FM Transmission Systems Course

Similar documents
Antenna Design Seminar

Colubris Networks. Antenna Guide

360 inches (915 cm) 240 inches (610 cm) 120 inches (305 cm) 240 inches is the recommended pole length, 360 inches is the recommended free space area

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 4 November Where is the RFR at my site?

Introduction to Basic Reflective Multipath In Short-Path Wireless Systems

Optimizing TV Transmitting Antennas for ATSC-M/H Mobile TV

Study of Factors which affect the Calculation of Co- Channel Interference in a Radio Link

Planning a Microwave Radio Link

Repack Space Squeeze How Long is That FM Antenna? Multi-Bay Antennas and AM Translators

TPV-SFN Series Low RFR VHF Slot Pylon Antennas

The Spectrum Repack: Is there a move to VHF in your future? Bill Ammons Broadcasters Clinic 2016

Amateur Radio License. Propagation and Antennas

DL Series UHF Top Mount Slot Antennas

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 33 August Micronetixx has moved into a larger facility

Presentation Title Subhead Date

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1341*

6 Radio and RF. 6.1 Introduction. Wavelength (m) Frequency (Hz) Unit 6: RF and Antennas 1. Radio waves. X-rays. Microwaves. Light

ECC Recommendation (16)04

4/18/2012. Supplement T3. 3 Exam Questions, 3 Groups. Amateur Radio Technician Class

Module contents. Antenna systems. RF propagation. RF prop. 1

Antenna Technology Bootcamp. NTA Show 2017 Denver, CO

This Antenna Basics reference guide includes basic information about antenna types, how antennas work, gain, and some installation examples.

Calculated Radio Frequency Emissions Report. Cotuit Relo MA 414 Main Street, Cotuit, MA 02635

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 10 May Optimizing VHF (Band III) Batwing antennas - Part 2

On Channel Repeater Implementation for HD Radio Coverage Improvement

AM Antenna Computer Modeling Course

TV Propagation & Multi-Path Effects Jim Andrews, KH6HTV

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1340 *,**

Chapter 15: Radio-Wave Propagation

Motorola Wireless Broadband Technical Brief OFDM & NLOS

Technician License Course Chapter 4

MITIGATING INTERFERENCE ON AN OUTDOOR RANGE

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 40 October Update on Antenna Delivery Times:

14. COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Developing the Model

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 28 October 2016

VectaStar 3500 METHODS FOR SUCCESSFUL ANTENNA DEPLOYMENT

Cell Extender Antenna System Design Guide Lines

700 and 800 MHz Band Slot Antennas

Modeling Antennas on Automobiles in the VHF and UHF Frequency Bands, Comparisons of Predictions and Measurements

TAP 6 Demo Quick Tour

Sw earth Dw Direct wave GRw Ground reflected wave Sw Surface wave

SECTION 2 BROADBAND RF CHARACTERISTICS. 2.1 Frequency bands

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

UNIT Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation?

Frequency Reuse How Do I Maximize the Value of My Spectrum?

Antennas & Propagation. CSG 250 Fall 2007 Rajmohan Rajaraman

Antenna Performance. Antenna Performance... 3 Gain... 4 Radio Power and the FCC... 6 Link Margin Calculations... 7 The Banner Way... 8 Glossary...

Planning Your Wireless Transportation Infrastructure. Presented By: Jeremy Hiebert

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 35 December 2017

Antenna Basics. Antennas. A guide to effective antenna use

BreezeACCESS VL. Beyond the Non Line of Sight

White Paper. 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence. 850 MHz Out-Of-Band Emissions Problem xxxx-xxxreva

PART 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.1144 GUIDE TO THE APPLICATION OF THE PROPAGATION METHODS OF RADIOCOMMUNICATION STUDY GROUP 3

Radio Propagation Fundamentals

4/29/2012. General Class Element 3 Course Presentation. Ant Antennas as. Subelement G9. 4 Exam Questions, 4 Groups

Introduction. TV Coverage and Interference, February 06, 2004.

Terrain Reflection and Diffraction, Part One

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Propagation effects relating to terrestrial land mobile and broadcasting services in the VHF and UHF bands

Link Budget Calculation

Radio Frequency Engineering Report. Proposed Raymond, ME Cellular Facility

Chapter 1: Telecommunication Fundamentals

CHAPTER 2 WIRELESS CHANNEL

Chapter 5.0 Antennas Section 5.1 Theory & Principles

Type 2701 and 2702 Series GRANGER Horizontally Polarized, Log-Periodic HF Antennas

Advanced Communication Systems -Wireless Communication Technology

World Journal of Engineering Research and Technology WJERT

ENGINEERING REPORT CONCERNING THE EFFECTS UPON FCC LICENSED RF FACILITIES DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE (Name of Project) WIND PROJECT Near (City, State)

Characteristics of and protection criteria for systems operating in the mobile service in the frequency range GHz

Adjacent Channel Studies in the FM Band

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 20 June New FMM - mid power FM antennas

The TV Spectrum Re-Packing Antenna Engineering Guide V2.0

LE/ESSE Payload Design

Elevation and Pseudo-Brewster Angle Formation of Ground- Mounted Vertical Antennas

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 1 August 2013

End Fed vs. Center Fed Slotted Coaxial Broadcast Antenna. Not a Choice of Preference

Information on the Evaluation of VHF and UHF Terrestrial Cross-Border Frequency Coordination Requests

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Guide to the application of the propagation methods of Radiocommunication Study Group 3

Transmission Media. Transmission Media 12/14/2016

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Propagation Mechanism

MINIMIZING SITE INTERFERENCE

Antennas and Propagation Chapters T4, G7, G8 Antenna Fundamentals, More Antenna Types, Feed lines and Measurements, Propagation

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS -I

LPFM Antenna Applications and Engineering Guide

White Paper 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence 900 MHz Receiver Blocking Problem

DDPP 2163 Propagation Systems. Satellite Communication

BENEFITS FOR DEPLOYABLE QUADRIFILAR HELICAL ANTENNA MODULES FOR SMALL SATELLITES

Using the epmp Link Budget Tool

RAPTORXR. Broadband TV White Space (TVWS) Backhaul Digital Radio System

Half-Wave Dipole. Radiation Resistance. Antenna Efficiency

MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE-OUTPUT (MIMO) The key to successful deployment in a dynamically varying non-line-of-sight environment

Unguided Media and Matched Filter After this lecture, you will be able to Example?

Technician License Course Chapter 4. Lesson Plan Module 9 Antenna Fundamentals, Feed Lines & SWR

Jeremy D. Ruck, PE Canton, Illinois

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.1624 *

Technical Note: Path Align-R Wireless Supporting Information

UNIT Write short notes on travelling wave antenna? Ans: Travelling Wave Antenna

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Spring 2010

Transcription:

FM Transmission Systems Course Course Description An FM transmission system, at its most basic level, consists of the transmitter, the transmission line and antenna. There are many variables within these basic building blocks, including types and sizes of antennas, size and type of transmission line, and transmitter power output. Situation-specific variables such as the allocation and class of station, permissible area to locate, permissible tower height, location of the tower site with respect to the target coverage area, and the local terrain all come into play in the proper selection of the correct tower, antenna, line and transmitter. This course will provide the student with knowledge of all of the above-mentioned items and variables and how they impact the performance of an FM station. Upon completion, the student should have a clear understanding of the proper design, installation and maintenance of an FM transmission system. Course Content 1. Antenna Site Considerations 2. Antenna Gain vs. TPO 3. Vertical Plane Characteristics 4. VSWR Bandwidth 5. Antenna Designs 6. Transmission Line Types 7. Transmission Line Selection 8. Transmission Line Installation 9. Maintenance SBE Recertification Credit The completion of a course through SBE University qualifies for 1 credit, identified under Category I of the Recertification Schedule for SBE Certifications. Enrollment Information SBE Member Price: $80 Non-Member Price: $105

Antenna Site Considerations Antenna Site Considerations While few of us have much control over the location of our antenna sites, perhaps there is room for change in some situations. For the rest, the information presented herein will help us evaluate the performance of our radio stations as a function of site location and antenna height. Location, location, location. Those are the three most important factors in real estate, and they are equally important for radio transmission systems. This applies equally to AM, FM, TV, MMDS, wireless, two-way, paging, WiFi and other RF-based services. Ideally, the antenna for an FM broadcast station would be situated at a location that would present a clear line-of-sight to the entirety of the desired service area. The antenna would have uniform horizontal- and vertical-plane radiation patterns, and there would be no reflections from natural or manmade objects. Unfortunately, the real world is very different from this ideal. The real world is full of obstructions, manmade and natural, that partially or fully obstruct the path from the transmitting to receiving antenna. Real-world transmitting antennas exhibit some non-uniformity in the horizontal plane, and in the vertical plane, half of the energy is radiated above the horizon into space, where it is wasted. Reflections from objects also produce amplitude variations in the received signal that cause noise and signal dropouts. The number of variables that go into the performance of a particular antenna site is quite large, and many of these factors are beyond the broadcaster's control. Many can be mitigated, however, with good site selection, and it is on those that we must focus when searching for an antenna site. The goal of the broadcaster is to produce a signal of sufficient amplitude to overcome noise and provide at least 20 db of signal-to-noise ratio at as many of the receiver locations within the desired service area as possible. How much signal is sufficient to meet this goal is largely dependent upon the receiver and its antenna. In the absence of interference, a signal level of as low as 2 uv/m may be sufficient for many of today's automobile receivers. Portables may require as much as 500 uv/m. Interference from co- and adjacent-channel stations usually increases the amount of signal required for acceptable reception. Fresnel Zone There is no substitute for a clear line of sight between the transmit and receive antennas. This is one of the first rules in VHF transmission. A transmitter site with a clear line of sight to virtually all the target service area is thus superior in most cases to one that is blocked by terrain or manmade obstructions to parts of the area. In some cases, simply having line of sight is not enough. In engineering our microwave and UHF STL paths, we always consider Fresnel zone clearance, knowing that a path with less than 60% first Fresnel zone clearance will be marginal. We often neglect this consideration in engineering our FM transmitting antenna locations. Figure 1 - Fresnel Zone For those not familiar with Fresnel zone clearances, they are circular areas surrounding the direct line-of-sight path that vary with frequency and path length. The longer the path and lower the frequency, the larger the mid-path clearance required for clear-path reception. As mentioned above, 60% first Fresnel zone clearance is all that is required to meet the clear-path reception objective, but that can be quite large at FM frequencies. The first Fresnel zone radius can be computed using the formula R = 1140 /d/f, where R is the radius in feet, d is the path length in miles and f is the frequency in MHz. A quick example of 60% first Fresnel zone radius for a few typical broadcast situations are 267 feet for a class A, 378 feet for a class B and 463 feet for a class C1. Keep in mind that we're talking about terrain clearance at the mid-point between the transmitting and receiving antennas required to produce clear-path reception. These translate to antenna heights above ground of 534 feet, 756 feet and 925 feet respectively. With the exception of the class C, the antenna heights are well above the maximum height above average terrain (HAAT) values for the classes. Figure 1 above shows a clear line-of-sight path, but terrain intrudes into the first Fresnel zone. This represents a compromised path with considerable attenuation, the line-of-sight path notwithstanding. This brings us to the conclusion that height is a very significant factor in most antenna site situations. As a rule, greater height is more useful than higher power in producing higher receive signal strength, all other factors being equal.

Multipath Considerations Multipath is a nasty word in the vocabulary of most radio engineers and station managers. It is a good descriptor of the destructive effect of the same radio signal arriving at a receive point by multiple paths. When these signals arrive in phase, all is well and the incident field strength is greater than it would be in the case of a single signal path. When they arrive out of phase, however, at least some degree of cancellation will take place, resulting in a reduced incident field strength, with complete cancellation (zero incident signal) taking place in the worst case situations. To make matters worse, sometimes, complete cancellation can take place on frequencies close to carrier while less than complete cancellation takes place on sideband frequencies. This in many case results in a demodulated sound much more offensive to the listener than the quiet hiss of no signal. Motion in an automobile produces a constantly varying multipath situation, often causing picket-fencing (the effect of the slats in a picket fence alternately permitting and then blocking the signal), which is quite objectionable to the listener. The worst-case multipath scenario is where the transmitting site is located on one side of the service area and a range of mountains or high hills is located on the other. Receivers within the service area get the direct line-of-sight signal from the transmitting antenna, but they also get a reflected signal from the mountains or hills. In such a case, there will be few locations within the service area where multipath effects will not be a factor. Figure 2 - Multipath Perhaps the best location for a transmitting antenna in such a geographic scenario, assuming that a mountaintop location is out of the question, is on a hill near the mountain range. A directional antenna would then be used to reduce radiation toward the mountains and maximize it toward the service area. This will result in greatly reduced reflections. While it would be impossible to completely eliminate reflections, they could be reduced so that the ratio of direct-to-reflected signal at most locations throughout the service area is sufficiently high to nullify the effects of multipath. Grazing Angle Ground reflections play a part in the overall propagation of FM signals, particularly the vertically-polarized component. Almost all FM signal coverage lies between the horizon and 10 degrees below the horizon. This is called the grazing angle, and it lies between the horizontal plane from the transmitting antenna and the earth's surface. Vertically-polarized energy is attenuated considerably more than horizontally-polarized energy at angles greater than about 2 degrees, with a peak attenuation occurring at about 11 degrees (the Brewster angle). As a result, circularly-polarized signals tend to be reflected more as elliptical rather than circular. It is important in site selection to avoid grazing angles to the desired service area which are greater than about 2 degrees. Simple geometry would suggest that sites close in to the service area would be more prone to produce such high grazing angles, indicating that a more distant site may be preferable. Vertical Radiation Pattern We mentioned early on the vertical-plane radiation characteristics of real-world transmitting antennas. Some of these characteristics come into play when selecting a transmitting antenna site. The more bays an antenna has, the narrower the main elevation plane will be. If a transmitting antenna is located at a considerable height above the target service area, the main elevation plane lobe may overshoot the target service area, with the energy being radiated out into space. The more bays an antenna has, the narrower the main elevation plane will be. Antennas with a small number of bays (less than four) exhibit a broad elevation plane lobe, making such overshoot of the target service area less likely. Figures 3 and 4 show the vertical plane patterns of six- and four-bay antennas, respectively. Note the deep vertical plane first null at -10 degrees for the six-bay antenna. If the antenna height is 500 feet, that null will occur at about 2,800 feet from the tower base, just over half a mile. A signal null will thus occur in a band around that tower at that radius, impacting any population in that zone. The two-bay's first null occurs at 30 degrees below the horizon or thereabouts. For a 500 foot antenna height, that null will fall at about 850 feet from the tower, making it much less likely to impact population.

Figure 3 Vertical Plane Pattern of a Six-Bay Antenna (full-wave spacing) Figure 4 Vertical Plane Pattern of a Two-Bay Antenna (full-wave spacing) In those situations where a large number of bays is used and the antenna is high above the target service area, it may be desirable to employ beam tilt to lower the beam angle slightly. Typically, just enough beam tilt is used to center the main elevation plane lobe on the distant edge of the target service area or on the horizon, whichever is closer. We will discuss beam tilt in more detail in Section 3.1 below, but it is mentioned here because it does impact site selection. Antennas with a large number of bays exhibit elevation plane nulls. The more bays an antenna has, the farther away from the antenna site that these elevation plane nulls hit the ground. If the area within a few miles of the antenna site is populated and it is desirable to provide service to this area, it may be desirable to employ null fill. A very small amount of null fill is all that is necessary to provide adequate service in these close-in areas. We will discuss null fill later in this course. Which class of FM station can most easily obtain sufficient antenna height for the desired Fresnel zone clearance? Class A Class B Class C Class D

Multipath interference is caused by: Distant stations on the same frequency as your transmitter. Distant stations on the first and second adjacent frequencies. Nearby stations that are 10.6 or 10.8 MHz from your carrier frequency. The reflection of your own station's transmitted signal.