +36 Cores limited across the site Need to locate voids and undertake investigation of weep drain pipes with CCTV. Provide interpreted report and conclusions

CCTV

Results

Conclusions Weep drainage poorly designed Main long drains sitting above cross drains so do not continuously drain. Water sits in drains and sediment not flushed Soft friable sandstone / mudstone bedrock possibly dissolving under the gravel drainage layers evident in drains. Removal of the bedrock allows gravel to settle as uncontained causing voids under slabs and movement of clay pipe sections with open joints. Voiding not excessive at present and does appear to be predominantly in the 1 in 2 sloped section.

EM Conductivity Testing Method induces current into the ground through the use of an electromagnetic field at set frequencies. Measures the variation in the recorded current caused by the effect of the ground coupling and decay of conductive response. Variations in the sub surface materials poor spaces say from loose gravels, sands to clays will effect a recordable response. Can be used to map large areas quickly to look for: buried material landfill, drums. Geomorphology karstic topo / sink holes Changes in lithology sands and gravels with clays use multiple frequency system to create a profile from different depths to a maximum of 10 15m

Rockhampton Levee Investigation

Ground Conductivity for soil assessment along Levee, Design Route

Conclusions Technological advances in computing and modern mobile electronics have never made it easier of cheaper to undertake investigations in the field and get good repeatable information recorded digitally for analysis and interpretation. Geophysical testing methods can provide a much bigger picture investigation technique which, when tied with physical testing for cross correlation is able to fill in the gaps and provide more confident interpretation of subsurface issues. The methods discussed here are rapid and cost effective solutions that can be applied to very large or very small scale investigations.

Questions?